| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| May 29, 2008 at 6:43 pm #2361 | |
|
Pheonix11 |
Firstly, short and sweet: Secondly, and hopefully lively, Did anyone else have trouble getting into LH? I’m only up to Chapter 4, Time fork. I think my main problem is The presence of Kochanski, Not in an I hate her way more, Hmmmm… Ok, The scenes lifted from the eps. like them in the other books, it’s interesting to see how they are used. But in this one, the red alert scene. I haven’t read far enough in to find out if I like This Kochanski yet, in my head she a weird mix of C.P. and ChloĆ©. I Think I’ll go back to the beginning of Time fork and give it another go. I got through the First three so fast, I guess I’m just dis-hearted that I’m struggling with this one. Peace. Phe |
| May 29, 2008 at 7:26 pm #80849 | |
|
Andrew |
> Was Ace?s Ship called Wildfire in LH or just Backwards? Just Backwards. But Ace isn’t IN Last Human, and neither’s his ship. > No spoilers please Ah. Hopefully that wasn’t one… |
| May 29, 2008 at 7:28 pm #80850 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
1. Ace isn’t in Last Human. The confusion may stem from the fact that the novel contains an alternate universes plot and “Smoke me a Kipper” is used in the final chapter but a successful Rimmer (aside from Arnold’s son) does not appear. And Ace’s ship in Dimension Jump was unnamed. I’m wondering if the confusion stems from the mistaken belief that Last Human follows on from Backwards. It doesn’t. Both it and Backwards follow on from Better Than Life; separate sequels. Rob Grant and Doug Naylor ended their partnership during the writing of [The] Last Human. Doug ended up writing Last Human, Rob offered his own sequel with Backwards. 2. The first part of the book probably doesn’t help if you had trouble getting into it as it’s all rather confusing what the hell is going on until you read a bit further. I think it’s the weakest of the books and the most un-Dwarfian but a lot of people here seem to disagree. The final chapters and the inclusion of Michael McGruder I find, to be frank, embarrassing. I would agree that scenes such as “Red Alert” jar a little with the general tone of the novel and slow down the action. >I haven?t read far enough in to find out if I like This Kochanski yet, in my head she a weird mix of C.P. and Chlo?. Novel Kochanski is a bit odd. She doesn’t seem to resemble either version but, that said, this one is in love with Lister rather than an alternate version of him. |
| May 29, 2008 at 10:07 pm #80854 | |
|
John Hoare |
I’ve always wondered how much of The Last Human Rob and Doug wrote before the partnership split up. Any of it? Or did they get a few chapters in? |
| May 29, 2008 at 10:42 pm #80856 | |
|
Andrew |
I know but cannot say. :-( |
| May 29, 2008 at 10:51 pm #80858 | |
|
John Hoare |
*shakes fist* …not like that. |
| May 30, 2008 at 2:11 am #80861 | |
|
Phil |
>I know but cannot say. :-( It’s true…you could be fired! |
| May 30, 2008 at 12:47 pm #80871 | |
|
Ridley |
Then he can tell us what he really thinks of series VIII. |
| May 30, 2008 at 4:18 pm #80872 | |
|
Pheonix11 |
Andrew: Thank you. And don’t worry, finding out a charector isn’t in a story, not a huge spoiler. : SSH: Thank you. I think my personal confusion comes from seeing people refer specifically to ‘Rob’s Ace in ‘Backwards’. I assumed it was because Doug has his own variation, My bad. Yeah I know she was never named in the show. I kinda like the way she is called Wildfire in a lot of Fan-fics, it’s an odd mix of Canon and fanon. I know that they are both meant to be sequels to BTL, Backwards just flows better from it, what with the whole, actually starting in the reverse-verse. As I said in the post I probably will give it another try, I have seen some mixed reviews, but I wont judge something I haven’t fully read for myself. :) Everyone else: Hello!! Phe |
| May 30, 2008 at 4:58 pm #80874 | |
|
Ian Symes |
Has anyone pointed out the spelling mistake yet? |
| May 31, 2008 at 4:52 am #80878 | |
|
Antipodean |
> I know that they are both meant to be sequels to BTL, Backwards just flows better from it, what with the whole, actually starting in the reverse-verse. I agree… mostly. I still don’t like it how Kochanski was written out of Backwards. “Oh, yeah, she couldn’t perceive time going forwards: she only remembered the future, like everyone else. Why was she like that and Lister wasn’t, when both were taken and transplanted onto Backwards Earth in exactly the same way? Because SHUT UP, that’s why.” On the whole, I’m not entirely happy about either book but I think I prefer “Last Human” to “Backwards”. “Backwards” is just too… sadistic. (And one minor point: if in the Red Dwarf TV show Lister and Cat were both de-aged to 15 years old, AND STAYED THAT WAY, how would you react?) |
| May 31, 2008 at 6:50 am #80879 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
People often mention this, but they seem to have no problem with Lister being discovered on Earth, an old and tired man, and later dying of a heart attack. Seems a little ohIdontknowsortofmaybe hypocritical, perhaps. |
| May 31, 2008 at 10:57 am #80880 | |
|
Antipodean |
Not really, since the end of “Better Than Life” says that he is going to spend 36 years on Backwards Earth, so that by the end of that – and in time for the beginning of the next book, presumably – he will be back at the physical age of 25. So he DOESN’T stay that way. That’s the difference. (And at any rate, there’s a difference between aging someone and de-aging someone. Aging a character gives the reader an image in their mind’s eye of the same character, physically older but still the same – so in Lister’s case, you’d imagine Craig Charles in old-age makeup. On the other hand, de-aging the character to a teenager is altogether a much bigger change, and also carries with it all the baggage of “Younger and Edgier Recasting!”) |
| May 31, 2008 at 11:53 am #80882 | |
|
John Hoare |
Yeah, I think part of the reason they get away with it in the book is because the issue of recasting doesn’t come up, like it would in the TV series. I need to read the books again, but I always preferred Backwards – and greatly enjoyed the sadistic content. Although I do recall being majorly bored during the section based on Gunmen, and skipping some of it – whether that’s because I didn’t have the attention span back then, or whether it really DOESN’T work, I don’t know. |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:04 pm #80884 | |
|
ChrisM |
Did you that section at all? It’s a lot gorier than the other version. As for choice, I used to think I’d go with Last Human… but I’m not sure. I liked return to the Backwards reality which the other skipped over, (although I agree concerning what happened with Kochanski, albeit I didn’t think of the contradiction – her not remembering in a forwards way.) I also liked the agonoid characters. I even go by the name of one on the main site. (Sort of.) Not sure why Rob Grant felt the need to rename ‘simulant’ to ‘agonoid’ though, they’re essentially the same as far as I can tell. |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:21 pm #80887 | |
|
John Hoare |
Yeah, I remember the gory stuff – the bullet through the shoe, as I recall. But as a whole, that section bored me to tears. Like I say, I might really like it now, though – my attention span has grown since then! |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:25 pm #80889 | |
|
ChrisM |
Thing is, that section is stuff you’ve seen already. (Mostly anyway.) You kinda know whats going to happen. Lots of other original stuff though so it all balances out. |
| June 1, 2008 at 1:33 am #80926 | |
|
John Hoare |
Jesus Christ, I didn’t know this – The Last Human is listed on fucking Amazon. THE Last Human, by Rob Grant and Doug Naylor. Amazon’s database really is FUCKED, isn’t it? So much dodgy crap on there that was never released… |
| June 2, 2008 at 7:39 pm #80970 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
I think I promised I’d transcribe this about three years ago, but here’s an interview with Grant Naylor from Steve Lyons and Chris Howarth. This is from Volume 2, No. 6 of the Smegazine (dated October 1993) and is a minor part of a large feature on the then-upcoming series VI… ————————– With the release date for the third Red Dwarf book, The Last Human, fast approaching, Steve Lyons and Chris Howarth also took their opportunity to ask writers Rob Grant and Doug Naylor how things were going. “Actually,” Rob confesses “It’s hard to say because of, all the genres, a novel is the one you really have to plan and you really have to know where you’re going. It’s hard keeping a thirty-minute episode in your head, never mind a whole novel…well, I find it hard! So it’s the planning stage which is the hardest; you feel like you’re doing no work at all when you’re planning, but it is the hardest part”. Although most of that planning has obviously been done now, the guys don’t want to give away much of the plotline of their latest epic just yet. “We might tell you we’re going to put something in and then we cut it”, explains Doug. “A week before we handed in the proofs for the first novel, Thanks for the Memory was in it” Rob adds, “and it all got cut”. One of the first jobs for the writers is to pick up the plot threads left hanging at the end of the second novel, Better Than Life. As Rob explains, however, “Our aim is that people can pick up the third book and still enjoy it without really missing anything. Obviously, there are always going to be people who’ve read them all, but the idea is to try and make it as self-contained as possible”. Those people who have read the story so far will recall that an aged Dave Lister has been left living a bizarre reverse life on an other dimensional, backwards-running Earth, where he is shortly to be partnered by the newly resurrected Kristine Kochanski. The third book, according to Doug, “does actually start the day after”. So, would it be too much, we wonder, if we asked for a hint as to whether Kochanski would be sticking around for any length of time. Actually: “It would, yes!” confirms Doug, with a laugh. As the continuity of the novels drifts further and further away from that of the TV show, it seems less and less likely that Rob and Doug would be able to use any ideas from the show at all. “It’s about a 60-40 mix of new stuff to old”, says Doug – in fact, roughly the same sort of ratio that was apparent both in Better Than Life and in Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers. “When we first started out, ” Rob explains “we wondered if people would get really angry that they weren’t just getting transcripts of the TV shows in sequence. But we thought, well, that’s not what we’re interested in doing anyway.” Obviously, they made the right choice, as evidenced by the international best-selling status of the first two novels. So how do they decide which episodes to adapt? “There are always ideas that, though we really try to cram into half an hour, they’re really worth a lot more,” says Rob. “Better Than Life particularly, and that kind of thing – so when we’re thinking of TV ideas now, naturally novel ideas come up as well, and in the novel we’ll do one thing, but for the TV show we’ll do a more straightforward, cheaper version”. The new book should be hitting the shelves at the end of October [!]; Penguin are obviously rushing it straight into the shops to tie in with the Television screening of Series 6. Perhaps the best news for many people is that we poorer fans will not be left hanging on for a paperback for a year, as with Better Than Life. Although Penguin do plan again to publish both hardback and paperback versions of The Last Human, these will be released simultaneously. ———————– So, how much did Rob Grant and Doug Naylor write? Rather a lot, it seems. |
| June 2, 2008 at 7:48 pm #80971 | |
|
Ian Symes |
Although, that interview always smelt a bit of bullshit to me. I think they’d actually done very little, other than odd ideas that would eventually diverge into the two different books. Some of the quotes you’ve, erm, quoted can easily be taken as them disguising the fact that they haddn’t got much down yet, despite the deadline being so tight. ?We might tell you we?re going to put something in and then we cut it?? Come on! |
| June 2, 2008 at 7:49 pm #80972 | |
|
Phil |
First: And then: Forgive me if I’m being thicker than a hilarious comparison, but does this mean that the book was scheduled to come out that very month, or are they referring to next October? If it was that very month then the thing…well…it should have been finished, barring corrections/minor rewrites. If it was to be the following October, though, God knows… |
| June 2, 2008 at 8:13 pm #80973 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Couple of things to bear in mind: The interview isn’t dated. Just because it was printed mere weeks prior to an intended publication date, doesn’t mean that it was conducted then. Much more likely that it was done at the same time that Lyons and Howarth were sniffing around the making of series VI, and publication was delayed to tie in with the release. As far as I can see the book was intended to come out in October 1993. (Bear in mind that the October issue probably came out in late August as is standard publishing lunacy). I get a slight whiff of BS (except for the remark about the novel beginning the day after BTL ended…which neither LH or Backwards did) but I’d surprised if they hadn’t at least got an outline and a fair few chapters before the deadline became unmanageable,or the the partnership dissolved. |
| June 2, 2008 at 8:30 pm #80974 | |
|
John Hoare |
They MUST have had an outline at least, surely. God, I’d love to read it. If it still exists! I don’t know, give us Bodysnatcher and it spoils us… |
| June 2, 2008 at 9:24 pm #80981 | |
|
Dave |
In the UK, many monthly magazines release October’s issue in September, maybe its so it looks ‘new’ for the whole of its shelf life. I’m not certain about the Smegazine. When I worked for WHSmiths (a newsagent) there was a sign up for Women’s Weeklies, and another up in the staff room (with orders it never be used) that read Women’s Monthlies. The day I left I swapped them over. I’m a cheeky scamp, welcome to my scampery. |
Jump to top / Jump to 'Recent Replies'
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.