Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part II

Viewing 269 posts - 1 through 269 (of 269 total)

Jump to bottom

Author Posts
Author Posts
May 25, 2008 at 8:41 pm #2352

John Hoare
G&T Admin

This thread continues this discussion. The topic was split because the system kept running out of memory. Wankers.

May 25, 2008 at 9:02 pm #80705

TheLeen

Cheers :D

May 25, 2008 at 9:20 pm #80706

Seb Patrick

And for those not keeping up, the episode we’d reached at the current state of play was The Girl In The Fireplace. So please don’t post anything relating to new series episodes beyond that until Marleen does.

May 25, 2008 at 9:33 pm #80707

Andrew

> So please don?t post anything relating to new series episodes beyond that until Marleen does.

“Dum-da-dum, dum-da-dum, dum-da-dum, dum-dum-da-dum-da-dum…”

That’s the theme tune from the next episode. I’m such a rebel.

May 25, 2008 at 9:44 pm #80708

TheLeen

God, I love you guys. :D

May 26, 2008 at 12:23 am #80715

Ben Paddon

And we love you too. Because, y’know, we’re nice like that.

May 26, 2008 at 1:54 pm #80724

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

>By the way, some three months ago I dreamt that I could manipulate the universe through pseudo SQL queries. I left-joined the kitchen to the bedroom for quicker access to the fridge. Awesome.

I hope you ensured that you in the bedroom = you in the kitchen, otherwise you could have been in a whole heap of trouble.

May 26, 2008 at 3:11 pm #80725

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

If more ladies made SQL jokes then this world would be a far nicer place to live in.

May 26, 2008 at 3:53 pm #80727

TheLeen

> I hope you ensured that you in the bedroom = you in the kitchen, otherwise you could have been in a whole heap of trouble.

XD

Tbh I don’t remember the exact details, but I think the primary key I used was some sort of room index inside the flat… or something. It was quite cool because I “saw” the tables and relations as kind of a second, see-through layer before visible reality. That’s why the building blocks stuff reminded me of it.

The night before that I’d had a dream that all my work colleagues were handpuppets, and our product line manager was the unintended clown of the piece. (The audience of 5-year-olds thought he was hysterically funny.) I think I work too much.

May 26, 2008 at 7:01 pm #80730

Ben Paddon

I dreamt last night that I’d been employed by Angel Investigations. Spike had teamed up with Drucilla again and Angel had me call Spike on his cellphone to shake him down for information. He was remarkably forthcoming with information.

Of course, the dream started slightly more bizarrely. An old man, who I’m fairly sure was an Eastenders character although I haven’t seen the show since I moved to LA, had a heart attack at a funeral, and the next thing I know I’ve woken up in a coffin on an ocean liner. The top and side comes off and there are people (I forget who) informing me that I’d better take a shower because using a used coffin as a means of transportation has karmic impact. I climb out of the coffin and a moldy skeletal leg falls out behind me with perfect comic timing. Then I had a shower.

I realise we’ve strayed somewhat from the original topic at hand, which is… erm… hats?

May 27, 2008 at 8:29 am #80754

TheLeen

W00t, series three is down to 35 quid. *click*

May 31, 2008 at 11:37 am #80881

TheLeen

Episode 2×05 – Rise of the Cybermen
Episode 2×06 – The Age of Steel

Good

- There was some funny lines in there, especially in Rise of the Cybermen.
- Cybermen.
- Continuity. (As in Pete, Ricky, … erhm. That’s it.)
- Archetypical bad guy. I like evil scientists. Not in real life, of course.
- I liked how the design of the cybermen seemed to have evolved from the earplug antennae.
- I liked the president.

Ungood

- But there were also a lot of very corny lines. Like the Doctor’s speech before his other speech (the code one – that one was okay).
- I had a feeling everything would change for Mickey, but him just staying there in place of dead Ricky, hm, I don’t know, is so clich?. I expected him to at least turn evil, or something entirely different.
- Hm. And: getting rid of Mickey when he just started to be fun! I’m going to miss him!
- How did the daily download work for people driving cars?

Miscellaneous

- Giving the episode the name “Rise of the Cybermen” really took away from the suspension. Glad that there was at least no teaser at the end of the episode though spoiling the second part.
- Exploding heads.
- Exploding everything.
- Welsh accent is so so weird.
- Rose just loves to hang down from a zeppelin, doesn’t she. Is that sort of a running gag? Will she be doing it in series three, too? I’ll find out!
- Did the writers have anything specific in mind to come back to when they wrote the Doctor calling him “Ricky” for the first time?
- Well, I don’t know how the Cybermen evolved in the Doctor’s universe, but if the two incidents were connected by a greater frame, that would be nice. I know in two parallel worlds, such things could just happen to happen, but still.

On Doctors Nine & Ten

- Forgot to mention it last week: last week I almost forgot my grief for the Ninth Doctor since the episode was brilliant and also seemed to suit the Tenth Doctor’s style well. In fact, I said to Vincent (half-jokingly), what was it again that was so brilliant about the Ninth Doctor?
- But now the Cybermen episodes on the other hand would have fit the Ninth Doctor better as they were dark and brooding and about loss and pain.

Summary

I liked the first part better than the second (and especially than its ending).
I’d been looking forward to my first Cybermen episode and, well, I can’t say I’m disappointed because it was kind of epic (being a two-parter and Mickey’s finale), but for such an epic pair of episodes, it was not all that. It should have felt better than average.

Haha, look at me, five months ago I had no idea what Doctor Who was about, and I’m already complaining like a spoilt child.

May 31, 2008 at 11:59 am #80883

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

Haha, look at me, five months ago I had no idea what Doctor Who was about, and I?m already complaining like a spoilt child.

ONE OF US.

May 31, 2008 at 12:12 pm #80885

ChrisM

>- I liked the president.

Did you recognize him? If not, check out Holoship for a younger model. In a dodgy jumpsuit. In a particularly great gag.

(I suddenly feel paranoid as it’s while since I saw that Cyberman episode, but I think my memory is correct. I’m sure it’s him.)

May 31, 2008 at 12:18 pm #80886

TheLeen

Oooooh yeah, of course! Hadn’t realised, although his voice and mouth seemed very familiar. That’s why he landed on the “I liked” list then. Oooooh! *marvels*

May 31, 2008 at 12:42 pm #80890

TheLeen

Oh and by the way: Torchwood.

- Torchwood institute… bla bla bla… published a study.

Hm. The Bad Wolf stuff was scarier, because it seemed a lot more random in the beginning (which, sadly, it actually was).

May 31, 2008 at 1:48 pm #80891

Dave

>How did the daily download work for people driving cars?

Oh yeah, I hadn’t thought of that.

>Welsh accent is so so weird

What? You’ve just sat through 90 minutes of Nick Briggs pronouncing the G in “DELETE” and you find the Welsh weird?

May 31, 2008 at 5:14 pm #80900

Pete Part Three

>And: getting rid of Mickey when he just started to be fun! I?m going to miss him!

Agreed. He annoyed me no end in the first series (and I DETEST that scene in Rose where he’s transformed into a dummy or whatever), but he grew on me a lot in the second.

May 31, 2008 at 8:08 pm #80909

TheLeen

> pronouncing the G in ?DELETE?

What?

June 1, 2008 at 9:47 am #80933

TheLeen

Episode 2×07 – The Idiot’s Lantern

On the good:

- Telly talking to you. I mean, YOU. I love it when that happens.
- Telly doing holographic hex vision.
- Faceless people. I love it.
- Rose clearly had fun talking to Eddie Connolly, and so did we.
- The special effect of the creature looking out of the telly was very nice.

On the rest:

- And there was us thinking the lantern’s idiot could be Mickey.
- Faceless people. I love it. No wait. HOW?
- The Wire looking out of the telly… HOW?
- Another villain decides to give away its plan before trying to kill its enemies. They never learn!
- I thought they gave away the creature’s motivation too early (“So hungry!). Would have been nice to be left wondering for a little longer what sort of conspiracy was going on…
- And we don’t know too much about The Wire, where it came from, what sort of being it was… I don’t suppose it matters much but that’s still a bit sad.

On zombies:

- Last time, metal zombies. This time, telly zombies. Zombies zombies zombies.

On the Doctor:

- He’s alright. Sometimes gets on my nerves a bit with the shouting, especially in “heureka” moments. But he’s alright.

On Torchwood:

- Apparently Torchwood is all over the media and every little police officer talks about it. Then no wonder the PM has heard of it. So how come that in Rose’s present it is quite suddenly supposed to be ONE BIG SECRET?

And all in all:

Nice (though historically probably totally irrelevant) little “fun” episode that made no sense whatsoever but was very entertaining nonetheless, and also very visual. I liked it.

June 1, 2008 at 9:50 am #80934

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

> Nice (though historically probably totally irrelevant) little ?fun? episode that made no sense whatsoever but was very entertaining nonetheless, and also very visual. I liked it.

Yes. A lot of other people were getting irritated with the shouting at this point, but I enjoyed the energy and fun between the Doctor and Rose.

June 1, 2008 at 7:04 pm #80945

ChrisM

As for the faceless people, that was really creepy wasn’t it?

I’d like to know how they continued to breathe though. Wire magic, no doubt. ;)

June 8, 2008 at 9:55 am #81074

TheLeen

Episode 2×08 – The Impossible Planet
Episode 2×09 – The Satan Pit

Hah, this was a bit Event Horizon, mixed with Sphere, with a dash of The Fifth Element, and what was that Star Trek: TNG episode featuring the devil? Oh, and the Alien tunnel scene.

Stuff that I loved:

- The setting. I’m not usually a lover of this sort of flick (I mean Event Horizon, Sphere etc) but it was nicely different from other Who episode settings.
- Although the subject of the devil being an ancient “evil” lifeform that has influenced a whole number of cultures (earth or otherwise) isn’t exactly new, I wasn’t bored one second.
- Vin liked that the sonic srewdriver wasn’t used once throughout the two episodes (except in the teaser right in the beginning).

Other stuff to be said:

- Well, I’m used to telly (or film) heroes getting more than a human’s usual share of good fortune (aka The Luck of Heroes), but the Doctor was really, really tempting fate there. I mean, he’s usually doing that a bit, but this time I felt a line was crossed. But then, he was under the telepathic influence of The Beast, so I suppose he’s got an excuse. He’d better get his priorities straight though for the next few episodes (1. find TARDIS, 2. save universe, 3. save Rose, 4. risk his life for a bit of fun). Why DID he give up the search for the TARDIS so soon, especially when he was going to go down anyway? Last time I checked, he had a remote control, too… and we know that he did have his sonic everythingdriver on him.
- The writing on the wall could have been either ANCIENT!, or, you know, nonsense ;)
- So, there was no oxygen in the maintenance tunnels, but simple grills between them and the living area, … lol.

Zombie stuff:

- Slave zombies! It was nice to see the Ood (I’d heard the term before not knowing who or what they were). They look really great with their Davy Jones style tentacles. But I hope there is more to them than wanting to serve…

Doctor X stuff:

- Yeah yeah, okay, I like him. I don’t like it when him and Rose go all “and then we went there and did that and do you remember them, ha ha ha, wasn’t that just brilliant”, it’s annoying. But there wasn’t much of that in these two particular episodes. And in the end when the Doctor was in the pit, going “yeah no yeah no”, that was very cute.
- Didn’t think of Doctor IX once.

Torchwood stuff:

- Aha, more humans to deal with space stuff, more Torchwood. Nothing fundamentally new there.

And all in all:

- I thought it was an excellent pair of episodes. Vin liked them, too. Very entertaining and relatively good cgi (I thought anyway). The plot seemed a little bit very very much constructed, but hey. Entertaining nonetheless and I’m going to rank it between the good episodes I enjoyed and the excellent Moffat ones, all the way up there.

June 8, 2008 at 12:50 pm #81077

Seb Patrick

>I?m going to rank it between the good episodes I enjoyed and the excellent Moffat ones, all the way up there.

That’s pretty much how most of us tend to think of that two-parter, I think. You may have noticed that there’s a pattern to each series, in the sense that there’s a “blockbuster two-parter” early on (wide, accessible story with big monsters), and then a more “adult two-parter” later (as with The Empty Child last year). Most people will generally agree that the adult two-parters present pretty much the best the show has to offer – you’re in for a treat when you get to next year’s, let me tell you.

June 8, 2008 at 7:35 pm #81092

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

And you’re going to come in your pants when you get to the Series 4 adult two-parter…

June 8, 2008 at 7:46 pm #81096

TheLeen

Yeah, I’m already looking forward (a bit too much) to… everything. I’ve got series three here, but I will eventually get to a point where I cannot watch two new episodes each weekend.

TOO SOON.

By the way, David Tennant’s German voice makes him sound younger and even a bit hotter. Oooh.

June 14, 2008 at 6:47 pm #81372

TheLeen

Episode 2×10 – Love & Monsters

Oooookay… let’s get this over with…

This was the good stuff:

- The webcam thing seemed fun (at first).
- Jackie was really sweet.
- Bunch of nerds off the blogosphere = a good thing.

This was the bad stuff:

- Way too much webcam and way too little story.
- The story was really quite silly.
- No satisfactory ending.
- Crap monster.

And finally:

- WHERE WAS THE DOCTOR?! How many lines did him and Rose have in that episode, combined? Five? Lame. I suppose there’s some good reason for this. Or so I hope.

All in all:

- Crap story, crap monster and crap resolution(s) = crap episode.
Well, it wasn’t that bad, at least it was a little fun to watch, but within the scope of Doctor Who it’s certainly somewhere at the lower end of the enjoyment scale. I kind of feel like having watched no Who at all, and am awfully glad that I don’t have to wait one week but can have another, hopefully better, one tomorrow. So, it wasn’t actually a Who episode. Mayb The Christmas Invasion and Love & Monsters together count as one whole episode, so there is still 13 in series two of Who. But only just.

June 14, 2008 at 7:05 pm #81374

Seb Patrick

Okay, so – the “good reason”.

Basically, the way the production “year” is structured and scheduled is for a 13 episode run. But since they introduced the Christmas specials, they’re basically doing 14 episodes in a 13 episode time frame.

Soooo, each year from series two onwards, there’s what we call the “Doctor-lite” episode. It’s an episode shot simultaneously with another one, that requires little time from the lead actors. Love & Monsters is the first example, it’s a shame you didn’t like it (I love it) but it IS a very divisive episode in terms of fan opinion.

Incidentally, series three’s Doctor-lite episode is THE BEST THING THAT HAS BEEN ON TV EVER. So all hope is not lost ;-)

Oh, and the monster? Designed by an eight-year-old for a kids’ TV competition ;-)

June 14, 2008 at 7:09 pm #81375

TheLeen

OH?! Gosh, now I’m sorry I said it was crap :D

(Some of those eight-year-old fans grow up to be Steven Moffat, you know)

Thanks for the info. It’s right, I wasn’t thrilled. What’s the point of a Doctor Who episode without the Doctor. But I’ll try and be unbiased when the time comes for the series three one. (14 episodes in series three, too? Half w00t!)

June 14, 2008 at 7:10 pm #81376

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Love & Monsters is still one of my favourite episodes of Who ever. And not just for the excellent oral sex joke at the end, although that’s one of many lovely touches.

But also: it remains the most accurate and sympathetic portrayal of fandom I’ve ever seen on television EVER. The fact that it was broadcast on mainstream telly is just the icing on the cake.

June 14, 2008 at 7:13 pm #81377

John Hoare
G&T Admin

What’s the point of a Doctor Who episode without the Doctor. But I?ll try and be unbiased when the time comes for the series three one. (14 episodes in series three, too? Half w00t!)

I’d argue that without the Doctor in it much, you get a really interesting perspective on the Doctor’s character, and people’s perceptions of him…

June 14, 2008 at 7:15 pm #81378

TheLeen

Portrayal of fandom?

June 14, 2008 at 7:39 pm #81388

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Portrayal of fandom?

I’ll explain it very badly. Instead, I point you towards this:

EDIT: BUT READ AFTER YOU’VE FINISHED SEASON 2!

http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2006/08/happy_times_and-comments.shtml

June 14, 2008 at 7:55 pm #81391

Seb Patrick

Eeep, be careful! That article contains end-of-series-two spoilers!

June 14, 2008 at 7:57 pm #81393

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Fuck fuck fuck!

Sorry, sorry, sorry. *Really* should have checked the article for those. I’ll be more careful in future. Sorry! But read it after you’ve finished this series…

June 14, 2008 at 7:57 pm #81394

TheLeen

I’ll keep the link for next week, then… :)

June 14, 2008 at 7:59 pm #81395

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Shit, thank *fuck* you didn’t read it. I feel awful now. I nearly ruined things!

June 14, 2008 at 8:04 pm #81397

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

You twat, Hoare.

June 14, 2008 at 8:04 pm #81398

TheLeen

It’s okay, nothing happend. :)

June 14, 2008 at 8:13 pm #81403

Andrew

I like Love and Monsters a lot, but it does divide people. Still, I’ll take experimental stuff like that over bog-standard run-and-explode stuff like the cybermen two-parter.

Again, there’s also a big Buffy influence – The Zeppo and Storyteller, showing the hero from an outside perspective. (A series two ep of Buffy also sees the heroine turned into a rat to help the actresses schedule.) It’s how Mickey Smith’s side of the fence looked.

It’s a story about being a fan. Which is a bit of a theme in New Who. Rose is a cypher for the audience, the viewer who gets to join the adventure. And ‘ Do you wanna come with me?’ was a cornerstone of the series one ad campaign.

June 14, 2008 at 8:54 pm #81404

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Here’s my review of Love & Monsters – notable for being one of the few Who reviews I’ve written that doesn’t make me curl up in embarrassment upon re-reading. (And Seb’s second opinion is great, too.)

It’s grown on me even more since then, though – it’s a five star episode for me now.

June 14, 2008 at 9:04 pm #81405

TheLeen

Nice… both of them reviews…

Hm, yeah. You’re right with everything you wrote there. And I didn’t think the episode stinks. I liked it. But I liked all of the other ones more. Except maybe “Aliens of London”, and possibly “Rose” (but I’m not even sure about that).

> It?s a story about being a fan. Which is a bit of a theme in New Who. Rose is a cypher for the audience, the viewer who gets to join the adventure. And ? Do you wanna come with me?? was a cornerstone of the series one ad campaign.

But hasn’t that been the purpose of the companions all along?

June 14, 2008 at 9:44 pm #81407

Andrew

> But hasn?t that been the purpose of the companions all along?

Not wishing to spoil things, should you ever go back, the short answer is ‘Yes, but…” and the long answer is ‘No, however…’.

For the sake of this thread, there’s a difference between an early companion asking ‘What IS that, Doctor?!’ as part of a show that needed exposition and a point of reference, and a writing team fulfilling a 40 year old dream to step inside the TARDIS.

June 14, 2008 at 9:57 pm #81409

TheLeen

I’m totally confused and entirely a-ha! at the same time! Good job Andrew!

Ah, today is one of those days where I just love everyone around me. :)

June 14, 2008 at 11:06 pm #81410

Andrew

> Ah, today is one of those days where I just love everyone around me. :)

Sound good. Form an orderly queue, people!

June 15, 2008 at 8:26 am #81414

Pete Part Three

Love & Monsters is one of the episodes that I’ve never got round to re-watching. I liked the idea but it was nowhere near as smart as it thought it was.

>Incidentally, series three?s Doctor-lite episode is THE BEST THING THAT HAS BEEN ON TV EVER. So all hope is not lost ;-)

This is bang on the money. You are in for one hell of a treat, Marleen.

June 15, 2008 at 9:24 am #81417

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

>For the sake of this thread, there?s a difference between an early companion asking ?What IS that, Doctor?!? as part of a show that needed exposition and a point of reference, and a writing team fulfilling a 40 year old dream to step inside the TARDIS.

And even then, the early companions could be much more. John keeps on at me to write an article…

June 15, 2008 at 10:10 am #81421

TheLeen

Please do!

So!

Episode 2×11 – Fear Her

I liked a lot:

- Drawings.
- Animated doodle!! I want one!! It’s almost as cute as Tron’s bit!!
- Closet monster coming to life. Like DoodleBob. Yeah.

Random observations:

- The episode was scary alright, but not quite as scary as the title suggested.
- The alien was very Star Trek: TNG. :)
- Trish? Vaguely familiar? I had to look it up, but hey, she was in Love Actually.

Zombies:

- Doodle zombies :)

Torchwood:

- There was no mention of Torchwood in it, was there? … odd… maybe the calm before the storm…

Overall:

- This episode’s only catch is that it is, plot-wise, so close to The Idiot’s Lantern. People scream out of a telly, people scream out of a drawing. Of the two, I prefer the drawing. I thought it was really cute, and maybe something cute is needed just before the series finale. It was heartbreaking when Rose said in the end “never ever…” of course in an ideal world I would not know that Billie left Who after series two. But as I don’t know whether she dies or falls through a time hole or marries Mickey or just decides to spend some more time with Jackie, I’m really anxious and worried now. And the worst thing is – I can’t watch any Who next weekend. So there is a lot of time for being worried and anxious.

June 15, 2008 at 10:13 am #81422

Seb Patrick

Gah. Fear Her. Hate hate hate. Worst episode of New Who. By miles.

June 15, 2008 at 10:19 am #81424

Dave

I’d rather watch Fear Her twice than Voyage Of The Damned at all

June 15, 2008 at 11:04 am #81427

Andrew

Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM.

June 15, 2008 at 11:05 am #81428

TheLeen

> Gah. Fear Her. Hate hate hate. Worst episode of New Who. By miles.

Please explain

June 15, 2008 at 11:49 am #81433

ChrisM

>Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM.

Yeah, I didn’t mind Fear Her. Wasn’t a fave of mine but it wasn’t bad. Mind you none of New Who is that bad.

June 15, 2008 at 1:24 pm #81435

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

> Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM.

It sets Ten up as not being a cat person, which is WRONGE. Good job Gridlock fixed that.

June 15, 2008 at 3:08 pm #81439

Seb Patrick

> Gah. Fear Her. Hate hate hate. Worst episode of New Who. By miles.

Please explain

It’s bland, it features some of the worst examples of the Doctor’s “AWWWH!” smart-arsedness (which reminds me – when you’ve finished series two, remind me to link you to Charlie Brooker’s wishlist for series three!), and the sequence with the Olympics torch and that hideous, hideous commentary is the most horrifically schmaltzy and rubbish moment in the show’s history. The story is completely unmemorable, and even from a directorial point of view it just feels like no-one could really be arsed.

It’s touch and go, I guess, whether Fear Her or New Earth is worse (or 42 from series three, for that matter), but they’re all pretty rank.

June 15, 2008 at 3:34 pm #81443

Ridley

But it’s courage and it’s love!

June 15, 2008 at 3:42 pm #81444

John Hoare
G&T Admin

The weird thing is, I *never* noticed any of that when I first watched it. It didn’t even cross my mind. I was too busy enjoying the image of the Doctor lighting the torch – which I thought was brilliant – to notice.

If I watched it again, it’d probably irritate me now, but it never bothered me at the time.

June 15, 2008 at 4:59 pm #81447

Andrew

Like the torch, the cupboard, the scribble and the whispered alien voice.

And I adore: the TARDIS materialising inconveniently, Rose halting the Doctor from dipping into the marmalade, and the lengthy multi-character conversation in the street. One of my favourite dialogue sequences of New Who.

June 15, 2008 at 5:13 pm #81450

ChrisM

As I said, I didn’t mind ‘Fear Her’ but I though the torch lighting bit sucked major monkey rump. And that ain’t tasty I can tell you.

Well I assume it isn’t. It’s not like I’ve spent an unhealthy amount of time in the simian section of London zoo… (quick recovery there.)

Ok, bit of an exaggeration maybe, but it made me wince.

June 15, 2008 at 5:45 pm #81453

TheLeen

> the TARDIS materialising inconveniently

Yeah, that was great :D

June 28, 2008 at 12:00 pm #81825

TheLeen

Episode 2×12 – Army of Ghosts
Episode 2×13 – Doomsday

This review might turn out short cause I’m really too sad to make an effort here.

I liked:

- David Tennant is, as you say, cute as a button. Oh and he looked so, so sad in the end. :’(
- Hey, it’s the last Daleks in existence! Again!
- Daleks vs. Cybermen was quite good. The dialogues were hilarious. I never knew either the Cyber men or the Daleks had a sense of humour. Which clearly they have. And: you almost felt sorry for the Cybermen, didn’t ya.
- Oh noes, one Dalek beamed away (into the parallel dimension I suppose)…
- Oh look! It’s Pete! And Jackie! Awwwwwwww.

And I didn’t:

- The beginning of the first episode. Don’t know why.
- Mickey, now that he’s come to terms with everything, has really become quite boring.

Stuff:

- And there was me thinking that the genesis thingy contained the Master (another something that I SHOULD NOT BE KNOWING ABOUT at this point)
- And the girl working at Torchwood’s for the Cybermen, I thought it was Martha, but obviously not.

Torchwood:

- No butt-fucking surprise there. It’s really what we’d seen coming by miles. But that’s okay.

Rose:

- I’d grown rather fond of Rose. I’m not a fan as such. I wouldn’t, say, join a Rose Typer facebook group. But the end was simply heartbreaking. I’ll be very picky with the next companion (poor girl, eh). What’s really really sad is that together with Rose, everything Rose-related vanished from Who: Jackie, Mickey, Pete (who managed to appear in quite too many episodes for a dead man, but I loved him as a character). So there’s a whole bunch gone at once. Someone said on Confidential that Rose’s family served as point to return to, for Rose as well as the viewer, and I realise now how well that worked. I feel unhinged. As Rose must feel now without the Doctor. Well, at least they’re all together, which works as a “happy” ending. I bet they’ll find ways to write Rose back in for single episodes, I mean if they can do it they will do it (probably have done it already). But I will miss Jackie most, I think! Anyway – parallel earth, parallel Torchwood – I wondered after Rise of the Cybermen already, where’s the parallel TARDIS with its parallel Doctor?

Overall

- Daleks AND Cybermen, a rift in reality, the Void, parallel planets, … The series finale was epic, I’ll give it that.
- Thought the second episode was much, much better than the first. All in all good, but, well, not THAT good. I think I’d rate it directly below Bad Wolf.

P.S.: Wtf?

- Sooooo… Catherine Tate. What is going on? See, I try, I really try to read as little as possible about Who on the ‘net (although I have see this, but anyway I know it’s Marth’a turn now and Donna is the series four companion, so that, yes, that was quite a surprise to see her there.

Anyway! Series two. For me, it never quite managed to reach the peaks of series one. But neither the bottom.

June 28, 2008 at 12:22 pm #81826

Andrew

SHE’S MADE A BLOODY CHART!!! :-D

> And there was me thinking that the genesis thingy contained the Master (another something that I SHOULD NOT BE KNOWING ABOUT at this point)

It wasn’t until you started series two that I realised how badly the packaging ruins the finale. The Daleks were kept as a total surprise on broadcast – it was going to be a cyber-ending, so far as we knew – and, obviously, you knew they were coming from the moment you looked at the box. A shame.

> And the girl working at Torchwood?s for the Cybermen, I thought it was Martha, but obviously not.

Same actress. There’s a simple explanation – which you’ll eventually get to.

Weirdly I watched these same two episodes LAST NIGHT. Freaky…

June 28, 2008 at 12:27 pm #81827

TheLeen

> It wasn?t until you started series two that I realised how badly the packaging ruins the finale. The Daleks were kept as a total surprise on broadcast – it was going to be a cyber-ending, so far as we knew – and, obviously, you knew they were coming from the moment you looked at the box. A shame.

Nah, I made nothing of it. I made it a habit, too, not to look at the box. It’s a nice packaging, especially on the inside, when you know the episodes already. It’s laden with spoilers though. So seeing the Daleks was still a surprise, but more of a “oh look, the last Dalek ever!” kind of ironic one *g*

>> And the girl working at Torchwood?s for the Cybermen, I thought it was Martha, but obviously not.

> Same actress. There?s a simple explanation – which you?ll eventually get to.

So I wasn’t entirely wrong. That is nice. Intriguing, too.

I’ll be on shoreleave next weekend, so, again, no Who for me for another while.

June 28, 2008 at 12:30 pm #81828

Seb Patrick

But I will miss Jackie most, I think! Anyway – parallel earth, parallel Torchwood – I wondered after Rise of the Cybermen already, where?s the parallel TARDIS with its parallel Doctor?

I’m not sure how much of explaining this is spoilers, so I think it’s alright to do so. The idea is that there’s only one set of Time Lords – they can traverse parallel universes, but they’ll never interact with themselves (uh, apart from when they cross their own timelines) because there’s only ever one version. So in the parallel universe, there’s no Doctor. The reason for Torchwood’s existence (again, I can’t remember where this was stated) is apparently that, because he wasn’t there to save her, Queen Victoria was killed by the werewolf. Torchwood was set up to battle alien threats from that point onwards.

June 30, 2008 at 3:53 pm #81868

TheLeen

Speaking of which, should I watch Torchwood next or series three of Who?

June 30, 2008 at 4:17 pm #81869

ChrisM

>Speaking of which, should I watch Torchwood next or series three of Who?

It doesn’t matter too much. If you have Torchwood, you might as well watch it first. Minor spoiler bellow (I’m leaving out plot stuff and details though so it shouldn’t spoil your enjoyment..)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
[spoiler]
Certain episodes of series 3 happen after Torchwood from a certain character’s point of view. Certain blanks in this character’s history are filled in this series of Doctor Who. However, if you watch Dr. Who first, it won’t spoil the main plot of either show.

Hope that was vague enough.;)

June 30, 2008 at 4:32 pm #81870

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

The mitigating factor here is that Torchwood series one is complete and utter shit. Only the first episode is worth watching.

June 30, 2008 at 4:57 pm #81871

Pete Part Three

Indeed.

Watch the first episode and, maybe, the last couple of episodes (which – slightly – leads into the season three finale of Doctor Who) but I really wouldn’t bother with the rest of it.

The first episode hinted at potential that has yet to be realised. The second season is slightly better, but not by much.

June 30, 2008 at 6:59 pm #81874

ChrisM

Taste is subjective though. One persons shite might be someone else’s honey (metaphorically speaking of course.) Many people like the show. I thought it could have been far better, but I didn’t hate it overall. (So certainly not honey, but edible albeit a few gristly bits were hard to swallow.)

Marleen-

My advise is to watch the first few episodes. If 3-4 episodes in you don’t like it then you can skip to the last couple episodes as they said.

June 30, 2008 at 7:38 pm #81879

Pete Part Three

I don’t like honey either.

June 30, 2008 at 7:44 pm #81880

Ridley

In retrospect I’d avoid series one and just watch from series two but Pete’s version makes more sense.

June 30, 2008 at 8:06 pm #81883

TheLeen

Since the option are a) buy the series one box or b) leave it, I’ll be going with b).

I can catch up on Torchwood once I run out of Who episodes (which will be too soon anyway).

June 30, 2008 at 8:11 pm #81884

Seb Patrick

I would at least read up on it a bit, familiarise yourself with who’s who and what happens. It will help you *slightly* when you get to the series three finale (and even moreso for the series four finale!), although it’s by no means essential in either case.

June 30, 2008 at 9:19 pm #81886

Andrew

While so far it’s been an overall miss for Torchwood, there HAVE been good episodes (Ian’s dead wrong – They Keep Killing Suzy is pretty good for a kick-off).

But it’s not a full-price purchase, frankly. Worth seeing the best eps if they ever appear on iTunes or whatever, though – if that ever happens, get a list from here!

July 1, 2008 at 7:24 am #81898

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

I was debating whether to add They Keep Killing Suzie to my list of episodes worth watching. That and Captain Jack Harkness are the only contenders from the first series, though. The second is much better.

July 1, 2008 at 7:29 am #81899

Pete Part Three

Convinced that the best thing about They Keep Killing Suzie is the title.

July 1, 2008 at 9:05 am #81902

Dave

Torchwood is so inconsistent. I liked Random Shoes, Out Of Time is great, Combat is a complete waste of everyone’s time

July 1, 2008 at 10:13 am #81905

Andrew

I thought Combat was one of the best in terms of tone and character writing. I wish Noel Clarke had written more. Whereas Random Shoes was pants.

Small Worlds was okay, but the script makes a huge error in having the team do literally nothing to affect the outcome.

July 1, 2008 at 10:26 am #81907

Dave

Sorry Marleen we’ve done it again.

Coming soon: The Torchwood Spoilers Thread

July 1, 2008 at 10:44 am #81908

TheLeen

O_O

July 1, 2008 at 12:28 pm #81910

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Coming soon: The Torchwood Spoilers Thread

http://www.ganymede.tv/forum/2008/07/the-torchwood-spoilers-thread

July 13, 2008 at 3:41 pm #82287

TheLeen

Episode 3×00 – The Runaway Bride

On the episode:
- Opening: Great opening.
- Monster: Fantastic monster! She was beautiful! For something as clich? and been-there as a spiderwoman, she did quite stun me. Didn’t look too cgi. Love the eyes.
- Science: Bler. As much as I appreciate ANCIENT magical energy forms, did it have to be golden glitter again? LOOK, it’s clearly Huon energy! Never mind that it looks exactly like nanogenes, or TARDIS dust, or, probably, most other things in Who ;)
- Ending: Good ending.

On Catherine Tate:
- I LIKED HER IN THIS EPISODE. A LOT. I THOUGHT SHE WAS PERFECT. There, I said it. Donna was twice as entertaining as she was annoying and the role must’ve been written especially for Catherine Tate to work so well. I’m looking forward to seeing more of her in series four. My only apology is that I have not had to sit through the so-called Catherine Tate Show that you lot so despise. Apart from one or two Lauren Cooper clips and the special one with David Tennant.

On the Doctor:
- Oh, he can look sooo hurt and lonely. It’s sad that he had to lose Rose before I could see that so clearly in him. Anyway, yes, I like him now.

On zombies:
- No zombies, only robots, alas, remote-controlled ones, so maybe zombots.

On christmas specials:
- Preferred this one to The Christmas Invasion, and by miles. I just thought it was more entertaining and not QUITE as silly. Well, hm, the spiderwench and Ms Tate really did it for me I guess.

July 13, 2008 at 7:21 pm #82290

ChrisM

- Monster: Fantastic monster! She was beautiful! For something as clich? and been-there as a spiderwoman, she did quite stun me. Didn?t look too cgi. Love the eyes.

She was a great monster wasn’t she? Actually I think she is a fusion of actress in prosthetics and CGI. Obviously the blinking extra eyes were cgi but I think they did make her up in part, including that head rig. I’m sure the distance stuff and the spider thorax were all CG though. A good example of how a fusion of CGI and live action can work well.

On Catherine Tate:
- I LIKED HER IN THIS EPISODE. A LOT. I THOUGHT SHE WAS PERFECT. There, I said it. Donna was twice as entertaining as she was annoying and the role must?ve been written especially for Catherine Tate to work so well.

I agree. I found her a bit irritating, but she was a great character.

I?m looking forward to seeing more of her in series four. My only apology is that I have not had to sit through the so-called Catherine Tate Show that you lot so despise.

Not me, I quite liked her show as well. It got old quite quickly though as a lot of her humor was based on repetitive catch-phrases. (Loren’s “Am I bovvered!” being one that is referenced a lot.) There were some great characters in her show. The Gran being a good example. And the ginger gags made me chuckle in their silliness.

July 14, 2008 at 12:04 am #82294

Dave

>Not me, I quite liked her show as well. It got old quite quickly though as a lot of her humor was based on repetitive catch-phrases. (Loren?s ?Am I bovvered!? being one that is referenced a lot.) There were some great characters in her show. The Gran being a good example. And the ginger gags made me chuckle in their silliness.

Get out

July 14, 2008 at 8:13 am #82295

Zombie Jim Undead

> I?m sure the distance stuff and the spider thorax were all CG though.

Actually the entire spider body was a practical prop, moved around on hyrdraulic pistons. It’s fooking massive. Saw it at the Doctor Who exibition.

July 14, 2008 at 3:42 pm #82317

ChrisM

Really? That’s impressive. So they just used the CG for the candles on the cake so to speak. A good use of the medium. (Not that I’m against intensive CGI if it’s good…)

July 14, 2008 at 11:22 pm #82349

Ben Paddon

The queen of the Rachnos is all prosthetic and no CGI. Just so you know.

July 14, 2008 at 11:29 pm #82351

ChrisM

I just meant CGI was used for the final touches. I.e. the candles on the cake being the blinking spider eyes. Not the eyes themselves, the blinking effect. That was certainly CG, utilised in a subtle but highly effective, and freaky way.

July 14, 2008 at 11:54 pm #82354

Ben Paddon

Oh yes, that.

July 19, 2008 at 6:00 pm #82475

ChrisM

Yeah, I quite liked both those episodes (although I’m not sure the magic stuff in the Elizabethan one quite fitted with the genre… even if it is essentially another science. Great villains though.)

As for the one with the Judoon, I thought the Judoon were great new aliens too. One thing that bugged me about that episode was that stuff about irradiating half the earth utilizing a bit of equipment in a room in the hospital. (It’s been a while so I can’t remember the specifics, radiography, X-ray machine, whatever.) I just thought they were a little TOO silly. I’d just about buy that the overload would harm the folks in the hospital, and while that’d be smaller stakes, it would still be more than enough for the heroics.

As for Martha, yeah I quite like her too. How did you consider Freema’s acting though?

Oh and good point concerning the cousin thing. It’s ploy often used in drama though. You can always get round it by imagining they actually look different, just like imagining bad effects look good. ;)

July 19, 2008 at 6:35 pm #82477

TheLeen

> One thing that bugged me about that episode was that stuff about irradiating half the earth utilizing a bit of equipment in a room in the hospital. (It?s been a while so I can?t remember the specifics, radiography, X-ray machine, whatever.) I just thought they were a little TOO silly.

*cough* London Eye *cough*

> As for Martha, yeah I quite like her too. How did you consider Freema?s acting though?

Hm, didn’t strike me as very good nor very bad. Have to see more of it before I can judge. If anything, it’s a bit bland (so far), but I just attributed it to the character.

July 19, 2008 at 6:36 pm #82472

TheLeen

Now, let’s see what we have here…

Episode 3×01 – Smith and Jones

On the episode:
- Liked the rain effect.
- Liked the baddie (kind of cheesy but good).
- LOVED the Rhinos (kind of VERY cheesy but extremely good! Only Doctor Who or The Fifth Element could pull this off!).
- And the thing we massively loved most: the Judoons marking humans with edding crosses.
- I tink there were a couple of great lines in the script, but I can’t remember them now!
- Anyways, good episode, for something not being the series’ highlight or finale or of other extraordinary relevance, and with the cheese factor it has.

On Martha:
- Well, she is kind of sweet.
- She’s also… a bit of a swot.
- Hmpf. (Translation: It’s not your fault but… get your fingers off my Doctor)
- You said there was an explanation for Martha looking exactly like Adeola in “Army of Ghosts”. A random “I had a cousin…” is NOT a valid explanation. It’s lame. I reckon they really really wanted Freema Agyeman for the role, but I wish they’d come up for a better explanation than that. It’s Doctor Who, they could’ve made up ANYTHING. “Cousin” is really lazy. Also, you usually don’t look exactly like your cousin and not very much like your own sister.

On the Doctor:
- Loved him in this episode.

On zombies:
- Leather biker zombies. Harr.

All in all:
- I enjoyed it immensely. Vin, too. We enjoyed it so much that we watched another episode there and then. Or maybe that was because I’m rather ill and so I could make three wishes (I had wished for some (real, proper) cheese and a hot chocolate before). I think I just made that rule up. Worked really well, too.

Episode 3×02 – The Shakespeare Code

This episode:
- You know by now that I do rather like “costume” type episodes, i.e. ones playing in the past. Lovely views of Elizabethan London.
- Ancient magic, someone banned at the beginning of the universe, so they’re just a legend, of course only until they try to set the rest of their kind free, who’re encaged somewhere on Earth, wait a minute, did we not just see that story two episodes ago? Ah heck, anyway, it was fun.
- Really loved the olde English being made funny. “I told thee so!” Tee hee hee.
- Some good Shakespeare jokes, but then it became too many Shakespeare jokes.
- Speaking of Shakespeare. Excuse me, I didn’t quite get it… what did you just say he was? A genius? Ohhhh, he is a genius, blah blah. He’s even more of a swot than Martha. Nauseating! There’s nothing wrong with a little praise but him bypassing the psychic paper was OTT.
- Other than that, nicely written, I enjoyed many of the lines, so I can only speak for myself, but I would say: great script!
- But: what’s with the Harry Potter references? SICK! (I love Harry Potter, by the way, but mixing two different fictional universes together… that makes me kind of queasy…)
- Other literary references: the title, the thing with the true names, … hmm, have I missed any more? Probably.
- Heh, the Doctor is not getting on with ANY of the female rulers of the UK, is he? First Harriet, then Vicky, now Liz. If I were him, I’d move to France where lady leaders adore him. Looking forward to any further episodes revealing why Elizabeth hates him so. Might this be this series’ mystery arc? Maybe not, although I’d like that.
- Author, author! I looked him up and imdb said he also wrote something to do with a unicorn and a wasp for series four. Oooooh, I’m looking forward to that one.

Zombies:
- Voodooly controlled ones.

All in all:
- Vin found it to be average or even below, I myself rather liked the episode. What a fun ride. Also, I think I don’t mind Martha. She’s still a bit bland, but then, so was Rose (for me) in the beginning.

July 19, 2008 at 6:39 pm #82478

TheLeen

I just edit-shifted my own posting to the bottom of the queue again, is this supposed to still be happening? Meh…

July 19, 2008 at 6:50 pm #82479

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

It’s still on the FIX LIST. I’m sure John will get to after he’s finished r… OH, WHOOPS, BETTER NOT MENTION THAT.

July 19, 2008 at 7:25 pm #82483

Danny Stephenson
G&T Admin

I?m sure John will get to after he?s finished r?

SHHHHHHHHHH!

July 19, 2008 at 7:26 pm #82484

ChrisM

As long as I don’t get accused of spoiling. I was responding to episodes reviewed, honest! ;)

July 20, 2008 at 4:15 am #82502

performingmonkey

> I?m sure John will get to after he?s finished r…

rogering a fanny?

July 20, 2008 at 10:41 am #82507

TheLeen

Episode 3×03 – Smith and Jones

The episode:
- Oooh, dystopia. Brazil-esque emo drug dealers, Dark City-like microcosm of infinite motorways, I like it.
- Lol, Irish cat. Waiiiit a minute, I know that voice! And seriously, I can’t believe I recognised Ardal O’Hanlon under that cat face. Still. What a lovely accent. <3
- The rest of the secondary characters were great as well.
- Crabs feeding off smog. Fair enough. Although after we’ve just seen spiders and rhinos, I wouldn’t have minded if they’d used aliens that don’t look like they belong in Earth’s fauna. (They used to be a real thread some billions of years ago… yawn…)
- I was hoping to hear something more… profound from good ol’ Face of Boe. The Doctor was hoping to hear nothing at all from the Face of Boe. Why?
- Wish I didn’t know about the Master, although I must admit I didn’t really think of him, not until Vin said “Will the other remaining time lord be good or evil then, whad do you think?”
- I THINK if I would care to start looking, I’d find some MAJOR plot holes in there. I am trying very very hard though to not look. Successfully so, so far.
- All in all, good episode! Series three is coming along rather well!

Doctor X:
- Stop being a jerk.

Martha:
- I feel more and more sorry for Martha each episode. She’s begging to get her heart broken. Poor girl.

July 20, 2008 at 10:47 am #82508

TheLeen

And the forum ate the rest of my posting!

July 20, 2008 at 10:51 am #82509

TheLeen

*sigh*

- The other secondary characters (the old ladies etc) were great, too.
- I was hoping to hear something more profound from good old Face of Boe. The Doctor was hoping to hear nothing at all from the Face of Boe. Why? Also: I wish I didn’t know about the Master. But I really didn’t make the connection until Vin said to me: “so, is this other remaining time lord good or evil, what do you think?”
- Smog-eating crabs, fair enough. But after the spiders and rhinos, it would have been kinda nice to see creatures that don’t look like Earth’s fauna.
- All in all: good episode. Series three is really nice so far.

Doctor X:
- Oh, stop being a jerk.

Martha:
- I feel more and more sorry for her with each new episode. She’s begging to get her heart broken. Poor girl.

July 20, 2008 at 12:57 pm #82510

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Gridlock remains one of my all time favourite episodes, mainly for The Doctor’s scenes at the start and end of the episodes regarding Gallifrey.

July 21, 2008 at 7:44 am #82523

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

> (Translation: It?s not your fault but? get your fingers off my Doctor)

*remembers Marleen’s response to Eccleston and chuckles*

Oh, and I’m very fond of the Judoon myself. They’re exactly what you might expect of galactic security guards.

July 21, 2008 at 9:04 am #82531

TheLeen

You’re right, it was only a matter of time. But I still love the two(ush) of them(ish) in two completely different ways.

July 21, 2008 at 1:36 pm #82536

TheLeen

Just found this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2008/whatson/2707.shtml

And now I’m crying big wet tears of not-canning-to-go because it’s, like, this Sunday.

July 21, 2008 at 1:50 pm #82538

Danny Stephenson
G&T Admin

Oh i’d go to see that!!

July 21, 2008 at 2:03 pm #82539

TheLeen

Yeah, I would. Except, I would’ve booked flights two months ago and arranged for crashing on someone’s floor. Although, as this is taking place mid-day, maybe I could fly home the same day. In any case, it’s too expensive now. EUR 270 for the flights (if booked today), per person.

July 22, 2008 at 6:56 pm #82574

TheLeen

Episode 3×04 – Daleks in Manhattan
Episode 3×05 – Evolution of the Daleks

Uhm… ?

What we liked:
- Impatient pigslaves in the elevator.

What we no liked:
- All the rest. I could make a more detailed list, but it would depress me further, and I’m already pissed off.
- Okay, I’m gonna say one thing. “… and that makes them more dangerous than ever!” was NOT the impression WE had.
- Grraaahhh.

Zombies:
- Pigslaves
- Messy-DNA-lightning-hybrid-or-something-disobedient zombies

Summary:
- The episode went riiiiight down to the bottom of my “favourite” list. In hindsight, series one’s Slitheen episodes weren’t so bad.

July 22, 2008 at 9:23 pm #82582

ChrisM

Those ‘American’ accents made me feel like wincing (particularly the dance girl) although cheesy stuff amuses me too. I’m perverse like that.

Good reconstruction of central park though. Not that I’ve go anything to base that on, having never been there but it looked good.

July 23, 2008 at 8:50 am #82591

TheLeen

Yeah.
And I do fancy the 20s to 40s, roughly, all the film noir stuff, but it didn’t help. If anything, I feel even more cheated. 13 episodes in a series, and these two block valuable slots, and also, the setting’s been wasted.

July 23, 2008 at 9:18 am #82595

Zombie Jim Undead

Still remains my favourite Dalek episode of the new series. Yes, I know I’m in the minority.

I just found it to be the most atmospheric and the most like Dalek stories of old – particularly Pertwee era like Day of the Daleks.

July 23, 2008 at 9:47 am #82597

Seb Patrick

Marleen, sorry to tell you that you’ve hit the really bumpy patch of series three – it’s going to be another couple of episodes before you reach the good stuff again. But when you hit the good stuff… well. You’ve got probably the best unbroken run of sheer brilliant episodes that New Who has to offer on the way… :-)

July 23, 2008 at 10:34 am #82598

Zombie Jim Undead

Then it’ll go shit again.

July 23, 2008 at 10:45 am #82599

TheLeen

Such is life! Rain sunshine blah blah.

Funny, although I probably agree with most (not all) of that Lawrence Miles wrote here but deleted later (good read by the way, if you don’t try to carefully read around spoilers), I don’t really care if Who occasionally becomes slightly… bumpy.

Still love it.

But I’ve been accused of treating tv shows like people (and people like telly).

July 23, 2008 at 11:25 am #82601

Pete Part Three

Why was that deleted?

July 23, 2008 at 11:34 am #82602

TheLeen

Don’t know. Maybe because he figured he’d rather write Doctor Who episodes in the future than be rude and piss everyone off. Or… something.

July 23, 2008 at 11:56 am #82604

Zombie Jim Undead

I say “shit”…it’s not the same as other shit. “Shit” Doctor Who is still wonderful. :)

July 23, 2008 at 12:00 pm #82605

Seb Patrick

Maybe because he figured he?d rather write Doctor Who episodes in the future than be rude and piss everyone off. Or? something.

Hahahahahahahahaha.

No.

Lawrence Miles burned his bridges a long time ago. What happens is that he posts his blogs, leaves them up for a couple of weeks or so, and then deletes them. While he makes the occasional good point, the posts usually contain vast amounts of out-and-out libellous slagging off of other writers (he’s particularly obsessed with Moffat, whom he claims drove him to alcoholism, and Neil Gaiman, whom he has repeatedly accused of copping off with his fans), and there is absolutely no chance whatsoever of him EVER writing for the TV series. Not least because, while he’s an undeniably talented writer of novels, he posted a sample script online a little while back that his acolytes thought was brilliant, but which actually showed that he has very little in the way of understanding of how to construct a TV script. And his slagging off of all and sundry has actually become MORE pronounced recently, not less so.

Basically, he’s a sad, pathetic, bitter little man who happens to have written some very good tie-in novels, but thinks this entitles him to his belief that the show will only ever be any good if it’s made to his precise specifications and for his sole entertainment.

July 23, 2008 at 12:00 pm #82606

Seb Patrick

>?Shit? Doctor Who is still wonderful. :)

42 and The Doctor’s Daughter disagree with you.

July 23, 2008 at 12:10 pm #82607

TheLeen

Thought so. Thanks for the summary!

July 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm #82608

Pete Part Three

Interesting. I liked The Moffat Times-Table and rather enjoyed reading that article. Didn’t agree with a lot of it though.

July 23, 2008 at 12:45 pm #82609

TheLeen

Okay, I’ve read up on it now. Haha. It was, uh… gut-wrenchingly entertaining.

July 23, 2008 at 2:11 pm #82611

Zombie Jim Undead

I love 42! The only episodes I have difficulty watching now are Aliens of London / World War 3…and maybe Boom Town. Oh, and Fear Her.

July 23, 2008 at 2:31 pm #82612

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

42 makes me want to cry. Midnight made its very existence completely pointless, anyway, as it does everything 42 was trying to do but WELL.

July 23, 2008 at 3:23 pm #82613

TheLeen

I liked Boom Town.

And shhhh about 42, I’m watching it next weekend. ta :)

July 23, 2008 at 7:32 pm #82617

TheLeen

Episode 3×06 – The Lazarus Experiment

We liked:
- Doctor feeling flattered after being called a geek. Awww!
- Doctor in the white box.
- Doctor talking to Martha’s mum.

We liked not:
- The organ bit was cheesy.
- The monster did just not look right. (At least this time there was a reason why it would look earth-ish. But the face cg was crap.)
- Running up the stairs in heels. What a great idea.
- Using hyper-sonic sound waves for rejuvenation may or may not be “inspired”. Naming the dude “Lazarus” certainly wasn’t.

Martha:
- Yeah, I get now what some people say about her acting. Could be worse though! I liked her family.

Zombies:
- None. Hooray!

Random:
- Last Friday, a man removed the glass from a lightbulb in his flat, then manipulated the gas pipes to create one flat-sized gas bomb (apparently he was expecting the police to turn up at his place). Neighbours smelled the gas and called the police, the firemen and the local gas supplier. The police, in fact, did turn up at his door, but luckily didn’t try to switch the lights on. All of this happened in my district here in Berlin, only a few streets away. They caught the man (well, suspect, as of now) only today in Hamburg. So. Watching that particular scene felt very, very strange anti… un… ex…. emersed (is that even a word) me. Hardly Doctor Who’s fault but it was not a nice feeling, that.

Series 3:
- So what’s the story arc now: This Saxon guy? Elisabeth? Boe’s Face’s prophecy? I’m confused.

Overall impression:
- I expected worse. The episode was certainly below average, but only because the average is so high, or otherwise it might’ve been just average. Anyway, seen worse.

July 23, 2008 at 11:56 pm #82621

Seb Patrick

Oh, I can’t wait until you get to episode eight… reading this thread got me thinking about it again today, and I got a big warm fuzzy feeling. I might have to watch it again soon. Looking at the Paul Cornell interview we did for NTS, I realised we didn’t ask him a single question about it – the Who stuff was mainly focused on Father’s Day – and that’s a shame, there’s plenty I would have liked to have brought up…

July 24, 2008 at 8:18 am #82626

Jo TORDFC

Yeah I was having a look at the episode list – after this next episode it all gets awesome!! Watch more Who quick! :oP

July 24, 2008 at 8:25 am #82627

Jo TORDFC

Oh I told Ian to comment on this…

Smog-eating crabs, fair enough. But after the spiders and rhinos, it would have been kinda nice to see creatures that don?t look like Earth?s fauna.

As he’d have explained it better than me, but as he’s rubbish and hasn’t bothered I’ll try my best!
The Macra have been previously featured in classic Who – In 1967 they appeared with the Second Doctor. So it was quite a geeky, fanboy moment when they were revealed.
Ian was *very* excited.

July 24, 2008 at 9:32 am #82629

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

And Jo was *quite* terrified by my reaction.

July 24, 2008 at 12:59 pm #82638

Phil

>Looking at the Paul Cornell interview we did for NTS

Say whaaaat?

July 24, 2008 at 7:05 pm #82652

TheLeen

Tried to talk Vin into watching some more Who tonight, but it looks like I have to wait for the weekend. :x

Thanks for the comments, advice, and bits of information :)

July 26, 2008 at 12:41 pm #82711

TheLeen

Episode 3×07 – 42

About the episode:
- It was a bit like the “Impossible Planet” two-parter, wasn’t it, but stripped of anything interesting?
- The TARDIS was messed up. I really worry now, it looks like it’ll come apart any minute (after all the abuse!)… Doctor had better get the duct tape ready…
- The ship was messed up. Who would put some pushbuttons on the outside of a spacecraft?
- The science was messed up.
- Apart from the happy primes. I admit I had to look those up, the happy numbers, because I couldn’t make any sense of what the Doctor said there, despite subtitles ,rewind and slow-mo – I just don’t have the mecessary English math slang handy. But anyway. Happy numbers, cool stuff.

About Martha:
- Martha kicks ass. But… Vin finds her boring. And he has a point. He thinks she’s too similar to Rose. Of course she is someone else. But for example in this particular episode, it could’ve been Rose doing all the running and scfreaming and it would’ve been the same episode, essentially. When I asked him what he had in mind for a companion, he said, someone from the middleages or the future or an alien or someone with a nasty secret of their own, just, different! (And I’d like to point out that he knows less about Who than I do, nothing about classic Who in fact, and hasn’t read Lawrence Miles’ rants either.)

About zombies:
- Sun zombies. That’s new!

- Series three arc: tightens and is actually interesting.

Overall impression:
- I’d expected worse. Come on, it was too constructed, below-average and apart from the phone calls mostly irrelevant, but not outright shit. If that’s the lowest point of series three, it’s still happytime.

July 26, 2008 at 12:57 pm #82712

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

You have no idea to the vast extent to which 42 *is* the low point of series 3. It’s all plain sailing now! Until… er, until series 4.

July 27, 2008 at 6:09 am #82736

Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc

>…someone from the middleages or the future…

I’m gonna delurk for a moment to say that I think this would be awesome if it ever happened. It happened a couple of times in the classic series, for instance. I might even start downloadin–WATCHING it again for that. Also, I think Classic Who featured an alien assistant for a while, a guy named Vislor Turlough. (Haven’t seen anything featuring him yet, however.)

July 27, 2008 at 10:10 am #82738

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

Classic Who featured plenty of non-human companions. Off the top of my head: Susan, K-9, Romana, Adric, Nyssa, Turlough, Kamelion… and Astrid. Then you’ve got humans that are miles out of their home era, such as Leela, Jamie, Vicky, Steven… and Jack.

July 27, 2008 at 10:41 am #82739

TheLeen

Leela the savage girl *g*

Episode 3×08 – Human Nature
Episode 3×09 – Family of Blood

Whilst I’m sitting here enjoying some almost-live Doctor Who music (the internet is a wonderful thing) (although being there would be so much better) I can just as well type up my and Vin’s impressions of series three’s way-into-the-series-two-parter. I’d been warned this would be good! And it was good!

The good:
- Nice setup. You didn’t even wonder whether it made sense at all because you (that means I) was occupied with loving the setup. Vin’s comment, a minute into the episode: “See? It was all a dream! I knew it!!”
- Oh look, it’s Paul Cornell, who I’d never heard of until two days ago.
- David Tennant can act.
- David Tennant knows how to make a sweet face.
- The way the scarecrows moved.
- Oh, with Harry Lloyd they did find themselves an actor there who can look quite, quite mad. (Loved the staring at first, but by the end it became a bit annoying to be honest.)
- Tom Sangster is one cute little bugger. Eh heh heh.
- The watch was nicely done. Even though it was just a prop and some sound effects, I could definitely feel the timelord. Very… dense… thing.
- Loved his journal.
- Loved the watch.
- Can’t decide wich I loved more.
- Epic ending, wasn’t it, with the Doctor punishing all four of them until the end of time. Not their fault he’d fallen in love. I’m scared now.

The bad:
- The episode should’ve ended with Doctor and Martha leaving. The memorial stuff, well, it was a sentimental ending which is fair enough, but there’d also already been John Smith seeing his possible life as a human, which was also sentimental, and Baines’ monologue about the Doctor locking them away, which was epic, and I thought it was a bit much in the end. Or maybe it’s also because I don’t feel comfortable with the poppy stuff. We don’t have veterans, remeberance days or every-day patriotism as such in Germany, except I suppose in the context of football. Anyway…
- Also, a bit of a waste of little Timmy there, they could’ve done so much more with that character, maybe in future episodes, and, well, hasn’t that been a bit ruined by the ending? Shame.

The miscellaneous:
- Very evil of the writer to make the Doctor very human (look, he’s actually up for grabs) for an episode or two (oh no, sorry, he isn’t after all). Very hard on the fangirls. I’m glad I’m a bit older than 14, or it’d broken my heart to see this.
- When the cliffhanger moment comes, I just say, like, “ooohhh grmmmmph cliffhanger, sorry honey, we’ll have to watch another episode right away.” I can do that. How do YOU cope? Having to wait a week for the resolution?

Martha:
- Poor Martha.

The zombies:
- Animated scarecrows, a classic.

The series three epic:
- There wasn’t anything in the episode, was there?

July 27, 2008 at 10:50 am #82740

Pete Part Three

>The series three epic:
>- There wasn?t anything in the episode, was there?

Um….

July 27, 2008 at 10:58 am #82741

TheLeen

I missed it??!!

July 27, 2008 at 12:51 pm #82747

Andrew

Don’t worry about it, Marleen – it’s not anything ‘missable’.

July 27, 2008 at 12:59 pm #82748

ChrisM

Trying not to spoil anything…

Watch on. All will become clear.
EDIT- Whoops Andrew beat me. (Now my post is superfluous.)

July 27, 2008 at 5:19 pm #82770

Jo TORDFC

You’ve got an awesome episode next – one of my favourites :o)
Can’t wait to see what you think!

July 28, 2008 at 8:54 pm #82848

Dave

Who would have thought all this vicarious whoing and froing would be so enjoyable?

August 1, 2008 at 7:23 pm #82959

TheLeen

Episode 3×10 – Blink

Well, that was fun, wasn’t it!

What we liked:
- The weeping angels
- The nerdy stuff (DVD easter eggs, shorthand, internet…)
- Well, the story was good, what with the transcript and all that.
- Billie
- Clever thing to include blinking… as the watcher automatically tries not to blink and realises how hard it is… it does raise the tension. Especially because when you’re scared, you really WANT to close your eyes.
- For an episode with not much of the Doctor in it, it really was quite good.

Other stuff we noticed:
- Ohhh, again folks that are nearly as old as the universe. Yawn. Why do they have to be?
- Okay, the angels are facing each other now so they’re rendered immobile. But forever? Apparently, all it takes is the light to go out and there you go… (or someone else to stand in the middle) (oh wait – like they did)
- Wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey… meh.
- Martha was rubbish in this. Oh, that sounds rude. Isn’t meant so rude. I just wish they’d given her something to do. Anything. At all.
- So the angels already had the key?… How?
- The very ending was OTT ;)

All in all…
- Yeah, like I said, for an episode with not much of the Doctor in it; but how this can be the majority of viewers’ FAVOURITE EPISODE OF ALL TIMES I don’t understand (Vin neither). Maybe I’m old-fashioned. But I do like my bit of Doctor in Who. I wouldn’t rank it at the very top. Top third, probably.
- I noticed that I’m, by now, having real trouble finding “the right spot” for episodes in my personal overall ranking. It’s very crowded up there. It becomes more difficult with each episode.

Next up: some titanic series finale. I’m looking forward to it!

August 2, 2008 at 8:27 am #82965

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

Well, it scared the bejesus out of a lot of viewers (me included) and had a seriously cute heroine, so that’s probably why it’s so popular. Also ‘Wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey’ kind of sums up the whole history of Doctor Who, so maybe you need to be a fan to appreciate that one.

August 2, 2008 at 10:28 am #82971

Zombie Jim Undead

“some titanic series finale”

*snigger*

August 2, 2008 at 12:42 pm #82976

TheLeen

Episode 3×11 – Utopia
Episode 3×12 – The Sound of the Drums
Episode 3×13 – Last of the Time Lords

Whoaaaa… !

We loved the following:
- Jack is back!
- Chantho was kinda cute.
- From “Utopia”, the Master business… (although I don’t see why his DNA-hiding-thingy had to be a fobwatch…)
- The Master, ooh he is quite, quite mad.
- Gallifrey scenes. Spectacular.
- You Are Not Alone
- I stopped the DVD right when Jack said he grew up in Boe-something and discussed this with Vin. When we continued with the DVD, it was given away right 10 seconds into it. Haha. Lovely. Face of Boe stuff, we loved.
- The Doctor and the Master, the whole forgiveness thing, the Doctor once again losing someone, ah, heartbreaking… well… in a good way. I’m selfish like that.
- Epicness!

And these things we also quite liked:
- Knew the Master would find a way to cheat. I thought he’d regenerate on the stake as soon as burnt up, but the ring’s fair enough, really. However, it MAKES one wonder why he used the obvious fobwatch in the first place.
- Darth Maul amongst the savages :p
- Turning the TARDIS into a paradox machine is better than no explanation, at least.
- The spheres from the future.
- The TARDIS trying to shake off Jack The Impossible. (But how come she didn’t mind him anymore later when the Doctor invited him to tag along?)
- “Master is our friend” Hahahaha. And later the Gandalf reference.
- So, the Doctor and the Master chose their nicknames. (Vin and I discussed that, too, and elaborated that we’re The Hamster and The Geek.)

Not so much maybe:
- The savages from “Utopia”.
- And the fact that they weren’t spoken of anymore during the second and third episode.
- The Doctor macgyvering the giant rocket in a matter of seconds.
- The Doctor becoming the glowing angelic saviour through the faith of every human. Hehe. Okay, I didn’t mind it THAT much.
- It seems that I’ve listened to “This is Gallifrey” too much on youtube; I kept recognising the music in the background, almost always NOT while Gallifrey was on screen, so this distracted me a bit.

Random stuff Vin noticed:
- UNIT, the American Torchwood… Vin thinks there might’ve been a mystery series called UNIT that wasn’t very good, I’ll have to check that out!

Overall impression:
- When I watched the first few episodes of Who I was so happy about all the relations between the episodes, all the references back to stuff we’d already seen. Now my head’s spinning from it. You do have to memorise everything ever said, don’t you, because it could well be slapped into your face at some point later in time. Lovely!
- It wasn’t as emotional as The Parting of the Ways (I still love The Ninth Doctor…) or even as the series two finale. But it sure was FUN TO WATCH. So I’d put it in my list, hm, somewhere pretty close to, but below, The Parting of the Ways. Vin says for him this was the best series finale so far. We loved it.
- I’m all doctored up now and I must say, I’m almost a little glad I will have a break now until November. I will most likely change my mind about that soon (probably tomorrow morning in front of the telly when we won’t have any Who to watch with our breakfast).

> ?some titanic series finale?

Yeah, lol.

August 2, 2008 at 1:02 pm #82977

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

- The savages from ?Utopia?.
- And the fact that they weren?t spoken of anymore during the second and third episode.

That’s a frequent criticism of this finale, and it’s perfectly valid *if* you’re unaware of the original context. Yes, this is a big three-parter, but when it was first aired it was billed as a one-part story about the Futurekind, followed by the traditional two-part finale. The realisation that we were watching one continuous story, and the gradual confirmation that Derek Jacobi was The Master, was an integral part of the viewing experience, and it made the entire thing absolutely brilliant. To quote a friend who was watching it with me, Seb and Cappsy: “we’ve been sold a dummy, and I’m entirely happy with the price negotiated”.

The Futurekind were one huge MacGuffin – just a means to an end. Watching it all in one go and expecting one long three-part story could bugger this up a bit, and I can see why you’d be disappointed.

UNIT, the American Torchwood

Interesting that you got that impression! Obviously, there’s a lot of backstory you’re not aware of, so it didn’t even occur to me that anyone would draw that conclusion from their brief appearances here.

August 2, 2008 at 1:15 pm #82978

TheLeen

> The Futurekind were one huge MacGuffin – just a means to an end. Watching it all in one go and expecting one long three-part story could bugger this up a bit, and I can see why you?d be disappointed.

That is brilliant! And I’m not disappointed as such, it’s okay really, under these circumstances I can completely accept them.

>> UNIT, the American Torchwood

> Interesting that you got that impression! Obviously, there?s a lot of backstory you?re not aware of, so it didn?t even occur to me that anyone would draw that conclusion from their brief appearances here.

Aha, so obviously we’re wrong.

August 2, 2008 at 5:44 pm #82982

TheLeen

Actually, thinking about it now, how did I know that the finale was the entire three parts? That bothers me now.
(This purity thing gets increasingly hard to keep up.)

November 22, 2008 at 3:04 pm #87046

TheLeen

Right! So! Series four arrived! And thanks to Amazon’s low price guarantee, I saved a total of 0,01 GBP, too. My sister commented: “Grats. Don’t spend it all at once!” And that will be very, very hard to do.

Anyway, seen the christmas special this morning, “Voyage of the Damned”. Is anyone here still interested in “Likes/Dislikes”, cause otherwise I’ll just say: I liked it; slightly better than the other christmas specials too… or, hm, the same as The Runaway Bride probably. But the Doctor should really stop womanising. This part really anbnoyed me. Kylie: “Can I come?” Doctor: “Sure!” Old man: “Can I come?” Doctor: “Uhm… nah. I travel alone.”

Anyway, good fun, and I’ll be watching a lot more Who during the next weeks!

November 22, 2008 at 3:32 pm #87047

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

As time goes on the more and more I detest Voyage of the Damned. It seems to include every excess of RTD’s writing to the point where the whole thing ends up as white noise.

I’m still interested in your massive lists, by the way!

November 22, 2008 at 4:05 pm #87048

Andrew

> I?m still interested in your massive lists, by the way!

Ditto and likewise!

I need to se VotD again. Haven’t seen it since broadcast, cos I like to save the specials, at least, for the arrival of the boxset. But as I’m a sucker for disaster movies, I imagine I’ll enjoy it just as much the second time around. Not the best cross-breeding of genres in Who, but good, knockabout fun for Christmas.

November 22, 2008 at 4:06 pm #87049

TheLeen

Okay then,

what we liked:

- the beginning of the episode, even though they cheated with the life belt ;)
- the future Titanic with its retro look
- the setting, with people on earth terrified of christmas, and the Queen staying in London
- and the Queen in her slippers.
- the christmas angels fit the other christmas specials well
- the earthonomicalist’s version of Christmas was FUNNY

What we didn’t like:

- the Sto people looking and behaving 100% human
- why didn’t the Doctor beam down to the TARDIS and pulled the Titanic out of the orbit?
- rather a lot of pathos that they really should have saved for the series finale
- the Doctor going, “Oh, no, I travel alone. … At least until a pretty girl asks me out, like, tomorrow.” As mentioned above.

Stuff:

- although she’s like 40, Kylie really passes for mid-end 20s. Scary.
- why oh why does the Doctor leave the TARDIS in places he’s guaranteed to lose her… and give his sonic screwdriver to other people? Will he never learn?

But still, I enjoyed it.

That’s all we can think of right now…

November 23, 2008 at 11:01 am #87060

TheLeen

Episode 4×01 – Partners in Crime

You know what I really like about Who? The sheer number of “what the fuck” moments. Even after three entire series, they still manage to wtf me.

What we liked

- Good beginning, in the cubicles.
- The scene with the Doctor and Martha lip-reading was hilarious.
- Donna was good. Really. Looking back, Martha was a bit of a bore. She was cute and everything, but Martha’s moaning is so much more entertaining.
- Share my body fat with aliens so that they can have babies while I get healthier? Yes please! I’d like to godmother two or three of the little buggers. And I’m sure most overweight people would. Why didn’t they just ask, then?
- Martha’s granddad was cute. I think old men in Who are always either supercute or supervillains.
- Hatbox

What we didn’t like

- Why did the Doctor bin the sonic pen? Could’ve given it to Donna, or even keep it as a spare so he wouldn’t have to lend his to random redshirts anymore…

OMFG Observation

- TEH ROSE! Series arc surely?

All in all

As far as episodes with little fat blobs go (i.e. not-so-serious, slightly ridiculous plots) – this was really really good.

November 23, 2008 at 11:29 am #87061

Seb Patrick

>Martha?s granddad

I think you mean Donna’s, but yeah :-) Did you spot that he was the newsvendor guy from Voyage of the Damned? Backstory : Bernard Cribbins (the actor who plays him) was only meant to be in that one episode, and originally series four was going to feature her Dad (who appeared in the Runaway Bride) as the stargazing fella. But sadly he was very ill with cancer and after filming a few scenes, he had to quit – unfortunately he died shortly afterwards. A happy (if you can call it that) side-effect was that they called in Cribbins (who was in one of the Peter Cushing Who movies back in the ’60s) and decided to make his character from VOTD Donna’s granddad. And he ended up being, by quite a significant distance, the best thing about series four.

(well, actually, not by that much of a distance, because Julian Bleach ended up giving him a run for his money. But still.)

November 23, 2008 at 11:39 am #87062

TheLeen

> think you mean Donna?s,

Oh, right, sorry.
Ahh! I think I even recognised him as the newsvendor and just didn’t think about it. Brilliant!

Although… sad bit of information at the same time.

November 23, 2008 at 12:12 pm #87063

Andrew

> The scene with the Doctor and Martha lip-reading was hilarious.

See? SEE?! It’s not just me!

(I mean I really don’t like the episode, but I loved this bit.)

November 23, 2008 at 12:55 pm #87064

TheLeen

> Martha

Donna! Donna! Donna! Argh.

November 23, 2008 at 1:06 pm #87065

Seb Patrick

>See? SEE?! It?s not just me!

I like that bit too, I’m just afraid of being shouted at.

November 23, 2008 at 4:07 pm #87067

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

ALL THREE OF YOU ARE CATEGORICALLY WRONG.

November 23, 2008 at 4:20 pm #87068

Pete Part Three

If Season 4 taught me anything, it’s that Catherine Tate is a good dramatic performer, but she’s still a weak comedy actress as she proved in Big Train, her shit-stain of a TV show and the “comic” bits such as the one above.

November 23, 2008 at 9:31 pm #87078

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

I agree with Pete, although I think she’s quite good in places in Big Train.

November 24, 2008 at 3:29 am #87082

performingmonkey

The bit where she says ‘fat-handed twat’. RTD should have tried to shoehorn that into series 4.

November 25, 2008 at 11:23 am #87092

TheLeen

Episode 4×02 – The Fires of Pompeii

This will be incomplete because we watched last night already, but here we go…

What we liked:

- Wheeee, colourful costumes!
- The modern family clich?s (were easy to please like that) and all the stuff with the house gods and everything
- Positions!
- Donna was okay
- Good wtf moment when the other guy said “Gallifrey”
Edit: and the Sybillines eyes-on-hands-thingie looked cool.

What we didn’t like:

- Maybe slightly too much modern language?
- Maybe Donna was bickering a little too much?
- Pyrovile, cheap name for a cheap monster.
- Some stuff was too obvious (house gods joke in the end, the Doctor blowing up Vesuv)
- Lazy plot resolution (in parts anyway; like, “oh by the way since the time’s up any minute now, there was a rift in time but it’s fixed now no more procognition thanks bye”)

What, uhm, puzzled us:

- The science seemed to be even more messed up than usual. Like… circuits carved out of marble. I’m pretty sure energy conversaion doesn’t work like that. Not even if the marble’s green. The slabs looked pretty though. I’d like one for me wall.
- I didn’t like how they tried to explain how the TARDIS translation feature works, because it rises even more questions, the answer to which is: this doesn’t actually work at all.
- I thought the TARDIS couldn’t be moved? How could the bloke sell it, then?

Didn’t think it was bad, just not excellent. Who has high pretty standards after all. I felt entertained :)

November 25, 2008 at 5:14 pm #87110

Ben Paddon

The TARDIS can and has been moved on a number of occasions. Case in point: “The End Of The World” and “Army of Ghosts”/”Doomsday”.

November 25, 2008 at 5:19 pm #87112

Seb Patrick

Yes, I think one of the characteristics of the TARDIS’ chameleon circuit is that it also takes on the physical characteristics of what it’s disguised as.

November 25, 2008 at 5:56 pm #87116

ChrisM

Yeah. I think the inside of the Tardis is essentially somewhere else, another dimension (hence the size disparity.) Although I suspect that’s an over simplification.

November 25, 2008 at 11:35 pm #87124

Dave

>Not even if the marble?s green.

This made me laugh. I like to laugh.

November 27, 2008 at 9:42 pm #87174

Andrew

Marleen! You missed Time Crash – the 8 minute ‘in-between’ episode on the first disc that fits…well, sort of after the last series and before Voyage of the Damned. More or less.

Anyway, I’m dying to know what you make of it!

November 27, 2008 at 10:40 pm #87178

TheLeen

Ooooh, there was a mini episode? Damn. I’ll look it up, thanks for the hint!

November 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm #87180

Seb Patrick

Yeah, you totally need to watch that.

Hey, you know what? It’s possible, just possible, that you’ll have caught up with us all by the time Christmas Day rolls around. At which point it’ll be time for these threads to retire! Shame, that, it’s been fun…

November 28, 2008 at 2:18 pm #87182

TheLeen

We can keep it up – after all I’m still very virgin when it comes to old Who and my perspective is still very German. Not to mention lack of BBC access…

November 29, 2008 at 1:20 pm #87188

TheLeen

4×03, Planet of the Ood

Good:

- Vincent liked the action and all the military stuff..
- It was entertaining.
- There were Ood.
- He sneezed his brains out. We actually both shouted “Gesundheit!”

Not so good:

- Good for Doctor, Donna that they were at the right time, right place. Now they’re be in the Oods’ song forever. What about the guy who actually did all the work and infiltrated the company for 10 years?
- Big brain swallowing the man looked stupid.
- Other man becoming Ood… didn’t see the point.
- They said the Ood lost their personalities and everything along with their stinky brains, yet when the big brain was free, it seemed they could just go back to being their normal Oody selves…
- There were some incredibly bad lines, especially in the second half.

Was ok.

November 29, 2008 at 1:34 pm #87189

TheLeen

Eps. 4 & 5, The Sontaran Stratagem & The Poison Sky

Good things:

- Good aliens. From the old series, yes? We liked them.
- We like Donna’s family. Not as much as Rose’s, but they’re still nice.
- Wunderkind’s supersect school for the gifted; and also himself (the character). Aww, tragic little geek.
- The blank clone
- Hey, side characters with names (like, Ross)! Liked them, too.
- I really like it when characters from earlier series appear (seemingly) randomly; makes everything seem more real.
- Donna was, again, good.

Bad things:

- When they actually fought, the Sontar weren’t as powerful as we thought they were going to be…
- Martha’s clone was annoying.
- Too many times an episode’s resolution involves the Doctor fusing two cables or pointing the sonic screwdriver at something.

Misc things:

- OMFG ROSE AGAIN! I am excited…
- UNIT. They were mentioned in an earlier series 4 episode already I think. Well, what are they then, the Men in Black of Whoniverse? Not so different from Torchwood Institute…

I thought it was definitely more fun to watch than the other “early series two parters”.

November 29, 2008 at 1:41 pm #87190

Andrew

> Good for Doctor, Donna that they were at the right time, right place. Now they?re be in the Oods? song forever. What about the guy who actually did all the work and infiltrated the company for 10 years?

I really like this ep – Pompeii and Ood are two of my all-time favourite non-Moffat/climax episodes – but watching it back this week I was horribly struck by how little the Doctor and Donna actually do in it. They really are just witnesses, and I didn’t notice at all on the first viewing.

> Good aliens. From the old series, yes?

Yep.

> UNIT. They were mentioned in an earlier series 4 episode already I think. Well, what are they then, the Men in Black of Whoniverse?

I keep saying this – that the show takes some vague audience understanding of UNIT for granted. This two-parter makes things clearer – even mentions the Doctor having worked for them – but I honestly think they needed a proper introduction. For the noobs.

December 2, 2008 at 1:12 am #87203

Jo TORDFC

Marleen, did you get round to watching ‘Time Crash’ yet?

December 2, 2008 at 8:41 am #87208

TheLeen

Nope, not yet!

December 2, 2008 at 11:57 am #87210

Seb Patrick

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4I76p1cZbq4

December 2, 2008 at 1:16 pm #87211

Tarka Dal

Yep. Clearly it was those few seconds that it would take to type ‘doctor who time crash’ into youtube that’s prevented her ;-)

December 2, 2008 at 4:29 pm #87214

Andrew

If only Marleen had access to some form of shiny round disc upon which could be stored the video content in question.

Curse you, sluggish development of technology! ;-)

December 2, 2008 at 5:33 pm #87216

TheLeen

Of course, of course. But it’s still nice to be prompted. I like some tlc as much as the next girl :)

December 3, 2008 at 11:13 am #87225

Tarka Dal

Curse the fact I watch wrestling. TLC in my head now defaults as tables, ladders and chairs. Of course I’ve known one or two girls who like that kind of thing.

December 3, 2008 at 2:19 pm #87229

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

TLC defaults as chasing waterfalls.

December 3, 2008 at 3:16 pm #87232

Danny Stephenson
G&T Admin

or indeed The Living Channel, the old satellite lifestyle channel.

December 3, 2008 at 3:45 pm #87233

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

Not to be confused with TCC, former home of Batman and Earthworm Jim in the same era.

December 3, 2008 at 4:36 pm #87234

Pete Part Three

Or RAC, the breakdown company.

December 3, 2008 at 5:07 pm #87235

TheLeen

Or WHO, the World Health Organisation…

December 3, 2008 at 6:13 pm #87236

Seb Patrick

Look, when there are 6 new posts in this thread, and the last one is by Marleen herself, I expect there to be UPDATES. Stop messing around, people.

December 3, 2008 at 6:26 pm #87237

Pete Part Three

[Shuffles feet]

Sorry, Seb.

December 3, 2008 at 6:27 pm #87238

Pete Part Three

I really mean that.

December 3, 2008 at 10:00 pm #87239

Tarka Dal

Yeah. I mean when you click on the ‘new dwarf’ comments it’s not like you find people having a completely off-topic discussion is it?

December 3, 2008 at 11:32 pm #87240

Jo TORDFC

*you’re* an off-topic discussion

December 3, 2008 at 11:38 pm #87241

TheLeen

http://www.gooogIe.co.uk/?gid=320600&hl=en&meta=o&q=you\\\’re%20an%20off-topic%20discussion

December 4, 2008 at 12:03 pm #87247

Tarka Dal

> *you?re* an off-topic discussion

No capital letter. No full stop.

December 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm #87249

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

> No capital letter. No full stop.

Shh everyone, Karl’s trying to make a point…

December 4, 2008 at 8:51 pm #87252

Tarka Dal

You don’t like me, do you?

December 5, 2008 at 2:17 am #87256

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

If I didn’t do you think I’d have let you do everything you did to my bottom the other week?

December 5, 2008 at 9:30 am #87260

Tarka Dal

After you with the “No comment” sir.

December 7, 2008 at 6:51 pm #87304

TheLeen

What’s wrong with youtube lately? It told me I was in the wrong country to watch Doctor Who. I nearly had to go and get the DVD!

Time Crash

- Hahaha, did he just say “desktop theme?”
- Hahaha, he just said “fan”.
- Hahaha, the high five!
- “You’re my Doctor.” Awwwwwww, how sweet is that.
- Actually I like nearly all of the dialogue. Like “Back to long ago!”
- Best mini episode so far. Made me laugh a lot.
- The only thing I didn’t like was the timeloop. Is that supposed to happen in Doctor Who’s universe? I know it was done before (Blink) but it still bothers me. Ah, but only a little. ;) Oh, the other only thing I didn’t like was the “timey wimey wibbly wobbly” line.

Concerning the old Doctors.

I know the first one is the old, black and white guy. And the 8th is the one that look fantastic in screenshots of an apparently rubbish film but he made up for it by being awesome in novels. And between those two are a number of guys with funny suits. And they’re all the same funny-suit-Doctor to me. And while, by now, I recognise a name as a Doctor’s actor’s one when I read it, I never know who’s who ;)

I’m reading “The Forgotten” right now, and it helps a bit, but it’s also cheating because maybe I really should watch some old Who instead to get a grip of who’s who.

This was my first on-screen encounter with a pre-9th Doctor (apart from that episode with the first Doctor I saw on youtube). I’m kind of glad these things are possible although former Doctors’ actors have (of course) grown older. The one in the special (the fifth one, with the cricket ball, as I know now ;)) looked a lot younger in the comic.

My best friend gave me a “best of Dalek” DVD for christmas though (we celebrated early cause we’re not going to see each other until next year). Looking forward to seeing what’s on it. But I already like it because it has a nice shimmering metal effect on the outside. I’m so easy to please. :)

December 7, 2008 at 9:21 pm #87306

Andrew

And so we open up the ‘What old Who should Marleen be watching once she’s done with series four?’ question.

ONE story per person, please, or we’ll blow her frightened German mind…

December 7, 2008 at 9:25 pm #87307

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

Genesis. Obviously.

December 7, 2008 at 9:33 pm #87308

Andrew

> Genesis. Obviously.

Gabriel or Collins?

December 7, 2008 at 10:15 pm #87309

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

Talons. Of. Weng. Chiang.

December 7, 2008 at 10:48 pm #87312

ChrisM

I probably haven’t seen enough old Who to give an informed answer but I did get ‘City of Death’ DVD with Tom Baker’s doctor from the library a few months back. I rather enjoyed it, and I understand it’s a fan favorite.

December 7, 2008 at 10:54 pm #87313

ChrisM

And while, by now, I recognise a name as a Doctor?s actor?s one when I read it, I never know who?s who ;)

Marleen, if you’d like to put name to face check out the top of the page:

http://www.gallifreyone.com/index2.php

December 7, 2008 at 11:11 pm #87314

Dave

The Curse Of Fenric

December 7, 2008 at 11:54 pm #87315

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Tomb of the Cybermen.

December 8, 2008 at 7:04 am #87316

Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc

Just one? Shit.

But since Tanya’s already suggested a good story with a great Doctor and assistant, I’ll chip in with “Carnival of Monsters” (if you can get it. Is it available?) It’s one of the shorter Third Doctor stories, and I recall it being rather fun to watch.

December 8, 2008 at 9:25 am #87317

TheLeen

O_O

December 8, 2008 at 9:36 am #87318

Seb Patrick

We should just do one for each Doctor, really.

December 8, 2008 at 10:05 am #87319

si

Personally, I really like Pyramids of Mars.

December 8, 2008 at 10:18 am #87320

TheLeen

Or someone could put up one poll for each Doctor. Actually, I’d like that.

December 8, 2008 at 1:05 pm #87323

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Ok, voting now begins for the First Doctor story that Marleen needs to see. My vote goes tis second ever story, The Daleks. Although if you watched the first, An Unearlthy Child, you’d see my grandma’s cousin! Have I mentioned that one enough?

December 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm #87324

Andrew

> Although if you watched the first, An Unearlthy Child, you?d see my grandma?s cousin! Have I mentioned that one enough?

Actually, I’ve not heard that one…

December 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm #87325

TheLeen

Oooooooh, shiny royal who ancestorage.

And yehh. If I’m going to see one iconic Who story from each Doctor’s era, I’d like to see them in chronological order.

December 8, 2008 at 2:07 pm #87326

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

> Actually, I?ve not heard that one?

http://uk.imdb.com/name/nm0153278/

She’s most famous for Sam, I think, but looking at that list she’s got some impressive credits on there!

December 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm #87327

Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc

Should there be a separate thread for all that? It’s just that this one’s getting a bit big.

December 8, 2008 at 9:08 pm #87344

Dave

>She?s most famous for Sam, I think, but looking at that list she?s got some impressive credits on there!

She was really good. She’s easily the most committed actor in both her Dr Who stories.

Hur: He told me his name…
Za: Name?
Hur: Yes. His name is “Friend.”

December 8, 2008 at 9:49 pm #87346

Phil

She can’t be that good if she hasn’t worked since 1976.

December 8, 2008 at 9:52 pm #87347

TheLeen

The Doctor’s Daughter

What I liked:

- Colourful aliens. Like a cross-breed of goldfish and parrots.

What I hated:

Since I can’t include THE ENTIRE SCRIPT, I’m going to give a few examples:

- All the dialogue, including the two attempts at comedy.
- Even the dialogue of the Hath, because the bubbling started to get on my nerves quickly.
- Martha was awful in this episode.
- Donna was… not particularly good in this episode.
- Hated everything about Jenny, despite her cute looks.
- THE DOCTOR was awful in this episode. But let’s start at the beginning…
- So. From the title, I was expecting a certain degree of epicness, and what I got was… the opposite.
- The Doctor’s daughter is not his daughter, but his clone.
- And she was cloned complete with clothes on and a dramatic eyeliner applied. Clearly the eyeliner is vital in battle.
- Jenny for generated? Why not Annie for anomaly?
- She also was cloned with leet war skillz and nothing else. Oh wait, except for leet knowledge abotu how to seduce a teenage soldier, as well as a concept of heterosexual relationship. In a society that breeds exclusively by cloning. Good job.
- Is General Cobb supposed to be a settler, or a clone? Because he is, quite clearly, at least in his fifties, but doesn’t remember the week before last.
- Jenny aka Little Miss Obvious: “Close the door.” “They’re coming.” et cetera…
- She may be cute and she may be of more royal Who ancestorage than Cappsy, but she can’t act. Sorry.
- Jenny hopping through the lasers: Blaaaaaaaaaaah. Seen this executed 300 times better. In a Britney Spears video.
- Martha’s Hath being Little Mister Obvious by jumping into a pool of wet quicksand like the redshirt he is in order to provide some emotional drama. It doesn’t work.
- Donna works out the numbers. Weeee! Question: they keep seeing numbers that are mostly the same. How does that mean that it is dates? Another question: they see a number that is digital. How does that mean that it is TODAY’s date?
- The creation myth & the terraforming device: not original.
- The typical golden glitter: not original.
- Everyone admiring the golden glitter and suddenly being friends: what the fuck? They’re easier to distract than me!
- Cobb trying to shoot the Doctor: yawn.
- Jenny stepping in front of him: yawn.
- Dramatical dying scene: yawn.
- Martha knowing all about the state Jenny’s in, with Jenny being Gallifreyan with two hearts, no blood anywhere (not even a hole in the shirt), no knowledge of whether a heart or the lung was hit… rubbish.
- And there’s still room for the low point of the episode. Martha: “She didn’t regenerate. She’s like you, but not enough.” Doctor: “She’s too much like me!” ehhhhhhh… what?
- Jenny waking up from the dead because of terraforming: yeah, like that makes sense. And: the peak of unoriginalness.
- An opportunity wasted to do something good with the Doctor, the family he lost, and a rampant teenage daughter (something that I actually think wouldn’t have had to be shit) = shit.

It’s shit. Really. It’s worse than Daleks in Manhattan. I hated every minute of it. In other news, I have PMS. I wanted to be fair, so I watched it a second time and tried to find things that I don’t hate. But it’s still shit.

I apologise to everyone who enjoyed this episode for the harsh words.

December 8, 2008 at 10:20 pm #87350

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Marleen, you are both entirely correct and awesome.

December 9, 2008 at 8:40 am #87351

Pete Part Three

Indeed. What a piece of poo that was.

December 9, 2008 at 9:06 am #87352

Ian Symes
G&T Admin

You should do all your reviews with PMS.

December 9, 2008 at 10:40 am #87353

Tanya Jones
G&T Admin

>Jenny for generated? Why not Annie for anomaly?

Heh! No, this ep didn’t live up to the hype at all…

December 9, 2008 at 11:24 am #87356

TheLeen

Ah. The next morning, I’m still aggravated. The more I think about it, the more things I remember that I hate.

I rather liked “The Unicorn and the Wasp”, but that’s probably because it came directly after “The Doctor’s Daughter”.

As for Jenny – I really, REALLY hope that she re-appears at some later point, preferable while Doctor 10 is still in effect, and some capable writer makes her BE COOL. It would make things right and justify this shitty episode. Just as I really, REALLY hope that Queen Elizabeth I will be in one of next year’s specials. Because I don’t like loose ends. Actually, I do like loose ends, because you can get back to them later and tie them up and then I get continuity orgasms. So. They’d better address this.

Okay, next one then:

The Unicorn and the Wasp

A mediocre episode that is forgiven its shitty components because it is actually fun to watch.

What we liked:

- Whodunit with Agatha Christie, generally a good idea for an episode.
- With a lot of lovely crime clich?s.
- Good guest actors.
- Nice costumes. I like costume episodes.
- The wasp with the pipe in the library. Brilliant.

What else was on our mind afterwards:

- The Unicorn was in the title purely for reasons of making the title sound nice. Not much unicorn in the episode at all.
- The POINT of whodunit type crime stories is that in the end, the reader (or viewer) could’ve worked out the solution themselves if they’d been as clever as the detective. That wasn’t the case for this episode. The first 30 minutes were really decent. Then the solution involved a shape-shifting alien, a magical heart pendant, sleeping super abilities, and a rite of telepathically imprinting a paradigm onto a newborn wasp. There is no way we could’ve worked THAT out. In other words:
- Fun build-up, lame-ass plot solution.

Still 1948395725 times more fun than “The Doctor’s Daughter”.

December 9, 2008 at 11:56 am #87357

Andrew

I can’t do a big defence of TDD, because it simply isn’t a good enough episode to be worth the effort, but I found it had redeeming qualities that, for me, at least put it about The Lazarus Experiment.

Georgia Moffett – well, I thought she could act. That’s all. I also like how not-like-Rose she was, given that it would have been easy to just do a re-run of Rose’s Daddy issues.

I did like some of the comedy.

I’m very keen indeed on the questioning of the Doctor as a claimed pacifist as well as a defeater of monsters and bad people. Questions worth asking, especially when series four has been a little less Doctor-centric in its storytelling, and asked pretty well here.

Oh, and I like the sets.

Interesting to see that TheLeen had NONE of the problems understanding the ending that plagued forums and message boards immediately after broadcast. While a large number of people were bewildered by whether her revival was some kind of regeneration, Marleen – and old-school geek and Trek fan – went straight to ‘terraform revival’ with no hesitation. The rest of us got there, but the similarity of effect choice, and the lack of exposition, got in the way of the story for many.

> The POINT of whodunit type crime stories is that in the end, the reader (or viewer) could?ve worked out the solution themselves

One thing I adore about TUATW is that, when interviewed, only one character is shown to be telling a story consistent with their flashback. And, because of that – in retrospect, anyway – they can be the only one who is concealing something, the flashback being a fabrication based on their statement rather than a truth concealed BY their statement. I love the writing of that.

December 9, 2008 at 12:32 pm #87358

TheLeen

> One thing I adore about TUATW is that, when interviewed, only one character is
> shown to be telling a story consistent with their flashback. And, because of that
> – in retrospect, anyway – they can be the only one who is concealing something,
> the flashback being a fabrication based on their statement rather than a truth
> concealed BY their statement. I love the writing of that.

Good point. We were suspecting him of being up to no good, now I know why.

(Here’s what we’d thought – a giant shape-shifting wasp broke into the church and replaced the reverend.)

As for The Doctor’s Daughter…

Here’s what we’d thought – two groups of unaware contestants in some sort of maze; the numbers probably reminded me of The Cube or something.

And Georgia Moffett: well, she wasn’t hideous. And I really only noticed it during the second viewing. But I was under the impression that she put not enough excitement into her voice (all her sentences seemed to end in a full stop, not exclamation mark – even when on the run) while she put TOO MUCH excitement into her face (wide-eyed over-excited open-mouthed grin-wise). Okay, the over-the-top excitement kind of suited the role. But her delivery of sentences didn’t suit THAT. And the discrepancy just felt very awkward to me. The rest of her acting was okay.

That’s why up there I typed “Close the door.” instead of “Close the door!!!” …

December 9, 2008 at 12:57 pm #87360

performingmonkey

She’s fit and blond so it doesn’t matter.

December 9, 2008 at 1:34 pm #87361

Andrew

> put it about The Lazarus Experiment.

I meant ‘above’, obviously.

> Here?s what we?d thought – two groups of unaware contestants in some sort of maze;

I went through a similar process. The cloning booths seemed like a ‘new life’ or ‘extra men’ part of a videogame.

> She?s fit and blond so it doesn?t matter.

It was talk like this that led to Martha’s slow descent into tedium being ignored – everyone was too busy staring at her arse to notice. :-)

December 9, 2008 at 2:36 pm #87362

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

> put it about The Lazarus Experiment.

I’m sorry, but I just don’t get the Lazarus hate. I watched the episode again the other week and I think I liked it even more. Where’s the equivalent pair of superb performances of Mark Gatiss and Thelma Barlow in TDD? Where’s the nice interweaving of the main series arc in TDD? Where’s the big, satisfying finale in TDD?

> everyone was too busy staring at her arse to notice. :-)

Also, I think her good work of series 3 counts in her favour a great deal.

December 9, 2008 at 3:03 pm #87363

Andrew

> I?m sorry, but I just don?t get the Lazarus hate.

I agree on the performances, but not the interweaving’s pretty basic and the finale far from satisfying. For me. The predictable story and primitive characterisation – and the fact the overly-linear story essentially climaxes half way then carries interminably on – really dumps it to the bottom.

> Also, I think her good work of series 3 counts in her favour a great deal.

I just rewatched the series three finale and I was struck by how little I liked her performance. As the crush thing wore off, there seemed to be less and less to the character, and her performance seemed more and one-note. Looking back I’m not sure her she actually had the ability – though I may be jaded by mediocre turns in both Who and Torchwood since.

December 14, 2008 at 1:35 pm #87459

TheLeen

Silence in The Library & Forest of the Dead

That’s more like it.

We loved:

- The first sentence: “Close your eyes and tell me what you see.” Best opening line ever.
- The last sentence: “Sweet dreams.” Good closing, too.
- Cute little girl with some amazing acting skills.
- Doctor Moon. Doctormoon. Good stuff.
- Donna & Lee. Awwwwwwwwww.
- River Song was a kind of awesome that scares me a little.
- Ghosting. Awesome.
- space suit skeleton zombies.
- Most of the dialogue, except when the Doctor took so long to work out that the woman knows him from his future.

There were however things (that I mainly noticed during the second viewing) that didn’t, well, that weren’t quite satisfactory. :x Here we go:

We wondered:

- I’d actually wondered how the Doctor’s past, present and future work – surely he must’ve bumped into future friends before…
- Yeah, books are made from wood. But you know what else is made from wood? Wood! Like the door that the Doctor said was made out of it. Or everything else in the library ;)
- The Doctor and CAL saved the expedition’s minds to the hard drive. Bless them. And now exactly why can’t CAL beam them down again now?
- Once more, death has been untimately defeated by science (see also: The Doctor’s Daughter and “How to become immortal by means of breahting in terraforming gases”)
- Soooo, the Doctor would never give anyone the Sonic Screwdriver; this would have been a good idea for the plot if it was actually the case. As it is, teh Doctor likes to hand his Screwdriver to average Joe, drop it off telegraph masts and so on; so far, he hasn’t been acting very protective of it, or at least that’s my impression.
- How did they know the Doctor couldn’t have survived the brain thing she did in the end?
- CAL is Mr Lux’ grandfather’s youngest daughter. That makes her Mr Lux’ aunt. The library has been closed for several generations. How can there be three generations between Mr Lux and his aunt, however little?
- How can the library have the kind of reputation needed to be THE Library (and something the Doctor knows) when it’s been available for the public so briefly? Opened up, quarantined for 100 years, Doctor appears, quarantined forever after…
- The Vashta Nerada had nothing to eat! Never had a taste of flesh from the day they hatched until the expedition came along!

Despite all this, I still think it’s two of the best episodes ever. Like I said earlier – if an episode is fun to watch, you don’t really care (and don’t want to care) about such things as minor inconsistencies…

Now, Mr Moffat. He’s created some damn fine episode scripts there. But I can’t really imagine an entire series’ worth of such episodes. You can’t keep up that level of personal drama for 13 episodes. And also, he can’t keep writing bigger, better love interests for the Doctor. :P

Will we see more of River Song, or Lee McAvoy in the future? Probably not. And that sucks. They’ll probably go the way of Elizabeth I and Jenny. River seems to have known him either with this face (which means he would have to meet her and go through a LOT of stuff with her during his current incarnation, which, as we sadly know through meta-knowledge, isn’t going to happen) or with a number of different faces (without really knowing their sort order, thus the diary check) and the Doctor has only three lives left (as far as we know right now). The latter is more likely, so the writers would have more time than for example, making Elizabeth’s scene in The Shakespeare Code make sense. You see the problem? The problem is that I CAN’T STOP THINKING ABOUT THESE THINGS.

December 14, 2008 at 6:45 pm #87467

Tarka Dal

> Now, Mr Moffat. He?s created some damn fine episode scripts there. But I can?t really imagine an entire series? worth of such episodes. You can?t keep up that level of personal drama for 13 episodes. And also, he can?t keep writing bigger, better love interests for the Doctor. :P

No. No. No.

It’s odd. I’m not the world’s most passionate guy and yet query, dispute or dismiss any Moffat Who and I just want to scream “YOU’RE WRONG! YOU’RE WRONG!”

I actually expect there to be a drop in viewing figures during Moffat’s run and yet I couldn’t care. I’m probably setting myself up for a huge fall, but I just refuse to consider Moffat’s Who as being anything less than my favourite Who of all-time.

I’ve grown over the four new series to have a huge amount of appreciation for what RTD achieved, and yet still if I had to set down and pick my Top 5 New Who stories I know 4 of them would be the Moffat written ones, very possibly in the Top 4 slots.

December 14, 2008 at 8:10 pm #87473

Phil

>I?m not the world?s most passionate guy

Lola. Lo-lo-lo-lo Lola. Lo-lo-lo lo Lolaahhhhh…

December 15, 2008 at 12:22 pm #87480

Tarka Dal

Played for and got :)

December 15, 2008 at 3:24 pm #87481

performingmonkey

Jekyll suggests that Moffat-run Who being consistently great is far from definite. Also, with the pressure of running the series how likely is it that he can come up with something as good as TGITFP, Blink etc. ? OK RTD managed to throw in some real crackers of his own, but it was mainly his finales and opening eps, not to mention the Christmas eps, that held his concentration.

December 15, 2008 at 4:34 pm #87482

Tarka Dal

No. No. No. You’re Wrong. You’re Wrong. You’RE WRONG! Jekyll was consistently brilliant. Even the finale. (Well I did warn you)

Seriously though, I thought Jekyll was the best bit of TV from last year aside from Moffat Who. Similarly Coupling, Joking Apart and Press Gang were all amongst my favourite shows at the time they aired – even though I was a bit too young for the last two at the time.

Fair enough not everything he’s done has been head and shoulders above everyone else. I never really took to Chalk, and I remember that getting terribly reviews, but in terms of Who… Come on! I’ve just never seen a chink in his armour.

‘Blink’ was a revelation for a bottle episode. Picasso on a postage stamp. A spellbinding piece of TV that through up a character we were all begging to have sex with/see as a new companion (delete as applicable) and iconic original monsters.

‘Empty Child/Doctor Dances’ gave us Captain Jack and monsters that truly hit bang on the old ‘hide behind your sofa’ cliche despite the fact it was just a small child repeating four simple words. Probably the first time New Who truly hit it’s stide.

‘Girl in the Fireplace’ – The second best 45 minutes of television ever.

I actually went into series four with nerves that he couldn’t possibly do it again. After watching ‘Silence in the Library’ my first thought was well it was an A just not an A+. A week later after watching Part 2 with Ian I had tears in my eyes, and a cheshire cat’s grin feeling like I had just been through some quasi-relgious-tantric experiment. It felt like someone had been playing Rubik’s cube with my brain for a week and as the credits rolled click everything into place.

If Moffat was going to do bad Who, It would have happened by now. Either in his episodes or in the magazine. I genuinely don’t believe the size of the task will have any relevance.

With regards to Xmas eps, finales and openers I guess it open’s up another debate about what constitutes a good series. I’m assuming Moffat’s run will follow a similar pattern to RTD in that he will personally craft these. I was pretty underwhelmed by both Series 2 and 4 apart from the Moffat eps and the finales. Series 3 wasn’t going well either until Moffat, The Cornell 2-parter and Utopia although Smith & Jones was a cracking opener.

Edit: I’ve removed the next 98 paragraphs of Moffat based verbal masterbation. Although I did conclude that only Neil Gaiman was in comparable. Ye gods I hope the rumour of him writing an episode at some point comes to fruition too.

December 15, 2008 at 4:52 pm #87483

TheLeen

> If Moffat was going to do bad Who, It would have happened by now. Either in his episodes or in the magazine. I genuinely don?t believe the size of the task will have any relevance.

You got me wrong there – I think all of his episodes are brilliant, including Time Crash. I love the dialogue he writes. He manages to write lyrical stuff into all-day dialogue without making it sound corny and pretentious, just beautiful. His episodes are poetry.

I just thought – right now, his episodes have been (among) the highlights of every series. What is a series going to be like consisting of highlights? Would or wouldn’t it be TOO AWESOME? Like eating candy all day?

(I know he isn’t going to write every episode himself. But with luck, more of them than he has so far.)

What makes his episodes be awesome? The good (and very creative) storylines and the perfect texts.

What makes his episodes emotional rollercoaster rides? Increased creepiness, increased drama and increased Doctor lovelife.

I think series 6 of Who can do with each and every episode having good storylines and perfect dialogues, but not too many having a) and b) (there should still be room for highlights) and christ, please no more than one episode per series with c).

I think Steven Moffat is a genius. But RTD Who is already pretty extreme in its colourfulness (lacking a better term) as it is, and I don’t want to end up lost in lollipop land. I really don’t know how else to explain it.

December 15, 2008 at 8:12 pm #87487

John Hoare
G&T Admin

My main issue with the library two-parter is that whilst it’s absolutely amazing, and some of the best New Who so far, there’s too many repeated themes from Moffat’s earlier Who stories in there. But I doubt that’ll be a problem when he takes over as showrunner.

Oh, and I’m just watching a repeat of The Sontaran Stratagem, and the bit where Donna says she’s going home to the Doctor makes me fucking head want to fall off. It’s excruciating. I grew to like Tate well enough in the role eventually, but whenever she did the full-on Tate-isms, which happened far more often in the first half of the season, it makes it impossible to.

I’d come to the conclusion that it was just the first episode which had put me off her… but rewatching the series, I don’t think that’s the case any more.

December 15, 2008 at 8:24 pm #87488

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Plus, she actually had flashbacks to the three episodes previous as if she’d been gone for years, when clearly she fucking hadn’t.

December 15, 2008 at 8:41 pm #87489

ChrisM

>Seriously though, I thought Jekyll was the best bit of TV from last year aside from Moffat Who.

Jekyll was very good. I didn’t like the explanation of how this present day version of Jekyll/Hyde came about, (even taking into account that the other explanations I can think of would have been rather cliche) but the rest, including the very end, great.

December 15, 2008 at 8:42 pm #87491

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Jekyll was awesome until the last episode came along like a big lumbering ball of crazy messiness.

December 15, 2008 at 8:49 pm #87495

Andrew

> there?s too many repeated themes from Moffat?s earlier Who stories in there.

Someone will correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t most of the Moffat stories all pitched for series one? (Aside from Blink, right?) So a certain tonal similarity isn’t surprising. Plus, no doubt, there’s a priority of ‘stuff that works for RTD’s Who’. You pitch things appropriate to the showrunner’s vision.

Moffat’s interest in ‘the Doctor on TV’, ‘familiar, transformed human monsters with catchphrases’ and ‘time conundrum love’ all gel well with the RTD format – where dreaming of travel in the TARDIS, iconic imagery and emotional whack are key aspects.

So, ditto – I doubt it’ll be a problem with a team of writers and a different set of creative and production priorities.

> Tate-isms

My problem with stuff that’s basically organic to the performer is that you can apply this negative-sounding term to any actor. “Cleese-isms’, ‘Tennant-isms’, ‘O’Dowd-isms’…

In Tate’s case these things simply, and sadly, become familiar in one context first – the sketch show. I guess I was lucky in as much as I didn’t over-expose myself to that show, so Tate’s mannerisms mostly feel like part of Donna.

I mean, I dislike the structure and substance of the sequence you’re talking about (too early to work as the mislead, too early for the flashbacks, and too drawn out to stay funny), but the performances give me no concern at all.

December 15, 2008 at 9:02 pm #87502

TheLeen

> In Tate?s case these things simply, and sadly, become familiar in one context first – the sketch show. I guess I was lucky in as much as I didn?t over-expose myself to that show, so Tate?s mannerisms mostly feel like part of Donna.

Yep.

December 15, 2008 at 9:04 pm #87506

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Someone will correct me if I?m wrong, but weren?t most of the Moffat stories all pitched for series one? (Aside from Blink, right?) So a certain tonal similarity isn?t surprising. Plus, no doubt, there?s a priority of ?stuff that works for RTD?s Who?. You pitch things appropriate to the showrunner?s vision.

Moffat?s interest in ?the Doctor on TV?, ?familiar, transformed human monsters with catchphrases? and ?time conundrum love? all gel well with the RTD format – where dreaming of travel in the TARDIS, iconic imagery and emotional whack are key aspects.

This is true. And one person’s repetitiveness is another person’s coherence of tone. I think it sails *slightly* too close to repetition in that final two-parter (but *only* in that final two-parter). But that’s subjective, and it doesn’t stop it being an amazing couple of episodes.

So, ditto – I doubt it?ll be a problem with a team of writers and a different set of creative and production priorities.

Yeah, I’m not worried at all in this regard. I think we can safely say that we’ll get more episodes where the time travel actually plays a part in the plot, rather than just being a means to get the story started, though. Hopefully it won’t be used too much.

> Tate-isms

My problem with stuff that?s basically organic to the performer is that you can apply this negative-sounding term to any actor. ?Cleese-isms?, ?Tennant-isms?, ?O?Dowd-isms??

I didn’t actually mean the term negatively in its own right at all – I’m just using it as a short hand, because I couldn’t think of another way to describe it. I’d happily use the phrase in a positive sense with another person.

In Tate?s case these things simply, and sadly, become familiar in one context first – the sketch show. I guess I was lucky in as much as I didn?t over-expose myself to that show, so Tate?s mannerisms mostly feel like part of Donna.

I mean, I dislike the structure and substance of the sequence you?re talking about (too early to work as the mislead, too early for the flashbacks, and too drawn out to stay funny), but the performances give me no concern at all.

I think to be honest, it’s just that I don’t like them at all – I’ve not seen much of the sketch show either (although I’ve seen enough to know I intensely dislike it, admittedly). If they worked for me in Who, I’d have no trouble adapting. But they just drive me up the wall, in whatever context. I mean, I do see them as part of Donna as well – it never feels out of character – just a part of Donna that drives me up the bloody wall!

It’s a shame they annoy me so much, really – because I’ve really come round to the idea that Martha is a pretty nothing character, and Donna is far more interesting. But just when I relax into her, she does something that really bloody irritates me! As I recall, it calms down in the second half of the series, though.

December 15, 2008 at 9:44 pm #87511

Dave

>?Cleese-isms?, ?Tennant-isms?, ?O?Dowd-isms??

O’Dowd is the new Doctor

December 15, 2008 at 9:59 pm #87513

TheLeen

What’s he gonna say then, “many planets have an Ireland”?

December 15, 2008 at 10:31 pm #87522

Dave

>What?s he gonna say then, ?many planets have an Ireland??

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6inFgxjpU

December 15, 2008 at 10:46 pm #87524

TheLeen

Oh, RIGHT. I forgot about that! Haha, fantastic.

December 16, 2008 at 1:37 pm #87545

Tarka Dal

> Jekyll was awesome until the last episode came along like a big lumbering ball of crazy messiness.

YOU’RE WRONG! (Repeat to fade)

December 16, 2008 at 8:10 pm #87577

TheLeen

Midnight

Uhm. That was special.

It was good telly. An enjoyable 40-something minutes.

But it’s not what I want to see when I pop a Doctor Who DVD in the player.

Same with “Blink” back then, really. It was great. But I’d never rank it as #1 bestest episode of Doctor Who. Because it is something else.

We were a bit annoyed that there was no real solution to the plot. Like, who or what that creature was and what it wanted. It was such an interesting alien… we would’ve liked to know.

Turn Left

That one was surprisingly good for an episode without the Doctor in it. I really liked it. It was very tense, the bug and its clicky noises were creepy enough, and Donna was great.

Then again, we’ve had that “What if everything was shit and only a handful people know” story last series already…

Why is Rose talking like she just got an anesthetic injection in her face?
Also, I’d been looking forward to seeing her again, but now she seems like an entirely different person than back in series two.

Bad Wolf. Lovely.

Cloister Bell. Something that I should know about, but don’t. I only know Cloister the Stupid :(

Had to keep these two short, because I’m off to watch the grande finale. :D

December 16, 2008 at 11:00 pm #87581

TheLeen

Well, what a letdown that was.

December 16, 2008 at 11:02 pm #87583

Andrew

Oh this is going to be interesting…

December 16, 2008 at 11:25 pm #87585

TheLeen

Shall I keep this one for next time I have PMS? :P

Nah, I’ll type it all when I have the time… although the two episodes were bloody long, so in order to remember all of the stuff I disapprove of, I’d have to watch them again, like in the olden days, with pencil and paper ready.

To cut it short for now: too much of everything.

December 17, 2008 at 1:11 am #87590

Jonathan Capps
G&T Admin

Quite how you could like the terrible Turn Left and have big problems with the finale is baffling to me!

December 17, 2008 at 1:21 am #87592

Andrew

> Quite how you could like the terrible Turn Left and have big problems with the finale is baffling to me!

THIS!!!!!!!!!

December 17, 2008 at 7:51 am #87602

Pete Part Three

>THIS!!!!!!!!!

THIS!!!!!!!!!

And Midnight is awesome.

December 17, 2008 at 10:26 am #87603

Dave

It looks like Marleen’s fallen out of love, maybe it’ll take another thread to remind her what she liked about Doctor Who in the first place.

December 17, 2008 at 2:24 pm #87614

ChrisM

The finale is good.

But, I can see how many would dislike it. Particularly considering THAT scene. Oh dear.

December 17, 2008 at 2:41 pm #87615

Seb Patrick

I thought it was the best of the finales so far. It was stupid, over-the-top, messy, confusing, badly-explained, schmaltzy and overlong. But gloriously so!

Also Davros.

Also Cribbins.

December 17, 2008 at 3:02 pm #87616

John Hoare
G&T Admin

I loved most of the finale.

But the more I think about it, the more the whole two Doctor thing – and Rose going off with the second Doctor – can fuck right the fuck off.

December 17, 2008 at 3:07 pm #87617

TheLeen

> It looks like Marleen?s fallen out of love,

Nooooooo. No no no no no.

> I thought it was the best of the finales so far.

I thought the finales have gotten gradually worse… (I can’t remember whether I preferred the 2nd or 3rd at the time – but still)

> It was stupid, over-the-top,
> messy, confusing, badly-explained, schmaltzy and overlong.

And I thought I had to write a summary… :P

> But gloriously so!

Really? :(

Ah well – I don’t want to discuss this based solely on my bad mood ;) I have a little much to do at work right now, so it may have to wait until Saturday…

December 17, 2008 at 4:41 pm #87625

TheLeen

I figured I’d rather get this over with and do over time!

Ah, where to start. Like I said, it was bloody long (which is not necessarily a bad thing – on the contrary, actually) and my memory is kind of blurry already.

What I liked:

- Donna at her best. I loved Catherine Tate in this, especially in the end when she did the “Ha!” and the “Oh yes!” – and now I’m a bit sad that she’s gone for good. (but I hope they stick with it, this time.) What the Doctor said to Donna’s mum at the end was good, too.
- German Daleckery
- Harriet Jones.
- Jackie and Mickey. (Slightly underused, sadly)
- I was actually pleased to see Sarah Jane. (Although she was in no way crucial to the story. But then, who was?)
- The idea of the stars going out.
- Davros was kind of cool.
- How Rose wasn’t part of the WebEx – at least it came as a surprise.
- The Shadow Proclamation.
- List probaly incomplete.

What I didn’t like:

- Rose. She didn’t act or sound any like I remember her. And: she hardly DID anything. After all the dimension-hopping, TARDIS-milking, future-foretelling and kicking-arse-ness (which was never explained!) – she fucking doesn’t do anything in this episode but provide a level of emotional drama for the Doctor. Which (at least as far as I am concerned) didn’t work. It should have worked.
- K9. I feel evil mentioning it. But I think in an epic, mature, desperation-based series finale, he has no place. unlike one of those early-series two-parters, which would have been perfect for him.
- The idea of a 27-planets-doomsday machine. (Granted – it LOOKED pretty. But I didn’t like the idea.)
- The “cliffhanger” at the end of The Stolen Earth. No, actually, that’s not true. It was a good cliffhanger. But the way it was shrugged off at the beginning of Journey’s End, in this “no big deal, let’s move on” way, I didn’t like. Cheating…
- How the TARDIS pulled Earth back.
- It’s new, it’s a first, it’s never been there; but the Doctors know just about enough about how fast he’s going to age to tell Rose everything about it on a beach. (By the way – how did they get home from there? Call a cab? ;))
- The Doctor II exiled for genocide? Riiiight… look who’s talking… anyway: very unconvincing reason for dropping him off in a parallel world.
- List probably incomplete.

Things I feel I should have known beforehand

- Still don’t know what the Cloister Bell is.
- Should Osterhagen mean anything to me? Or was it made up for the episode?
- Davros
- ALL of the bloody spin-offs. Mr Smith?

What I learned:

- The Doctor should always keep a spare hand, because then he won’t have to regenerate his 13 lives away. (see also: series four’s 101 new ways to immortality)
- Germans always keep their technology in Castle Wolfenstein. (see also: Indiana Jones)

Random observations:

- I really should’ve watched all those spin-offs.
- I really don’t know why they never cast Germans for German roles. The German lady’s German sounded… well, not horrible, but very noticeably foreign.
- Rose’s story is told and over; Donna’s gone for good; Martha is still an insufferable bore (There were sweet sides to Martha in series three, why didn’t they show any of that in sereis four?). At least we’ll be getting a fresh new start.
- Jack Harkness always comes back from the dead with ihs clothes intact. That doesn’t make sense, and it should be changed. (Cheating! *g*)
- How can Donna go back to a normal life when she’s been absent for what must have been months? Surely they would’ve had to make up a coma or something to explain it? Because her mates would ask her about it? For example that night, on the phone?
- And they may never mention the Doctor, not a single word about him, because her head will explode, but he can go out there and talk to her in the kitchen ;) handy.
- The Doctor Donna thing – I just want to say that I didn’t mind it. Didn’t especially love it, but it worked for me. Unlike much of the rest.

Actually, scrap that. This “Like/Dislike” thing doesn’t work for the finale.

There were a lot of tiny little things that only irritated me on the whole. I didn’t HATE the episode, like I hated, let’s say, The Doctor’s Daughter. But it was… it just didn’t leave me with a good feeling. I wasn’t scared, I didn’t cry, it didn’t touch me. Why?

I think part of the reason WHY it didn’t touch me was the WAY over the top setting.
- In series one, boom, Dalek invasion, scary; Rose becoming omnipotent, epic; the (not sexual) kiss in the end, touching.
- Series two, boom, Cybermen invasion, fair enough; Dimension Jumping and all that, okay; goodbye scene, very sad.
- Series three, the Master enslaves Earth – that should have been scary, but the “one year of slavery” thing was already too much for me to… tune in properly. Doctor aging quickly… nothing I ever wanted to see. Touching end – maybe, but I don’t remember it at all.
- Series four, Daleks again (sigh); this time, it’s not Earth that is threatened, not just the universe, no, ALL universes; the Doctor becomes two Doctors and Donna becomes half of a Time Lady; the ending left me cold…

And even worse than me not really caring is this: “You’ve faught Daleks in series one already” “yeah, but they were, like, mad Daleks. These ones are PROPER Daleks.” Well, *I* was a LOT more scared of the ones in the first series; secondly, Caan (of course) and Davros (yes) and also the rest of them that were about to destroy everything, including themselves – are definitely madder than any Dalek I’ve ever seen before; thirdly, it felt like the episode wanted to make itself look scarier AT THE EXPENSE of the series one finale. It kind of killed all of series one’s “Bad Wolf” storyline. And that’s not okay. It did piss me off a little. No telly show should give you the feeling that you need to protect earlier episodes. But then, they managed to totally kill the emotional epic of series two’s finale as well by giving Rose half-a-Doctor to play with.

As for ALL OF THE DOCTOR’S FRIENDS UNITED… I see how they wanted to give the fans something special, but it just felt so forced and unnatural. And OF COURSE K9 had to jump out of the corner. The problem that the whole nostalgia thing just doesn’t… work for me. Not THAT good anyway.

Not everything was bad. Yeah, yeah, it was good to see so much Cribbins. But we could’ve seen much Cribbins in a different series four finale.

So, what would I have wanted this to be like?

- End Rose’s story, but do so in a… better way.
- If there needs to be a happy end for Rose, give her a proper one (with a second Doctor that is 100% human. And not a git.)
- If that wasn’t possible, have the second Doctor die in the episode. Or better yet, no second Doctor, ever (the hand thing was… not good.)
- Have the balls to properly kill off side characters instead of sending them into exile, making them immortal, giving them amnesia and the likes. At least when it was so dramatically announced beforehand! Cheating!
- Stop trying to come up with bigger better Daleks that kick more arse than before. Because they were INTRODUCED as kicking ultimate arse in the first place. Trying to make them morer scarier is… kind of childish.
- Really, enough with the Daleks. The occasional Dalek would be fine. I loved the Dalek in “Dalek”, and he scared the shit out of me, but ever since, each time I see them, they’ve been less of a thrill.
- I wish they’d given the TARDIS more to do. I know *someone* shut the door. But in other episodes, I felt like the TARDIS was truly alive, and with a bit of a personality, too. I would’ve liked that.

But that’s nit-picking, now. The main problems are the ones I described in the middle of the wall of text here.
- Too much of everything.
- The sacifice of earlier epic and emotional moments for the sake of making this appear better, which pissed me off.
- It wasn’t “outright bad”, but I’d been hoping for “really good” and it was only somewhere in between.
- I just didn’t feel it.

December 17, 2008 at 5:06 pm #87635

Tarka Dal

I think my reaction after watching the Series Four finale at the House of Symes boiled down to “Toss, but brilliant toss”. Although I found myself agreeing with lots of your points so on a second viewing it’s likely I wouldn’t be quite so satisfied.

December 17, 2008 at 5:07 pm #87637

Seb Patrick

Davros, though.

December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87641

John Hoare
G&T Admin

Davros was entirely bloody underused. And not, I don’t think, in a way that makes any satisfactory point, either.

December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87642

Tarka Dal

Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN.

December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87643

Tarka Dal

Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN.

December 17, 2008 at 5:27 pm #87644

Tarka Dal

Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN.

Jump to top / Jump to 'Recent Replies'

Viewing 269 posts - 1 through 269 (of 269 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.