| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| May 25, 2008 at 8:41 pm #2352 | |
|
John Hoare |
This thread continues this discussion. The topic was split because the system kept running out of memory. Wankers. |
| May 25, 2008 at 9:02 pm #80705 | |
|
TheLeen |
Cheers :D |
| May 25, 2008 at 9:20 pm #80706 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
And for those not keeping up, the episode we’d reached at the current state of play was The Girl In The Fireplace. So please don’t post anything relating to new series episodes beyond that until Marleen does. |
| May 25, 2008 at 9:33 pm #80707 | |
|
Andrew |
> So please don?t post anything relating to new series episodes beyond that until Marleen does. “Dum-da-dum, dum-da-dum, dum-da-dum, dum-dum-da-dum-da-dum…” That’s the theme tune from the next episode. I’m such a rebel. |
| May 25, 2008 at 9:44 pm #80708 | |
|
TheLeen |
God, I love you guys. :D |
| May 26, 2008 at 12:23 am #80715 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
And we love you too. Because, y’know, we’re nice like that. |
| May 26, 2008 at 1:54 pm #80724 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
>By the way, some three months ago I dreamt that I could manipulate the universe through pseudo SQL queries. I left-joined the kitchen to the bedroom for quicker access to the fridge. Awesome. I hope you ensured that you in the bedroom = you in the kitchen, otherwise you could have been in a whole heap of trouble. |
| May 26, 2008 at 3:11 pm #80725 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
If more ladies made SQL jokes then this world would be a far nicer place to live in. |
| May 26, 2008 at 3:53 pm #80727 | |
|
TheLeen |
> I hope you ensured that you in the bedroom = you in the kitchen, otherwise you could have been in a whole heap of trouble. XD Tbh I don’t remember the exact details, but I think the primary key I used was some sort of room index inside the flat… or something. It was quite cool because I “saw” the tables and relations as kind of a second, see-through layer before visible reality. That’s why the building blocks stuff reminded me of it. The night before that I’d had a dream that all my work colleagues were handpuppets, and our product line manager was the unintended clown of the piece. (The audience of 5-year-olds thought he was hysterically funny.) I think I work too much. |
| May 26, 2008 at 7:01 pm #80730 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
I dreamt last night that I’d been employed by Angel Investigations. Spike had teamed up with Drucilla again and Angel had me call Spike on his cellphone to shake him down for information. He was remarkably forthcoming with information. Of course, the dream started slightly more bizarrely. An old man, who I’m fairly sure was an Eastenders character although I haven’t seen the show since I moved to LA, had a heart attack at a funeral, and the next thing I know I’ve woken up in a coffin on an ocean liner. The top and side comes off and there are people (I forget who) informing me that I’d better take a shower because using a used coffin as a means of transportation has karmic impact. I climb out of the coffin and a moldy skeletal leg falls out behind me with perfect comic timing. Then I had a shower. I realise we’ve strayed somewhat from the original topic at hand, which is… erm… hats? |
| May 27, 2008 at 8:29 am #80754 | |
|
TheLeen |
W00t, series three is down to 35 quid. *click* |
| May 31, 2008 at 11:37 am #80881 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 2×05 – Rise of the Cybermen Good - There was some funny lines in there, especially in Rise of the Cybermen. Ungood - But there were also a lot of very corny lines. Like the Doctor’s speech before his other speech (the code one – that one was okay). Miscellaneous - Giving the episode the name “Rise of the Cybermen” really took away from the suspension. Glad that there was at least no teaser at the end of the episode though spoiling the second part. On Doctors Nine & Ten - Forgot to mention it last week: last week I almost forgot my grief for the Ninth Doctor since the episode was brilliant and also seemed to suit the Tenth Doctor’s style well. In fact, I said to Vincent (half-jokingly), what was it again that was so brilliant about the Ninth Doctor? Summary I liked the first part better than the second (and especially than its ending). Haha, look at me, five months ago I had no idea what Doctor Who was about, and I’m already complaining like a spoilt child. |
| May 31, 2008 at 11:59 am #80883 | |
|
Ian Symes |
ONE OF US. |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:12 pm #80885 | |
|
ChrisM |
>- I liked the president. Did you recognize him? If not, check out Holoship for a younger model. In a dodgy jumpsuit. In a particularly great gag. (I suddenly feel paranoid as it’s while since I saw that Cyberman episode, but I think my memory is correct. I’m sure it’s him.) |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:18 pm #80886 | |
|
TheLeen |
Oooooh yeah, of course! Hadn’t realised, although his voice and mouth seemed very familiar. That’s why he landed on the “I liked” list then. Oooooh! *marvels* |
| May 31, 2008 at 12:42 pm #80890 | |
|
TheLeen |
Oh and by the way: Torchwood. - Torchwood institute… bla bla bla… published a study. Hm. The Bad Wolf stuff was scarier, because it seemed a lot more random in the beginning (which, sadly, it actually was). |
| May 31, 2008 at 1:48 pm #80891 | |
|
Dave |
>How did the daily download work for people driving cars? Oh yeah, I hadn’t thought of that. >Welsh accent is so so weird What? You’ve just sat through 90 minutes of Nick Briggs pronouncing the G in “DELETE” and you find the Welsh weird? |
| May 31, 2008 at 5:14 pm #80900 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
>And: getting rid of Mickey when he just started to be fun! I?m going to miss him! Agreed. He annoyed me no end in the first series (and I DETEST that scene in Rose where he’s transformed into a dummy or whatever), but he grew on me a lot in the second. |
| May 31, 2008 at 8:08 pm #80909 | |
|
TheLeen |
> pronouncing the G in ?DELETE? What? |
| June 1, 2008 at 9:47 am #80933 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 2×07 – The Idiot’s Lantern On the good: - Telly talking to you. I mean, YOU. I love it when that happens. On the rest: - And there was us thinking the lantern’s idiot could be Mickey. On zombies: - Last time, metal zombies. This time, telly zombies. Zombies zombies zombies. On the Doctor: - He’s alright. Sometimes gets on my nerves a bit with the shouting, especially in “heureka” moments. But he’s alright. On Torchwood: - Apparently Torchwood is all over the media and every little police officer talks about it. Then no wonder the PM has heard of it. So how come that in Rose’s present it is quite suddenly supposed to be ONE BIG SECRET? And all in all: Nice (though historically probably totally irrelevant) little “fun” episode that made no sense whatsoever but was very entertaining nonetheless, and also very visual. I liked it. |
| June 1, 2008 at 9:50 am #80934 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
> Nice (though historically probably totally irrelevant) little ?fun? episode that made no sense whatsoever but was very entertaining nonetheless, and also very visual. I liked it. Yes. A lot of other people were getting irritated with the shouting at this point, but I enjoyed the energy and fun between the Doctor and Rose. |
| June 1, 2008 at 7:04 pm #80945 | |
|
ChrisM |
As for the faceless people, that was really creepy wasn’t it? I’d like to know how they continued to breathe though. Wire magic, no doubt. ;) |
| June 8, 2008 at 9:55 am #81074 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 2×08 – The Impossible Planet Hah, this was a bit Event Horizon, mixed with Sphere, with a dash of The Fifth Element, and what was that Star Trek: TNG episode featuring the devil? Oh, and the Alien tunnel scene. Stuff that I loved: - The setting. I’m not usually a lover of this sort of flick (I mean Event Horizon, Sphere etc) but it was nicely different from other Who episode settings. Other stuff to be said: - Well, I’m used to telly (or film) heroes getting more than a human’s usual share of good fortune (aka The Luck of Heroes), but the Doctor was really, really tempting fate there. I mean, he’s usually doing that a bit, but this time I felt a line was crossed. But then, he was under the telepathic influence of The Beast, so I suppose he’s got an excuse. He’d better get his priorities straight though for the next few episodes (1. find TARDIS, 2. save universe, 3. save Rose, 4. risk his life for a bit of fun). Why DID he give up the search for the TARDIS so soon, especially when he was going to go down anyway? Last time I checked, he had a remote control, too… and we know that he did have his sonic everythingdriver on him. Zombie stuff: - Slave zombies! It was nice to see the Ood (I’d heard the term before not knowing who or what they were). They look really great with their Davy Jones style tentacles. But I hope there is more to them than wanting to serve… Doctor X stuff: - Yeah yeah, okay, I like him. I don’t like it when him and Rose go all “and then we went there and did that and do you remember them, ha ha ha, wasn’t that just brilliant”, it’s annoying. But there wasn’t much of that in these two particular episodes. And in the end when the Doctor was in the pit, going “yeah no yeah no”, that was very cute. Torchwood stuff: - Aha, more humans to deal with space stuff, more Torchwood. Nothing fundamentally new there. And all in all: - I thought it was an excellent pair of episodes. Vin liked them, too. Very entertaining and relatively good cgi (I thought anyway). The plot seemed a little bit very very much constructed, but hey. Entertaining nonetheless and I’m going to rank it between the good episodes I enjoyed and the excellent Moffat ones, all the way up there. |
| June 8, 2008 at 12:50 pm #81077 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
>I?m going to rank it between the good episodes I enjoyed and the excellent Moffat ones, all the way up there. That’s pretty much how most of us tend to think of that two-parter, I think. You may have noticed that there’s a pattern to each series, in the sense that there’s a “blockbuster two-parter” early on (wide, accessible story with big monsters), and then a more “adult two-parter” later (as with The Empty Child last year). Most people will generally agree that the adult two-parters present pretty much the best the show has to offer – you’re in for a treat when you get to next year’s, let me tell you. |
| June 8, 2008 at 7:35 pm #81092 | |
|
Ian Symes |
And you’re going to come in your pants when you get to the Series 4 adult two-parter… |
| June 8, 2008 at 7:46 pm #81096 | |
|
TheLeen |
Yeah, I’m already looking forward (a bit too much) to… everything. I’ve got series three here, but I will eventually get to a point where I cannot watch two new episodes each weekend. TOO SOON. By the way, David Tennant’s German voice makes him sound younger and even a bit hotter. Oooh. |
| June 14, 2008 at 6:47 pm #81372 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 2×10 – Love & Monsters Oooookay… let’s get this over with… This was the good stuff: - The webcam thing seemed fun (at first). This was the bad stuff: - Way too much webcam and way too little story. And finally: - WHERE WAS THE DOCTOR?! How many lines did him and Rose have in that episode, combined? Five? Lame. I suppose there’s some good reason for this. Or so I hope. All in all: - Crap story, crap monster and crap resolution(s) = crap episode. |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:05 pm #81374 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Okay, so – the “good reason”. Basically, the way the production “year” is structured and scheduled is for a 13 episode run. But since they introduced the Christmas specials, they’re basically doing 14 episodes in a 13 episode time frame. Soooo, each year from series two onwards, there’s what we call the “Doctor-lite” episode. It’s an episode shot simultaneously with another one, that requires little time from the lead actors. Love & Monsters is the first example, it’s a shame you didn’t like it (I love it) but it IS a very divisive episode in terms of fan opinion. Incidentally, series three’s Doctor-lite episode is THE BEST THING THAT HAS BEEN ON TV EVER. So all hope is not lost ;-) Oh, and the monster? Designed by an eight-year-old for a kids’ TV competition ;-) |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:09 pm #81375 | |
|
TheLeen |
OH?! Gosh, now I’m sorry I said it was crap :D (Some of those eight-year-old fans grow up to be Steven Moffat, you know) Thanks for the info. It’s right, I wasn’t thrilled. What’s the point of a Doctor Who episode without the Doctor. But I’ll try and be unbiased when the time comes for the series three one. (14 episodes in series three, too? Half w00t!) |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:10 pm #81376 | |
|
John Hoare |
Love & Monsters is still one of my favourite episodes of Who ever. And not just for the excellent oral sex joke at the end, although that’s one of many lovely touches. But also: it remains the most accurate and sympathetic portrayal of fandom I’ve ever seen on television EVER. The fact that it was broadcast on mainstream telly is just the icing on the cake. |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:13 pm #81377 | |
|
John Hoare |
I’d argue that without the Doctor in it much, you get a really interesting perspective on the Doctor’s character, and people’s perceptions of him… |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:15 pm #81378 | |
|
TheLeen |
Portrayal of fandom? |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:39 pm #81388 | |
|
John Hoare |
I’ll explain it very badly. Instead, I point you towards this: EDIT: BUT READ AFTER YOU’VE FINISHED SEASON 2! http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2006/08/happy_times_and-comments.shtml |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:55 pm #81391 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Eeep, be careful! That article contains end-of-series-two spoilers! |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:57 pm #81393 | |
|
John Hoare |
Fuck fuck fuck! Sorry, sorry, sorry. *Really* should have checked the article for those. I’ll be more careful in future. Sorry! But read it after you’ve finished this series… |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:57 pm #81394 | |
|
TheLeen |
I’ll keep the link for next week, then… :) |
| June 14, 2008 at 7:59 pm #81395 | |
|
John Hoare |
Shit, thank *fuck* you didn’t read it. I feel awful now. I nearly ruined things! |
| June 14, 2008 at 8:04 pm #81397 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
You twat, Hoare. |
| June 14, 2008 at 8:04 pm #81398 | |
|
TheLeen |
It’s okay, nothing happend. :) |
| June 14, 2008 at 8:13 pm #81403 | |
|
Andrew |
I like Love and Monsters a lot, but it does divide people. Still, I’ll take experimental stuff like that over bog-standard run-and-explode stuff like the cybermen two-parter. Again, there’s also a big Buffy influence – The Zeppo and Storyteller, showing the hero from an outside perspective. (A series two ep of Buffy also sees the heroine turned into a rat to help the actresses schedule.) It’s how Mickey Smith’s side of the fence looked. It’s a story about being a fan. Which is a bit of a theme in New Who. Rose is a cypher for the audience, the viewer who gets to join the adventure. And ‘ Do you wanna come with me?’ was a cornerstone of the series one ad campaign. |
| June 14, 2008 at 8:54 pm #81404 | |
|
John Hoare |
Here’s my review of Love & Monsters – notable for being one of the few Who reviews I’ve written that doesn’t make me curl up in embarrassment upon re-reading. (And Seb’s second opinion is great, too.) It’s grown on me even more since then, though – it’s a five star episode for me now. |
| June 14, 2008 at 9:04 pm #81405 | |
|
TheLeen |
Nice… both of them reviews… Hm, yeah. You’re right with everything you wrote there. And I didn’t think the episode stinks. I liked it. But I liked all of the other ones more. Except maybe “Aliens of London”, and possibly “Rose” (but I’m not even sure about that). > It?s a story about being a fan. Which is a bit of a theme in New Who. Rose is a cypher for the audience, the viewer who gets to join the adventure. And ? Do you wanna come with me?? was a cornerstone of the series one ad campaign. But hasn’t that been the purpose of the companions all along? |
| June 14, 2008 at 9:44 pm #81407 | |
|
Andrew |
> But hasn?t that been the purpose of the companions all along? Not wishing to spoil things, should you ever go back, the short answer is ‘Yes, but…” and the long answer is ‘No, however…’. For the sake of this thread, there’s a difference between an early companion asking ‘What IS that, Doctor?!’ as part of a show that needed exposition and a point of reference, and a writing team fulfilling a 40 year old dream to step inside the TARDIS. |
| June 14, 2008 at 9:57 pm #81409 | |
|
TheLeen |
I’m totally confused and entirely a-ha! at the same time! Good job Andrew! Ah, today is one of those days where I just love everyone around me. :) |
| June 14, 2008 at 11:06 pm #81410 | |
|
Andrew |
> Ah, today is one of those days where I just love everyone around me. :) Sound good. Form an orderly queue, people! |
| June 15, 2008 at 8:26 am #81414 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Love & Monsters is one of the episodes that I’ve never got round to re-watching. I liked the idea but it was nowhere near as smart as it thought it was. >Incidentally, series three?s Doctor-lite episode is THE BEST THING THAT HAS BEEN ON TV EVER. So all hope is not lost ;-) This is bang on the money. You are in for one hell of a treat, Marleen. |
| June 15, 2008 at 9:24 am #81417 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
>For the sake of this thread, there?s a difference between an early companion asking ?What IS that, Doctor?!? as part of a show that needed exposition and a point of reference, and a writing team fulfilling a 40 year old dream to step inside the TARDIS. And even then, the early companions could be much more. John keeps on at me to write an article… |
| June 15, 2008 at 10:10 am #81421 | |
|
TheLeen |
Please do! So! Episode 2×11 – Fear Her I liked a lot: - Drawings. Random observations: - The episode was scary alright, but not quite as scary as the title suggested. Zombies: - Doodle zombies :) Torchwood: - There was no mention of Torchwood in it, was there? … odd… maybe the calm before the storm… Overall: - This episode’s only catch is that it is, plot-wise, so close to The Idiot’s Lantern. People scream out of a telly, people scream out of a drawing. Of the two, I prefer the drawing. I thought it was really cute, and maybe something cute is needed just before the series finale. It was heartbreaking when Rose said in the end “never ever…” of course in an ideal world I would not know that Billie left Who after series two. But as I don’t know whether she dies or falls through a time hole or marries Mickey or just decides to spend some more time with Jackie, I’m really anxious and worried now. And the worst thing is – I can’t watch any Who next weekend. So there is a lot of time for being worried and anxious. |
| June 15, 2008 at 10:13 am #81422 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Gah. Fear Her. Hate hate hate. Worst episode of New Who. By miles. |
| June 15, 2008 at 10:19 am #81424 | |
|
Dave |
I’d rather watch Fear Her twice than Voyage Of The Damned at all |
| June 15, 2008 at 11:04 am #81427 | |
|
Andrew |
Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM. |
| June 15, 2008 at 11:05 am #81428 | |
|
TheLeen |
> Gah. Fear Her. Hate hate hate. Worst episode of New Who. By miles. Please explain |
| June 15, 2008 at 11:49 am #81433 | |
|
ChrisM |
>Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM. Yeah, I didn’t mind Fear Her. Wasn’t a fave of mine but it wasn’t bad. Mind you none of New Who is that bad. |
| June 15, 2008 at 1:24 pm #81435 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
> Fear Her has many good qualities. APPRECIATE THEM. It sets Ten up as not being a cat person, which is WRONGE. Good job Gridlock fixed that. |
| June 15, 2008 at 3:08 pm #81439 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
It’s bland, it features some of the worst examples of the Doctor’s “AWWWH!” smart-arsedness (which reminds me – when you’ve finished series two, remind me to link you to Charlie Brooker’s wishlist for series three!), and the sequence with the Olympics torch and that hideous, hideous commentary is the most horrifically schmaltzy and rubbish moment in the show’s history. The story is completely unmemorable, and even from a directorial point of view it just feels like no-one could really be arsed. It’s touch and go, I guess, whether Fear Her or New Earth is worse (or 42 from series three, for that matter), but they’re all pretty rank. |
| June 15, 2008 at 3:34 pm #81443 | |
|
Ridley |
But it’s courage and it’s love! |
| June 15, 2008 at 3:42 pm #81444 | |
|
John Hoare |
The weird thing is, I *never* noticed any of that when I first watched it. It didn’t even cross my mind. I was too busy enjoying the image of the Doctor lighting the torch – which I thought was brilliant – to notice. If I watched it again, it’d probably irritate me now, but it never bothered me at the time. |
| June 15, 2008 at 4:59 pm #81447 | |
|
Andrew |
Like the torch, the cupboard, the scribble and the whispered alien voice. And I adore: the TARDIS materialising inconveniently, Rose halting the Doctor from dipping into the marmalade, and the lengthy multi-character conversation in the street. One of my favourite dialogue sequences of New Who. |
| June 15, 2008 at 5:13 pm #81450 | |
|
ChrisM |
As I said, I didn’t mind ‘Fear Her’ but I though the torch lighting bit sucked major monkey rump. And that ain’t tasty I can tell you. Well I assume it isn’t. It’s not like I’ve spent an unhealthy amount of time in the simian section of London zoo… (quick recovery there.) Ok, bit of an exaggeration maybe, but it made me wince. |
| June 15, 2008 at 5:45 pm #81453 | |
|
TheLeen |
> the TARDIS materialising inconveniently Yeah, that was great :D |
| June 28, 2008 at 12:00 pm #81825 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 2×12 – Army of Ghosts This review might turn out short cause I’m really too sad to make an effort here. I liked: - David Tennant is, as you say, cute as a button. Oh and he looked so, so sad in the end. :’( And I didn’t: - The beginning of the first episode. Don’t know why. Stuff: - And there was me thinking that the genesis thingy contained the Master (another something that I SHOULD NOT BE KNOWING ABOUT at this point) Torchwood: - No butt-fucking surprise there. It’s really what we’d seen coming by miles. But that’s okay. Rose: - I’d grown rather fond of Rose. I’m not a fan as such. I wouldn’t, say, join a Rose Typer facebook group. But the end was simply heartbreaking. I’ll be very picky with the next companion (poor girl, eh). What’s really really sad is that together with Rose, everything Rose-related vanished from Who: Jackie, Mickey, Pete (who managed to appear in quite too many episodes for a dead man, but I loved him as a character). So there’s a whole bunch gone at once. Someone said on Confidential that Rose’s family served as point to return to, for Rose as well as the viewer, and I realise now how well that worked. I feel unhinged. As Rose must feel now without the Doctor. Well, at least they’re all together, which works as a “happy” ending. I bet they’ll find ways to write Rose back in for single episodes, I mean if they can do it they will do it (probably have done it already). But I will miss Jackie most, I think! Anyway – parallel earth, parallel Torchwood – I wondered after Rise of the Cybermen already, where’s the parallel TARDIS with its parallel Doctor? Overall - Daleks AND Cybermen, a rift in reality, the Void, parallel planets, … The series finale was epic, I’ll give it that. P.S.: Wtf? - Sooooo… Catherine Tate. What is going on? See, I try, I really try to read as little as possible about Who on the ‘net (although I have see this, but anyway I know it’s Marth’a turn now and Donna is the series four companion, so that, yes, that was quite a surprise to see her there. Anyway! Series two. For me, it never quite managed to reach the peaks of series one. But neither the bottom.
|
| June 28, 2008 at 12:22 pm #81826 | |
|
Andrew |
SHE’S MADE A BLOODY CHART!!! :-D > And there was me thinking that the genesis thingy contained the Master (another something that I SHOULD NOT BE KNOWING ABOUT at this point) It wasn’t until you started series two that I realised how badly the packaging ruins the finale. The Daleks were kept as a total surprise on broadcast – it was going to be a cyber-ending, so far as we knew – and, obviously, you knew they were coming from the moment you looked at the box. A shame. > And the girl working at Torchwood?s for the Cybermen, I thought it was Martha, but obviously not. Same actress. There’s a simple explanation – which you’ll eventually get to. Weirdly I watched these same two episodes LAST NIGHT. Freaky… |
| June 28, 2008 at 12:27 pm #81827 | |
|
TheLeen |
> It wasn?t until you started series two that I realised how badly the packaging ruins the finale. The Daleks were kept as a total surprise on broadcast – it was going to be a cyber-ending, so far as we knew – and, obviously, you knew they were coming from the moment you looked at the box. A shame. Nah, I made nothing of it. I made it a habit, too, not to look at the box. It’s a nice packaging, especially on the inside, when you know the episodes already. It’s laden with spoilers though. So seeing the Daleks was still a surprise, but more of a “oh look, the last Dalek ever!” kind of ironic one *g* >> And the girl working at Torchwood?s for the Cybermen, I thought it was Martha, but obviously not. > Same actress. There?s a simple explanation – which you?ll eventually get to. So I wasn’t entirely wrong. That is nice. Intriguing, too. I’ll be on shoreleave next weekend, so, again, no Who for me for another while. |
| June 28, 2008 at 12:30 pm #81828 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
I’m not sure how much of explaining this is spoilers, so I think it’s alright to do so. The idea is that there’s only one set of Time Lords – they can traverse parallel universes, but they’ll never interact with themselves (uh, apart from when they cross their own timelines) because there’s only ever one version. So in the parallel universe, there’s no Doctor. The reason for Torchwood’s existence (again, I can’t remember where this was stated) is apparently that, because he wasn’t there to save her, Queen Victoria was killed by the werewolf. Torchwood was set up to battle alien threats from that point onwards. |
| June 30, 2008 at 3:53 pm #81868 | |
|
TheLeen |
Speaking of which, should I watch Torchwood next or series three of Who? |
| June 30, 2008 at 4:17 pm #81869 | |
|
ChrisM |
>Speaking of which, should I watch Torchwood next or series three of Who? It doesn’t matter too much. If you have Torchwood, you might as well watch it first. Minor spoiler bellow (I’m leaving out plot stuff and details though so it shouldn’t spoil your enjoyment..) Hope that was vague enough.;) |
| June 30, 2008 at 4:32 pm #81870 | |
|
Ian Symes |
The mitigating factor here is that Torchwood series one is complete and utter shit. Only the first episode is worth watching. |
| June 30, 2008 at 4:57 pm #81871 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Indeed. Watch the first episode and, maybe, the last couple of episodes (which – slightly – leads into the season three finale of Doctor Who) but I really wouldn’t bother with the rest of it. The first episode hinted at potential that has yet to be realised. The second season is slightly better, but not by much. |
| June 30, 2008 at 6:59 pm #81874 | |
|
ChrisM |
Taste is subjective though. One persons shite might be someone else’s honey (metaphorically speaking of course.) Many people like the show. I thought it could have been far better, but I didn’t hate it overall. (So certainly not honey, but edible albeit a few gristly bits were hard to swallow.) Marleen- My advise is to watch the first few episodes. If 3-4 episodes in you don’t like it then you can skip to the last couple episodes as they said. |
| June 30, 2008 at 7:38 pm #81879 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
I don’t like honey either. |
| June 30, 2008 at 7:44 pm #81880 | |
|
Ridley |
In retrospect I’d avoid series one and just watch from series two but Pete’s version makes more sense. |
| June 30, 2008 at 8:06 pm #81883 | |
|
TheLeen |
Since the option are a) buy the series one box or b) leave it, I’ll be going with b). I can catch up on Torchwood once I run out of Who episodes (which will be too soon anyway). |
| June 30, 2008 at 8:11 pm #81884 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
I would at least read up on it a bit, familiarise yourself with who’s who and what happens. It will help you *slightly* when you get to the series three finale (and even moreso for the series four finale!), although it’s by no means essential in either case. |
| June 30, 2008 at 9:19 pm #81886 | |
|
Andrew |
While so far it’s been an overall miss for Torchwood, there HAVE been good episodes (Ian’s dead wrong – They Keep Killing Suzy is pretty good for a kick-off). But it’s not a full-price purchase, frankly. Worth seeing the best eps if they ever appear on iTunes or whatever, though – if that ever happens, get a list from here! |
| July 1, 2008 at 7:24 am #81898 | |
|
Ian Symes |
I was debating whether to add They Keep Killing Suzie to my list of episodes worth watching. That and Captain Jack Harkness are the only contenders from the first series, though. The second is much better. |
| July 1, 2008 at 7:29 am #81899 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Convinced that the best thing about They Keep Killing Suzie is the title. |
| July 1, 2008 at 9:05 am #81902 | |
|
Dave |
Torchwood is so inconsistent. I liked Random Shoes, Out Of Time is great, Combat is a complete waste of everyone’s time |
| July 1, 2008 at 10:13 am #81905 | |
|
Andrew |
I thought Combat was one of the best in terms of tone and character writing. I wish Noel Clarke had written more. Whereas Random Shoes was pants. Small Worlds was okay, but the script makes a huge error in having the team do literally nothing to affect the outcome. |
| July 1, 2008 at 10:26 am #81907 | |
|
Dave |
Sorry Marleen we’ve done it again. Coming soon: The Torchwood Spoilers Thread |
| July 1, 2008 at 10:44 am #81908 | |
|
TheLeen |
O_O |
| July 1, 2008 at 12:28 pm #81910 | |
|
John Hoare |
http://www.ganymede.tv/forum/2008/07/the-torchwood-spoilers-thread |
| July 13, 2008 at 3:41 pm #82287 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×00 – The Runaway Bride On the episode: On Catherine Tate: On the Doctor: On zombies: On christmas specials: |
| July 13, 2008 at 7:21 pm #82290 | |
|
ChrisM |
She was a great monster wasn’t she? Actually I think she is a fusion of actress in prosthetics and CGI. Obviously the blinking extra eyes were cgi but I think they did make her up in part, including that head rig. I’m sure the distance stuff and the spider thorax were all CG though. A good example of how a fusion of CGI and live action can work well.
I agree. I found her a bit irritating, but she was a great character.
Not me, I quite liked her show as well. It got old quite quickly though as a lot of her humor was based on repetitive catch-phrases. (Loren’s “Am I bovvered!” being one that is referenced a lot.) There were some great characters in her show. The Gran being a good example. And the ginger gags made me chuckle in their silliness. |
| July 14, 2008 at 12:04 am #82294 | |
|
Dave |
>Not me, I quite liked her show as well. It got old quite quickly though as a lot of her humor was based on repetitive catch-phrases. (Loren?s ?Am I bovvered!? being one that is referenced a lot.) There were some great characters in her show. The Gran being a good example. And the ginger gags made me chuckle in their silliness. Get out |
| July 14, 2008 at 8:13 am #82295 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
> I?m sure the distance stuff and the spider thorax were all CG though. Actually the entire spider body was a practical prop, moved around on hyrdraulic pistons. It’s fooking massive. Saw it at the Doctor Who exibition. |
| July 14, 2008 at 3:42 pm #82317 | |
|
ChrisM |
Really? That’s impressive. So they just used the CG for the candles on the cake so to speak. A good use of the medium. (Not that I’m against intensive CGI if it’s good…) |
| July 14, 2008 at 11:22 pm #82349 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
The queen of the Rachnos is all prosthetic and no CGI. Just so you know. |
| July 14, 2008 at 11:29 pm #82351 | |
|
ChrisM |
I just meant CGI was used for the final touches. I.e. the candles on the cake being the blinking spider eyes. Not the eyes themselves, the blinking effect. That was certainly CG, utilised in a subtle but highly effective, and freaky way. |
| July 14, 2008 at 11:54 pm #82354 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
Oh yes, that. |
| July 19, 2008 at 6:00 pm #82475 | |
|
ChrisM |
Yeah, I quite liked both those episodes (although I’m not sure the magic stuff in the Elizabethan one quite fitted with the genre… even if it is essentially another science. Great villains though.) As for the one with the Judoon, I thought the Judoon were great new aliens too. One thing that bugged me about that episode was that stuff about irradiating half the earth utilizing a bit of equipment in a room in the hospital. (It’s been a while so I can’t remember the specifics, radiography, X-ray machine, whatever.) I just thought they were a little TOO silly. I’d just about buy that the overload would harm the folks in the hospital, and while that’d be smaller stakes, it would still be more than enough for the heroics. As for Martha, yeah I quite like her too. How did you consider Freema’s acting though? Oh and good point concerning the cousin thing. It’s ploy often used in drama though. You can always get round it by imagining they actually look different, just like imagining bad effects look good. ;) |
| July 19, 2008 at 6:35 pm #82477 | |
|
TheLeen |
> One thing that bugged me about that episode was that stuff about irradiating half the earth utilizing a bit of equipment in a room in the hospital. (It?s been a while so I can?t remember the specifics, radiography, X-ray machine, whatever.) I just thought they were a little TOO silly. *cough* London Eye *cough* > As for Martha, yeah I quite like her too. How did you consider Freema?s acting though? Hm, didn’t strike me as very good nor very bad. Have to see more of it before I can judge. If anything, it’s a bit bland (so far), but I just attributed it to the character. |
| July 19, 2008 at 6:36 pm #82472 | |
|
TheLeen |
Now, let’s see what we have here… Episode 3×01 – Smith and Jones On the episode: On Martha: On the Doctor: On zombies: All in all: Episode 3×02 – The Shakespeare Code This episode: Zombies: All in all: |
| July 19, 2008 at 6:39 pm #82478 | |
|
TheLeen |
I just edit-shifted my own posting to the bottom of the queue again, is this supposed to still be happening? Meh… |
| July 19, 2008 at 6:50 pm #82479 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
It’s still on the FIX LIST. I’m sure John will get to after he’s finished r… OH, WHOOPS, BETTER NOT MENTION THAT. |
| July 19, 2008 at 7:25 pm #82483 | |
|
Danny Stephenson |
SHHHHHHHHHH! |
| July 19, 2008 at 7:26 pm #82484 | |
|
ChrisM |
As long as I don’t get accused of spoiling. I was responding to episodes reviewed, honest! ;) |
| July 20, 2008 at 4:15 am #82502 | |
|
performingmonkey |
> I?m sure John will get to after he?s finished r… rogering a fanny? |
| July 20, 2008 at 10:41 am #82507 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×03 – Smith and Jones The episode: Doctor X: Martha: |
| July 20, 2008 at 10:47 am #82508 | |
|
TheLeen |
And the forum ate the rest of my posting! |
| July 20, 2008 at 10:51 am #82509 | |
|
TheLeen |
*sigh* - The other secondary characters (the old ladies etc) were great, too. Doctor X: Martha: |
| July 20, 2008 at 12:57 pm #82510 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Gridlock remains one of my all time favourite episodes, mainly for The Doctor’s scenes at the start and end of the episodes regarding Gallifrey. |
| July 21, 2008 at 7:44 am #82523 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
> (Translation: It?s not your fault but? get your fingers off my Doctor) *remembers Marleen’s response to Eccleston and chuckles* Oh, and I’m very fond of the Judoon myself. They’re exactly what you might expect of galactic security guards. |
| July 21, 2008 at 9:04 am #82531 | |
|
TheLeen |
You’re right, it was only a matter of time. But I still love the two(ush) of them(ish) in two completely different ways. |
| July 21, 2008 at 1:36 pm #82536 | |
|
TheLeen |
Just found this: And now I’m crying big wet tears of not-canning-to-go because it’s, like, this Sunday. |
| July 21, 2008 at 1:50 pm #82538 | |
|
Danny Stephenson |
Oh i’d go to see that!! |
| July 21, 2008 at 2:03 pm #82539 | |
|
TheLeen |
Yeah, I would. Except, I would’ve booked flights two months ago and arranged for crashing on someone’s floor. Although, as this is taking place mid-day, maybe I could fly home the same day. In any case, it’s too expensive now. EUR 270 for the flights (if booked today), per person. |
| July 22, 2008 at 6:56 pm #82574 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×04 – Daleks in Manhattan Uhm… ? What we liked: What we no liked: Zombies: Summary: |
| July 22, 2008 at 9:23 pm #82582 | |
|
ChrisM |
Those ‘American’ accents made me feel like wincing (particularly the dance girl) although cheesy stuff amuses me too. I’m perverse like that. Good reconstruction of central park though. Not that I’ve go anything to base that on, having never been there but it looked good. |
| July 23, 2008 at 8:50 am #82591 | |
|
TheLeen |
Yeah. |
| July 23, 2008 at 9:18 am #82595 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
Still remains my favourite Dalek episode of the new series. Yes, I know I’m in the minority. I just found it to be the most atmospheric and the most like Dalek stories of old – particularly Pertwee era like Day of the Daleks. |
| July 23, 2008 at 9:47 am #82597 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Marleen, sorry to tell you that you’ve hit the really bumpy patch of series three – it’s going to be another couple of episodes before you reach the good stuff again. But when you hit the good stuff… well. You’ve got probably the best unbroken run of sheer brilliant episodes that New Who has to offer on the way… :-) |
| July 23, 2008 at 10:34 am #82598 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
Then it’ll go shit again. |
| July 23, 2008 at 10:45 am #82599 | |
|
TheLeen |
Such is life! Rain sunshine blah blah. Funny, although I probably agree with most (not all) of that Lawrence Miles wrote here but deleted later (good read by the way, if you don’t try to carefully read around spoilers), I don’t really care if Who occasionally becomes slightly… bumpy. Still love it. But I’ve been accused of treating tv shows like people (and people like telly). |
| July 23, 2008 at 11:25 am #82601 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Why was that deleted? |
| July 23, 2008 at 11:34 am #82602 | |
|
TheLeen |
Don’t know. Maybe because he figured he’d rather write Doctor Who episodes in the future than be rude and piss everyone off. Or… something. |
| July 23, 2008 at 11:56 am #82604 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
I say “shit”…it’s not the same as other shit. “Shit” Doctor Who is still wonderful. :) |
| July 23, 2008 at 12:00 pm #82605 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Hahahahahahahahaha. No. Lawrence Miles burned his bridges a long time ago. What happens is that he posts his blogs, leaves them up for a couple of weeks or so, and then deletes them. While he makes the occasional good point, the posts usually contain vast amounts of out-and-out libellous slagging off of other writers (he’s particularly obsessed with Moffat, whom he claims drove him to alcoholism, and Neil Gaiman, whom he has repeatedly accused of copping off with his fans), and there is absolutely no chance whatsoever of him EVER writing for the TV series. Not least because, while he’s an undeniably talented writer of novels, he posted a sample script online a little while back that his acolytes thought was brilliant, but which actually showed that he has very little in the way of understanding of how to construct a TV script. And his slagging off of all and sundry has actually become MORE pronounced recently, not less so. Basically, he’s a sad, pathetic, bitter little man who happens to have written some very good tie-in novels, but thinks this entitles him to his belief that the show will only ever be any good if it’s made to his precise specifications and for his sole entertainment. |
| July 23, 2008 at 12:00 pm #82606 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
>?Shit? Doctor Who is still wonderful. :) 42 and The Doctor’s Daughter disagree with you. |
| July 23, 2008 at 12:10 pm #82607 | |
|
TheLeen |
Thought so. Thanks for the summary! |
| July 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm #82608 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Interesting. I liked The Moffat Times-Table and rather enjoyed reading that article. Didn’t agree with a lot of it though. |
| July 23, 2008 at 12:45 pm #82609 | |
|
TheLeen |
Okay, I’ve read up on it now. Haha. It was, uh… gut-wrenchingly entertaining. |
| July 23, 2008 at 2:11 pm #82611 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
I love 42! The only episodes I have difficulty watching now are Aliens of London / World War 3…and maybe Boom Town. Oh, and Fear Her. |
| July 23, 2008 at 2:31 pm #82612 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
42 makes me want to cry. Midnight made its very existence completely pointless, anyway, as it does everything 42 was trying to do but WELL. |
| July 23, 2008 at 3:23 pm #82613 | |
|
TheLeen |
I liked Boom Town. And shhhh about 42, I’m watching it next weekend. ta :) |
| July 23, 2008 at 7:32 pm #82617 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×06 – The Lazarus Experiment We liked: We liked not: Martha: Zombies: Random: Series 3: Overall impression: |
| July 23, 2008 at 11:56 pm #82621 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Oh, I can’t wait until you get to episode eight… reading this thread got me thinking about it again today, and I got a big warm fuzzy feeling. I might have to watch it again soon. Looking at the Paul Cornell interview we did for NTS, I realised we didn’t ask him a single question about it – the Who stuff was mainly focused on Father’s Day – and that’s a shame, there’s plenty I would have liked to have brought up… |
| July 24, 2008 at 8:18 am #82626 | |
|
Jo TORDFC |
Yeah I was having a look at the episode list – after this next episode it all gets awesome!! Watch more Who quick! :oP |
| July 24, 2008 at 8:25 am #82627 | |
|
Jo TORDFC |
Oh I told Ian to comment on this…
As he’d have explained it better than me, but as he’s rubbish and hasn’t bothered I’ll try my best! |
| July 24, 2008 at 9:32 am #82629 | |
|
Ian Symes |
And Jo was *quite* terrified by my reaction. |
| July 24, 2008 at 12:59 pm #82638 | |
|
Phil |
>Looking at the Paul Cornell interview we did for NTS Say whaaaat? |
| July 24, 2008 at 7:05 pm #82652 | |
|
TheLeen |
Tried to talk Vin into watching some more Who tonight, but it looks like I have to wait for the weekend. :x Thanks for the comments, advice, and bits of information :) |
| July 26, 2008 at 12:41 pm #82711 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×07 – 42 About the episode: About Martha: About zombies: - Series three arc: tightens and is actually interesting. Overall impression: |
| July 26, 2008 at 12:57 pm #82712 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
You have no idea to the vast extent to which 42 *is* the low point of series 3. It’s all plain sailing now! Until… er, until series 4. |
| July 27, 2008 at 6:09 am #82736 | |
|
Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc |
>…someone from the middleages or the future… I’m gonna delurk for a moment to say that I think this would be awesome if it ever happened. It happened a couple of times in the classic series, for instance. I might even start downloadin–WATCHING it again for that. Also, I think Classic Who featured an alien assistant for a while, a guy named Vislor Turlough. (Haven’t seen anything featuring him yet, however.) |
| July 27, 2008 at 10:10 am #82738 | |
|
Ian Symes |
Classic Who featured plenty of non-human companions. Off the top of my head: Susan, K-9, Romana, Adric, Nyssa, Turlough, Kamelion… and Astrid. Then you’ve got humans that are miles out of their home era, such as Leela, Jamie, Vicky, Steven… and Jack. |
| July 27, 2008 at 10:41 am #82739 | |
|
TheLeen |
Leela the savage girl *g* Episode 3×08 – Human Nature Whilst I’m sitting here enjoying some almost-live Doctor Who music (the internet is a wonderful thing) (although being there would be so much better) I can just as well type up my and Vin’s impressions of series three’s way-into-the-series-two-parter. I’d been warned this would be good! And it was good! The good: The bad: The miscellaneous: Martha: The zombies: The series three epic: |
| July 27, 2008 at 10:50 am #82740 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
>The series three epic: Um…. |
| July 27, 2008 at 10:58 am #82741 | |
|
TheLeen |
I missed it??!! |
| July 27, 2008 at 12:51 pm #82747 | |
|
Andrew |
Don’t worry about it, Marleen – it’s not anything ‘missable’. |
| July 27, 2008 at 12:59 pm #82748 | |
|
ChrisM |
Trying not to spoil anything… Watch on. All will become clear. |
| July 27, 2008 at 5:19 pm #82770 | |
|
Jo TORDFC |
You’ve got an awesome episode next – one of my favourites :o) |
| July 28, 2008 at 8:54 pm #82848 | |
|
Dave |
Who would have thought all this vicarious whoing and froing would be so enjoyable? |
| August 1, 2008 at 7:23 pm #82959 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×10 – Blink Well, that was fun, wasn’t it! What we liked: Other stuff we noticed: All in all… Next up: some titanic series finale. I’m looking forward to it! |
| August 2, 2008 at 8:27 am #82965 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
Well, it scared the bejesus out of a lot of viewers (me included) and had a seriously cute heroine, so that’s probably why it’s so popular. Also ‘Wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey’ kind of sums up the whole history of Doctor Who, so maybe you need to be a fan to appreciate that one. |
| August 2, 2008 at 10:28 am #82971 | |
|
Zombie Jim Undead |
“some titanic series finale” *snigger* |
| August 2, 2008 at 12:42 pm #82976 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 3×11 – Utopia Whoaaaa… ! We loved the following: And these things we also quite liked: Not so much maybe: Random stuff Vin noticed: Overall impression: > ?some titanic series finale? Yeah, lol. |
| August 2, 2008 at 1:02 pm #82977 | |
|
Ian Symes |
That’s a frequent criticism of this finale, and it’s perfectly valid *if* you’re unaware of the original context. Yes, this is a big three-parter, but when it was first aired it was billed as a one-part story about the Futurekind, followed by the traditional two-part finale. The realisation that we were watching one continuous story, and the gradual confirmation that Derek Jacobi was The Master, was an integral part of the viewing experience, and it made the entire thing absolutely brilliant. To quote a friend who was watching it with me, Seb and Cappsy: “we’ve been sold a dummy, and I’m entirely happy with the price negotiated”. The Futurekind were one huge MacGuffin – just a means to an end. Watching it all in one go and expecting one long three-part story could bugger this up a bit, and I can see why you’d be disappointed.
Interesting that you got that impression! Obviously, there’s a lot of backstory you’re not aware of, so it didn’t even occur to me that anyone would draw that conclusion from their brief appearances here. |
| August 2, 2008 at 1:15 pm #82978 | |
|
TheLeen |
> The Futurekind were one huge MacGuffin – just a means to an end. Watching it all in one go and expecting one long three-part story could bugger this up a bit, and I can see why you?d be disappointed. That is brilliant! And I’m not disappointed as such, it’s okay really, under these circumstances I can completely accept them. >> UNIT, the American Torchwood > Interesting that you got that impression! Obviously, there?s a lot of backstory you?re not aware of, so it didn?t even occur to me that anyone would draw that conclusion from their brief appearances here. Aha, so obviously we’re wrong. |
| August 2, 2008 at 5:44 pm #82982 | |
|
TheLeen |
Actually, thinking about it now, how did I know that the finale was the entire three parts? That bothers me now. |
| November 22, 2008 at 3:04 pm #87046 | |
|
TheLeen |
Right! So! Series four arrived! And thanks to Amazon’s low price guarantee, I saved a total of 0,01 GBP, too. My sister commented: “Grats. Don’t spend it all at once!” And that will be very, very hard to do. Anyway, seen the christmas special this morning, “Voyage of the Damned”. Is anyone here still interested in “Likes/Dislikes”, cause otherwise I’ll just say: I liked it; slightly better than the other christmas specials too… or, hm, the same as The Runaway Bride probably. But the Doctor should really stop womanising. This part really anbnoyed me. Kylie: “Can I come?” Doctor: “Sure!” Old man: “Can I come?” Doctor: “Uhm… nah. I travel alone.” Anyway, good fun, and I’ll be watching a lot more Who during the next weeks! |
| November 22, 2008 at 3:32 pm #87047 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
As time goes on the more and more I detest Voyage of the Damned. It seems to include every excess of RTD’s writing to the point where the whole thing ends up as white noise. I’m still interested in your massive lists, by the way! |
| November 22, 2008 at 4:05 pm #87048 | |
|
Andrew |
> I?m still interested in your massive lists, by the way! Ditto and likewise! I need to se VotD again. Haven’t seen it since broadcast, cos I like to save the specials, at least, for the arrival of the boxset. But as I’m a sucker for disaster movies, I imagine I’ll enjoy it just as much the second time around. Not the best cross-breeding of genres in Who, but good, knockabout fun for Christmas. |
| November 22, 2008 at 4:06 pm #87049 | |
|
TheLeen |
Okay then, what we liked: - the beginning of the episode, even though they cheated with the life belt ;) What we didn’t like: - the Sto people looking and behaving 100% human Stuff: - although she’s like 40, Kylie really passes for mid-end 20s. Scary. But still, I enjoyed it. That’s all we can think of right now… |
| November 23, 2008 at 11:01 am #87060 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 4×01 – Partners in Crime You know what I really like about Who? The sheer number of “what the fuck” moments. Even after three entire series, they still manage to wtf me. What we liked - Good beginning, in the cubicles. What we didn’t like - Why did the Doctor bin the sonic pen? Could’ve given it to Donna, or even keep it as a spare so he wouldn’t have to lend his to random redshirts anymore… OMFG Observation - TEH ROSE! Series arc surely? All in all As far as episodes with little fat blobs go (i.e. not-so-serious, slightly ridiculous plots) – this was really really good. |
| November 23, 2008 at 11:29 am #87061 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
>Martha?s granddad I think you mean Donna’s, but yeah :-) Did you spot that he was the newsvendor guy from Voyage of the Damned? Backstory : Bernard Cribbins (the actor who plays him) was only meant to be in that one episode, and originally series four was going to feature her Dad (who appeared in the Runaway Bride) as the stargazing fella. But sadly he was very ill with cancer and after filming a few scenes, he had to quit – unfortunately he died shortly afterwards. A happy (if you can call it that) side-effect was that they called in Cribbins (who was in one of the Peter Cushing Who movies back in the ’60s) and decided to make his character from VOTD Donna’s granddad. And he ended up being, by quite a significant distance, the best thing about series four. (well, actually, not by that much of a distance, because Julian Bleach ended up giving him a run for his money. But still.) |
| November 23, 2008 at 11:39 am #87062 | |
|
TheLeen |
> think you mean Donna?s, Oh, right, sorry. Although… sad bit of information at the same time. |
| November 23, 2008 at 12:12 pm #87063 | |
|
Andrew |
> The scene with the Doctor and Martha lip-reading was hilarious. See? SEE?! It’s not just me! (I mean I really don’t like the episode, but I loved this bit.) |
| November 23, 2008 at 12:55 pm #87064 | |
|
TheLeen |
> Martha Donna! Donna! Donna! Argh. |
| November 23, 2008 at 1:06 pm #87065 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
>See? SEE?! It?s not just me! I like that bit too, I’m just afraid of being shouted at. |
| November 23, 2008 at 4:07 pm #87067 | |
|
Ian Symes |
ALL THREE OF YOU ARE CATEGORICALLY WRONG. |
| November 23, 2008 at 4:20 pm #87068 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
If Season 4 taught me anything, it’s that Catherine Tate is a good dramatic performer, but she’s still a weak comedy actress as she proved in Big Train, her shit-stain of a TV show and the “comic” bits such as the one above. |
| November 23, 2008 at 9:31 pm #87078 | |
|
Ian Symes |
I agree with Pete, although I think she’s quite good in places in Big Train. |
| November 24, 2008 at 3:29 am #87082 | |
|
performingmonkey |
The bit where she says ‘fat-handed twat’. RTD should have tried to shoehorn that into series 4. |
| November 25, 2008 at 11:23 am #87092 | |
|
TheLeen |
Episode 4×02 – The Fires of Pompeii This will be incomplete because we watched last night already, but here we go… What we liked: - Wheeee, colourful costumes! What we didn’t like: - Maybe slightly too much modern language? What, uhm, puzzled us: - The science seemed to be even more messed up than usual. Like… circuits carved out of marble. I’m pretty sure energy conversaion doesn’t work like that. Not even if the marble’s green. The slabs looked pretty though. I’d like one for me wall. Didn’t think it was bad, just not excellent. Who has high pretty standards after all. I felt entertained :) |
| November 25, 2008 at 5:14 pm #87110 | |
|
Ben Paddon |
The TARDIS can and has been moved on a number of occasions. Case in point: “The End Of The World” and “Army of Ghosts”/”Doomsday”. |
| November 25, 2008 at 5:19 pm #87112 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Yes, I think one of the characteristics of the TARDIS’ chameleon circuit is that it also takes on the physical characteristics of what it’s disguised as. |
| November 25, 2008 at 5:56 pm #87116 | |
|
ChrisM |
Yeah. I think the inside of the Tardis is essentially somewhere else, another dimension (hence the size disparity.) Although I suspect that’s an over simplification. |
| November 25, 2008 at 11:35 pm #87124 | |
|
Dave |
>Not even if the marble?s green. This made me laugh. I like to laugh. |
| November 27, 2008 at 9:42 pm #87174 | |
|
Andrew |
Marleen! You missed Time Crash – the 8 minute ‘in-between’ episode on the first disc that fits…well, sort of after the last series and before Voyage of the Damned. More or less. Anyway, I’m dying to know what you make of it! |
| November 27, 2008 at 10:40 pm #87178 | |
|
TheLeen |
Ooooh, there was a mini episode? Damn. I’ll look it up, thanks for the hint! |
| November 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm #87180 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Yeah, you totally need to watch that. Hey, you know what? It’s possible, just possible, that you’ll have caught up with us all by the time Christmas Day rolls around. At which point it’ll be time for these threads to retire! Shame, that, it’s been fun… |
| November 28, 2008 at 2:18 pm #87182 | |
|
TheLeen |
We can keep it up – after all I’m still very virgin when it comes to old Who and my perspective is still very German. Not to mention lack of BBC access… |
| November 29, 2008 at 1:20 pm #87188 | |
|
TheLeen |
4×03, Planet of the Ood Good: - Vincent liked the action and all the military stuff.. Not so good: - Good for Doctor, Donna that they were at the right time, right place. Now they’re be in the Oods’ song forever. What about the guy who actually did all the work and infiltrated the company for 10 years? Was ok. |
| November 29, 2008 at 1:34 pm #87189 | |
|
TheLeen |
Eps. 4 & 5, The Sontaran Stratagem & The Poison Sky Good things: - Good aliens. From the old series, yes? We liked them. Bad things: - When they actually fought, the Sontar weren’t as powerful as we thought they were going to be… Misc things: - OMFG ROSE AGAIN! I am excited… I thought it was definitely more fun to watch than the other “early series two parters”. |
| November 29, 2008 at 1:41 pm #87190 | |
|
Andrew |
> Good for Doctor, Donna that they were at the right time, right place. Now they?re be in the Oods? song forever. What about the guy who actually did all the work and infiltrated the company for 10 years? I really like this ep – Pompeii and Ood are two of my all-time favourite non-Moffat/climax episodes – but watching it back this week I was horribly struck by how little the Doctor and Donna actually do in it. They really are just witnesses, and I didn’t notice at all on the first viewing. > Good aliens. From the old series, yes? Yep. > UNIT. They were mentioned in an earlier series 4 episode already I think. Well, what are they then, the Men in Black of Whoniverse? I keep saying this – that the show takes some vague audience understanding of UNIT for granted. This two-parter makes things clearer – even mentions the Doctor having worked for them – but I honestly think they needed a proper introduction. For the noobs. |
| December 2, 2008 at 1:12 am #87203 | |
|
Jo TORDFC |
Marleen, did you get round to watching ‘Time Crash’ yet? |
| December 2, 2008 at 8:41 am #87208 | |
|
TheLeen |
Nope, not yet! |
| December 2, 2008 at 11:57 am #87210 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
|
| December 2, 2008 at 1:16 pm #87211 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Yep. Clearly it was those few seconds that it would take to type ‘doctor who time crash’ into youtube that’s prevented her ;-) |
| December 2, 2008 at 4:29 pm #87214 | |
|
Andrew |
If only Marleen had access to some form of shiny round disc upon which could be stored the video content in question. Curse you, sluggish development of technology! ;-) |
| December 2, 2008 at 5:33 pm #87216 | |
|
TheLeen |
Of course, of course. But it’s still nice to be prompted. I like some tlc as much as the next girl :) |
| December 3, 2008 at 11:13 am #87225 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Curse the fact I watch wrestling. TLC in my head now defaults as tables, ladders and chairs. Of course I’ve known one or two girls who like that kind of thing. |
| December 3, 2008 at 2:19 pm #87229 | |
|
Ian Symes |
TLC defaults as chasing waterfalls. |
| December 3, 2008 at 3:16 pm #87232 | |
|
Danny Stephenson |
or indeed The Living Channel, the old satellite lifestyle channel. |
| December 3, 2008 at 3:45 pm #87233 | |
|
Ian Symes |
Not to be confused with TCC, former home of Batman and Earthworm Jim in the same era. |
| December 3, 2008 at 4:36 pm #87234 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Or RAC, the breakdown company. |
| December 3, 2008 at 5:07 pm #87235 | |
|
TheLeen |
Or WHO, the World Health Organisation… |
| December 3, 2008 at 6:13 pm #87236 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Look, when there are 6 new posts in this thread, and the last one is by Marleen herself, I expect there to be UPDATES. Stop messing around, people. |
| December 3, 2008 at 6:26 pm #87237 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
[Shuffles feet] Sorry, Seb. |
| December 3, 2008 at 6:27 pm #87238 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
I really mean that. |
| December 3, 2008 at 10:00 pm #87239 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Yeah. I mean when you click on the ‘new dwarf’ comments it’s not like you find people having a completely off-topic discussion is it? |
| December 3, 2008 at 11:32 pm #87240 | |
|
Jo TORDFC |
*you’re* an off-topic discussion |
| December 3, 2008 at 11:38 pm #87241 | |
|
TheLeen |
http://www.gooogIe.co.uk/?gid=320600&hl=en&meta=o&q=you\\\’re%20an%20off-topic%20discussion |
| December 4, 2008 at 12:03 pm #87247 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
> *you?re* an off-topic discussion No capital letter. No full stop. |
| December 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm #87249 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
> No capital letter. No full stop. Shh everyone, Karl’s trying to make a point… |
| December 4, 2008 at 8:51 pm #87252 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
You don’t like me, do you? |
| December 5, 2008 at 2:17 am #87256 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
If I didn’t do you think I’d have let you do everything you did to my bottom the other week? |
| December 5, 2008 at 9:30 am #87260 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
After you with the “No comment” sir. |
| December 7, 2008 at 6:51 pm #87304 | |
|
TheLeen |
What’s wrong with youtube lately? It told me I was in the wrong country to watch Doctor Who. I nearly had to go and get the DVD! Time Crash - Hahaha, did he just say “desktop theme?” Concerning the old Doctors. I know the first one is the old, black and white guy. And the 8th is the one that look fantastic in screenshots of an apparently rubbish film but he made up for it by being awesome in novels. And between those two are a number of guys with funny suits. And they’re all the same funny-suit-Doctor to me. And while, by now, I recognise a name as a Doctor’s actor’s one when I read it, I never know who’s who ;) I’m reading “The Forgotten” right now, and it helps a bit, but it’s also cheating because maybe I really should watch some old Who instead to get a grip of who’s who. This was my first on-screen encounter with a pre-9th Doctor (apart from that episode with the first Doctor I saw on youtube). I’m kind of glad these things are possible although former Doctors’ actors have (of course) grown older. The one in the special (the fifth one, with the cricket ball, as I know now ;)) looked a lot younger in the comic. My best friend gave me a “best of Dalek” DVD for christmas though (we celebrated early cause we’re not going to see each other until next year). Looking forward to seeing what’s on it. But I already like it because it has a nice shimmering metal effect on the outside. I’m so easy to please. :) |
| December 7, 2008 at 9:21 pm #87306 | |
|
Andrew |
And so we open up the ‘What old Who should Marleen be watching once she’s done with series four?’ question. ONE story per person, please, or we’ll blow her frightened German mind… |
| December 7, 2008 at 9:25 pm #87307 | |
|
Ian Symes |
Genesis. Obviously. |
| December 7, 2008 at 9:33 pm #87308 | |
|
Andrew |
> Genesis. Obviously. Gabriel or Collins? |
| December 7, 2008 at 10:15 pm #87309 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
Talons. Of. Weng. Chiang. |
| December 7, 2008 at 10:48 pm #87312 | |
|
ChrisM |
I probably haven’t seen enough old Who to give an informed answer but I did get ‘City of Death’ DVD with Tom Baker’s doctor from the library a few months back. I rather enjoyed it, and I understand it’s a fan favorite. |
| December 7, 2008 at 10:54 pm #87313 | |
|
ChrisM |
Marleen, if you’d like to put name to face check out the top of the page: |
| December 7, 2008 at 11:11 pm #87314 | |
|
Dave |
The Curse Of Fenric |
| December 7, 2008 at 11:54 pm #87315 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Tomb of the Cybermen. |
| December 8, 2008 at 7:04 am #87316 | |
|
Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc |
Just one? Shit. But since Tanya’s already suggested a good story with a great Doctor and assistant, I’ll chip in with “Carnival of Monsters” (if you can get it. Is it available?) It’s one of the shorter Third Doctor stories, and I recall it being rather fun to watch. |
| December 8, 2008 at 9:25 am #87317 | |
|
TheLeen |
O_O |
| December 8, 2008 at 9:36 am #87318 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
We should just do one for each Doctor, really. |
| December 8, 2008 at 10:05 am #87319 | |
|
si |
Personally, I really like Pyramids of Mars. |
| December 8, 2008 at 10:18 am #87320 | |
|
TheLeen |
Or someone could put up one poll for each Doctor. Actually, I’d like that. |
| December 8, 2008 at 1:05 pm #87323 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Ok, voting now begins for the First Doctor story that Marleen needs to see. My vote goes tis second ever story, The Daleks. Although if you watched the first, An Unearlthy Child, you’d see my grandma’s cousin! Have I mentioned that one enough? |
| December 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm #87324 | |
|
Andrew |
> Although if you watched the first, An Unearlthy Child, you?d see my grandma?s cousin! Have I mentioned that one enough? Actually, I’ve not heard that one… |
| December 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm #87325 | |
|
TheLeen |
Oooooooh, shiny royal who ancestorage. And yehh. If I’m going to see one iconic Who story from each Doctor’s era, I’d like to see them in chronological order. |
| December 8, 2008 at 2:07 pm #87326 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
> Actually, I?ve not heard that one? http://uk.imdb.com/name/nm0153278/ She’s most famous for Sam, I think, but looking at that list she’s got some impressive credits on there! |
| December 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm #87327 | |
|
Arlene Rimmer BSc SSc |
Should there be a separate thread for all that? It’s just that this one’s getting a bit big. |
| December 8, 2008 at 9:08 pm #87344 | |
|
Dave |
>She?s most famous for Sam, I think, but looking at that list she?s got some impressive credits on there! She was really good. She’s easily the most committed actor in both her Dr Who stories. Hur: He told me his name… |
| December 8, 2008 at 9:49 pm #87346 | |
|
Phil |
She can’t be that good if she hasn’t worked since 1976. |
| December 8, 2008 at 9:52 pm #87347 | |
|
TheLeen |
The Doctor’s Daughter What I liked: - Colourful aliens. Like a cross-breed of goldfish and parrots. What I hated: Since I can’t include THE ENTIRE SCRIPT, I’m going to give a few examples: - All the dialogue, including the two attempts at comedy. … It’s shit. Really. It’s worse than Daleks in Manhattan. I hated every minute of it. In other news, I have PMS. I wanted to be fair, so I watched it a second time and tried to find things that I don’t hate. But it’s still shit. I apologise to everyone who enjoyed this episode for the harsh words. |
| December 8, 2008 at 10:20 pm #87350 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Marleen, you are both entirely correct and awesome. |
| December 9, 2008 at 8:40 am #87351 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
Indeed. What a piece of poo that was. |
| December 9, 2008 at 9:06 am #87352 | |
|
Ian Symes |
You should do all your reviews with PMS. |
| December 9, 2008 at 10:40 am #87353 | |
|
Tanya Jones |
>Jenny for generated? Why not Annie for anomaly? Heh! No, this ep didn’t live up to the hype at all… |
| December 9, 2008 at 11:24 am #87356 | |
|
TheLeen |
Ah. The next morning, I’m still aggravated. The more I think about it, the more things I remember that I hate. I rather liked “The Unicorn and the Wasp”, but that’s probably because it came directly after “The Doctor’s Daughter”. As for Jenny – I really, REALLY hope that she re-appears at some later point, preferable while Doctor 10 is still in effect, and some capable writer makes her BE COOL. It would make things right and justify this shitty episode. Just as I really, REALLY hope that Queen Elizabeth I will be in one of next year’s specials. Because I don’t like loose ends. Actually, I do like loose ends, because you can get back to them later and tie them up and then I get continuity orgasms. So. They’d better address this. Okay, next one then: The Unicorn and the Wasp A mediocre episode that is forgiven its shitty components because it is actually fun to watch. What we liked: - Whodunit with Agatha Christie, generally a good idea for an episode. What else was on our mind afterwards: - The Unicorn was in the title purely for reasons of making the title sound nice. Not much unicorn in the episode at all. Still 1948395725 times more fun than “The Doctor’s Daughter”. |
| December 9, 2008 at 11:56 am #87357 | |
|
Andrew |
I can’t do a big defence of TDD, because it simply isn’t a good enough episode to be worth the effort, but I found it had redeeming qualities that, for me, at least put it about The Lazarus Experiment. Georgia Moffett – well, I thought she could act. That’s all. I also like how not-like-Rose she was, given that it would have been easy to just do a re-run of Rose’s Daddy issues. I did like some of the comedy. I’m very keen indeed on the questioning of the Doctor as a claimed pacifist as well as a defeater of monsters and bad people. Questions worth asking, especially when series four has been a little less Doctor-centric in its storytelling, and asked pretty well here. Oh, and I like the sets. Interesting to see that TheLeen had NONE of the problems understanding the ending that plagued forums and message boards immediately after broadcast. While a large number of people were bewildered by whether her revival was some kind of regeneration, Marleen – and old-school geek and Trek fan – went straight to ‘terraform revival’ with no hesitation. The rest of us got there, but the similarity of effect choice, and the lack of exposition, got in the way of the story for many. > The POINT of whodunit type crime stories is that in the end, the reader (or viewer) could?ve worked out the solution themselves One thing I adore about TUATW is that, when interviewed, only one character is shown to be telling a story consistent with their flashback. And, because of that – in retrospect, anyway – they can be the only one who is concealing something, the flashback being a fabrication based on their statement rather than a truth concealed BY their statement. I love the writing of that. |
| December 9, 2008 at 12:32 pm #87358 | |
|
TheLeen |
> One thing I adore about TUATW is that, when interviewed, only one character is Good point. We were suspecting him of being up to no good, now I know why. (Here’s what we’d thought – a giant shape-shifting wasp broke into the church and replaced the reverend.) As for The Doctor’s Daughter… Here’s what we’d thought – two groups of unaware contestants in some sort of maze; the numbers probably reminded me of The Cube or something. And Georgia Moffett: well, she wasn’t hideous. And I really only noticed it during the second viewing. But I was under the impression that she put not enough excitement into her voice (all her sentences seemed to end in a full stop, not exclamation mark – even when on the run) while she put TOO MUCH excitement into her face (wide-eyed over-excited open-mouthed grin-wise). Okay, the over-the-top excitement kind of suited the role. But her delivery of sentences didn’t suit THAT. And the discrepancy just felt very awkward to me. The rest of her acting was okay. That’s why up there I typed “Close the door.” instead of “Close the door!!!” … |
| December 9, 2008 at 12:57 pm #87360 | |
|
performingmonkey |
She’s fit and blond so it doesn’t matter. |
| December 9, 2008 at 1:34 pm #87361 | |
|
Andrew |
> put it about The Lazarus Experiment. I meant ‘above’, obviously. > Here?s what we?d thought – two groups of unaware contestants in some sort of maze; I went through a similar process. The cloning booths seemed like a ‘new life’ or ‘extra men’ part of a videogame. > She?s fit and blond so it doesn?t matter. It was talk like this that led to Martha’s slow descent into tedium being ignored – everyone was too busy staring at her arse to notice. :-) |
| December 9, 2008 at 2:36 pm #87362 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
> put it about The Lazarus Experiment. I’m sorry, but I just don’t get the Lazarus hate. I watched the episode again the other week and I think I liked it even more. Where’s the equivalent pair of superb performances of Mark Gatiss and Thelma Barlow in TDD? Where’s the nice interweaving of the main series arc in TDD? Where’s the big, satisfying finale in TDD? > everyone was too busy staring at her arse to notice. :-) Also, I think her good work of series 3 counts in her favour a great deal. |
| December 9, 2008 at 3:03 pm #87363 | |
|
Andrew |
> I?m sorry, but I just don?t get the Lazarus hate. I agree on the performances, but not the interweaving’s pretty basic and the finale far from satisfying. For me. The predictable story and primitive characterisation – and the fact the overly-linear story essentially climaxes half way then carries interminably on – really dumps it to the bottom. > Also, I think her good work of series 3 counts in her favour a great deal. I just rewatched the series three finale and I was struck by how little I liked her performance. As the crush thing wore off, there seemed to be less and less to the character, and her performance seemed more and one-note. Looking back I’m not sure her she actually had the ability – though I may be jaded by mediocre turns in both Who and Torchwood since. |
| December 14, 2008 at 1:35 pm #87459 | |
|
TheLeen |
Silence in The Library & Forest of the Dead That’s more like it. We loved: - The first sentence: “Close your eyes and tell me what you see.” Best opening line ever. There were however things (that I mainly noticed during the second viewing) that didn’t, well, that weren’t quite satisfactory. :x Here we go: We wondered: - I’d actually wondered how the Doctor’s past, present and future work – surely he must’ve bumped into future friends before… Despite all this, I still think it’s two of the best episodes ever. Like I said earlier – if an episode is fun to watch, you don’t really care (and don’t want to care) about such things as minor inconsistencies… Now, Mr Moffat. He’s created some damn fine episode scripts there. But I can’t really imagine an entire series’ worth of such episodes. You can’t keep up that level of personal drama for 13 episodes. And also, he can’t keep writing bigger, better love interests for the Doctor. :P Will we see more of River Song, or Lee McAvoy in the future? Probably not. And that sucks. They’ll probably go the way of Elizabeth I and Jenny. River seems to have known him either with this face (which means he would have to meet her and go through a LOT of stuff with her during his current incarnation, which, as we sadly know through meta-knowledge, isn’t going to happen) or with a number of different faces (without really knowing their sort order, thus the diary check) and the Doctor has only three lives left (as far as we know right now). The latter is more likely, so the writers would have more time than for example, making Elizabeth’s scene in The Shakespeare Code make sense. You see the problem? The problem is that I CAN’T STOP THINKING ABOUT THESE THINGS. |
| December 14, 2008 at 6:45 pm #87467 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
> Now, Mr Moffat. He?s created some damn fine episode scripts there. But I can?t really imagine an entire series? worth of such episodes. You can?t keep up that level of personal drama for 13 episodes. And also, he can?t keep writing bigger, better love interests for the Doctor. :P No. No. No. It’s odd. I’m not the world’s most passionate guy and yet query, dispute or dismiss any Moffat Who and I just want to scream “YOU’RE WRONG! YOU’RE WRONG!” I actually expect there to be a drop in viewing figures during Moffat’s run and yet I couldn’t care. I’m probably setting myself up for a huge fall, but I just refuse to consider Moffat’s Who as being anything less than my favourite Who of all-time. I’ve grown over the four new series to have a huge amount of appreciation for what RTD achieved, and yet still if I had to set down and pick my Top 5 New Who stories I know 4 of them would be the Moffat written ones, very possibly in the Top 4 slots. |
| December 14, 2008 at 8:10 pm #87473 | |
|
Phil |
>I?m not the world?s most passionate guy Lola. Lo-lo-lo-lo Lola. Lo-lo-lo lo Lolaahhhhh… |
| December 15, 2008 at 12:22 pm #87480 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Played for and got :) |
| December 15, 2008 at 3:24 pm #87481 | |
|
performingmonkey |
Jekyll suggests that Moffat-run Who being consistently great is far from definite. Also, with the pressure of running the series how likely is it that he can come up with something as good as TGITFP, Blink etc. ? OK RTD managed to throw in some real crackers of his own, but it was mainly his finales and opening eps, not to mention the Christmas eps, that held his concentration. |
| December 15, 2008 at 4:34 pm #87482 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
No. No. No. You’re Wrong. You’re Wrong. You’RE WRONG! Jekyll was consistently brilliant. Even the finale. (Well I did warn you) Seriously though, I thought Jekyll was the best bit of TV from last year aside from Moffat Who. Similarly Coupling, Joking Apart and Press Gang were all amongst my favourite shows at the time they aired – even though I was a bit too young for the last two at the time. Fair enough not everything he’s done has been head and shoulders above everyone else. I never really took to Chalk, and I remember that getting terribly reviews, but in terms of Who… Come on! I’ve just never seen a chink in his armour. ‘Blink’ was a revelation for a bottle episode. Picasso on a postage stamp. A spellbinding piece of TV that through up a character we were all begging to have sex with/see as a new companion (delete as applicable) and iconic original monsters. ‘Empty Child/Doctor Dances’ gave us Captain Jack and monsters that truly hit bang on the old ‘hide behind your sofa’ cliche despite the fact it was just a small child repeating four simple words. Probably the first time New Who truly hit it’s stide. ‘Girl in the Fireplace’ – The second best 45 minutes of television ever. I actually went into series four with nerves that he couldn’t possibly do it again. After watching ‘Silence in the Library’ my first thought was well it was an A just not an A+. A week later after watching Part 2 with Ian I had tears in my eyes, and a cheshire cat’s grin feeling like I had just been through some quasi-relgious-tantric experiment. It felt like someone had been playing Rubik’s cube with my brain for a week and as the credits rolled click everything into place. If Moffat was going to do bad Who, It would have happened by now. Either in his episodes or in the magazine. I genuinely don’t believe the size of the task will have any relevance. With regards to Xmas eps, finales and openers I guess it open’s up another debate about what constitutes a good series. I’m assuming Moffat’s run will follow a similar pattern to RTD in that he will personally craft these. I was pretty underwhelmed by both Series 2 and 4 apart from the Moffat eps and the finales. Series 3 wasn’t going well either until Moffat, The Cornell 2-parter and Utopia although Smith & Jones was a cracking opener. Edit: I’ve removed the next 98 paragraphs of Moffat based verbal masterbation. Although I did conclude that only Neil Gaiman was in comparable. Ye gods I hope the rumour of him writing an episode at some point comes to fruition too. |
| December 15, 2008 at 4:52 pm #87483 | |
|
TheLeen |
> If Moffat was going to do bad Who, It would have happened by now. Either in his episodes or in the magazine. I genuinely don?t believe the size of the task will have any relevance. You got me wrong there – I think all of his episodes are brilliant, including Time Crash. I love the dialogue he writes. He manages to write lyrical stuff into all-day dialogue without making it sound corny and pretentious, just beautiful. His episodes are poetry. I just thought – right now, his episodes have been (among) the highlights of every series. What is a series going to be like consisting of highlights? Would or wouldn’t it be TOO AWESOME? Like eating candy all day? (I know he isn’t going to write every episode himself. But with luck, more of them than he has so far.) What makes his episodes be awesome? The good (and very creative) storylines and the perfect texts. What makes his episodes emotional rollercoaster rides? Increased creepiness, increased drama and increased Doctor lovelife. I think series 6 of Who can do with each and every episode having good storylines and perfect dialogues, but not too many having a) and b) (there should still be room for highlights) and christ, please no more than one episode per series with c). I think Steven Moffat is a genius. But RTD Who is already pretty extreme in its colourfulness (lacking a better term) as it is, and I don’t want to end up lost in lollipop land. I really don’t know how else to explain it. |
| December 15, 2008 at 8:12 pm #87487 | |
|
John Hoare |
My main issue with the library two-parter is that whilst it’s absolutely amazing, and some of the best New Who so far, there’s too many repeated themes from Moffat’s earlier Who stories in there. But I doubt that’ll be a problem when he takes over as showrunner. Oh, and I’m just watching a repeat of The Sontaran Stratagem, and the bit where Donna says she’s going home to the Doctor makes me fucking head want to fall off. It’s excruciating. I grew to like Tate well enough in the role eventually, but whenever she did the full-on Tate-isms, which happened far more often in the first half of the season, it makes it impossible to. I’d come to the conclusion that it was just the first episode which had put me off her… but rewatching the series, I don’t think that’s the case any more. |
| December 15, 2008 at 8:24 pm #87488 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Plus, she actually had flashbacks to the three episodes previous as if she’d been gone for years, when clearly she fucking hadn’t. |
| December 15, 2008 at 8:41 pm #87489 | |
|
ChrisM |
>Seriously though, I thought Jekyll was the best bit of TV from last year aside from Moffat Who. Jekyll was very good. I didn’t like the explanation of how this present day version of Jekyll/Hyde came about, (even taking into account that the other explanations I can think of would have been rather cliche) but the rest, including the very end, great. |
| December 15, 2008 at 8:42 pm #87491 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Jekyll was awesome until the last episode came along like a big lumbering ball of crazy messiness. |
| December 15, 2008 at 8:49 pm #87495 | |
|
Andrew |
> there?s too many repeated themes from Moffat?s earlier Who stories in there. Someone will correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t most of the Moffat stories all pitched for series one? (Aside from Blink, right?) So a certain tonal similarity isn’t surprising. Plus, no doubt, there’s a priority of ‘stuff that works for RTD’s Who’. You pitch things appropriate to the showrunner’s vision. Moffat’s interest in ‘the Doctor on TV’, ‘familiar, transformed human monsters with catchphrases’ and ‘time conundrum love’ all gel well with the RTD format – where dreaming of travel in the TARDIS, iconic imagery and emotional whack are key aspects. So, ditto – I doubt it’ll be a problem with a team of writers and a different set of creative and production priorities. > Tate-isms My problem with stuff that’s basically organic to the performer is that you can apply this negative-sounding term to any actor. “Cleese-isms’, ‘Tennant-isms’, ‘O’Dowd-isms’… In Tate’s case these things simply, and sadly, become familiar in one context first – the sketch show. I guess I was lucky in as much as I didn’t over-expose myself to that show, so Tate’s mannerisms mostly feel like part of Donna. I mean, I dislike the structure and substance of the sequence you’re talking about (too early to work as the mislead, too early for the flashbacks, and too drawn out to stay funny), but the performances give me no concern at all. |
| December 15, 2008 at 9:02 pm #87502 | |
|
TheLeen |
> In Tate?s case these things simply, and sadly, become familiar in one context first – the sketch show. I guess I was lucky in as much as I didn?t over-expose myself to that show, so Tate?s mannerisms mostly feel like part of Donna. Yep. |
| December 15, 2008 at 9:04 pm #87506 | |
|
John Hoare |
This is true. And one person’s repetitiveness is another person’s coherence of tone. I think it sails *slightly* too close to repetition in that final two-parter (but *only* in that final two-parter). But that’s subjective, and it doesn’t stop it being an amazing couple of episodes.
Yeah, I’m not worried at all in this regard. I think we can safely say that we’ll get more episodes where the time travel actually plays a part in the plot, rather than just being a means to get the story started, though. Hopefully it won’t be used too much.
I didn’t actually mean the term negatively in its own right at all – I’m just using it as a short hand, because I couldn’t think of another way to describe it. I’d happily use the phrase in a positive sense with another person.
I think to be honest, it’s just that I don’t like them at all – I’ve not seen much of the sketch show either (although I’ve seen enough to know I intensely dislike it, admittedly). If they worked for me in Who, I’d have no trouble adapting. But they just drive me up the wall, in whatever context. I mean, I do see them as part of Donna as well – it never feels out of character – just a part of Donna that drives me up the bloody wall! It’s a shame they annoy me so much, really – because I’ve really come round to the idea that Martha is a pretty nothing character, and Donna is far more interesting. But just when I relax into her, she does something that really bloody irritates me! As I recall, it calms down in the second half of the series, though. |
| December 15, 2008 at 9:44 pm #87511 | |
|
Dave |
>?Cleese-isms?, ?Tennant-isms?, ?O?Dowd-isms?? O’Dowd is the new Doctor |
| December 15, 2008 at 9:59 pm #87513 | |
|
TheLeen |
What’s he gonna say then, “many planets have an Ireland”? |
| December 15, 2008 at 10:31 pm #87522 | |
|
Dave |
>What?s he gonna say then, ?many planets have an Ireland?? |
| December 15, 2008 at 10:46 pm #87524 | |
|
TheLeen |
Oh, RIGHT. I forgot about that! Haha, fantastic. |
| December 16, 2008 at 1:37 pm #87545 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
> Jekyll was awesome until the last episode came along like a big lumbering ball of crazy messiness. YOU’RE WRONG! (Repeat to fade) |
| December 16, 2008 at 8:10 pm #87577 | |
|
TheLeen |
Midnight Uhm. That was special. It was good telly. An enjoyable 40-something minutes. But it’s not what I want to see when I pop a Doctor Who DVD in the player. Same with “Blink” back then, really. It was great. But I’d never rank it as #1 bestest episode of Doctor Who. Because it is something else. We were a bit annoyed that there was no real solution to the plot. Like, who or what that creature was and what it wanted. It was such an interesting alien… we would’ve liked to know. Turn Left That one was surprisingly good for an episode without the Doctor in it. I really liked it. It was very tense, the bug and its clicky noises were creepy enough, and Donna was great. Then again, we’ve had that “What if everything was shit and only a handful people know” story last series already… Why is Rose talking like she just got an anesthetic injection in her face? Bad Wolf. Lovely. Cloister Bell. Something that I should know about, but don’t. I only know Cloister the Stupid :( Had to keep these two short, because I’m off to watch the grande finale. :D |
| December 16, 2008 at 11:00 pm #87581 | |
|
TheLeen |
Well, what a letdown that was. |
| December 16, 2008 at 11:02 pm #87583 | |
|
Andrew |
Oh this is going to be interesting… |
| December 16, 2008 at 11:25 pm #87585 | |
|
TheLeen |
Shall I keep this one for next time I have PMS? :P Nah, I’ll type it all when I have the time… although the two episodes were bloody long, so in order to remember all of the stuff I disapprove of, I’d have to watch them again, like in the olden days, with pencil and paper ready. To cut it short for now: too much of everything. |
| December 17, 2008 at 1:11 am #87590 | |
|
Jonathan Capps |
Quite how you could like the terrible Turn Left and have big problems with the finale is baffling to me! |
| December 17, 2008 at 1:21 am #87592 | |
|
Andrew |
> Quite how you could like the terrible Turn Left and have big problems with the finale is baffling to me! THIS!!!!!!!!! |
| December 17, 2008 at 7:51 am #87602 | |
|
Pete Part Three |
>THIS!!!!!!!!! THIS!!!!!!!!! And Midnight is awesome. |
| December 17, 2008 at 10:26 am #87603 | |
|
Dave |
It looks like Marleen’s fallen out of love, maybe it’ll take another thread to remind her what she liked about Doctor Who in the first place. |
| December 17, 2008 at 2:24 pm #87614 | |
|
ChrisM |
The finale is good. But, I can see how many would dislike it. Particularly considering THAT scene. Oh dear. |
| December 17, 2008 at 2:41 pm #87615 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
I thought it was the best of the finales so far. It was stupid, over-the-top, messy, confusing, badly-explained, schmaltzy and overlong. But gloriously so! Also Davros. Also Cribbins. |
| December 17, 2008 at 3:02 pm #87616 | |
|
John Hoare |
I loved most of the finale. But the more I think about it, the more the whole two Doctor thing – and Rose going off with the second Doctor – can fuck right the fuck off. |
| December 17, 2008 at 3:07 pm #87617 | |
|
TheLeen |
> It looks like Marleen?s fallen out of love, Nooooooo. No no no no no. > I thought it was the best of the finales so far. I thought the finales have gotten gradually worse… (I can’t remember whether I preferred the 2nd or 3rd at the time – but still) > It was stupid, over-the-top, And I thought I had to write a summary… :P > But gloriously so! Really? :( Ah well – I don’t want to discuss this based solely on my bad mood ;) I have a little much to do at work right now, so it may have to wait until Saturday… |
| December 17, 2008 at 4:41 pm #87625 | |
|
TheLeen |
I figured I’d rather get this over with and do over time! Ah, where to start. Like I said, it was bloody long (which is not necessarily a bad thing – on the contrary, actually) and my memory is kind of blurry already. What I liked: - Donna at her best. I loved Catherine Tate in this, especially in the end when she did the “Ha!” and the “Oh yes!” – and now I’m a bit sad that she’s gone for good. (but I hope they stick with it, this time.) What the Doctor said to Donna’s mum at the end was good, too. What I didn’t like: - Rose. She didn’t act or sound any like I remember her. And: she hardly DID anything. After all the dimension-hopping, TARDIS-milking, future-foretelling and kicking-arse-ness (which was never explained!) – she fucking doesn’t do anything in this episode but provide a level of emotional drama for the Doctor. Which (at least as far as I am concerned) didn’t work. It should have worked. Things I feel I should have known beforehand - Still don’t know what the Cloister Bell is. What I learned: - The Doctor should always keep a spare hand, because then he won’t have to regenerate his 13 lives away. (see also: series four’s 101 new ways to immortality) Random observations: - I really should’ve watched all those spin-offs. Actually, scrap that. This “Like/Dislike” thing doesn’t work for the finale. There were a lot of tiny little things that only irritated me on the whole. I didn’t HATE the episode, like I hated, let’s say, The Doctor’s Daughter. But it was… it just didn’t leave me with a good feeling. I wasn’t scared, I didn’t cry, it didn’t touch me. Why? I think part of the reason WHY it didn’t touch me was the WAY over the top setting. And even worse than me not really caring is this: “You’ve faught Daleks in series one already” “yeah, but they were, like, mad Daleks. These ones are PROPER Daleks.” Well, *I* was a LOT more scared of the ones in the first series; secondly, Caan (of course) and Davros (yes) and also the rest of them that were about to destroy everything, including themselves – are definitely madder than any Dalek I’ve ever seen before; thirdly, it felt like the episode wanted to make itself look scarier AT THE EXPENSE of the series one finale. It kind of killed all of series one’s “Bad Wolf” storyline. And that’s not okay. It did piss me off a little. No telly show should give you the feeling that you need to protect earlier episodes. But then, they managed to totally kill the emotional epic of series two’s finale as well by giving Rose half-a-Doctor to play with. As for ALL OF THE DOCTOR’S FRIENDS UNITED… I see how they wanted to give the fans something special, but it just felt so forced and unnatural. And OF COURSE K9 had to jump out of the corner. The problem that the whole nostalgia thing just doesn’t… work for me. Not THAT good anyway. Not everything was bad. Yeah, yeah, it was good to see so much Cribbins. But we could’ve seen much Cribbins in a different series four finale. So, what would I have wanted this to be like? - End Rose’s story, but do so in a… better way. But that’s nit-picking, now. The main problems are the ones I described in the middle of the wall of text here. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:06 pm #87635 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
I think my reaction after watching the Series Four finale at the House of Symes boiled down to “Toss, but brilliant toss”. Although I found myself agreeing with lots of your points so on a second viewing it’s likely I wouldn’t be quite so satisfied. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:07 pm #87637 | |
|
Seb Patrick |
Davros, though. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87641 | |
|
John Hoare |
Davros was entirely bloody underused. And not, I don’t think, in a way that makes any satisfactory point, either. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87642 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm #87643 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN. |
| December 17, 2008 at 5:27 pm #87644 | |
|
Tarka Dal |
Which was great yeah, but as TheLeen sort of said…Daleks AGAIN. |
Jump to top / Jump to 'Recent Replies'
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
