Is Justice a deliberate retcon…or is Kryten lying?

Home Forums Ganymede & Titan Forum Is Justice a deliberate retcon…or is Kryten lying?

This topic contains 111 replies, has 21 voices, and was last updated by  Ben Saunders 2 weeks, 2 days ago.

Viewing 112 posts - 1 through 112 (of 112 total)

Jump to bottom

  • Author
    Posts
  • #230668

    Pete Part Three

    I’ve reached Justice in my rewatch, and I’m always intrigued over Kryten’s defence of Rimmer.

    The Justice field works by detecting a person’s guilt (rather than trying to determine actual culpability), and Kryten’s defence hinges on this. He argues that Rimmer couldn’t possibly be guilty of 2nd degree murder, as his responsibilities extended no further than repairing vending machines. It’s Rimmer’s grand delusions over his role on Red Dwarf that is feeding his guilt.

    Interestingly, you could possibly argue that his death scene in Me2 is a faked reconstruction along these lines; Hollister yelling at Rimmer “It was your responsibility to fix the drive plate” could be a warped Rimmer’s way of remembering the accident, but there’s clearly several lines in The End which confirm that Rimmer *was* responsible, and he *was* in the drive room when he died (despite clearly not having a reason to go there regularly).

    The curious thing is that Justice never actually reveals whether this is Rob and Doug retconning events (and bringing things in line with Infinity, as they did a lot throughout Series IV) or whether Kryten is deliberately lying. Is it seeding the court-case later, when Kryten says “Boy, I’m really getting the hang of this “lie mode.”” when they enter Justice World, or just a coincidence?.

    I’d also forgotten that Kryten refers to Rimmer as a “retard” at one point. Urgh.

    #230671

    Col

    The whole drive plate thing never made much sense to me anyway. Why would a mere 2nd technician, more used to ensuring that the chicken soup nozzle on vending machines wasn’t clogged, be entrusted with repairing such a vital piece of equipment such as the drive plate? Rimmer may have guilt over the incident but he still blames Lister for it, saying that if he had some help while fixing it, it wouldn’t have happened. So if Lister was unavailable as he was in stasis, why wasn’t someone else assigned to help Rimmer?

    #230672

    Taiwan Tony

    >I’d also forgotten that Kryten refers to Rimmer as a “retard” at one point. Urgh.

    Careful. Better Dead Than Smeg will be calling you for a chat.

    #230673

    bloodteller

    >The whole drive plate thing never made much sense to me anyway. Why would a mere 2nd technician, more used to ensuring that the chicken soup nozzle on vending machines wasn’t clogged, be entrusted with repairing such a vital piece of equipment such as the drive plate?

    it’s implied in Back In The Red that repairing the drive plates is an incredibly easy task- presumably Rimmer was given the job of fixing them because Hollister assumed that not even Rimmer was stupid enough to botch such an easy task.

    #230674

    bloodteller

    it’s like a person trying to unclog a toilet but somehow messing up and flooding the entire house

    #230675

    Warbodog

    I’m leaning towards retcon now, and that’s weird.

    I’ve always taken that scene as Kryten not denying the events, but putting the blame on the yo-gurt who assigned the task to someone inept who was bound to fail, and the Justice computer conveniently finding that an acceptable excuse.

    But reading the dialogue, Kryten rejects the possibility it even happened, and the verdict is “It is not possible for you to have committed the crimes.” Even though it is possible because it did happen (at least in the original continuity).

    #230676

    Ben Saunders

    I always believed that the job of fixing the drive plate was given to Rimmer, but shouldn’t have been. Either they underestimated the importance of the job and had no idea it could go so catastrophically wrong, or they were just idiots. The captain was Dennis the donut boy, after all.

    #230678

    Ben Saunders

    Also Skipper confirms Rimmer’s claim that if Lister was here the crisis would have been averted by showing us the universe in which Lister becomes captain. In that episode he also mentions a cash payoff to keep shtum and I think implies that he discovered the fault, so perhaps we can take that to mean that a radiation leak was not a known possibility at the time of Rimmer fixing the drive plate, so the idea that the job wasn’t seen as thay critical works. Now that’s a retcon.

    #230681

    Dave

    The whole drive plate thing never made much sense to me anyway. Why would a mere 2nd technician, more used to ensuring that the chicken soup nozzle on vending machines wasn’t clogged, be entrusted with repairing such a vital piece of equipment such as the drive plate?

    Isn’t it a hangover from the original version of The End, where they weren’t quite such lowly vending-machine repairmen, but were engineers who actually had to fix reasonably important machinery?

    Justice probably just inadvertently calls undue attention to the fact that rewrites to The End made it a lot less plausible that Rimmer would be entrusted with such important repair work.

    I think it’s pretty well-established in-universe that Rimmer was responsible for the leak though. So in that respect, yes, Kryten is lying during the trial.

    #230691

    Warbodog

    >I think it’s pretty well-established in-universe that Rimmer was responsible for the leak though.

    No Kochanski relationship + 169 crew members were also concrete facts from dialogue in multiple episodes, that’s why it seems like it might be another of those post-novel retcons that’s less obvious. I can’t remember if/when Rimmer’s drive plate culpability is mentioned again, but the continuity’s a mish-mash in VIII and beyond.

    #230695

    Ben Saunders

    Kryten is using the determinism defence in that it is the fault of the person/system who gave Rimmer the job rather than the fault of Rimmer himself. Logically this means that it is the fault of the person/system who caused the person/system who chose Rimmer to choose him, and it is the fault of the person/system who resulted in them doing that doing that, and so on and so on, thus proving that nobody could be guilty of anything unless they were God, and the Justice Computer decides that God cannot exist, therefore nobody can possible be guilty of anything, therefore the Justice Computer has no purpose and explodes.

    Or am I misremembering the episode?

    #230696

    Dave

    No Kochanski relationship + 169 crew members were also concrete facts from dialogue in multiple episodes, that’s why it seems like it might be another of those post-novel retcons that’s less obvious.

    Yeah, I suppose that’s fair. But then why would Rimmer feel guilty about it?

    The interesting thing about Justice is that the judgement process is not like The Inquisitor, so it’s not as though Rimmer is judging *himself* as being guilty over the incident. In fact, one of the best gags of the episode is that he stands in his prison shoes fully expecting to be cleared and allowed in, and then is unpleasantly surprised when he’s reminded of what he did.

    To me, that suggests that the guilt is sincere but buried deep down, subconsciously, to the point where Rimmer doesn’t even consciously think of himself as guilty of the deaths he caused. I think that runs counter to the self-delusion scenario that Kryten outlines.

    The trouble is, I think Kryten’s argument is *so* convincing that even the viewers start to think to themselves “yeah, hang on, how could Rimmer get anywhere near something that important?”. And I think that disconnect is exacerbated by the rewrites to The End that makes Second and Third Technicians more lowly than originally intended.

    I think the truth lies somewhere between the idea of Rimmer being as deluded and buffoonish as Kryten argues, and the idea that he’s solely responsible. The truth is that he’s someone incompetent who was tasked with something that was too complicated and important for him to handle, and he cocked it up as a result.

    #230697

    Hamish

    > Or am I misremembering the episode?

    No, you are remembering that one scene in Entangled fairly well.

    #230698

    Pete Part Three

    >But then why would Rimmer feel guilty about it?

    Well, the argument that Kryten (although, not necessarily, the episode) puts forward is that Rimmer, yearning for self-importance, imagined the scenario that he was responsible for repairing the drive plate…and then he fucked it up and killed everyone.

    As you say, the fact that he’s subsequently forgotten it and no longer feels consciously guilty for it, means that it all seems pretty flimsy.

    And yet somehow it works. The Prosecution says “this court accepts that, in your case, the mind probe is not an adequate method of ascertaining guilt”, but I’d think that it creates such a precedent, as to undermine the the use of mind probe for *anyone*. (I’d also query whether Simulants even feel guilt about anything…)

    I’m of the opinion that Rimmer still fucks up the drive plate in Series IV continuity, doesn’t feel massive guilt over it and Kryten’s lying has become sophisticated…but I do find it odd how the episode never bothers to state this. The episode reminds the audience of a fact, spends 10 minutes convincing another character that the fact is untrue…but never clarifies the actual truth.

    #230701

    Ben Saunders

    >Undermine the use of the mind probe for *anyone*

    Good news for this guy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrvh_jB6c70

    #230702

    GlenTokyo

    I always just thought he was tricking the mind probe by leaving out certain bits of truth, but I don’t think anything Kryten says implies Rimmer wasn’t responsible in canon.

    By going on about how inexplicable it’d be that they’d get a vending machine repair man to fix a drive plate he convinces the probe that it’s merely misplaced guilt rather than actual culpability despite the fact Rimmer was sent to repair the driveplate, because he knows that the only evidence the probe has to work with is Rimmer’s mind, not records and CCTV, as such the probe knows what kind of person Rimmer is, the “his ship, his fault” stuff and lets him off.

    Simply

    Is Rimmer guilty/ does he feel guilt?

    Yes

    Does Rimmer think the smooth running of Red Dwarf is his responsibility?

    Yes

    Considering his rank, is it likely he would have been asked to repair the driveplate?

    No

    As such not guilty.

    #230704

    Me Own Stunts

    > The captain was Dennis the donut boy, after all.

    Nope.

    Wasn’t.

    #230705

    Dave

    because he knows that the only evidence the probe has to work with is Rimmer’s mind, not records and CCTV

    It does rather show up the nonsensical nature of the process. Why consider evidence and facts when you can just test whether someone feels subjectively guilty about it?

    Presumably genuine psychopaths who know they are culpable but feel no remorse or guilt for their crimes would get off scott free every time.

    #230706

    Ben Saunders

    So did the enormous explosion fix the drive plate all on its own? Or is Red Dwarf now operating without a drive plate? What did it do, and why did it have one if they just explode, killing everybody, and seemingly serve no other function? Is the drive plate the appendix of interplanetary mining spaceships?

    #230707

    Dave

    I assumed Holly fixed it afterwards. Which makes you wonder why he didn’t just do it in the first place.

    #230710

    International Debris

    The ‘Rimmer caused the accident’ explanation is hinted at and referred to in VIII and X, so I don’t think it was ever fully retconned. I think in Justice it’s a mixture of the fact that Rimmer never murdered anybody (it’d be manslaughter at most), displaced blame (Rimmer was not appropriately trained for the role – perhaps somebody gave him the chance to better himself? – and therefore is not responsible) and Kryten’s exaggeration based on fact (Rimmer’s incompetence) and an opportunity to lay into Rimmer.

    At the same time, it’s probably best to acknowledge that, continuity-wise, it’s not one of the best scenes, and this is the sort of nonsense Doug & Rob did a lot of in the middle years of the show.

    #230711

    bloodteller

    >So did the enormous explosion fix the drive plate all on its own? Or is Red Dwarf now operating without a drive plate?

    if i recall correctly it’s mentioned in various bits of dialogue that there’s more than one drive plate, so presumably if just one blows up it doesn’t stop the ship from working. e.g. “There’s a potentially lethal scenario involving drive plates, sir. If one of these plates is misrepaired…”. So for all we know there’s thousands of drive plates onboard the ship, whatever they actually are.

    #230719

    Warbodog

    >The ‘Rimmer caused the accident’ explanation is hinted at and referred to in VIII and X, so I don’t think it was ever fully retconned.

    I feel like the improvised retconning ended in VII (with its new Kochanski and reimagined blue Space Corps uniforms) and the old TV continuity was respected more from VIII onwards, after Remastered revived it (old-style uniforms, referencing Future Echoes and drive plates, feeling the need to explain visual changes to the ship in dialogue). They hung on to useful retconned things like the 1,000+ crew (presumably) and the Lister-Kochanski relationship.

    #230720

    Warbodog

    It’s also odd that IV doesn’t retcon things the same way they did in the novels, where the crew was 11,000+ and it starts in the late 22nd century (eventually used in Ouroboros, which also mentions Kryten Rimmering the Nova 5 crew).

    Did 11,169 sound like too many to be funny in Justice? Did “enlightened 22nd century guy” not have the right cadence?

    #230734

    Plastic Percy

    <<I assumed Holly fixed it afterwards. Which makes you wonder why he didn’t just do it in the first place. >>

    Because the service robots have a better union than the technicians.

    #230834

    Plastic Percy

    Also, how come the justicefield didn’t discover Kryten’s guilt over the deaths of the Nova 5 crew? Ok, it was an accident, but he’s at least technically guilty of that as Rimmer is of killing the Red Dwarf crew.

    #230835

    bloodteller

    didn’t the Nova 5 crew die of old age? their skeletons are still there and such, so i always thought that was the case

    #230836

    Dave

    It isn’t retconned as Kryten’s fault until series VII, is it?

    #230837

    Ben Saunders

    Either way, Kryten was oblivious to the fact that the crew of the Nova 5 were even dead, so wouldn’t recognise it as his fault. It could be argued that he realised/was told what happened by the time of VII, but yes it is a retcon I think.

    #230844

    Taiwan Tony

    Wasn’t it his fault in the book?

    #230845

    Dave

    Yes. I think it’s one of those book differences that eventually made its way into the series.

    #230846

    bloodteller

    is it ever established in the book that him ‘cleaning’ the computer and causing the ship to crash was what actually killed the crew, though? they aren’t dead by the end of the chapter, so i always just assumed they lived out the rest of their lives stuck on the ship with Kryten, rather than them all dying in the crash.

    #230847

    Plastic Percy

    His cleaning of the computer resulted in the deaths of all those in the stasis booths, so he’s at least guilty of creating the accident that killed them. Tracy, Jane and Ann died of old age. But you’d have thought he at least subliminally knew as he had the idea to put them in wigs.

    #230856

    Me Own Stunts

    > But you’d have thought he at least subliminally knew as he had the idea to put them in wigs.

    Maybe Kryten thought when they had become skeletons that they had just ‘gone grey’.

    #230859

    Warbodog

    I only watched Psycho recently, and was a bit annoyed at Rimmer for having twice spoiled the big reveal in ‘Kryten’ and ‘DNA.’

    #230860

    Warbodog

    Back to Reality, not DNA. I was getting my mysterious ancient corpses mixed up.

    #230861

    Dave

    Casablanca next?

    #230869

    Ben Saunders

    I haven’t seen the sixth sense because the twist ending has been ruined by the simpsons, scrubs, the lonely island etc. It’s now common knowledge like what’s the capital of France and what colour is the sky.

    #230870

    Ben Saunders

    I’m also aware of what happens in Psycho despite never having watched it, and RIP to anybody who didn’t watch Empire Strikes Back when they were very young

    #230907

    Pete Part Three

    Psycho and The Sixth Sense are much more than just their twists.

    Empire’s twist is spoiled for new viewers simply if they watch the films in episode order. So they’re fucked either way.

    #230909

    quinn_drummer

    Watching films like the Sixth Sense or Shutter Island etc, knowing the ending, is great as you get to see how the twist plays out in the film and how it is subtle but also obvious once you know that that is what is going on … if that makes sense?

    Sure it’d be nice to have experienced it first and then gone back and watch it again, but it shouldn’t stop you watching just because you know how it ends. As Pete Part Three says, the films are more than just the twist ending.

    #230919

    Toxteth O-Grady

    Is there anyone left who doesn’t already know the twist ending of Planet of the Apes (1968)?
    If references in things like The Simpsons hadn’t already spoiled it for you, then simply look at the cover of the home video release. Or watch the recent reboot/prequel trilogy.

    #230924

    Ben Saunders

    That is another one that’s just sort of, known. The baby at the end of 2001, is another thing that’s now as much a part of popular culture as it is a bit in a film. Everybody dying at the end of Blackadder, as well, I haven’t seen that either.

    But then, you know the Doctor is going to regenerate every single time and you can still get a cracking good story out of it. Even Hartnell – Troughton I think was announced beforehand.

    And sometimes even when a character death/twist is a surprise (the end of The Last Jedi) it can still be shit.

    #230947

    Warbodog

    >Is there anyone left who doesn’t already know the twist ending of Planet of the Apes (1968)?

    My wife didn’t know it, but assumed what was going on straight away, since it’s blatant if you watch enough sci-fi and Twilight Zone specifically. She was also unspoiled when we watched Empire Strikes Back, Sixth Sense, all Nu Who regenerations except the last one (only because I told her), Simpsons-spoiled Twilight Zones, and basically all films and TV. She won’t watch Red Dwarf though.

    #230948

    Ben Saunders

    >She was also unspoiled when we watched Empire Strikes Back
    Literally how? Did she not consume a single piece of popular media pre-Empire?
    I’d say because of how everybody knows the Doctor is going to regenerate anyway, the stories are designed in such a way as to be more effective with that knowledge, as none of them are really surprising in any way because they don’t try to be. You get to enjoy all the foreshadowing and events with the dramatic irony of knowing what’s coming, even if you don’t know the specifics.

    #230950

    Warbodog

    >Literally how?

    Different cultural background, or just bad taste pre- my great taste. Things sometimes remind her of childhood anime I have no knowledge of. Even if you once saw an “I am your father” parody with some robot-looking guy 10 years ago, there are lots of things with robot-looking guys.

    #230951

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    “I’d also forgotten that Kryten refers to Rimmer as a “retard” at one point. Urgh.”

    Urgh. Virtue signalling. Yuck.

    #230953

    bloodteller

    >I’d also forgotten that Kryten refers to Rimmer as a “retard” at one point. Urgh.

    i wonder what the initial reaction to that line was at the time? surely it can’t have been considered such a horrible word at the time if it was being casually used on BBC 2.

    #230954

    Dave

    I think it’s a case of a word being more widely recognised as offensive now than it was then, certainly.

    There are a few jokes from early Red Dwarf that played fine at the time but are a bit more wince-inducing now.

    #230957

    International Debris

    My wife didn’t know it, but assumed what was going on straight away

    Ha, my girlfriend was the same – I hid the DVD sleeve from her before watching, but after five minutes after they landed she said “I bet they’re back on Earth”

    #230960

    Ben Saunders

    I actually researched the history of the word retard after reading that comment and it’s vaguely interesting. Stuff to be made about how “idiot” and “moron” used to be just as bad as “retard” but now aren’t, leading me to wonder if one day “retard” will be on the same level as those words.

    “…during the 1960s when “there was a push among disability advocates to use the label mental retardation”.This push from advocates was because older terms for the mentally disabled, like moron, imbecile, feeble-minded and idiot, had developed negative meanings. Retard was not used to refer to mentally disabled people until 1985. It was widely accepted to refer to people who are mentally disabled as mentally retarded, or as a retard. From there, it turned quickly into a pejorative term….”

    #230964

    Plastic Percy

    This is going to be The Spastics Society all over again.

    #230971

    Pete Part Three

    >Urgh. Virtue signalling. Yuck.

    Yeah, that’s what that is. Nothing to do with the fact that I’ve had a bunch of experiences since I last saw the episode, and that’s influenced how I view that term.

    I guess you don’t feel uncomfortable about Major saying “w*gs” and “n***ers” in Fawlty Towers, either.

    #230973

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    “I guess you don’t feel uncomfortable about Major saying “w*gs” and “n***ers” in Fawlty Towers, either.”

    Wigs? Nutters? Errrr not really.

    :/

    #230974

    Ben Saunders

    God i haven’t heard the word wags since about 2007, took me a second to realise how w*gs could be offensive. Footballers wives, innit?

    Maybe it’ll turn out that Red Dwarf is actually just extremely prescient and none of these words are actually offensive in the future, making the show an accurate depiction of 23rd century society

    #230975

    Ben Saunders

    Although I’m still not convinced that WAGs is such a horrific word it requires asterisks. Am I missing something?

    #230977

    Dave

    Golly, I think you might be.

    #230978

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    > Although I’m still not convinced that WAGs is such a horrific word it requires asterisks. Am I missing something?

    It’s because they are such slags.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zXDo4dL7SU

    #230980

    Ben Saunders

    It’s not a word that anybody I have ever come into contact with has ever used, sonI probably don’t get it. Us it an English thing?

    #230982

    bloodteller

    i’d never heard the word before until just now when it was mentioned on the forum, so I’m kind of lost here too. according to google it just means the wives/girlfriends of sports people?

    #230983

    clem

    Wrong vowel, lads.

    #230984

    bloodteller

    oh christ

    #230985

    bloodteller

    >There are a few jokes from early Red Dwarf that played fine at the time but are a bit more wince-inducing now.

    out of interest, which jokes would those be? the only one i can think of that seems a bit iffy now is Rimmer’s line about “Awful is when you’re fumbling with your date in the back of your car and you discover she’s got testicles” which could be viewed as transphobic or something

    #230986

    Ben Saunders

    Wigs? Wegs? Wugs? Wygs?

    ….oh nevermind I worked it out.

    Also drug-crazed transvestite is one of those, I think bloodteller. And people also have issues with any gay panic stuff or the McGruder having a concussion stuff

    #230987

    pi r squared

    Whilst I’m sure the sentence would be rephrased if written in 2018, it is worth pointing out that Kryten refers to Rimmer as an “emotional retard” (ie. emotionally-stunted, which is reasonably apt) rather than calling him a “retard” outright. Not ideal but at least marginally less offensive, and I’m sure – like Steve Coogan famously regretting using “spastic” in I’m Alan Partridge – that Doug and Rob would probably rewrite it if they could.

    As a half-black person, I don’t enjoy the Major’s niggers and wogs “joke” in Fawlty Towers, but I appreciate that (a) it’s a product of its time, (b) the point is supposed to be demonstrating the Major’s senility and outdated (even for 1974) values and is therefore meant to be uncomfortable, and (c) even in those days it only gets a pretty lukewarm response from the audience.

    Judging a 1991 episode by 2018 sensibilities is always going to be tough and acceptable language and behaviour will inevitably change. Growing up, our family would happily use the terms “half-caste” and “coloured” to describe ourselves (leading to my toddler sister happily describing herself as “coloured-in” to people!) but this would be frowned upon nowadays, even though our mixed race little unit was anything but racist.

    #230988

    Dave

    out of interest, which jokes would those be? the only one i can think of that seems a bit iffy now is Rimmer’s line about “Awful is when you’re fumbling with your date in the back of your car and you discover she’s got testicles” which could be viewed as transphobic or something

    Mostly ones revolving around gender politics spring to mind. Not a huge deal but they just play a little differently now.

    Largely though I think the show’s comedy is pretty timeless.

    #230989

    Pete Part Three

    >Wigs? Nutters? Errrr not really.

    Hey, Rameses. How about we just ignore each other going forward? Two threads in, and I’m already sick of you.

    > is worth pointing out that Kryten refers to Rimmer as an “emotional retard”

    Yes, I appreciate this is the intention. Unfortunately, if you stick a bunch of adjectives (“neurotic”, “under-achieving”) in front of the term, it gets a bit lost.

    #230990

    bloodteller

    >Yes, I appreciate this is the intention. Unfortunately, if you stick a bunch of adjectives (“neurotic”, “under-achieving”) in front of the term, it gets a bit lost.

    if it’s any consolation the Dave repeats of the episode remove the “under-acheiving emotional retard” part of the sentence and so Kryten just calls him a neurotic

    #230991

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    > Hey, Rameses. How about we just ignore each other going forward? Two threads in, and I’m already sick of you.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    #230994

    Ben Saunders

    Honestly, if you’re straight you wouldn’t exactly want to find out your date had balls, but i could imagine somebody thinking up a joke like that today and thinking “ooh, better not” and binning it. Worth noting that I know quite a few transgender people who make jokes like that anyway, and would be fine if i did similar. It’s quite interesting what exactly they deem offensive and inoffensive, often they’re fine with jokes like that but then there are very specific things you’d never even think about which bother them.

    Either I’m young enough to have never really heard “wogs” or it just doesn’t get used by people i know, i only vaguely know what it even means. Which shows its a pretty old-fashioned term.

    “Emotional retard” does soften the blow a little bit, up until now i thought he had actually just straight up called him retarded and I had somehow forgotten. I would absolutely change the line were it being written today, but flat out censoring it is a curious idea (I believe things should be presented as-was for the most part, but of course there will be guidelines for this sort of thing)

    #230995

    bloodteller

    >Worth noting that I know quite a few transgender people who make jokes like that anyway, and would be fine if i did similar. It’s quite interesting what exactly they deem offensive and inoffensive, often they’re fine with jokes like that but then there are very specific things you’d never even think about which bother them.

    yeah, i mean i’m transgender and i don’t find the joke offensive- honestly i think it’s a pretty funny line. but i do know plenty of people in the LGBTQ community who would probably get offended by it. either way it’s on Bodysnatcher which is a ludicrously hard to find DVD (saw it in CeX today for 42.00!) so you’d have to be actively searching for that to even stumble across the line to begin with

    #230997

    Warbodog

    Not counting VIII bollocks, the main one I’ve found “a bit dodgy” is the way Lister/Craig delivers the “drug-crazed transvestite” line in Balance of Power, where it doesn’t really come across that he’s jokingly making light of Goering’s slightly worse traits. When he brings up the same points in Meltdown, it just seems like fun trivia Lister (/Rob/Doug) picked up from a documentary he watched.

    I know a lot of old comedies treated rape for laughs, but Rimmer taking advantage of McGruder was always supposed to be horrible. Pre-Me² Rimmer really isn’t likeable, we just love him already. “Served her right for being concussed” doesn’t get a knowing laugh, and Lister makes a disapproving face.

    #231003

    Ben Saunders

    That’s how I see it, Worbo, it’s more a joke at the expense of Rimmer thab MacGruder. How does the transvestite line come off to you?

    Maybe that gag laughing at JFK’s successor crossdressing would catch some flak today, but similar gags were being made right up until the late 00’s.

    Transvestite feels like an old fashioned term as well, to the point that I’m not even that sure what it’s actually supposed to mean. This is what Google is for, though

    #231005

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    I’ve never seen a fan-base so offended by a show they claim to love. I remember the series 11 podcasts and practically every week ‘someone’ was offended by something or other.

    I don’t know how some of you leave your house in the morning. I almost feel sorry for you in a way.

    #231009

    International Debris

    Yes, I think you’re mixing up ‘finding stuff problematic’ and ‘being so upset as to not be able to leave the house’ there. Not something I’d get confused at, but just wanted to clear that up for you.

    #231011

    Dave

    I almost feel sorry for him in a way.

    #231012

    Ben Saunders

    Yeah i feel sorry for people like him, honestly

    #231016

    bloodteller

    >I’ve never seen a fan-base so offended by a show they claim to love.

    you can love a show and still find parts of it offensive, shit, or offensively shit. most people here like Red Dwarf as a whole but despise Pete, for example.

    don’t know if anyone hated Pete so much they were unable to leave the house though.

    #231017

    International Debris

    Yes, I think there’s a lot more ire expressed at the shitness of VIII than there is at the occasionally mis-judged joke, but nobody ever feels sorry for people for that. Frankly, I think I’m deserving some sympathy for how angry VIII makes me.

    #231019

    clem

    Very often on my days off work, I *don’t* leave my house in the morning! Same goes for when I’m on late shifts. Anyway I live in a flat.

    #231020

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    Where’s My Thribble?

    #231023

    Hamish

    > Very often on my days off work, I *don’t* leave my house in the morning!

    But is it because of Pete or Timewave?

    For me it is Timewave.

    #231024

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    > Very often on my days off work, I *don’t* leave my house in the morning! Same goes for when I’m on late shifts. Anyway I live in a flat.

    Then my out of context taken comment wasn’t meant for the likes of you. But thanks for playing though.

    I live in a bungalow myself. It’s a college night so I’m not allowed out.

    #231029

    Ben Paddon
    #231034

    RamesesNiblickTheThird
    #231036

    Taiwan Tony

    >I’ve reached Justice in my rewatch

    Where are you at now? And will you be watching, you know, all of it?
    Sometimes I occasionally think about watching 7 and 8 again.

    #231040

    International Debris

    Don’t do it.

    #231041

    Taiwan Tony

    Okay, I won’t.

    #231046

    Ben Saunders

    7 is worth a revisit. 8 exists.

    #231050

    flanl3

    I occasionally still sit up with a start with a sudden rage because I’ve remembered that Timewave exists, but that’s mostly not because it’s offensive, just that it’s utter shit and I’d rather spend an evening smelling my own farts than watching it once.

    #231052

    Katydid

    I hope the crap episode in Series XIII is better than Timewave. If it’s at least as good as Can of Worms, we’re fine.

    #231054

    Pete Part Three

    >Where are you at now?

    I started with The End on the 30th Anniversary and then switched to doing 2 eps each weekend. Will be watching Meltdown on Saturday, and then Holoship on Sunday. And probably the Series IV DVD documentary at some point.

    I’ve really enjoyed rewatching I-IV because I haven’t seen them in years, and picking up new bits and pieces has been interesting.

    >And will you be watching, you know, all of it?

    I’m borderline interested to see VII again.

    Doubt I have the stamina or inclination to do VIII but haven’t decided 100% either way. I don’t think I’ve seen it properly in about 17 years. Even when it came out on DVD, I remembering slapping on the cast commentaries once but never watching the episodes without that, so the last time I did a proper rewatch was on VHS (pretty sure Bytes 1,2 were the first things I bought on Amazon). I don’t ever tend to change my opinions on Red Dwarf from my initial viewing, so it would just be 4 hours of thinking ‘Oh, yeah. This is why I hate this”.

    Back to Earth is also a struggle for me, but I might get that over with in one sitting via the Director’s Cut.

    #231071

    RamesesNiblickTheThird

    Timewave possibly has the worst joke in the series history and also one of the biggest let downs of not fulfilling its potential going for it I suppose

    The jail cell scene is better than most of series 8 for me though

    I’d just put all of series 8 in a pile at the end of the recent list if i did it

    #231081

    Katydid

    I’d still sooner rewatch Timewave than any of Series VIII. Anyone who says otherwise clearly hasn’t watched VIII in a long time.

    #231091

    Ben Saunders

    I watched it at the start of this year and I’d gladly throw in BitR before Timewave, which I rewatched last month. All of it, the extended version.

    #231092

    Hamish

    Well, I actually did re-watch Pete and Krytie TV alongside Timewave in order to finalize my Pearl Poll rankings last January. I left Timewave exactly where it was – at the bottom.

    #231097

    Dave

    I watched VIII a few months before voting too.

    Timewave was third from bottom, only Pete Part One and Krytie TV were worse.

    #231098

    bloodteller

    >I’d still sooner rewatch Timewave than any of Series VIII. Anyone who says otherwise clearly hasn’t watched VIII in a long time.

    i watched VIII last week. i still think Timewave is a lot worse than anything in VIII tbh.

    #231099

    bloodteller

    despite being shit, Pete Part 2 at least has some funny jokes in it that make me laugh. Timewave was shit *and* not funny, so that made Timewave the worse episode tbh. i think i did put it at the absolute bottom in the latest poll

    #231100

    Timewave Part Two

    Timewave was pretty good

    #231101

    International Debris

    Timewave made me laugh, and also cringe, and also wince. Most of 8 just makes me cringe and wince.

    #231108

    Warbodog

    I watched Cassandra a while ago when Rimmer rape allegations were flying around, I still enjoy it more than the majority of the Dave era and all of VII, and don’t think it’s as dragged down by as much cack as Parallel Universe or Emohawk.

    I won’t touch the rest of VIII, but wouldn’t watch half of the new episodes for fun either.

    #231111

    bloodteller

    yeah, i enjoy Cassandra far more than most of the Dave era too- it’s a genuinely great episode,i think. there’s just so much good stuff in it

    #231117

    Taiwan Tony

    >I started with The End on the 30th Anniversary and then switched to doing 2 eps each weekend.

    This is very restrained, in the age of box set binge watching. Do you find it allows you to digest the episodes as individual entities? If I watch a few episodes of a sitcom, they all merge into one after a while. In the way it doesn’t matter with ongoing narratives like Breaking Bad etc.

    #231118

    International Debris

    I struggle to binge watch stuff that doesn’t have some sort of arc. I’m currently rewatching A Touch of Frost, and the only time I’ll watch more than one episode in a row is when it’s a two-parter.

    #231119

    Warbodog

    My slow-binge record is probably Firefly. I’ve been watching for almost two years now (first time) and recently watched episode five. Helps to spread out the short supply, I guess.

    #231122

    Pete Part Three

    >This is very restrained, in the age of box set binge watching. Do you find it allows you to digest the episodes as individual entities?

    I’m not too fond of binge watching, particularly stuff which has individual stories per episode. When Sky Atlantic dumped the whole of The Trip to Spain on their on demand service last year, I stil kept to my own vague weekly schedule. It stops things blurring together, certainly.

    I HATED when BBC2 first aired Buffy Season 7, and they dumped it on 3/4 days a week. The whole thing wasn’t was done and dusted in a few weeks and a show which previously had a bunch of standout episodes per season blurred into one. This may be emphasised by my distaste over the way they completely embraced the arc that season, mind.

    I like spotting stuff I haven’t seen before when I rewatch something. After about 2 hours, I’ll likely be considerably less observant or, um, checking my phone.

    #231130

    Dave

    I’m similar. Even when streaming services dump an entire series, I find I naturally progress at around one or two episodes a week. I wouldn’t enjoy it if I sat down and binged the whole thing.

    #231132

    Ben Saunders

    I used to be the kind to binge-watch five or six episodes of a series a day (when I was young i had a VHS of Red Dwarf series with all of the non-special opening/closing credits except the first and last cut out, so would watch entire series in uninterrupted blocks regularly)

    But now i watch one episode of whatever a day, sometimes two, MAYBE three if there’s some incredible cliffhanger that coaxes me into watching another.

    #231135

    International Debris

    I do really struggle to watch arc-based shows at such a slow pace. My girlfriend and I got through Stranger Things 2 in two days, and that was only because we needed to sleep by the halfway point. Seasons 2 – 4 of Babylon 5 were similarly difficult to say no to as well, I was going through four or five of them a day.

    #231136

    bloodteller

    honestly for me it depends how interested I actually am in a show- if i’m really enjoying it and it really interests me, i’ll usually blast through the entire show in a couple of days. when it’s a show i’m not as interested in, it can take me weeks to finish.

    i think the most enjoyable way to watch is when they’re new and so you get one episode every week. getting to the end of the week and realising there’ll be a brand new episode of a show i like airing always feels like a treat, plus if the episode ends on a cliffhanger you get the suspense of “ooh, what’s going to happen next?!”

    #231139

    Ben Saunders

    I agree with that sentiment bloodteller.
    Recently I watched four seasons of Chuck in about a month and about midway through Series 4 things really were starting to blur so I took a break, lol.

Jump to top / Jump to 'Recent Replies'

Viewing 112 posts - 1 through 112 (of 112 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.