Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Mundane observation dome Search for: This topic has 6,448 replies, 77 voices, and was last updated 2 hours, 48 minutes ago by Dave. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic April 27, 2021 at 1:00 pm #266000 WarbodogParticipant Do you have any miscellaneous insights on the series that may be worth contemplating for a few seconds before moving on with our lives? Here are some of mine. 1. The four regulars have names that can work any way around, though this would have been more obvious if David Ross had stayed and wouldn’t work if Chris Barrie used his real name. 2. The series’ lax attitude to continuity extends to the setting. Outside of Holly’s distress calls, I don’t think three million years is mentioned all that much after series I and before VI (not sure about later years). Instead, we get the extremely fudged “dead for centuries” and “travelling for thousands of years” – not actual retcons, but suggesting a more conventional setting for casual viewers tuning in and the sort of stories they’re telling. It’s only millions when they need it to be. 3. 200 years of stasis between series V and VI means that the earlier series took place in their equivalent of the early 19th century by comparison (e.g. Blackadder the Third). Since they didn’t run into a long-lived Camille or one of her great-great-etc grandchildren, it didn’t come up. 4. Although Lister is routinely slagged off in the series, he’s spared the level of seemingly authoritative character assassination that Rimmer gets, because the audience is aligned with Lister’s viewpoint most of the time. For example, we see Kochanski Camille belittling Rimmer’s interests, but we don’t get the equivalent of Hologram Camille reacting to Lister’s pickup lines, we’re left to form our own opinions on those. This flimsy point has not been considered much beyond this single example. 5. Cat’s costumes are overwhelmingly referenced more than anyone else’s in the series, but the least discussed by fans. 6. Ace Rimmer and Duane Dibbley were so seemingly ubiquitous in canon and tie-in merchandise through the 90s (Smegazine strips, T-shirts) that they still feel overused today, even though it’s been over 20 years since they appeared. Maybe they’re allowed back after all. 7. Only series III & V and maybe XI & XII (not as familiar with those) don’t have any sense of an arc whatsoever (though IV’s minor Kryten disobedience arc was already fucked up by episode shuffling). Series III is just about the only series where no episode directly references any previous episode, but it still has the Backwards scrolling text and general references to Rimmer having died and stuff. 8. One of the series’ most famous and quoted scenes – everybody’s dead, Dave – is a straight-up 2001: A Space Odyssey homage and would have been received that way at the time, but doesn’t work like that for most people coming to the episode later on or new viewers who are young or don’t watch old films. 9. Sometimes dismissed as lightweight and gimmicky today, Backwards was designed as an innovative interactive experience to reward extracurricular effort. As well as inviting fans to work out the backwards events and filming logistics, Arthur Smith’s eugolonom is teasingly long and “you scoundrels” is clearly a cleaned-up translation gag even before you’ve heard it. Unfortunately, by the time technology caught up with the intent and the ability to reverse media files properly on home computers became commonplace, Backwards Forwards came out and everyone just cheated with the walkthrough. Imagine the quality of the musings I left out! Creator Topic Viewing 48 replies - 6,401 through 6,448 (of 6,448 total) 1 2 3 … 127 128 129 Author Replies September 11, 2026 at 1:54 pm #327277 DaveParticipant I could, but I wouldn’t, because it’s a poor argument. September 11, 2026 at 2:01 pm #327278 RushyParticipant I could, but I wouldn’t, because it’s a poor argument. I love this phrasing. Pure Holly. September 11, 2026 at 2:57 pm #327279 PodeyParticipant DNA and Emohawk both end with two of the characters having been significantly altered and no explicit return to the status quo, only for things to be back to normal in the next episode with no continuation or explanation of what happened in between. Obviously both episodes imply how the situation can be resolved, but I do think it makes them slightly unsatisfying endings, like they don’t play by sitcom rules. This reminds me of how fun it was on South Park when, for the first time in the show’s history, characters started to remember what happened week-to-week and there was an episode where Cartman or someone went to greet one of the kids who it transpired was still pissed off at him because of what happened the week before and that was a huge “WHAAAAAAAAT?!” moment. September 11, 2026 at 3:49 pm #327280 Flap JackParticipant I like Emohawk, it only bothers me that it steals Rimmer’s snidiness and Cat’s vanity for no particular reason. They’re not in a heightened state like in Polymorpth. It could have picked any random emotion but, surprise, surprise, it picks those. Just a bit lazy. It didn’t steal Rimmer’s snideness or Cat’s vanity. Cat’s vanity would have been a particularly crap choice, because that was literally the exact same combination as in Polymorph 1. The actual ones aren’t much better though. “Cool” is NOT AN EMOTION. Bitterness is, but it felt too reductive to say that removing that one emotion would simply turn Rimmer into Ace (even superficially). September 11, 2026 at 3:58 pm #327281 gerrydelaselParticipant Marge, they’re just synonyms, okay. September 11, 2026 at 4:13 pm #327282 DaveParticipant September 11, 2026 at 4:14 pm #327283 DaveParticipant Bitterness is, but it felt too reductive to say that removing that one emotion would simply turn Rimmer into Ace (even superficially). Maybe he should have turned into a musketeer instead. September 11, 2026 at 5:12 pm #327284 Flap JackParticipant Marge, they’re just synonyms, okay. I wouldn’t say they are synonyms, and that’s part of the problem. For Rimmer, the Emohawk just sucked out a bunch of his bad qualities instead of focusing on a specific one. But bitterness is kind of the main one, because it’s the one he says first and repeats later, and it’s the one which is actually an emotion. Snidiness – or snideness, as the internet insists it’s spelled whenever I search it to double check I have the definition right – is more of a behaviour. Fair’s fair, though, snidiness is on the list. I’m sorry for falsely correcting you on that. September 11, 2026 at 5:20 pm #327285 WarbodogParticipant Spaying polymorphs at birth makes them able to sap emotions more directly and to have a more glittery morph effect. September 11, 2026 at 5:58 pm #327286 Ben SaundersParticipant It could also be that they don’t actually know specifically what “emotion” got sucked out of themselves, because you wouldn’t be able to tell, would you? They just say bitterness and cool because that’s what it feels like. They aren’t tricorders. Rimmer could probably just check to be fair. September 11, 2026 at 6:27 pm #327287 gerrydelaselParticipant Gives me an idea for an episode where Lister is alone and has to reboot Rimmer, and decides to start messing with the combinations of traits he wants to upload into him. But every combination ends up being harder to live with than the original. September 11, 2026 at 6:41 pm #327288 PodeyParticipant Gives me an idea for an episode where Lister is alone and has to reboot Rimmer, and decides to start messing with the combinations of traits he wants to upload into him. But every combination ends up being harder to live with than the original. September 11, 2026 at 6:46 pm #327289 gerrydelaselParticipant My version would be good September 11, 2026 at 6:52 pm #327290 RushyParticipant It’s like modding a video game when you don’t know what you’re doing, and it just goes more and more haywire as you try to figure out where you went wrong. September 12, 2026 at 7:52 am #327304 DaveParticipant MINDSLIDES Lister is alone and has to reboot Rimmer, and decides to start messing with the combinations of traits he wants to upload into him. But every combination ends up being harder to live with than the original. September 13, 2026 at 4:18 pm #327354 PodeyParticipant I’m relistening to the novels before I hear Titan for the first time (after reading the print edition) and, for the first time, I’ve found myself preferring BTL to IWCD. Not sure why… the latter feels like a more complete story but I think the writing is a little better. I’m sure this probably came up in the DwarfCasts but I wonder why Chris did such a different voice for Talkie Toaster? I really enjoyed his performance (probably partly why I preferred BTL this time as there are a few jokes that work better in audio than on the page) but I can’t connect that cartoon Brooklyn accent to Talkie Toaster. September 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm #327355 WarbodogParticipant The print book was released on 25/10/90, the episode was recorded on 13/12/90 and broadcast on 7/3/91. I don’t know when Chris recorded the audio, but it might have been before he heard Ross’ interpretation. September 13, 2026 at 4:39 pm #327356 DaveParticipant Even then I guess he’d have series 1 Talkie to match to (or not). Maybe he just wanted to do something different with it. September 13, 2026 at 5:03 pm #327357 PodeyParticipant The fact I was listening at 2x speed probably helped but I actually laughed out loud when he was doing the time dilation bit. September 13, 2026 at 6:00 pm #327358 WarbodogParticipant I was a 1.5x/2x speeder back when I listened to a lot of audiobooks 10+ years ago. Probably wouldn’t do it for Red Dwarf though, the cadence is too familiar. September 13, 2026 at 6:15 pm #327359 PodeyParticipant It is definitely the first time I’ve listened to them at anything other than normal speed but I read a lot more than I used to now and 2x just about matches up the reading to the speed at which I’d read the printed page so they feel GLACIALLY slow if I try listen at anything below 1.5x now. September 25, 2026 at 12:46 pm #327698 RushyParticipant I’m always a bit upset when in Meltdown, nobody laughs at this: September 26, 2026 at 7:42 pm #327734 MoonlightParticipant Considering basically every gag in the show gets a reaction from the audience, I’m always annoyed that this line gets abject silence. September 30, 2026 at 4:37 am #327842 MoonlightParticipant You haven’t had to force me to face the terrifying onward march of time, so you’re safe. I spotted this Cappsy post at the bottom of the first page. This one’s for you. Samsara aired 10 years ago today (in my timezone). September 30, 2026 at 9:32 pm #327854 RushyParticipant Back to Earth is old enough to be a father next year. September 30, 2026 at 9:59 pm #327855 TechnopeasantParticipant I mean technically that was true by around the start of the pandemic. September 30, 2026 at 10:08 pm #327856 Flap JackParticipant Back to Earth is old enough to be a father next year. Surprising choice of benchmark, because I think in the UK that’s only true if you’re talking about sperm donation specifically. September 30, 2026 at 10:55 pm #327858 WarbodogParticipant It only feels less long ago because there hasn’t been that much Red Dwarf since. Taskmaster was still on series 2 (now 22) and, as increasingly self-referenced, they looked way younger. September 30, 2026 at 11:55 pm #327861 MoonlightParticipant Back to Earth being really old doesn’t hit me as hard because I was barely 13 years old when it aired and that feels like a lifetime ago. Series XI happened when I was an adult. October 1, 2026 at 7:49 pm #327876 International DebrisParticipant As someone whose first ‘new’ Dwarf was technically VI, everything makes me feel old. October 1, 2026 at 10:18 pm #327878 Flap JackParticipant I realised the other day that it’s been over 5 years since I first visited the beach from that M. Night Shyamalan film. God I’m old. October 4, 2026 at 3:07 pm #327925 JimboidParticipant It struck me today that the claymation in the full-length Tongue Tied may have been inspired by / meant as a parody of the 1986 video for Reet Petite, which was shown on BBC’s Arena and subsequently went viral (or whatever we used to call the equivalent back then). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CTs8a7dVa0&list=RD8CTs8a7dVa0&start_radio=1 The inclusion of the claymation bit in Back in the Red remains unexplained. October 4, 2026 at 4:00 pm #327926 RushyParticipant Back in the Red remains unexplained. October 4, 2026 at 4:35 pm #327927 cwickhamParticipant Saw Graeme Garden discussing his life and work in conversation with Samira Ahmed this afternoon, and his verdict on Astronauts was “it should have been more like Red Dwarf”. October 7, 2026 at 2:01 pm #327992 DaveParticipant I wonder if Craig was offended by his claymation counterpart. October 8, 2026 at 3:24 am #328019 MoonlightParticipant He looks like somebody sat on an Easter Island head. October 9, 2026 at 8:26 pm #328102 RushyParticipant This change of camera angle when it cuts back to Rimmer is weird. October 9, 2026 at 9:20 pm #328104 DaveParticipant This change of camera angle when it cuts back to Rimmer is weird. There are quite a few slightly disjointed-feeling bits in V, which is maybe not that surprising given what was going on behind the scenes. October 11, 2026 at 3:31 pm #328149 DaveParticipant I was today years old when I realised that the riff on the Trojan horse at the beginning of The Inquisitor was setup for the manner in which Lister ultimately defeats the Inquisitor at the end. October 11, 2026 at 4:48 pm #328152 Quinn: Clochebusters World ChampionParticipant I was today years old when I realised that the riff on the Trojan horse at the beginning of The Inquisitor was setup for the manner in which Lister ultimately defeats the Inquisitor at the end. I can sort of see it. If that is the case its quite subtle, unlike the start of Holoship in the same series October 11, 2026 at 5:27 pm #328153 DaveParticipant The Holoship one is fun because it’s so overdone I suppose. October 11, 2026 at 6:27 pm #328154 MoonlightParticipant October 11, 2026 at 7:17 pm #328156 DaveParticipant Or maybe Doug was playing a long game that didn’t pay off until the start of series X. October 11, 2026 at 7:22 pm #328157 loadoftottnumbParticipant It’s been noted that there are a lot of Franks in Red Dwarf but have you ever counted the Jim/Jimmys/Jimbos? I know Listers son was named after Bexley speed but there are still quite a few. October 12, 2026 at 3:41 am #328162 Ben SaundersParticipant I was today years old when I realised that the riff on the Trojan horse at the beginning of The Inquisitor was setup for the manner in which Lister ultimately defeats the Inquisitor at the end. Never even thought about this. Amazed nobody else has ever mentioned it. I thought it was just a non-sequitur. October 12, 2026 at 6:07 am #328165 RushyParticipant God, now we have to re-examine all the first act skits. See, Back in the Red starts with the ship shrinking down around the crew, symbolizing how their freedom is going to be taken away by the government machine of bureaucracy. The walls are closing in! October 12, 2026 at 6:37 am #328169 sleepeyParticipant Meltdown opens on Rimmer tormenting Lister with stories about wargames, foreshadowing how the episode will be really boring (jk jk) October 12, 2026 at 6:49 am #328170 DaveParticipant The End starts with “The End”, foreshadowing the end. Author Replies Viewing 48 replies - 6,401 through 6,448 (of 6,448 total) 1 2 3 … 127 128 129 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In