Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Wedding of the Decade? Search for: This topic has 96 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by si. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic February 24, 2009 at 5:11 pm #2923 JamesParticipant You can’t have escaped the “Jade” headlines today. The most romantic gesture some all calling it. What is everyone else calling it? Creator Topic Viewing 46 replies - 51 through 96 (of 96 total) 1 2 Author Replies March 2, 2009 at 10:09 pm #93040 CarlitoParticipant So they actually got MARRIED, did they? Meh, I give it a month. March 2, 2009 at 10:10 pm #93041 CarlitoParticipant Too soon? March 2, 2009 at 10:27 pm #93043 Ben PaddonParticipant The way I see it, if you can’t laugh at tragedy you may as well be dead. Which, y’know, works out in Jade Goodie’s favour either way, really. March 2, 2009 at 10:57 pm #93044 siParticipant You are nasty, nasty people. March 2, 2009 at 11:00 pm #93045 CarlitoParticipant It’s the good ole British trench humour. If we didn’t laugh, we’d cry. Cry, from the strain of trying to stop ourselves laughing. “He’s a cryyyyyyin’ man, doin what he can…” March 9, 2009 at 12:45 pm #93485 Tarka DalParticipant Yep. 85 years ago our ancestors went to war so in the future people could make jokes about people dieing of cancer. Clearly that’s what it was all about. March 9, 2009 at 4:42 pm #93507 JoParticipant >Yep. 85 years ago… When you were a young lad. March 9, 2009 at 11:10 pm #93536 peas_and_cornParticipant >Yep. 85 years ago our ancestors went to war so in the future people could make jokes about people dieing of cancer. Clearly that?s what it was all about. Karl, I’m fascinated about this perspective of yours on history and would like to subscribe to your newsletter. March 10, 2009 at 1:37 am #93542 CarlitoParticipant I would too, except I gotta stay loyal to the Cs. Carl with a C is better than Karl with a K. March 10, 2009 at 6:54 am #93545 AnonymousInactive >”Yep. 85 years ago our ancestors went to war so in the future people could make jokes about people dieing of cancer. Clearly that?s what it was all about.” I heard that it started when a bloke called Archie Duke shot an ostrich because he was hungry. March 10, 2009 at 1:28 pm #93566 Tarka DalParticipant > Carl with a C is better than Karl with a K. Sadly at this moment a Vogon war-fleet destroyed the Earth to make way for a new bypass. March 10, 2009 at 9:13 pm #93608 CarlitoParticipant Heavy. March 10, 2009 at 10:03 pm #93614 Ben PaddonParticipant Great, Scott. March 10, 2009 at 11:54 pm #93619 RicheyParticipant If every other woman in the UK who is dying from the forms of cancer that Mrs Tweed is dying from were also given constant news coverage, loads of money for exclusive interviews and free shit from rich celebrities, then I’d have no problem with the former Miss Goody. As it is, I don’t see what makes her the exception. March 10, 2009 at 11:59 pm #93620 Ben PaddonParticipant It’s because the tabloids feel guilty for ripping into her when her life was going down the shitter. We’ve covered this. March 11, 2009 at 12:04 am #93622 JamesTCParticipant Tabloids do not feel guilt, they have no emotion. March 11, 2009 at 1:06 am #93634 CarlitoParticipant Do they fuck: they’re hypocrites but they don’t feel a smidgen of guilt… Jade Goody is a well-known celebrity (mostly due to the coverage they gave her). They built her up, and then they cut her down. Now she is dying… that is a sad story. Sad stories sell newspapers. Just like episodic long-running storylines sell soap operas to viewers and increase their ratings, ongoing episodic news stories, milked dry by the media, sell newspapers. It is like a new cliffhanger everyday, and it reaches a crescendo and then a satisfying (if sad) conclusion. By satisfying, I mean it is a storyline with a definite end in sight. There’s no risk. The papers know it is coming. It is perfect paper-selling fodder. Tugs at the nations heartstrings, hooks them in to the saga, and keeps them hooked til the end. Her death will rule the news. Then her funeral will. Then, before long, she will barely be referenced ever again. I’m not saying this to sound like a cunt, I’m saying this because its the way these papers operate. They love to create their own news to maintain readership. The real news isn’t juicy enough. That’s why they “create” celebrities out of naive morons likely to embrace it when actual talented people see the tabloids as cockroaches and won’t deal with them. These machiavellian rags chew people like Jade up, and spit them out. They spat her out and forgot about her – now that she suddenly became of interest to them again, she’s right back in the news as “the people’s brave champion”. It’s not her fault; she should be allowed to die with a little dignity, not in the spotlight of the vultures. March 11, 2009 at 1:09 am #93635 CarlitoParticipant On the subject of these irresponsible rags creating their own stories, I honestly believe the newspapers, in particular the tabloids, have a large part to play in the accentuating of the economical issues crippling the country at the moment through their scaremongering piss-poor impersonation of ‘journalism’, but that’s a seperate issue. And one they should one day be held accountable for. March 11, 2009 at 1:11 am #93637 siParticipant Michael Jackson has invited her to one of his concerts. In JUNE… March 11, 2009 at 1:40 am #93647 CarlitoParticipant Wow, he needs to be careful; if he keeps up with these crazy shenanigans, people might start calling him “Wacko Jacko”. Or something. PMSL though, is that true? March 11, 2009 at 8:59 am #93663 JoParticipant Re: Michael Jackson. I work on the phones for Carphone Warehouse customer support – this morning so far I’ve had 3 calls from people wanting to buy tickets for the concert?!?! March 11, 2009 at 10:09 am #93666 Ian SymesKeymaster That’s an extraordinary leap of logic. “Hmm, Michael Jackson’s playing in a venue owned by O2. O2 are a mobile phone network. I wonder if an unrelated mobile phone retailer will sell tickets?” March 11, 2009 at 11:14 am #93667 JoParticipant Indeed! That does seem to have been the pattern of thought though – I find it very strange that 3 (now 4) people have arrived at this conclusion. March 11, 2009 at 12:08 pm #93669 DaveParticipant >Tabloids do not feel guilt, they have no emotion Fear is an emotion, Contempt is as well. March 11, 2009 at 12:25 pm #93675 Tarka DalParticipant > Re: Michael Jackson. I work on the phones for Carphone Warehouse customer support – this morning so far I?ve had 3 calls from people wanting to buy tickets for the concert?!?! Cool. Can you blag me a couple? March 12, 2009 at 12:07 am #93741 peas_and_cornParticipant >Michael Jackson?s playing in a venue owned by O2 Do they own it or did they just buy naming rights? March 12, 2009 at 12:17 am #93742 CarlitoParticipant Any news on tickets? March 12, 2009 at 6:22 pm #93771 Danny StephensonKeymaster As part of the investment programme, naming rights were sold to O2 plc; and ‘The O2’ became the official name of the project on 25 May 2007.[5] The ?6 million a year deal between O2 plc and AEG also included priority tickets and reserved VIP accommodation for O2 mobile customers. Hope that helps… March 12, 2009 at 7:14 pm #93776 Mr FlibbleParticipant And the attention to detail in the Blue Room got them the iPhone contract, apparently. March 13, 2009 at 12:23 pm #93793 Tarka DalParticipant What are the chances of him actually playing these gigs? When was the last time he toured? I thought his health had deteriorated massively in the last ten years. March 13, 2009 at 12:32 pm #93795 locusceruleusParticipant >I thought his health had deteriorated massively in the last ten years. If he was in such poor health he’d never have been given the go ahead to plan these gigs by the promoters. If these gigs ended up getting cancelled the o2, the promoters and MJ would stand to lose millions. March 13, 2009 at 12:39 pm #93796 Tarka DalParticipant You’re right, but he’s not exactly been the most stable or consistent human being has he? That’s what has suprised me so much about the volume of shows announced. Then again I guess multiple shows equal millions in advanced ticket saaaaaaaaaales… March 22, 2009 at 9:59 am #94371 siParticipant Back on topic for the briefest of brief seconds. RIP Jade. Whether you liked her or not, you can’t deny that she did a hell of a lot in seven years. March 22, 2009 at 12:30 pm #94381 locusceruleusParticipant What’s that phrase about quantity and quality… March 22, 2009 at 12:50 pm #94382 hummingbirdParticipant Don’t get me wrong, it’s very sad she’s been taken at the age of 27, leaving two kids behind, but she doesn’t deserve our sympathy just because she’s a celebrity. I mean, someone dies of cancer every couple of minutes – Goody is only considered a hero because the tabloids want to sell more papers. > you can?t deny that she did a hell of a lot in seven years Did she really? I mean, I take it you’re referring to really worthwhile things making her worthy of her current deification in the media? Do tell. March 22, 2009 at 2:38 pm #94389 locusceruleusParticipant Gordon Brown: “She was a courageous woman both in life and death and the whole country have admired her determination to provide a bright future for her children.” Since when does he decide who we all admire? March 22, 2009 at 6:30 pm #94396 ChrisMParticipant Regardless of ‘hero status’, worthiness or famousness, it’s sad. 27 year old woman (several years younger than me) died leaving children behind. It’s not more tragic than all the unfamous (non-famous?) people who have died, but it’s sad just the same. March 22, 2009 at 7:27 pm #94399 TonguetiedParticipant Amen to that. Rest in peace Jade. Anyone who has the utter hell of going through cancer all deserve the same respect. None are more special than the other. I was never a big fan of Jade but I feel loss at the utter tragic misfortune of being taken so young. March 22, 2009 at 9:04 pm #94404 Ben PaddonParticipant I don’t think all cancer patients deserve the same respect. That’s a bit like saying “Everyone who wears that Christmas jumper their Nan knitted for them when they go to visit their Nan despite not actually like it is the KING OF KINGS.” Only, y’know, on a larger scale. March 22, 2009 at 11:27 pm #94411 locusceruleusParticipant >Anyone who has the utter hell of going through cancer all deserve the same respect. I don’t think getting a disease makes you deserve respect. It just makes you unfortunate. Being respectable, dignified, and respectful to others earns my respect, and Jade Goody fails on all counts. I don’t expect that to matter to anyone, by the way. I just don’t see how respect should be automatically doled out for something as inevitable as disease. You can only be good or bad by the choices you make, not unavoidable circumstance. March 22, 2009 at 11:49 pm #94416 Tarka DalParticipant > Jade Goody fails …failed. March 23, 2009 at 12:00 am #94417 CarlitoParticipant I think he just meant respect on a humane level for the suffering, not respect as a person. March 23, 2009 at 12:25 am #94420 Tanya JonesParticipant I did respect Jade’s determination to secure her children’s future once she knew she was in deep trouble, and I do think her attempts to apologise for her behaviour in the CBB house was genuine. I didn’t have any strong feelings about her selling her death to the media; after all, it was the logical conclusion to her having sold her life to them, and clearly someone out there wanted to buy it. I hope her sons have a secure future in front of them. March 23, 2009 at 8:58 am #94429 locusceruleusParticipant >I think he just meant respect on a humane level for the suffering, not respect as a person. Perhaps so, though I’d argue that was pity more than anything, which is little use to anyone. March 23, 2009 at 10:42 am #94434 Tarka DalParticipant This morning they mentioning on TV a statment from the Archbishop of Canterbury and referred to her career in reality TV. THIS IS NOT A CAREER. March 23, 2009 at 11:23 am #94437 siParticipant What Tanya said. Author Replies Viewing 46 replies - 51 through 96 (of 96 total) 1 2 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In