Profile Topics Started Replies Created Engagements Forum Replies Created Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 1,027 total) 1 2 3 4 … 19 20 21 Author Replies August 27, 2010 at 3:56 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf in games #110499 hummingbirdParticipant >> spent most of yesterday trying to fix the Missus’ laptop that had a giant electronic aneurysm so didn’t go online > Hopefully my ickle netbook can be revived over the weekend :-( *sob* O noes! I hope you’ve backed up the lovely ficcage. August 25, 2010 at 10:58 pm in reply to: Gordon Brown’s Red Dwarf Mount Rushmore sculpture now available to buy! #110481 hummingbirdParticipant In all honesty, if I didn’t know who it was supposed to be then I wouldn’t know who it was supposed to be. I still don’t. . I realise that the guy must have put a lot of work into it, but ….. erm ….. July 21, 2010 at 12:33 pm in reply to: Some women are such total Gannons! #110253 hummingbirdParticipant Best thread title ever. July 21, 2010 at 11:54 am in reply to: Psychoville #110251 hummingbirdParticipant Agreed. The ‘Rope’ episode is a joy to watch. It’s also the ep that’s most rewarding on repeat viewings. The multi-angle version is a lot of fun. July 20, 2010 at 6:12 am in reply to: Some women are such total Gannons! #110215 hummingbirdParticipant I feel for you, Blisschick. I have a couple of fangirl girl friends who are normally addicted to perfectly reasonable things like Who, but have now succombed to the evil that is Twilight. I was dragged around Collectormania few weeks ago just so they could get a few glimpses of somone who was a wolf, or something(?). And Robert Pattinson is a big girl who needs a good slapping, imho. July 19, 2010 at 5:59 pm in reply to: Jara Cimrman and the Red Dwarf #110204 hummingbirdParticipant > Or Wispas IN bed. OMNOMNOMNOM Is this in any way related to what Mick Jagger does with Mars Bars? July 8, 2010 at 8:22 am in reply to: Desire #110129 hummingbirdParticipant Jo, I didn’t need to post any bills in, it was all done automatically by the cashback site. All you do is register with them and then – importantly – access the retailer’s site via the link on the cashback site. The transaction generally tracks after a couple of days and then you wait a few weeks for the lovely money. I’ve bought 2 phones this way, and I’ve recommended it to friends who have had no problems with the cashback being paid. But you have to check out the feedback for each retailer – Orange, for example, offer more cashback, but people seem to have problems getting them to pay up. I do quite a lot of my online shopping via that cashback site and I must make a few hundred quid a year. July 7, 2010 at 9:56 pm in reply to: Desire #110125 hummingbirdParticipant I know nowt about phones, but can I recomend a cashback site? http://www.topcashback.co.uk/ref/leyos I’ve bought a couple of phones via this site. Last time I used ‘e2save’ who pay £43 cashback on a new contract (or £70 if it’s an iphone). It takes a couple of months for the cash to be paid, but, hey, it’s *free money*!!! July 5, 2010 at 11:04 am in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #110115 hummingbirdParticipant They have, but by the same token – Smith is so utterly brilliant that an episode without much of him in would have been a waste of a precious episode slot. It sounds terrible to say it, but we could actually cope without much Tennant for a week each year… Indeed. I had issues with Tennant for most of his tenure, and I actually enjoyed ‘Blink’ all the more for his absence. July 3, 2010 at 6:29 pm in reply to: IT Crowd Series 4 #110092 hummingbirdParticipant > Wasn’t that Andrew out of focus in the background in the Street Countdown scene? Yeah. Doesn’t he know how distracting that can be? ;-) June 30, 2010 at 1:54 pm in reply to: Dave buys CARPOOL! WOOOOOOOOOOO! #110066 hummingbirdParticipant That’s a bit good, isn’t it? June 28, 2010 at 4:00 pm in reply to: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Daleks #110051 hummingbirdParticipant Sorry. Just had to delete my comments twice. I’m far too much of bitch today. June 27, 2010 at 3:12 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #110041 hummingbirdParticipant I’ve just watched it for the second time and I’m still blown away by the scale of the awesome. Too many wonderful moments to mention …. but the scene at Amelia’s bedside has to be the greatest thing ever – can I have Smith’s babies now, please? Any plot niggles I have are just that – niggles. June 26, 2010 at 10:48 am in reply to: IT Crowd Series 4 #110026 hummingbirdParticipant Don’t you think that playing D&D is a little OOC for Moss? …. I mean, it involves a degree of social interaction with a group of people, and social interaction is hardly Moss’s forte. D&D seems much more Roy’s kind of game. Of course, I’m talking bollocks as it doesn’t matter in the slightest. Still a great ep June 21, 2010 at 4:58 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #110023 hummingbirdParticipant By rights, once the Doctor is safely (if temporarily) disposed of, the Daleks, Cybermen, et al should all get down to kicking seven shades of crap out of each other – anything else would be OOC. That I would like to see. But it ain’t gonna happen. June 20, 2010 at 1:21 pm in reply to: IT Crowd Series 4 #110006 hummingbirdParticipant I agree: very good, but not one of the best. June 19, 2010 at 7:43 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109997 hummingbirdParticipant Yes, yes, and OMFG YES ! June 18, 2010 at 8:58 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109989 hummingbirdParticipant I’ve only just seen The Lodger, but I’d say it was easily the best episode for the past few weeks. The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood was disappointingly dull – I mean it *should* have been good, but never quite got there, and even Vincent wasn’t especially exciting for me. There definitely has been a lull … I kind of lost the impetus to watch it as it was broadcast over the last few weeks, but I absolutely loved this last ep. June 15, 2010 at 4:09 pm in reply to: BBC VFX- Mike Tucker’s new book, coming soon, #109984 hummingbirdParticipant > And it’s got Cappsy on the front cover! And the Liberator = prettiest ship ever = win June 7, 2010 at 8:42 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109951 hummingbirdParticipant Sorry about the delay in getting back to you, but my internet connection has been down for the last couple of days. Going by the royal mail website, shipping is going to be expensive: 9kg by parcelforce will be about £12-£15. I’m not sure what the going rate for Lego is … make me an offer? ^_^ June 4, 2010 at 6:56 pm in reply to: Something’s happening… #109920 hummingbirdParticipant *2* series?! Bobby was tweeting today about there being big news, but said he wasn’t able to say anything more. I assumed it was Carpool related. June 4, 2010 at 2:51 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109915 hummingbirdParticipant I still have that big box of Lego available, if anyone’s interested. Just let me know. June 3, 2010 at 6:36 pm in reply to: RD themed spam #109905 hummingbirdParticipant There’s a budget? May 27, 2010 at 10:03 pm in reply to: We’d better do a LOST thread, then… #109876 hummingbirdParticipant >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eomWspUS8B0&feature=player_embedded Sometimes I wonder if these people ever actually watch the show. May 27, 2010 at 5:32 pm in reply to: So….who do we rob to get Lister’s first guitar! #109869 hummingbirdParticipant Slow news day? May 25, 2010 at 6:05 am in reply to: Peculiar Review #109847 hummingbirdParticipant Yeah, but some people are amused by anything. May 24, 2010 at 9:01 pm in reply to: We’d better do a LOST thread, then… #109844 hummingbirdParticipant >> Lisa – Why are you in a LOST thread risking being spoilered if you’ve not watched it yet?! I saw there was only one new post so figured I’d risk it. I live dangerously, me ;-) . Just to expand on Jo’s answers … Non- candidates: *everyone* on the island was originally a candidate – do you remember the cave with all the names crossed out? And the wheel in the lighthouse? The final candidates were decided by a process of elimination. Charlie: he wasn’t using anymore at that point (he says so himself), but he was having freaky dreams/visions and getting pretty paranoid. Time Travel: although it’s a rather unsatisfying explanation, I see this as a plot device so that they could show us the history of the island. Widmore: neither Ben nor Widmore were ‘special’, their conflict was all about control of the island … but neither understood its true nature (nor did Alpert) Jack’s tattoo: Matthew Fox already had the tattoo, and they foolishly tried to write a whole episode around it. The definition of a filler ep. Shannon/Nadia: The people were linked because of their experiences on the island. Nadia was never on the island. Ben/Locke: Ben said it himself – he was jealous, and Ben was still trying to get back to the island at that point. It was for the same reason that he tried to kill him every other time; jealous because he was losing control, because Locke was ‘special’. . >> I’d also like an explanation for the numbers, but apparently this was covered in spin-off media. Which is lame. Each candidate was given a number in the cave and on the wheel in the lighthouse, and as the candidates were eliminated the numbers corresponded to those who were left. May 24, 2010 at 9:30 am in reply to: We’d better do a LOST thread, then… #109838 hummingbirdParticipant I haven’t seen the finale yet, but I’m wondering what you think hasn’t been explained? I think they’ve done a pretty good job of explaining most of what’s happened since day 1 – certainly all the important stuff. May 19, 2010 at 4:51 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109785 hummingbirdParticipant > now I’m no expert or nothing, but I think this head may be slightly cubic!! I think they’ve oversimplified it a little. It would look better as a tetradecagon, (effectively shaving the corners off the cube). May 19, 2010 at 4:47 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109783 hummingbirdParticipant Possibly the first recorded sighting of the mankini. May 18, 2010 at 6:57 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109773 hummingbirdParticipant A little less than 9kg May 18, 2010 at 5:22 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109771 hummingbirdParticipant > How many bricks? :D. I’m serious :) I’ll weigh them tonight if you like. Shame you didn’t mention it 6 months ago as I’ve already got rid of more than half of it May 18, 2010 at 6:03 am in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109767 hummingbirdParticipant > Here’s a nice WIP Starbug on TOS… http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/forum/messages.cfm?threadid=9FB4EEC0-E558-7A23… Oooh, nice. > http://www.ganymede.tv/atspeed/2004/06/bricks-appeal Well, this went for a burn didn’t it? If you ever to decide to do it again I could let you have a load of bricks. May 17, 2010 at 9:58 pm in reply to: New Doctor Who Spoof Series I’m Working On… #109765 hummingbirdParticipant Awww, our boys! But the earlier series are so much slashier. *g* Actually, what amuses me most about that scene is that Chris obviously hating it *so much*! May 17, 2010 at 8:11 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109760 hummingbirdParticipant That’s great. But what about the rest of the ship? :-) The interior of Starbug would be fun, too. May 17, 2010 at 7:17 pm in reply to: This has probably been asked before, but … #109757 hummingbirdParticipant Update … I had the DVD within a couple of days, it’s not the best quality but very watchable. It took me about half of the first ep to get into it, but grew on me very quickly from then on. I’ve watched about half the eps so far and I’m loving it – Jack Docherty & Mark Williams are a joy! Recommended. £4 well spent. Also, being something of a Blake’s 7 fan, I was pleasantly suprised to find little cameos from Gareth Thomas and Paul Darrow. XD *happy fangirl* May 17, 2010 at 7:02 pm in reply to: Doctor Who live show #109755 hummingbirdParticipant I can’t see it being a problem with Who, as the show has so many adult fans …. which is generally not the case with Sooty ;-) Myself and a small group of ladies will be going to the Liverpool show, if anyone wants to come along. May 17, 2010 at 6:43 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109754 hummingbirdParticipant I’d be tempted to have a go at the bunk room. I once had way, way too much time on my hands and made the Swan hatch from Lost, complete with bunks, computer room and full compliment of Losties (and Henry Gale locked in the armoury!), so a RD interior should be do-able. It’s just finding the time to do it :-/ May 17, 2010 at 5:56 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Lego! #109748 hummingbirdParticipant I love the Dwarf itself – very cute! May 16, 2010 at 6:42 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109741 hummingbirdParticipant > Anyway, I rather liked that despite the rather large central problem that Upper Leadworth was never going to be reality (a shame they over-egged it with making Amy pregnant). The Dream Lord stuff was interesting. Not sure about the final reveal as it creates the problem that it was all a big joke with no real danger, but the self-loathing that the Doctor seems to feel for himself is certainly an interesting aspect. This. May 10, 2010 at 12:43 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf – Songs In The Key Of Files #109708 hummingbirdParticipant That was fun, I enjoyed it. Although, I agree with Seb about the title. May 9, 2010 at 4:07 pm in reply to: This has probably been asked before, but … #109693 hummingbirdParticipant Thanks for the info, everyone. Unfortunately, my machine tends to be a bit temperamental where torrents are concerned :-S I have, however, managed to track it down on DVD here http://hard2findculttv.webs.com/ , at the bargain price of £4. At least I hope it’s a bargain. I’ll let you know what the quality’s like when it arrives. May 8, 2010 at 5:55 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109681 hummingbirdParticipant I finally figured out who Matt Smith’s Doctor reminds me of: Michael Palin, anybody? May 7, 2010 at 10:51 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109678 hummingbirdParticipant > Yes, my main contribution is about sexual tension. I can relate to that. Maybe we should talk about that instead? ;-) May 3, 2010 at 7:24 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109638 hummingbirdParticipant I’m loving Smith’s Doctor more and more with every ep – there were so many stand-out moments for the character in that last episode. He’s my favourite New Who Doctor, no contest. > She goes from hugging him like a best friend two episodes ago to ripping his clothes off? I don’t see it as inconsistent. There’s no ‘romance’ here, rather an understandable emotional reaction to a near-death experience. > Hellooooo, new desktop wallpaper. Likewise. Nice one, Danny. April 29, 2010 at 5:06 pm in reply to: Nerd Merit Badges #109605 hummingbirdParticipant Oh how lovely! Is it totally wrong that I read ‘Laptop Sash’ as ‘Laptop Slash’ first time round? I’ll get my coat. April 23, 2010 at 5:51 pm in reply to: Norman Lovett has joined Twitter… #109522 hummingbirdParticipant That’s ten seconds of my life wasted and gone forever. April 20, 2010 at 6:11 pm in reply to: New Scrabble rule means that “JOZXYQK” is now technically a valid word #109462 hummingbirdParticipant So, do I get a new high score for Eyjafjallajokull? April 18, 2010 at 5:24 pm in reply to: Norman Lovett has joined Twitter… #109440 hummingbirdParticipant I wouldn’t bother, he’s only posted twice since December. April 17, 2010 at 10:58 pm in reply to: Doctor Who – Series 5 – Broadcast Discussion (NO SPOILERS) #109422 hummingbirdParticipant Very disappointed. I liked the new Daleks, though. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 1,027 total) 1 2 3 4 … 19 20 21