Profile Topics Started Replies Created Engagements Forum Replies Created Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 2,933 total) 1 2 3 … 57 58 59 Author Replies February 14, 2026 at 2:49 pm in reply to: Your Red Dwarf Art #316546 International DebrisParticipant Yeah, I was gonna say, I wouldn’t have the faintest idea where to begin making something like that. Fantastic! February 10, 2026 at 3:02 pm in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316497 International DebrisParticipant https://www.reddit.com/r/rant/comments/1qz4zgj/my_fucking_washing_machine_needs_my_gps_location/ M-Corp is quickly becoming the most prescient episode. February 8, 2026 at 1:48 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316466 International DebrisParticipant February 7, 2026 at 11:23 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316451 International DebrisParticipant Yeah, it’s the music that reminds me most of Cyberia. Along with the stringy brown lettuce, it’s like a living punishment. February 7, 2026 at 5:12 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316441 International DebrisParticipant I’m not sure if we’re meant to draw a causal link, especially as the low crew don’t actually have any real history and were only created less than an hour ago, so wouldn’t have had time to watch any of those videos anyway. It’s just that everything on the Low version of Red Dwarf is meant to be the trashiest, worst version possible. The videos probably don’t even play properly. The toilets are broken. The doors stick. The food is mouldy. Oh yeah, definitely, it’s just… I dunno, it’s so broad that it probably ends up being a touch too unfocused, maybe. Like, we’re given an explanation for Lister being so horrible, his dabbling in shitty behaviour being the entire basis for a whole person, but that’s a different concept to there happening to be terrible b-movies and horrible food sat around. It’s not like cinema hot dogs are ‘part of’ Lister’s curries, for example. It just feels like it’s trying to do too many things at once, which stops it from conveying as much of a message as we get in similar stories like Polymorph, Terrorform, Dimension Jump and so on, which is why I think it usually ends up being the least liked episode of V. February 7, 2026 at 2:18 pm in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316437 International DebrisParticipant Isn’t that the Alternate Personalities featurette? February 7, 2026 at 2:15 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316436 International DebrisParticipant The contents of the low bunkroom always remind me of Cyberia from Last Human. But yeah, there’s a slight conflation of ‘low culture’ and ‘low morals’ in the concept which does seem to align watching splatter movies and eating awful junk food with being a psychopathic killer, which doesn’t quite work. February 6, 2026 at 11:38 pm in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316411 International DebrisParticipant I still feel it should be the original. Not because of act of God, but because it was how the lives were going to play out untampered. I just personally feel that should count for something. I don’t think the life of the child born through time travel is any more or less valid than the child born through linear time. The problem is – and this is where conversations about time travel begin to get difficult – both timelines happen from the same point. You have two potential timelines starting at the point you go back to. If you decide to go back, that means some people won’t be born. But also your “interference” in the past will lead other people to be born. So deciding not to go back means you’re depriving those people of life. From the perspective of someone living at the point you arrive, neither timeline is better, unless you believe that one person is more entitled to life than the other. February 6, 2026 at 11:28 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316409 International DebrisParticipant It’s mostly that Rob and Doug could think of far more fun and interesting ways of doing the low versions of the characters. It’s hard to make high versions that are both character related and funny. February 6, 2026 at 3:03 am in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316351 International DebrisParticipant So? If I’m created through a corruption of the timeline, then I wasn’t meant to exist. “Meant to exist” suggests a plan or a creator. I don’t believe in either, so I don’t have much of a response. But in short, what we think of as the “correct” timeline might itself be corrupted by past time travel. Who’s to say which timeline is more valid or correct than another? February 5, 2026 at 10:36 am in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316330 International DebrisParticipant As Flap Jack alludes to up thread, at what stage are they culpable and who is to say what is the correct course? The correct course is the one without time travel. It’s one thing to affect others around you. It’s quite another to go back and rewrite what happened. Unless you’re a complete hermit, inevitably you will affect people’s lives in some manner and those ripples will spread. Imagine someone comes back in time willy-nilly and, with the best of intentions, innocently decides to date your mother in the past. You might never even be born, and they’d have no way of knowing you should be born. But your life is just casually wiped out forever. Imagine you were only born because someone travelled back in time and dated your mother. Without time travel you’d never even have been born and you’d have been casually wiped out forever. February 4, 2026 at 5:01 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316310 International DebrisParticipant I find BtE needs the context of following VIII to really work. I still think it’s a mostly mediocre script, but the fact that it’s so character focused and actually Red Dwarf-ish makes it seem like a masterpiece in comparison to what came before. February 4, 2026 at 1:06 am in reply to: Mundane observation dome #316282 International DebrisParticipant This wig tho I’m getting proper Partridge vibes from that screenshot. February 3, 2026 at 2:25 am in reply to: Jokes you don't/didn't get #316236 International DebrisParticipant It’s possible that AH was a common abbreviation for asshole/arsehole at the time, but I’ve never heard of it outside of Can’t Smeg Won’t Smeg. February 1, 2026 at 7:59 pm in reply to: Blake’s 7 reboot possibly on the horizon #316207 International DebrisParticipant I think woke has become a shorthand for the kind of patronising I described, however. It was certainly that for a while, which was when it became weaponised. It was used to describe people whose sensitivities about social issues were perceived as eclipsing the seriousness of them. Those days have passed though, and it’s become used to describe anything socially liberal. Lists of ‘woke games’ include any game that happens to include a LGBTQ+ character, regardless of whether they are there to hammer home a message or simply exist. For a while it was just the latest in a long run of terms – snowflake, SJW, PC – but now it’s become a really problematic word that gets trotted out as an increasingly successful way of shutting down anything that represents marginalised groups in some form or another. January 31, 2026 at 1:42 am in reply to: Blake’s 7 reboot possibly on the horizon #316152 International DebrisParticipant I’d say it definitely benefits women if they just strongly put up with being treated like shit rather than whining about it all the time. January 30, 2026 at 2:58 pm in reply to: “Pete” shouldn’t have been a 2-parter: “Only the Good” should have #316132 International DebrisParticipant That’s not the opposite. If Kochanski is 100% Lister then Lister is 100% Kochanski. January 30, 2026 at 1:19 pm in reply to: “Pete” shouldn’t have been a 2-parter: “Only the Good” should have #316124 International DebrisParticipant If they did have a kid, let’s say a son, Kochanski would give birth to her own brother in law. The kid would be his own uncle. Also Lister is 50% Kochanski, 50% Lister. And also 100% Lister. Does this mean Kochanski is 50% Lister? Or would she have to be 100% Lister? In which case then he’s having sex with his mum and dad and himself and his girlfriend at the same time. What am I even saying? January 29, 2026 at 1:24 pm in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #316066 International DebrisParticipant Except we’ve met a series 3000, and he had a Kryten-like face. January 28, 2026 at 5:21 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with threatening auras #316041 International DebrisParticipant January 28, 2026 at 5:11 pm in reply to: Jokes you don't/didn't get #316040 International DebrisParticipant Durex do “tingle” condoms, which are minty, and all they do is make your bits cold and numb. A deeply unsatisfying experience for all involved. January 27, 2026 at 9:28 am in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #316009 International DebrisParticipant Cue a lengthy discussion on how you pronounce gauche. January 26, 2026 at 2:09 am in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315973 International DebrisParticipant Red Dwarf frames with unsexy auras. January 26, 2026 at 12:56 am in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315969 International DebrisParticipant January 26, 2026 at 12:54 am in reply to: Jokes you don't/didn't get #315967 International DebrisParticipant Is Rimmer suggesting Lister goes on a date with him or… something…? January 26, 2026 at 12:47 am in reply to: Jokes you don't/didn't get #315965 International DebrisParticipant Holly had been keeping it hidden from Hollister for a laugh. January 25, 2026 at 4:41 pm in reply to: RD Easter Egg on ST:DS9 #315939 International DebrisParticipant Bajor was immediately post-occupation, uncertain whether it would join the Federation or remain independent, and generally very fractured. Renting out shops to other non-Federation races seems pretty reasonable in that context. January 25, 2026 at 12:50 pm in reply to: RD Easter Egg on ST:DS9 #315936 International DebrisParticipant Let’s take a moment to appreciate this was all in the 1990s space station show that theoretically was supposed to be post-capitalist… Well that was part of the thing about DS9, the Federation had joint control of the station but it was still owned by the Bajorans, who weren’t in the Federation. January 23, 2026 at 6:08 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315873 International DebrisParticipant January 23, 2026 at 6:06 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with threatening auras #315872 International DebrisParticipant January 23, 2026 at 5:48 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315871 International DebrisParticipant January 23, 2026 at 5:47 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with threatening auras #315870 International DebrisParticipant January 23, 2026 at 3:30 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315865 International DebrisParticipant January 23, 2026 at 12:05 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315862 International DebrisParticipant January 22, 2026 at 11:38 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315844 International DebrisParticipant January 22, 2026 at 11:07 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315839 International DebrisParticipant January 22, 2026 at 11:05 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315838 International DebrisParticipant January 22, 2026 at 10:44 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf frames with sexy auras #315834 International DebrisParticipant January 22, 2026 at 10:57 am in reply to: RD Easter Egg on ST:DS9 #315816 International DebrisParticipant I’m honestly more concerned about the Forbin Project being there to be honest. Doesn’t seem like a wise idea. January 21, 2026 at 1:49 pm in reply to: Blake’s 7 reboot possibly on the horizon #315789 International DebrisParticipant Yeah, it’s definitely more Genesis of the Daleks than Planet of the Daleks. Although there is a character called Tarrant. January 20, 2026 at 7:43 pm in reply to: How did did you discover Red Dwarf? #315763 International DebrisParticipant I quite like the curry pot noodle, but I tend to go for the Itsu miso rice noodles if I’m getting one of those things these days. January 19, 2026 at 2:06 pm in reply to: Mundane observation dome #315698 International DebrisParticipant I see Cappsy’s not fixed the new page bug yet, then. January 19, 2026 at 2:05 pm in reply to: How did did you discover Red Dwarf? #315697 International DebrisParticipant Hang on, are you saying that Pete Part Two is a good episode, or just that if it were a good episode, if would still be a bad first episode because it’s a “Part Two”? I’m saying I missed the first “good”. January 19, 2026 at 2:04 pm in reply to: Blake’s 7 reboot possibly on the horizon #315696 International DebrisParticipant Not having it. There’s no apostrophe in the Blakes 7 logo and we all know it. January 16, 2026 at 6:42 pm in reply to: How did did you discover Red Dwarf? #315618 International DebrisParticipant Any good episode is a good first episode January 14, 2026 at 6:31 pm in reply to: The Other Place #315554 International DebrisParticipant The rainbow was already supposed to refer to, you know, all the colours of the rainbow. Sadly we’re well into the era of it being used by “LGB without the T” types, so I get why there’s a fuller one now. Agreed on the aesthetic issue, though. January 14, 2026 at 1:21 pm in reply to: How did did you discover Red Dwarf? #315536 International DebrisParticipant My ‘last’ episode was Rimmerworld, as I only saw it once on TV and didn’t tape it. So the DVD was the second time I saw it, which was lovely to have as a ‘new’ bubble episode. Imagine if it was something like White Hole or Thanks for the Memory instead of Rimmerworld. January 13, 2026 at 5:31 pm in reply to: Mundane observation dome #315492 International DebrisParticipant That “they don’t understand…” reply is enough to give you an idea of how biased AI can be. It’s not a nice, helpful computer giving you facts, it’s a company subtly (or not so subtly) pushing you to use its service. There are occasions when AI can be genuinely useful, and these will increase over time, but LLMs are terrible things that use obscene amounts of resources for very little benefit. January 13, 2026 at 5:28 pm in reply to: How did did you discover Red Dwarf? #315491 International DebrisParticipant First episode I saw was Terrorform, specifically the scene with Rimmer being oiled. My dad and I had been to the working men’s club – him for a pint, me for an orange juice (28 I was) – and come home and put the TV on. That scene was on as we turned it on. I’d been into comedy from a young age, thanks to dad always watching HIGNFY, Monty Python repeats, Blackadder, playing tapes of the Goon Show in the car and so on, so we sat and watched it and enjoyed it and decided to tune in next week. Whether it was shortly afterwards or the following year – I don’t know if this was the original airing or a repeat run – we also watched VI, and I became a definite fan. A friend of mum’s had the first two series on VHS and lent me them, which I duly devoured. I taped VI off the TV on its second repeat run, when Rimmerworld was replaced with Dimension Jump, and watched that video more times than I care to remember. VII followed, and VIII, and I became gradually disappointed in things, although had I-III Remastered tapes and IV and V off-airs to keep me happy during that period. January 13, 2026 at 1:10 am in reply to: Mundane observation dome #315460 International DebrisParticipant I’m pretty sure “I did kill him, you know” couldn’t happen with current LLMs. Yeah, the novelty and strangeness has gone from it now. Replaced by… well, Grok. What a time to be alive. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 2,933 total) 1 2 3 … 57 58 59