Forum Replies Created

Viewing 23 posts - 1,501 through 1,523 (of 1,523 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Funny Stuff What You Done Found on The Interweb #121839
    Ridley
    Participant

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE2hA8qCS40

    Not really teh 1nternetz but They’re never going to get around to releasing series two and three on DVD.

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121832
    Ridley
    Participant

    I reckon I liked Rebecca, the Narnia wardrobe and Myth Child.

    in reply to: I’m back in England for two weeks… #121814
    Ridley
    Participant

    80 Available
    81 Jump Leads
    82 Available

    Somebody’s antisocial

    in reply to: Red Dwarf in games #121764
    Ridley
    Participant

    I haven?t read any Buffy comics except what I mentioned (which strictly speaking isn?t Buffy as it?s other slayer in that universe.)

    You might be interested in http://www.darkhorse.com/search/search.php?frompage=userinput&sstring=Buffy+omnibus&x=0&y=0 aswell then.

    Just out of interest, which tag on this site is the one to url link with text instead of the whole web address? :P

    in reply to: This droid was made for walking. #121756
    Ridley
    Participant
    in reply to: What do you prefer to Red Dwarf? #121702
    Ridley
    Participant

    Anyone know how the Partridge movie is doing?

    in reply to: ‘Allo ‘Allo to be shown in Germany #121483
    Ridley
    Participant

    So is this just a dubbing of the episode or will it be remake like Das iTeam (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vum37p8Ey74)?

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121482
    Ridley
    Participant

    Actually seeing that arseface kid in the comic (that is disturbing by the way isn?t it?) that rings a bell. Also Cassidy?s comment. Completely skipped my mind that did. In my defence I read that book a long time ago.

    That’s my defence too, should have remembered Arseface World when I have the issue.

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121460
    Ridley
    Participant

    As for Preacher, I?ve only read one of those comics (the first I beleive.) I?m somewhat surprised they did the bumface gag there as it didn?t come across as that kind of comic. (The book with the supernatural comic with the rather unpreacherlike, er, preacher, the lady and the Irish vampire right? Or am I getting mixed up with something else?) No doubt I need to read the scene in context though.

    No, no, you’re right about the book, but Preacher’s Arseface doesn’t literally have an… well, arseface. ;)

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121445
    Ridley
    Participant

    Where have the snooker commentators gone (easily one of the funniest sets of characters)? Why do we still have Sir Digby Chicken Caesar, who I never liked?

    Ah, now I never found the snooker commentators funny. But I was surprised they’d dropped so many recurring characters for the second series.

    Why can’t we have these http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWWAAMju8fY and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC_QSEvpmyA (if that one loads) back?

    First series was much better all round. *cough*green clarinet*cough*

    in reply to: Funny Stuff What You Done Found on The Interweb #121446
    Ridley
    Participant

    http://www.newgrounds.com/collection/burntfaceman.html

    (These movies have naughty language that may not be suitable for your little ones)

    in reply to: So this potentially “Big News”… #121414
    Ridley
    Participant

    TOS forum software upgrade?

    It’s a new countdown clock!

    in reply to: 10 little questions… #121398
    Ridley
    Participant

    I just always assumed the nanobots consciously decided not to duplicate Lister and Kochanski because they were already there.

    “If I’m so stupid, explain why I was able to re-create a new set of
    nanobots and get them to resurrect the crew.”

    I wouldn’t have thought Holly would have been very specific in telling them what to do any more than Kryten’s (DivaDroid International’s?) nanobots being told “We want that planetoid turned back into Red Dwarf, and we also want you to build a new arm for Mr Lister”.

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121392
    Ridley
    Participant

    Petril

    in reply to: 10 little questions… #121296
    Ridley
    Participant

    Write another comic? :P

    The interesting thing is that some of the crew members, if rebuilt from dead cells, wouldn’t necessarily have to have been on the ship at the time of the radiation leak. And vice versa (like non Dwarf Space Corps. personnel)

    Were there be bits of Camille, Jim or Bexley lying around that could and were revived? The polymorph(s)? The Mayor of Warsaw? The mutated pneumonia that made him solid? It’s not like we were shown much beyond what was happening on Floor 13.

    in reply to: 10 little questions… #121283
    Ridley
    Participant

    I/ Series IX

    II/ Originals (plus new Kochanski. Oop and Kryten)

    III/ Both probably

    IV/ NEW

    V/ Erm… they all got scattered across the universe somehow.

    VI/ Hologram. Series VIII Rimmer does die in only The Good but gets brought back and they get his personality off Starbug’s black box. Or something. ;)

    VII/ Still there and asking why she was Scottish in this reality etc. Rimmer convinced he’s highest ranked member still aboard because she’s from another reality.

    VIII/ Lovett I guess. Though there IS that “other version” of him.

    IX/ Stand alone probably.

    X/ And left open.

    in reply to: Funny Stuff What You Done Found on The Interweb #121244
    Ridley
    Participant

    http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation

    http://www.floatinghandsstudios.com/comicparodies.html

    Actually while I got reminded of I Love Horses magazine… that Beasts & Beings Magazine advert that recently appeared on TV (http://www.beasts-and-beings.co.uk/index.html) seems to be edging into exactly what Peter Serafinowicz did http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klS92A8YzfY

    in reply to: What do you prefer to Red Dwarf? #121240
    Ridley
    Participant

    Even Million Little Fibers?

    South Park did the 24 parody better than the Simpsons too. And ‘Up the Down Steroid’ was done better than The Ringer it supposedly ripped off.

    Rob Schneider derp de derp.

    in reply to: What do you prefer to Red Dwarf? #121235
    Ridley
    Participant

    The first five minutes or so, with the comic book stuff (and Moore/Spiegelman/Clowes), were absolutely brilliant, and had me thinking ?Wow! The Simpsons knows how to be funny again! Admittedly by narrowing its appeal and making loads of geeky comics-related injokes, but still! Yay!?

    Everything before “Maus is in the Haus!”, right? ;)

    I liked bits of ‘Midnight Towboy’ but The Simpsons just hasn’t been the same since it became The Homer Show and did things that would usually be reserved for the Treehouse of Horror. Kicks in around Season 10.
    The movie was watchable but it was three ‘classic’ episodes put together for the most part. eg Large breasted Inuit woman = Coyote spirit guide. (Though I did think Russ Cargill should have been Hank Scorpio since Brooks was using the same voice.)

    But no, I don’t prefer any comedy over Red Dwarf.

    in reply to: A charming message I recieved through YouTube #121095
    Ridley
    Participant

    What does s/he think of Moonraker?

    in reply to: I Would Just Like to Denounce… #121045
    Ridley
    Participant

    It shares elements but I don’t think the story arc (or setting), for the first series at least, are necessarily needed for most of its humour.

    in reply to: I Would Just Like to Denounce… #121042
    Ridley
    Participant

    But the League of Gentlemen is a sketch show for the first two series…

    in reply to: That’s Numberwang! #121011
    Ridley
    Participant

    If you’re counting Arseface then James Vance did it before that.

Viewing 23 posts - 1,501 through 1,523 (of 1,523 total)