Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 183 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: 2008 – The Year of The Dwarf #118910
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Happy new year all, I hope it’s a prosperous one for everyone here! Let’s hope it’s a good year for the Dwarf in terms of advancement, ahem, Doug.

    in reply to: Simpsons DVD #125791
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Well, the Simpson’s has been dismal for the past 5 or so years, it had it’s golden age back in 1990’s. It’s dragged on now like an old lame horse than needs to be put down to save it a miserable death. The movie should have been out a decade ago. Such a shame to see an ok comedy go on to become a mindless parody. But alas, that’s what america does best. Some flashy extras aren’t going to pull me in. The Simpson’s has never been that side splitting to begin with, it’s been an alright comedy that got worse and worse, until it became boring. There are far, far better comedies out there to get on dvd, quality for money as well.

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125153
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Because I have decency, and I don’t want to get personal with people.

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125147
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Personal, your the willy woofter around here friend of mine. Swivel on it you philistine.

    in reply to: New BBC comedy comedy guide #125148
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    To ganymede and titan, yes sir I’ve been around.

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125143
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Touch wood Mick, touch wood.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125131
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Happy now, Baz you nitpicker.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125126
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Still he doesn’t need to brag, nor do you. You’re still human, you smell in the morning , therefore we are equal midear.

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125130
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Doesn’t take much then petey.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125123
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Seb your delusional, you have the same rights as me, ”so there”. I bet you stuck your tongue out when you wrote that, petty. What you meant to say was, you have more of an arrogant air about you. And yeah I totally agree with you ha.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125114
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I’ll leave when I wish, it’s my post, I created it and I have a right to send feedback, just like you. So hush up those snappers baby. I don’t mind the Lister Kochanski banter, I prefered Clare Grogan’s banter with Lister, well what there was of it, much more natural.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125088
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Don’t write anything Johnny boy if you don’t like my posts. Savy?

    in reply to: Blue Midgit Giftset #125080
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Poor effort my underlings.

    in reply to: Blue Midgit Giftset #125079
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Nope. Still nothing doing, sigh.

    in reply to: Blue Midgit Giftset #125077
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Nothing doing. Sorry.

    in reply to: Blue Midgit Giftset #125070
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Get your own catchphrase Ian, kid. Or are you not acute enough to come up with one my long haired friend?

    in reply to: Onto the matter now of Star Trek TOS if you will #124721
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Yeah but it leaves fans wondering what boxset to get, the original or the remastered, I’m not forking out money for both. RD is different, the body snatcher boxset is a piece of RD history and probably the last dvd of the franchise coming out. With Trek now some fans are wondering what is official canon now, TOS untouched or the ”touched up” version?

    in reply to: Father Ted 2007 DVD box set #124692
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    The first hi-def release as I mentioned yes.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124690
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    And hey, ha, as if he wasn’t being sarky to me but yeah he can get off with it. Clever, very clever. Rethink my friend.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124689
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Indeed, here here. Are you the back up?

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124687
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Witty to the bitter end my liege.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124686
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Oh ha ha.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124680
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Go climb a tree. He should still reply.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124681
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I asked him a question which I’m entitled to and I will continue to do so in my efforts to fight for justice. How d’em apples?

    in reply to: Father Ted 2007 DVD box set #124677
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    There is meant to be an Archival HD/Blue ray version coming out in the near future which will supposedly be the final cut of the original films. And apparently they have been holding back doccos and featurettes for this particular release. I don’t mind when the creator remasters their vision, they can do it as many times as they like;it’s their creation after all. But when it’s done after the creator is dead, ie Star Trek TOS, it’s a different story. Then we get bastard versions of loved shows.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124676
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    That’s what he thinks.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124674
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Your copy and paste skills are so honed Andrew, what other skills do you possess? Perhaps you could share your incredible insight, tell us how you perfected your impeccable wit. So when are you updating blue midget, you still refuse to answer,why is this so? It’s your duty as a Official Siter to answer questions posed to you is it not sir? You know I’ll keep asking until the cows come home, so why not just settle it now my feathered friend?

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124667
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    You spoke to Rocky Ian, that is quite a pleasure indeed. Regardless the more insect like just didn’t pull it for me. I mentioned the episode in series 5 Andrew.

    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Well my fellow dwarf fans I’m back, and I’m bad! Obviously, within certain
    sensible pre-set parameters…! And yes Andrew when are you going to update Blue Midget you never did get back to me. Hello Ian, I hope your not still upset over our itty bitty tiff we had, as I myself of course bear no grudges. Interesting topic I must say. I can only say that old AJ’s hair is due to the fact that he either wanted a change, ie he decided what the smeg. Or it’s just a continuity error on Chris Barrie’s part and his make up. P.S.it’s nice that you guys were remembering me…in some way or another.

    Tonguetied
    Participant

    So what are your thoughts on VIII alternate setting Phil?

    in reply to: Regarding mellowness in Series 3 #124337
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    You doubt it Danny? Well I think the Rimmer/Lister relationship is the heart of the show. It is the foremost fundamental that makes the show so highly entertaining in my opinion.I realise all the developments that series 3 had, blatantly obvious. And yeah I never said it was less thrilling over all, only that some aspects were missing, Dannielsan.

    in reply to: Regarding AJ’s Uniform worn in series 3,4 and 5 #124326
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Indeed Somebody, indeed it is. Well done to that man, or woman?

    in reply to: Regarding mellowness in Series 3 #124325
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I think it would have been just as entertaining, we needed that force, the tension between AJ and Lister, that’s why series 1 and 2 were so successful.

    in reply to: Regarding mellowness in Series 3 #124299
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Still you can’t take the man out of his contempt for Lister, he should have shown it more that season. Regardless of cooperation, and since when was AJ the sort of man who did anything else other than what suited him, out for himself, he’s the reverse of the Three Musketeers moto, ”all for one and one for all!”, he’s the contrary to it by all standards. The character works because he has such disregard for his companions, he’s the epitome of what they hate, and so he should have been the git we all know and cherish for season trois.

    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Yes my fellow dwarfers, the Observation Dome set was grossly under used, it’s criminal frankly. One of the best sets ever created for Dwarf.

    in reply to: Regarding AJ’s Uniform worn in series 3,4 and 5 #124283
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    easy mistake my man, easy mistake. Especially when you type as fast as I. Doesn’t hinder my knowledge of le Dwarf. But since your looking at every word so carefully, tell ya what i’ll do; I’ll go back and edit them, how is that for you fellow Alan Partridge fan?

    in reply to: Regarding AJ’s Uniform worn in series 3,4 and 5 #124271
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Still I view the series as a whole, as one overall continuity. I have to say without a doubt that my favourite Rimmer uniform is his original space corp cotton duds. Those costumes gave the early series a sense of navy/militaristic feel. The latter series bar series VIII of course, felt very surreal with costumes, not just Rimmers but guest characters. The pastel look was believable. I just thought it would be an interesting part of Dwarf Mythos, I mean there is a logical explanation I’m sure, but it’s where he got the idea to change from his 2nd technician uniform into something that seems to have branched out from nowhere. I would just like your views on what that green/red costume were, where did they come from?

    in reply to: Regarding AJ’s Uniform worn in series 3,4 and 5 #124281
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Ok, it’s fine. Still do you think that series 1 takes place in the same dimension as the latter series, Andrew, as an official siter it would be interesting to hear your opinion on that particular aspect of Dwarf mythos.

    in reply to: Regarding AJ’s Uniform worn in series 3,4 and 5 #124279
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I don’t mean where did they come from literally Andrew, everyone who loves dwarf know who howard burden is. You honestly don’t think I know my Dwarf inside out do you? I mean what was the template in the story. ie Rimmer’s template for series one and 2 is space core issue. Still I believe Rob and Doug officially see the show as one continuity it is not disputed anywhere I believe. Except of course from the series 3 opening crawl which is mainly for gags. Plus I would argue that series 1- 2 combatesque uniforms were ultimately better. But that is my opinion of course.

    in reply to: Regarding mellowness in Series 3 #124276
    Tonguetied
    Participant


    Yeah one of the few scenes he does his ordering about. But what about Lister, it just feels like he is the same character, still up against Rimmer, but AJ let’s him off quite easily in this series. Rimmer just doesn’t snap back this time round.

    in reply to: Regarding mellowness in Series 3 #124273
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Yeah, I agree with you with the return to his uptight nature in Series 4,but can you think of anytime in Series 3 when he is obnoxious or strict with Lister?

    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Dark ages? Are you being serious?

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124221
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Cool I’ll bear that in mind. A smegazine cover art work would be great. Well at least a shot of the cast members heads from the mags, depending on resolution. I’m thinking of the header space here. But yeah, it’s cool, what was your first header? I can imagine it was a generic Lister or Rimmer shot?

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124219
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    So can anyone submit you material for a header, as long as it keeps within the range of sensibility and Dwarf related? Or is it just administrators privileges.

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124218
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Of course.

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124215
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    It’s a good choice for a header pic I must say, who’s decision was it? Or was a consensus?

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124213
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    The great Richard Ridings.

    in reply to: Replacement header pic #124212
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Yup I noticed it today when I came on, pretty snazzy stuff huh?

    in reply to: Red Dwarf used for a pile of shit ‘spoof’ article #124210
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I have not met Le Kettle, sir.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf used for a pile of shit ‘spoof’ article #124208
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Abysmal even though I say so myself.

Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 183 total)