Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Roswell 1847 production log Search for: This topic has 68 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by Jo. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic August 4, 2008 at 5:52 pm #2460 PhilParticipant Not really. But kind of. It’s a telling insight into the filmmaker’s mentality, at least. http://fxhome.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=29800&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid= Read it. Enjoy. Note the reactions to the news of the film and compare them to the reactions to the trailer when that’s posted. Watch the filmmaker have a nervous breakdown in the middle of a forum squabble. And definitely stick around for all the “my 13 year old daughter can outspell you!” nonsense that you’d come to expect from a thread like this. Creator Topic Viewing 18 replies - 51 through 68 (of 68 total) 1 2 Author Replies October 22, 2008 at 7:13 pm #86265 hummingbirdParticipant >And heres a clip I found on another site. http://www.indieflix.com/ViewVitalClip.aspx?filename=18642_clip&ti tle=Recon+7+Down It would be interesting to know if that’s a fair sample of the film as a whole. October 22, 2008 at 11:57 pm #86272 BillCParticipant No thats not a good sample Indyflix.com took that part from the film (I never really cared for that scene to be honest the film has to have it).I would rather see action in a clip not three guys standing by a plane. I told them to take a 2 1/2 min clip certain time range about 2 3rds of the way in the film. Plus they have the price alot lower than the DVDs should be I don’t think they will have it fixed till monday Recon and Roswell are priced at 9.99 Recon should be 19.99 and Roswell 18.99. So if your a bargan hunter darn good price. Recon has done well Priced at 22.99 on Amazon.com and target and at Ny stores ect. Also they have yet to put up any Roswell clip. It seems all the places bugger the price The Download price For Recon on another site is $4.90 to see the film and like S19.00 to burn a copy It should be 2.99 and 8.99 Oh well Lots of phone calls to make to fix it in the Morning. October 27, 2008 at 6:42 am #86366 BillCParticipant Phil Yes I recived your PM I’ll mail a copy out, end of week. I am busy the first 3 days of the week with the election Ra Ra suff. October 27, 2008 at 10:56 am #86369 PhilParticipant Thanks Mr. Cheney. I’ll be on the lookout for it in the next week or so, and shoot you a PM when it gets here. November 25, 2008 at 9:51 pm #87123 PhilParticipant Mr. Cheney: If you’re still popping in here, I haven’t heard back from you on the superteamfilms board. No DVD has arrived and I’m concerned that it might have been lost in the mail. (My postman was observed eating a lolipop that I have to assume he stole from a child’s care-package.) Let me know if you sent it. Also: You guys managed to get the license for the Starship Troopers franchise? http://www.superteamfilms.co.uk/product45173_103655.aspx Congratulations! November 25, 2008 at 11:46 pm #87125 Jonathan CappsKeymaster > Also: You guys managed to get the license for the Starship Troopers franchise? Finally, the franchise is saved! > A handfull of people are selected to go on a mission to help colonists on another planet, they are getting attacked by giant bugs. A brave new direction. November 26, 2008 at 6:23 am #87134 DaveParticipant >new direction Filth November 26, 2008 at 8:08 am #87136 Pete Part ThreeParticipant “Superteam produce their own feature films, you can buy them direct from us or you can pay a higher price and buy them from stores.” What were the options again? November 26, 2008 at 4:58 pm #87139 hummingbirdParticipant I hate these either/or questions. December 30, 2008 at 1:41 pm #87966 JoParticipant Phil, did you ever hear from him then? December 30, 2008 at 8:09 pm #87998 PhilParticipant Just checked my PM box on their forums and the answer is…no! Gah. I’m really saddened by this, actually. If Mr. Cheney is still buzzing around out there, rest assured I would have given this film a fair appraisal. If you feared that a negative review would be automatic…well, I’d understand that, based on some of the views expressed in this thread. But by not giving me the chance to view the entire movie, you basically cement this premature appraisal as “the last word.” Also, I’d buy the movie for myself it wasn’t around $20. I can get entire seasons of The Simpsons for that price right now, and I’d probably be overcome with self-loathing when I see the superteam.biz entry on my bank statement at the end of the month. December 31, 2008 at 12:30 pm #88007 TheLeenParticipant I was looking forward to the review, too. December 31, 2008 at 5:12 pm #88011 PhilParticipant http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_it_true_that_Norman_Lovett_is_in_a_new_film_called_Roswell_1847_with_William_Cheney_from_Star_Trek April 1, 2009 at 7:42 pm #94889 PhilParticipant doctorkickles (5 days ago) Show Hide Reply | Remove I can’t get this on Netflix but I want to do a Condensed Film of it. Can I get a copy? b4uaskimagod (5 days ago) Show Hide Reply Hi, It’s on Amazon, but as the copyright owners we can’t allow people to condense the film, sorry. That’s the bad news. The good news is that another one of their films WAS available… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DVM4Y9yyJ8 May 1, 2009 at 7:36 pm #98433 WillParticipant The link phil posted above was removed from youtube for violation of copyright. Heres what was recived today from phil.You will also see he states he did not get the film from Netfilx. His email In law terms, defamation (also called calumny, libel (for written publications), slander (for spoken word), and vilification. MR. Cheney was injured befor the new year and is unable to deal with this direct. To Phil your email from you tube is being reported to proper authorities for Harassment Charges. We felt you should all know what kind of person Phil is. Re: William Was called. Ripping footage from a DVD and uploading to the net is Illegal you first should have asked permission. Re: Re: William Was called. Ripping footage from a DVD and uploading to the net is Illegal you first should have asked permission. Good morning Mr. Cheney. You’ll be happy to know that the review has been re-edited so as to include no actual footage from the film. In order to retain my narration, however, I’ve padded it out with still photographs of yourself that I was able to dig up online, along with entertaining captions suggesting that you get up to various unsavory activities. (Voyeurism, bestiality, Taiwanese prostitution, assaulting police officers, a conviction for dealing drugs to school children…) It seems that this sort of thing is actually allowed by youtube as long as I make clear that my accusations are false and are made for the sake of parody, which I’ll probably do at the very end, when nobody’s watching. Of course, I haven’t uploaded it yet, because I remembered that you seemed to be interested in posting a reply video to my original review. So I will make you an offer. You can create a reply to my original video, which I will link to clearly both in the video and at the top of the description so that whatever you would like to say will be heard (in other words, settle this like men), or you can be grouchy about footage from your film appearing in a video and I’ll upload and advertise the personal attack one instead. Your choice. Remember, Mr. Cheney, there’s no such thing as bad publicity. What you don’t seem to realize is that it’s introducing your film to hundreds who have never even heard of it, and, otherwise, never would. Sure, I say it’s lousy, but doesn’t the box-art say that itself? Let me know what you’d like to do. I’ll be in Tampa all next week so you have some time to decide. If I don’t hear from you, I’ll stick the new edit up and start advertising that. Your friend, Phil PS–I know you think I ripped that original footage from your DVD, but you’re wrong…I don’t actually have the ability to do that with my setup. (Part of why the sound quality on those clips was so low.) Instead, I had to utilize a digital download of your entire film (others of yours are available there as well) and grab clips out of that. If you’re really concerned about circulating footage, maybe you should get off youtube for 30 seconds and track down the people who are giving away your work, in its entirety, for free. May 1, 2009 at 8:17 pm #98434 PhilParticipant >The link phil posted above was removed from youtube for violation of copyright. Actually it was removed by me about two weeks ago, when you asked me to remove it. Why not email me directly, friend? May 2, 2009 at 8:46 pm #98476 Pete Part ThreeParticipant I am both confused and entertained. May 4, 2009 at 8:17 am #98516 JoParticipant To Phil your email from you tube is being reported to proper authorities for Harassment Charges. We felt you should all know what kind of person Phil is. At least he’s not a tell-tale. Did you send this to his Mum too? Author Replies Viewing 18 replies - 51 through 68 (of 68 total) 1 2 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In