Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › What did you prefer, Series 1-2 sets or the latter Series onwards? Search for: This topic has 111 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 12 months ago by Moonlight. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic July 25, 2007 at 10:47 pm #1815 TonguetiedParticipant Some say Series 1-2 sets were the best, others disagree and claim that they prefered the sets of later series. We know that the early series sets were dirt cheap, they look as though they were going to fall apart; That the colours were too dull. However I believe that these sets really gave the early shows that certain atmosphere which I certainly missed in later series. The colours gave it a very monotonous look sure, but hey this is a big mining ship, not a luxury space cruiser. It gave it a sense of greatness. Lister and Rimmer’s bunkroom had a great design, as did the other rooms seen in the first two series. Later series, did have great designs, but I felt it was missing something that the earlier series had. The simple clean look which I felt should have been retained. Sure it was cheap, but hey, some things in life don’t cost much to be great. Anyway tell me your views, which do you prefer, or are you indifferent? Creator Topic Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 111 total) 1 2 3 Author Replies July 25, 2007 at 10:52 pm #124089 Jonathan CappsKeymaster Series 1 and 2 sets cost the same as the series III sets onwards. Ad for the topic… I think I prefer the later sets more. Series 1 and 2 do a great job of giving the atmosphere of a dank, life sapping, procedural mining ship, but the later inventiveness of Mel Bibby manages to give a much nicer contrast with nice, clean Officer’s Quarters and some brilliant dank and dark engine rooms and the like. That and series 1 and 2 *is* too gray. July 25, 2007 at 10:59 pm #124092 TonguetiedParticipant Yeah I know, same cost, different designer, Mel Bibby, radically different way of design. I liked the Officers quarters, if it were used more for scenes with Rimmer and Lister. However as you know, the actors did not particulary like one another, and rehearsing those bunk scenes was a major problem. They just weren’t used that much Jonathan. Sure in series 3 there were some gems, like the Wilma scene with Cat and Lister. The frog description by Rimmer. The whole scoffing at night scene in bodyswap and some others. However after that, come series 4 and 5 while the boys were still on the dwarf, the officers quarters were used less and less, until it became more corridor based look at the Inquisitor. However thanks for your comment. July 25, 2007 at 11:14 pm #124095 Jonathan CappsKeymaster I’m not sure if you’re trying to prove my opinion wrong, or just win a competition for regurgitating as much documentary information as possible… July 25, 2007 at 11:18 pm #124097 TonguetiedParticipant lol I sure love the doccos Johnathan. But no I think we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I think you have valid arguments. It’s just I feel that the officers quarters could have been used more. Like the early series, which would have been great. However I agree with you about the whole contrast the sets had with each other. Mel Bibby is a very very talented designer. Paul was great too I feel. July 25, 2007 at 11:31 pm #124098 Smeg4BrainsParticipant I see what you mean about the bunkrooms. My favourite bits of the first two series are when a story is being told just to build up to one big laugh (Eg. Lister’s ‘Smart Shoes’ story and Rimmer’s ‘Lemming’ story). July 25, 2007 at 11:34 pm #124099 TonguetiedParticipant Yeah It feels more homely, less of the danger that was heavily focused on in later series. Just those two talking bollocks, it was when dwarf was a two man gig, I love that aspect. July 25, 2007 at 11:37 pm #124100 Smeg4BrainsParticipant And when Holly was senile not just a prat. July 25, 2007 at 11:44 pm #124104 TonguetiedParticipant Haha, good old Norman. Yeah when he became a she, Hattie came in etc. I agree the whole character was different, less practical jokes on Lister, like the Norweb federation. Change of actor made Rob and Doug write the part for her rather than retain the personality established in the earlier series. However Hattie did have her moments, even though she was a prat some of the time, like the fall when she sees Ace and when she acts up in White Hole.Most of the time though she just wasn’t the same, dialogue was obviously different, because there were just too many characters,lines had to be shared, Kryten became the expositionial man, the man of reason, while Cat was given the more dumbfounded lines that Holly would usually had.The solution in series VI was sensible, to get rid of her. Then come Series VIII, the whole problem started again, the Cat became a background character. Still Norman did shine when he had the chance in series VIII.And of course it was back to the senile familiar holly we had known in series 1 and 2. July 25, 2007 at 11:49 pm #124101 Smeg4BrainsParticipant I still dont think he was the same in VII and VIII. They tried to hard to make him senile and he just ended up being stupid. July 25, 2007 at 11:53 pm #124102 TonguetiedParticipant I see what you mean, he should have been brought in earlier in series VII, or at least have him more in Nanarchy. His awrite dudes was great though when he materialized at the end. but I liked the whole become a dog strategy for Lister. His try not to get crushed to death in Back in the Red extended. He should have been better written to hark back to the glory years. I love how the mirror on the early sets in Listers bunkroom doubled as a viewscreen. July 25, 2007 at 11:56 pm #124107 Smeg4BrainsParticipant I’m not saying that he couldn’t be funny in VII and VIII but it just didn’t seem like the same Holly we all know and love……not in a homo-erotic way. July 25, 2007 at 11:58 pm #124108 TonguetiedParticipant Yeah more senile holly, that’s what would have made series VIII miles better. Not that it doesn’t have it’s moments mind you. July 26, 2007 at 12:11 am #124109 TonguetiedParticipant Where are you from Smeg4Brains, and how long have you been in the Red Dwarf posse lol? July 26, 2007 at 12:25 am #124110 Smeg4BrainsParticipant I’m 18 and I’ve been watching Red Dwarf from an early age…probably from around series VI. I think that may be why I have more tolerance for the later series, because that’s what I grew up watching. And I’m from Rotherham (near Sheffield) July 26, 2007 at 1:09 am #124114 pfmParticipant I think the sets managed to match each series perfectly. Sure, the sheer greyness of the series 1 sets and the, let’s face it, crapness of the props don’t make the show particularly appealing to a viewer, but the strength of the show shines through in that you soon get sucked in and forget about these things. The episodes worked very much like dialogue-driven two/three-handers which could have been performed on a stage with a black cloth background and it would still have been great. The funniest sets are in series 2 where it’s basically the grey 1 sets but with various bits of COLOUR (in capital letters) thrown on. Also, the Observation Dome set…classic. It reminds you of dodgy ’80s BBC chroma key, which can only be a good thing. What you have to keep reminding yourself is that this is a SITCOM! The sets were amazing for a sitcom, especially when they brought the corridor in (which to me never seems like they’re running up and down the same one) July 26, 2007 at 1:39 am #124115 Danny StephensonKeymaster > the Observation Dome set?classic. It reminds you of dodgy ?80s BBC chroma key, which can only be a good thing. Ah, the old “background stays the same, regardless of camera angles”. Bless them. July 26, 2007 at 12:51 pm #124118 BazParticipant Loved the music in the background of that scene. Sometimes just put the DVD in to listen to it (searches for soundtrack CDs so far proving fruitless). Also has the best line of series 2 Cat- Aaaaaaooooow! I am so hungry, I’ve just gotta eat! Lister- Shhh! Rimmer’s Dad’s died. Cat- Well, I’d prefer chicken. Also the “Rubber Nuclear Weapons” reference later on in the bunkroom, priceless. I personally prefer the first two series, I think the writing was so much sharper. Perhaps I’m just being nostalgic. August 3, 2007 at 6:39 pm #124285 TonguetiedParticipant Yes my fellow dwarfers, the Observation Dome set was grossly under used, it’s criminal frankly. One of the best sets ever created for Dwarf. August 3, 2007 at 10:28 pm #124300 Seb PatrickKeymaster >(searches for soundtrack CDs so far proving fruitless) *cough* I’ve never made one of those. Ever. August 3, 2007 at 10:40 pm #124301 Danny StephensonKeymaster Yes, you have, you made the… *SLAP* *sits back in corner* August 4, 2007 at 9:35 am #124312 Jonathan CappsKeymaster “Ted, what about that ?200 you won on the horses?” August 4, 2007 at 10:08 am #124313 Seb PatrickKeymaster “Actually, Ted, I forgot you had the money. I was just going to say, your flies are undone.” August 4, 2007 at 3:15 pm #124296 Jonathan CappsKeymaster Damn, I’m misquoted. August 4, 2007 at 7:47 pm #124319 Danny StephensonKeymaster “once again, you’ve made me look a complete idiot in front of REAL people… Thank you so much…” August 5, 2007 at 2:14 am #124323 pfmParticipant > ?once again, you?ve made me look a complete idiot in front of REAL people? Thank you so much?? That’s the perfect line to say to your girlfriend after a night out. August 5, 2007 at 11:36 pm #124342 mickParticipant Yes my fellow dwarfers, the Observation Dome set was grossly under used Probably for fear of legal recourse as it’s a blatent rip off of the observation dome in the final few episodes of Battlestar Galactica (original series) hehe ;) August 6, 2007 at 8:29 am #124348 AndrewParticipant I think you’ll find Dark Star got there ahead of them… August 6, 2007 at 10:28 am #124359 AnonymousInactive Bit of a tough one to call that as Glen Larson had been actively trying to get Battlestar Galactica off the ground since the late 1960’s. I also know for a fact that one of the scripts featuring the Observation dome was written when he was working on The Six Million Dollar Man which would have been in 1973, so he would have at least had no prior knowledge of the Observation Dome on Darkstar. August 6, 2007 at 12:51 pm #124362 AndrewParticipant Doesn’t matter who had the idea first, it’s who got it out into the popular culture earliest – we’re only talking about cultral influence. And when it comes to influence on Dwarf, Dark Star’s clearly the daddy. August 6, 2007 at 5:00 pm #124363 mickParticipant we?re only talking about cultral influence Are we? I jokingly sugested it was for fear legal recourse, neither that or the following posts read to me like we were debating either shows cultural influence or that on Red Dwarf. Of course I concede that Darkstar had more influence on the show. Aside from the model shots which bare stiking resemblances (see shuttle crashing in ‘The Gun on Ice Planet Zero’) Im willing to wager Battlestar Galactica had virtually no influence at all on Red Dwarf. As for cultural influences, well I wont get into that in any depth (perhaps a face to face debate at DJ) but I find very very small ammounts of comedy of sci-fi fans even ‘get’ Darkstar let alone find it ammusing, where as Battlestar Galactica was a massive influence on everyone at a time where it was widely viewed as a TV version of Star Wars. I think the Darkstar phenomenon to a certain point comes down to its cult status and the masses of annoying little barstuards wo instantly suscribe to anything with that status attached to it. A great example of this is Donnie Darko, I forced loads of people to watch it and all but a few proclaimed it to be shit, until of couse it was given ‘cult’ status then everyone thinks its the best thing since double ply arse wipes. I still think Darkstar is terrible, it still puts me to sleep and I have never even once grinned at any of the ‘humour’ contained in it, despite me being a huge fan of both that sort of comedy and the work of John Carpenter. August 6, 2007 at 6:12 pm #124364 Danny StephensonKeymaster I thought Donnie Darko was an awesome film. I’d not heard anythign abotu it beforehand which is unusual for me, because i usually read up on a film before i start to engage in it. August 6, 2007 at 6:48 pm #124365 AndrewParticipant > Are we? I jokingly sugested it was for fear legal recourse, neither that or the following posts read to me like we were debating either shows cultural influence or that on Red Dwarf. Surely the joke that it was a rip-off from Galactica stems from the suggestion that one work of popular culture affected the other? I think you just wanted to show off some “Galactica had a scripted Obs Dome dontcha know” triva… :-) August 6, 2007 at 7:37 pm #124366 mickParticipant Not really I mentioned it to about a dozen people at DJ in bedford, all of whom post here, although I think you were all too busy watching my piling pizza on symes and drawing on his face ;) August 6, 2007 at 9:34 pm #124369 AndrewParticipant > although I think you were all too busy watching my piling pizza on symes and drawing on his face ;) Well who WOULDN’T want to watch that?! :-) August 6, 2007 at 9:37 pm #124370 Danny StephensonKeymaster > although I think you were all too busy watching my piling pizza on symes and drawing on his face ;) What? Pissed Pizza Jenga? I won the ‘spoon balancing on Ian’s nose’ competition! August 7, 2007 at 8:33 am #124375 BazParticipant I am so going to have to attend DJ this year… August 7, 2007 at 10:48 am #124378 mickParticipant > I won the ?spoon balancing on Ian?s nose? competition! You certainly did not! August 7, 2007 at 3:26 pm #124353 Danny StephensonKeymaster *cries* August 7, 2007 at 7:29 pm #124354 mickParticipant *laughs* August 7, 2007 at 8:13 pm #124355 PhilParticipant *felches* August 7, 2007 at 8:13 pm #124385 PhilParticipant *felches* August 8, 2007 at 12:53 am #124392 Danny StephensonKeymaster Do you still have the picture from that glorious night, Mick? August 8, 2007 at 9:27 am #124395 mickParticipant Oooooooh yes. August 9, 2007 at 4:19 pm #124425 Danny StephensonKeymaster Still got your brick(s)? August 9, 2007 at 4:45 pm #124426 Jonathan CappsKeymaster I think now would be an appropriate juncture to state that I love my brick. August 9, 2007 at 5:32 pm #124427 Danny StephensonKeymaster NAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! FED UP WITH BREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK! August 9, 2007 at 10:36 pm #124428 mickParticipant > Still got your brick(s)? Yep, one in the car, three in the garage :D August 9, 2007 at 11:06 pm #124429 Jonathan CappsKeymaster > one in the car, three in the garage The new Murder-Rom-Com from Richard Curtis, there. August 12, 2007 at 4:59 pm #124450 DaveParticipant I never really had a preference regarding sets aboard Red Dwarf. But I was quite proprietorial about Starbug. I love Starbug. The set was never better than in Series VI. Series VII’s alterations really lessoned the impact of the ship and undermined the story. March 9, 2018 at 1:23 am #229151 JawscvmcdiaParticipant I must admit I have a soft spot for the Series 1 set, but I think had it been developed further it would have been quite effective in terms of portraying a battered mining ship. I also think the Series 8 sets were also pretty good, a nice amalgamation of both the early series and later series sets. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 111 total) 1 2 3 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In