Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Official Changes

Scroll to bottom

  • Creator
    Topic
  • February 18, 2008 at 11:15 pm #2183
    thomasaevans
    Participant

    Probably been mentioned… but did anyone notice TOS now is called the Red Dwarf Development Site?

    Are we just getting a new website?

  • Creator
    Topic
Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • February 18, 2008 at 11:15 pm #120605
    thomasaevans
    Participant

    Sorry, that sounded ungratefull. New website would be great.

    February 19, 2008 at 12:36 am #120607
    Mr Flibble
    Participant

    IIRC it’s always said that on standalone pages.

    February 19, 2008 at 12:44 am #120608
    Andrew
    Participant

    > IIRC it?s always said that on standalone pages.

    We have a development site that we’ve used every week since we launched, getting the stories up before they go live, because I don’t do the tech side myself. The header has appeared on the main site every so often for years, typically when we try to do anything non-standard. (I think it’s followed the Christmas lights up, been attached to Merchandise image windows – stuff like that – in its time.) So no, it’s no indication of anything – other than the current site having far too many flaws.

    There may be a thread somewhere pointing this out… :-)

    February 19, 2008 at 1:49 am #120609
    Mr Flibble
    Participant

    If I was bored I might point out you said

    the current site

    which implies there is a future one.

    But I’m not, so I won’t.

    February 19, 2008 at 2:24 am #120610
    pfm
    Participant

    Face it, it’s going to be a call-out for us to give all our DVDs to GNP because we don’t deserve their greatness.

    February 19, 2008 at 9:20 am #120612
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    If you’ve brought the DVDs just for completism, you should throw them away. And then buy them again because you like them.

    February 19, 2008 at 11:20 am #120615
    Phil
    Participant

    >which implies there is a future one.

    Or it implies that there’s been a past one. Which there has…

    February 19, 2008 at 12:44 pm #120616
    Mr Flibble
    Participant

    Yes. But that doesn’t suit any conspiracy theory :P

    February 20, 2008 at 12:06 am #120629
    thomasaevans
    Participant

    Ok… never EVER noticed that before.

    OOO Andrew you’ve got me all excited and flustered! :D

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

Scroll to top  •  Scroll to Recent Forum Posts

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.