Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Duane’s First Scene In Emohawk Search for: This topic has 29 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 6 months ago by Andrew. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic November 1, 2007 at 11:08 am #1987 AndrewParticipant Just been looking at the Duane Dibbley stuff in Emohawk and the mechanics of his first post-transformation scene suddenly REALLY stuck out for me. Having been drained of his cool and style, ‘Duane’ emerges to talk to Rimmer in the mid-section. Only, it’s not Duane. The hair and the teeth are there, but he still *completely* has the Cat’s personality. He complains about the dorkiness, the spot cream and dandruff. The change is entirely superficial. The next time, though – once Ace has appeared (and he’s fully-formed right away) – he HAS become Duane. He wants to change into geekier clothes, and the voice has altered. It’s one of those things that clearly happens when scripts are coming in very late, there’s just no time to press the logic holes. But it’s weird how they get away with it. (To be fair, in the original Polymorph Kryten had a brief moment of plot-exposition dialogue before exhibiting his change. Everyone else either falls unconscious or is cut away from.) Creator Topic Viewing 29 replies - 1 through 29 (of 29 total) Author Replies November 1, 2007 at 11:44 am #125360 TheLeenParticipant I don’t get why taking away the cat’s cool changes him into an entirely different person anyway. Make him clumsy, ok. Change his teeth… uhm how? I suppose I just stop asking *any* questions at that point. November 1, 2007 at 1:19 pm #125363 AnonymousGuest Maybe it takes a while for the changes made to the psyche by the Polymorph to set in. Remember the first Polymorph, when Kryten has his guilt removed there’s a few seconds of him speaking as himself, reflecting on the fact… which is swiftly followed by “Oh, screw you hadron head!” November 1, 2007 at 1:20 pm #125364 Pete Part ThreeParticipant Part of the reason that Emohawk just seems like fan-fic. Good fan fic, but a little contrived. I dislike the way that Cat and Rimmer narrate their transformations and I guess that’s the only reason for that Non-Duane scene. It’s just exposistion. Really needed Holly or Kryten there to explain what was happening. “It’s removing my bitterness, taking my negativity, slurping out all my snidieness.” Oh, yeah…because we all know what THAT feels like! November 1, 2007 at 1:26 pm #125366 AnonymousGuest I think it’s definitely the weakest of Series 6. Really does feel like Duane, Rimmer and the poly-morph are shoe-horned into it as a fan pleaser. The last “What a Dibbley!” bit is toe-curlingly lame. But I still love it! November 1, 2007 at 1:31 pm #125367 BazParticipant Doesn’t quite manage to explain how the transformation can extend to the physical level, including apparently clothes and props. Reconfiguring Rimmer to Ace, yes, he’s a hologram, ok, but Dwayne? Or perhaps the Cat keeps a parka, thermos, sandwiches, corn plasters, telephone money, dandruff brush, animal footprint chart and one triple thick condom handy because, well, you never know! November 1, 2007 at 1:38 pm #125369 AnonymousGuest Indeed. It don’t make sense! And don’t get me started on Rimmer being a hard-light hologram whilst playing the locker game in the Series 7 flashback… ;) November 1, 2007 at 1:39 pm #125370 Pete Part ThreeParticipant And what the hell is up with those kippers in the deleted scene from Dimension Jump? November 1, 2007 at 1:57 pm #125372 AnonymousGuest I had no idea what was going on with the “I’ll smoke him a smegging kipper!” set-up at the end of Dimension Jump until I saw that deleted scene. November 1, 2007 at 2:06 pm #125374 PhilParticipant >And don?t get me started on Rimmer being a hard-light hologram whilst playing the locker game in the Series 7 flashback? He’s not, though. Lister does all of the physical work during that scene…Arnie doesn’t touch anything at all. And the “blue suit?” Well, there’s no reason Rimmer can’t change his clothes based on whim (which, indeed, he does several times)…but I always just chalked it up to Lister mis-remembering the scene. The last time he saw Rimmer he was hardlight/blue, and it’s not unlikely that this is the wardrobe with which he remembers him best. November 1, 2007 at 2:10 pm #125375 AnonymousGuest Or the production team could have just made a mistake. ;-) From all evidence previously in the series it does seem to be that blue = hard light. November 1, 2007 at 2:18 pm #125376 TheLeenParticipant > but I always just chalked it up to Lister mis-remembering the scene. The last time he saw Rimmer he was hardlight/blue, and it?s not unlikely that this is the wardrobe with which he remembers him best. Oh, how nice! It makes sense! It makes my red dwarf universe a little wholer! Thanks. November 1, 2007 at 2:25 pm #125377 PhilParticipant >From all evidence previously in the series it does seem to be that blue = hard light. Well, quite, but that doesn’t render Rimmer incapable of selecting it one day…it could well have been a change for him as meaningless as his shift from green to red. Or, indeed, grey to green. Neither does it change the fact that there is no physical evidence that he is hardlight at all. If he were, wouldn’t he be physically participating in the game? It’s a mis-remembrance…that’s all it takes to bring everything in line with continuity. November 1, 2007 at 2:29 pm #125379 AndrewParticipant > From all evidence previously in the series it does seem to be that blue = hard light. Oh sure, but Rimmer requires Lister to open the locker for him, and is in no way scorched by the flames. He’s soft-light in the scene…he’s just in the wrong outfit. November 1, 2007 at 2:41 pm #125380 AnonymousGuest True that! November 1, 2007 at 2:51 pm #125381 TheLeenParticipant Rimmer from the future was hard light and wore yellow. (Just saying.) November 1, 2007 at 3:03 pm #125383 AnonymousGuest This is true too! Always assumed that his colour had faded / gone jaundice with age. November 1, 2007 at 6:04 pm #125391 Ian SymesKeymaster Why *wouldn’t* the Emohawk be able to change the physical characteristics of its victims? It amuses me that people say that it doesn’t make sense, when it’s a made-up thing! I guess you can explain the fact that the Emohawk changes physical aspects and the original Polymorph doesn’t because the Emohawk is a different breed of Polymorph. If you accept that a creature can remove aspects of someone’s personality at will, you should accept that they can change their teeth and hair too. November 1, 2007 at 8:07 pm #125398 Jonathan CappsKeymaster > From all evidence previously in the series it does seem to be that blue = hard light. But hasn’t it already been said that Rimmer’s change to a blue suit after the conversion in Legion was a continuity error? Surely you can’t make up your own laws of the Dwarf universe and then cry foul when they’re contradicted? November 1, 2007 at 8:09 pm #125399 AndrewParticipant > But hasn?t it already been said that Rimmer?s change to a blue suit after the conversion in Legion was a continuity error? You’re thinking of Gunmen, where Rimmer starts again as soft-light. (Or possibly the first version of the final scene of Legion…) Aren’t you?! November 1, 2007 at 10:17 pm #125401 PhilParticipant >> From all evidence previously in the series it does seem to be that blue = hard light. This is faulty reasoning, anyway, under any circumstance. You can’t disregard the current situation because it doesn’t gibe with the evidence that came before. If you could do that then there’d never be any way to solve mystery stories…because you could just dismiss any further evidence that lends credence to a theory of the murderer’s identity that doesn’t agree with the one you already formulated. If anything this is contrary evidence to the fact that blue = hardlight. It’s a change of clothes, that’s all. Rimmer changing from his grey uniform to his green one doesn’t necessarily imply a complete structural overhaul of the character’s physical traits, so why should the red to blue? It was a good way of keeping the audience clued in to the fact that a change had occurred, but in no way does it imply that blue can only be worn by hardlight holograms. November 2, 2007 at 12:23 am #125403 pfmParticipant > It was a good way of keeping the audience clued in to the fact that a change had occurred Exactly. It removes the natural train of thought of ‘well he doesn’t look any different’. Just the simple change of colour is enough. November 2, 2007 at 12:58 am #125405 Jonathan CappsKeymaster > You?re thinking of Gunmen, where Rimmer starts again as soft-light. (Or possibly the first version of the final scene of Legion?) Aren?t you?! No, I’m thinking of the Legion scene… I thought that was a clothing cock up? November 2, 2007 at 9:29 am #125414 AnonymousGuest It just seemed like an error as I’d always assumed that Blue quilted costume = hard light as he involuntarily turned blue when he went hard light. It just seemed to always act as a short-hand so you knew when he switched between hard and soft light. There are indeed ways around it, but I reckon during the locker game it was just a cock-up in the wardrobe department who didn’t think to change him back from his Series 7 costume. No biggie. Now, as for Lister’s appendix… ;) November 2, 2007 at 10:41 am #125417 AndrewParticipant > There are indeed ways around it, but I reckon during the locker game it was just a cock-up in the wardrobe department who didn?t think to change him back from his Series 7 costume. No biggie. I’d say this was absolutely the case. But I love Phil’s ‘subjective memory’ get-out. November 2, 2007 at 2:35 pm #125422 SomebodyParticipant Just curious – what costumes would still have been available to the wardrobe dept.? Would the I/II beige uniform, or the III/IV/Inquisitor “Captain Emerald” costume still have been around without recreating them? [And would they have fitted CB if they did? :)] November 2, 2007 at 3:49 pm #125424 AnonymousGuest Hehe…very doubt that they’d fit Chris these days. Should imagine the wardrobe department is quite ruthless with chucking stuff out. The captain emerald costume always struck me as strange. I mean…it’s exactly like a Captain Scarlet costume! Observe: November 2, 2007 at 4:37 pm #125425 mickParticipant > The captain emerald costume always struck me as strange. I mean?it?s exactly like a Captain Scarlet costume! *bangs head on wall* November 2, 2007 at 4:59 pm #125426 AnonymousGuest Yes, I know that the original gag referred to the same observation… Just a strange design choice. Wonder when Mel Bibby first thought “Ah, yes…Gerry Anderson design. That’s very Rimmer!” November 2, 2007 at 5:41 pm #125429 AndrewParticipant > Just curious – what costumes would still have been available to the wardrobe dept.? Very few. Certainly nothing from I and II, and maybe nothing at all… Author Replies Viewing 29 replies - 1 through 29 (of 29 total) Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In