Red Dwarf 4K

Home Forums Ganymede & Titan Forum Red Dwarf 4K

This topic contains 11 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by  Offline 2 days, 12 hours ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

Jump to bottom

  • Author
    Posts
  • #252883

    clarence

    So now we have the fixed blu ray dvds to enjoy i wondered:
    When are we going to get a 4K version? i want more definition of that dog food in marooned!

    #252884

    Dave

    In 4k, but only at 10fps.

    #252891

    GlenTokyo

    They could probably release bits of Dave Dwarf in true 4K.

    Depends how slack they are with framing, I know productions film at high res so they can crop stuff out (boom in shot) or crop in for close ups.

    BtE’s special effects would take a hit.

    I’d like Stellar Rescue in 4K.

    #252975

    Darrell

    Trojan had a lot of postproduction in 1080 to paint out camera faults. I don’t think any Dave Dwarf has masters in excess of 1080i, and it’s unclear how much rushes/raw stuff gets archived these days – with no physical medium to transfer to and high wrangling/preservation costs, it’s possible that no true RAW footage has been archived.

    #253066

    Flap Jack

    They should release the Mobisodes in 4K 48FPS 3D, exclusive to IMAX.

    #253158

    Katydid

    BtE’s special effects would take a hit.

    In terms of shots that only exist at a max of 1080p, I’d expect that they wouldn’t take a hit so much as the rest of the footage would look much sharper. It definitely wouldn’t be on par with instances in the HD version of Star Trek TNG where the raw footage of certain shots couldn’t be found, necessitating the use of the umpeenth-generation videotape version with its almost early Red Dwarf levels of blurry greyness.

    The X-Files has the same kind of problem, only worse because that show was shot in a way that permitted the HD version to go 16:9 (seasons 1-4 were 4:3, 5 and on were 16:9) with actual expansion of the sides and minimal cropping on the top and bottom. However when they weren’t able to find original film were certain shots, that meant not only would they have to flip back to the grey blurry SD version, they’d have to blow that up about 200% to crop it into 16:9. Not only does resolution half all of a sudden, we blow up it up to reach the edges of the screen so that we’re seeing the limits of the resolution literally twice as easily. It’s a double degradation of picture quality and resolution, compared to TNG’s single level of quality drop.

    But here’s the beauty part.

    The majority of what got cropped are special effects shots created in SD in post-production. So you’d have instances where what you’re supposed to be seeing is the money shot of a three-part episode where this giant fucking UFO with Close Encounters-levels of lights flies over Mulder and it looks worse than the DVD.

    A hypothetical 4K Red Dwarf would be a breeze compared to that. The quality drops would be only down to Blu-ray-quality 1080p, no multiple generations of picture degradation involved. That’s significantly less distracting.

    Although I think the 4K would be an utter waste anywhere outside the location filming.

    #253159

    Katydid

    The X-Files has the same kind of problem, only worse because that show was shot in a way that permitted the HD version to go 16:9 (seasons 1-4 were 4:3, 5 and on were 16:9)

    I worded this poorly. I meant that the original broadcast switched to 16:9 in the fifth season, not that the Blu-ray did. The Blu-Ray was in 16:9 from the beginning.

    Still, switching to producing the show in 16:9 in the late ’90s alongside filming much of the 4:3 seasons almost totally 16:9 safe (with the notable exception of the pilot) shows a lot of foresight on their part on the direction television was eventually going. It’s one of the few 16:9 conversions that (A) doesn’t feel utterly pointless and (B) actually leaves you with more picture than you started with.

    #256416

    Offline

    I really don’t think Voyager should be ported over to HD, it’s a very location and FX heavy show at times and both the sets and FX were tuned to maximise what you could get out of standard definition. TNG works in HD though because it was mostly in camera FX and a lot of dialogue heavy scenes, in HD it really looks powerful and theatrical whereas Voyager always felt like TNG-lite, a more pop version and it look emptier in HD, you’d be more aware it was sets and early digital FX.#

    I don’t care for DS9, the Ferengi episodes are great but the rest is muck.

    #256420

    GlenTokyo

    As someone who never fancied DS9 from when it was on to about 2 years ago, having watched it, it’s not only the best Star Trek show, it’s one of the best shows I’ve ever seen full stop. Bit ropey at the very end, long run tends to do that, but at full power it’s untouchable.

    #256421

    Ben Saunders

    DS9 gets about as good as television gets, yeah. The iffirst season is dreadful though and they certainly make some curious decisions towards the end.

    #256422

    Ben Saunders

    I’m 2.5 seasons into Voyager and its shit

    #256447

    Offline

    There’s a good dozen episodes from Season 1 and 2 of VOY that are crackers but it doesn’t really kick off until later in Season 3. Season 4 to 6 is top drawer Trek.

    I honestly don’t think I’ve watched Season 1 and 2 of DS9 since it first aired.

Jump to top / Jump to 'Recent Replies'

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.