Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Your Updated Red Dwarf Gags Search for: This topic has 153 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 2 days ago by Turk Thrust. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic March 24, 2026 at 10:03 pm #317701 DaveParticipant Red Dwarf jokes updated for the modern era. Creator Topic Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 153 total) 1 2 3 4 Author Replies March 27, 2026 at 9:46 am #317888 DaveParticipant For fuck’s sake Dave, I thought of that one the other day while not in front of my computer, and then forgot. The exact same reference. I couldn’t decide between that or Confused Travolta. But the Travolta meme is probably older than I’d like to think. March 27, 2026 at 10:08 am #317889 Ian SymesKeymaster March 27, 2026 at 10:54 am #317891 WarbodogParticipant Unless it has one of those already. March 27, 2026 at 10:59 am #317892 Nick RParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:09 am #317893 Ian SymesKeymaster March 27, 2026 at 11:18 am #317894 Nick RParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:32 am #317895 Ben SaundersParticipant Can I sit in the boobs chair? March 27, 2026 at 11:37 am #317896 DaveParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:41 am #317897 UnrumbleParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:48 am #317898 DaveParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:48 am #317899 DaveParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:57 am #317900 Ian SymesKeymaster March 27, 2026 at 12:02 pm #317901 WarbodogParticipant March 27, 2026 at 12:45 pm #317902 Flap JackParticipant March 27, 2026 at 1:41 pm #317905 DaveParticipant March 27, 2026 at 2:44 pm #317906 DaveParticipant March 27, 2026 at 11:20 pm #317914 RudolphParticipant March 28, 2026 at 12:19 am #317916 TechnopeasantParticipant ChatGPT it surely? March 28, 2026 at 1:31 am #317921 clemParticipant March 28, 2026 at 2:51 am #317923 RunawayTrainParticipant ChatGPT it surely? Steady on, they couldn’t risk being seen to endorse that kind of behaviour. March 28, 2026 at 3:54 am #317925 TechnopeasantParticipant Photoshop is a contemporary reference though. The first versions came out alongside Red Dwarf. March 28, 2026 at 4:39 am #317927 UnrumbleParticipant I did wonder about Photoshop not being up-to-date enough, but nothing else sprung to mind. March 28, 2026 at 6:22 am #317928 WarbodogParticipant March 28, 2026 at 6:35 am #317930 WarbodogParticipant The old-school reference archive is still handy: https://www.red-rose.com/www.cobalt.demon.co.uk/alt.tv.red-dwarf/reflist-tv-255.html March 28, 2026 at 6:53 am #317932 WarbodogParticipant This line can never escape seeming euphemistic, it seems. I don’t know if people have generally started Americanizing these, it just stood out when I heard an otherwise British-sounding fellow in the Post Office use both in the same sentence. March 28, 2026 at 9:44 am #317939 Nick RParticipant March 28, 2026 at 6:24 pm #317942 PodeyParticipant March 28, 2026 at 7:19 pm #317947 Quinn: Clochebusters World ChampionParticipant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_meat_shower Learned about this this week. Maybe not so much an update, but its all I could think of March 28, 2026 at 8:32 pm #317949 TechnopeasantParticipant Maybe not so much an update, but its all I could think of 800 years is arguably the biggest update so far. March 28, 2026 at 9:03 pm #317951 Nick RParticipant Let’s update it further: March 28, 2026 at 10:16 pm #317953 Ben SaundersParticipant March 28, 2026 at 11:12 pm #317955 TechnopeasantParticipant I don’t think you can vaccinate for radiation. March 28, 2026 at 11:14 pm #317957 Flap JackParticipant Not with that attitude. March 29, 2026 at 12:35 am #317963 Ben SaundersParticipant I don’t think you can vaccinate for radiation. You just need the right anti-radiation gloves. March 29, 2026 at 2:09 pm #317976 RidleyParticipant Four thousand, six-hundred and ninety-one irradiated May 7, 2026 at 9:52 am #319873 WarbodogParticipant I just saw this jarring, non-ironic insertion in a 2021 revised edition of a 1996 book, because we can’t have tragically dated references in an otherwise timeless chapter where a teenager tries to locate a mysterious girl by looking up her surname in the telephone directory and dialling all the numbers. May 7, 2026 at 3:04 pm #319892 Ben SaundersParticipant Modern references feel so much more dated than actually dated ones, it’s painful to be reminded of the real world and actual events while watching something, like Kryten mentioning the then-recent FIFA scandal. But obviously that problem goes away with time, and there are plenty of references to stuff that actually was then-relevant in the 80s and 90s, I just didn’t notice because I was stupid. May 7, 2026 at 11:56 pm #319911 RudolphParticipant May 8, 2026 at 2:56 am #319918 MoonlightParticipant Modern references feel so much more dated than actually dated ones My stance is that any pop culture that was actually current during my life or was at least recent enough to still be in the zeitgeist feels dated in a fundamentally different way to anything from before. The pop culture that “always was” vs. something like Pokemon which I was there firsthand for. May 8, 2026 at 9:41 am #319931 Ian SymesKeymaster it’s painful to be reminded of the real world and actual events while watching something, like Kryten mentioning the then-recent FIFA scandal. On the other hand, there have been about ten FIFA scandals in the years since, so it’s fairly timeless as far as references go. There’s always a recent FIFA scandal. Like Rupert Murdoch being namechecked as inherently evil in Cured – the phone hacking scandal may have been fresh in the mind at the time the line was written, but everything else he’s done before and since stops the joke from being linked specifically to that. Both of those examples pale into insignificance compared to the Ishtar and Run For Your Wife references. May 8, 2026 at 10:59 am #319939 UnrumbleParticipant At least this guy’s still knocking about. May 8, 2026 at 12:37 pm #319947 International DebrisParticipant The difference between Run for Your Wife / Ishtar and FIFA / Murdoch is the former are mocking naff pop culture while the latter feel like they’re trying to make slightly more serious points. Saying a crap product is crap explains itself, even if you don’t know the product, but controversial events can lead the viewer to think “wait, what happened?” or “what did they do?” May 8, 2026 at 12:43 pm #319948 DaveParticipant I guess it’s a question of how well known they are. Murdoch is maybe on the line, but it’s obviously easier to justify the inclusion universally-known evil figures like Hitler, Caligula or Kevin Keegan. May 8, 2026 at 12:58 pm #319950 Ben SaundersParticipant Both of those examples pale into insignificance compared to the Ishtar and Run For Your Wife references. May 8, 2026 at 8:08 pm #319960 PodeyParticipant May 8, 2026 at 9:09 pm #319962 RudolphParticipant May 8, 2026 at 9:34 pm #319964 DaveParticipant May 9, 2026 at 1:34 am #319972 Nick RParticipant I can’t do this as a screenshot because it’s not from an episode. You know that bit in the Red Dwarf Night version of Smeg Ups, where Lister says the outtakes need to be hidden somewhere no one will ever see them, and Kryten suggests putting them on Channel 5 at the end of the 20th century? Well, an updated version of that would be: “Suggest we place them on My5, sir, early in the 21st century.” At least, that would have been an updated version a few years ago. Since then, Channel 5 have done a Channel 4 and given their streaming service the same name as the channel. So the latest updated version would be: “Suggest we place them on 5, sir, early in the 21st century.” … And that just sounds silly. May 9, 2026 at 7:27 am #319987 Quinn: Clochebusters World ChampionParticipant I can’t do this as a screenshot because it’s not from an episode. You know that bit in the Red Dwarf Night version of Smeg Ups, where Lister says the outtakes need to be hidden somewhere no one will ever see them, and Kryten suggests putting them on Channel 5 at the end of the 20th century? Well, an updated version of that would be: “Suggest we place them on My5, sir, early in the 21st century.” At least, that would have been an updated version a few years ago. Since then, Channel 5 have done a Channel 4 and given their streaming service the same name as the channel. So the latest updated version would be: “Suggest we place them on 5, sir, early in the 21st century.” … And that just sounds silly. And that’s just updating the name, the joke remains accurately the same still to this day. May 19, 2026 at 10:31 am #320769 DaveParticipant Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 101 through 150 (of 153 total) 1 2 3 4 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In