Home Forums Ganymede & Titan Forum 10 little questions…

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2228
    Baz
    Participant

    If there was ever some new Red Dwarf series to be made one day, and you had the chance to steer it, which way would you chose on the following questions?

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?

    7. The Foami… The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.

    There, that should throw the kitten in among the Dobermans. Well it was getting silly in here, time we had some proper flame-war provoking discussion. I’ll tot up all the answers in a few weeks and see what the overall consensus was.

Viewing 40 replies - 1 through 40 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #121274
    Anonymous
    Guest

    1. Continuation, but without much attention paid to end of 8. A speedy text scroll ala Series 3 would be fine.

    2. Originals!

    3. Both!

    4. Probably new. I do like it.

    5. No crew. Just say they were eaten by the microbe thing. Or that the end of 6 and all of 7 and 8 were an unreality bubble.

    6. Hologram.

    7. Gone.

    8. Hattie. Cos Norman’s rubbish now.

    9. Stand-alone…maybe a two-part series finale.

    10. Finish it. Let them get back to Earth, or get to Earth and go back in time 3 million years so they return just after they left.

    #121276
    mick
    Participant

    1. A re-imagining from the start.

    2. Replacements.

    3. Red Dwarf

    4. Old Red Dwarf

    5. The Crew gone/were never there

    6. Rimmer Hologram

    7. Kochansky dead.

    8. See #2

    9. Both.

    10. Leave it open.

    #121280
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    1. Series 8 Take 2.

    2. Except no imitations.*

    3. Not really an issue for me.

    4. You’re joking, right?

    5. They were never there. It was all a reality bubble. Or something.

    6. Hologram.

    7. Only in the event of full-frontal nudity.

    8. Hattie

    9. Standalone. Don’t need 3 minutes of recaps in a 28 minute programme.

    10. Leave it open to invite endless debate and interesting forum threads like this one.

    * Apart from Holly and Kryten, obviously.

    #121283
    Ridley
    Participant

    I/ Series IX

    II/ Originals (plus new Kochanski. Oop and Kryten)

    III/ Both probably

    IV/ NEW

    V/ Erm… they all got scattered across the universe somehow.

    VI/ Hologram. Series VIII Rimmer does die in only The Good but gets brought back and they get his personality off Starbug’s black box. Or something. ;)

    VII/ Still there and asking why she was Scottish in this reality etc. Rimmer convinced he’s highest ranked member still aboard because she’s from another reality.

    VIII/ Lovett I guess. Though there IS that “other version” of him.

    IX/ Stand alone probably.

    X/ And left open.

    #121290
    TheLeen
    Participant

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?
    Continue

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?
    Originals

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?
    Red Dwarf

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?
    Uh… Fine with either.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?
    They were remade! I think it’s brilliant though, I throroughly enjoyed them in the early series’ backflashes and always wanted more of them.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?
    Grown quite attached to the hologram but can live with living Rimmer also.

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?
    Returned to her dimension. But I think a nanobotically remade original Kochanski & Lister are somewhere out there still, too.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?
    A schizophrenic Holly who switches faces and personality between Hattie, Norm, Conehead, Queeg and probably others. Heyyyyyy guest appearances for everyone!

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?
    Stand-alone with the odd story arc (over a few episodes) thrown in

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.
    If it must be finished, by God, finish it, but finish it good.

    #121294
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    >But I think a nanobotically remade original Kochanski & Lister are somewhere out there still, too.

    Why would there be another Lister out there? Surely the nanobots created the “new” crew from the remains of the old one.

    #121295
    Andrew
    Participant

    > > But I think a nanobotically remade original Kochanski & Lister are somewhere out there still, too.

    I never understood this logic – and it comes up a lot. Why would the ‘bots, as commanded by Holly, rebuild Lister and Kochanski when they’re already knocking around? For that matter, why not a second Cat?

    > Why would there be another Lister out there? Surely the nanobots created the ?new? crew from the remains of the old one.

    Those remains, while never discussed, presumably amount to discarded genetic material – hair, skin, nail clippings, maybe the ship’s medical unit includes blood samples – rather than the original dust piles. (Which, in theory, were ejected in canisters long ago; though that’s a deleted scene, so doesn’t have to be canon.) So anybody on board at any time could have been resurrected.

    One thing I’d have done with VIII is rebuild one or more members of the cat race, who’s leftovers must also be available somewhere, for a one-episode story mid-season. Though as I ALSO always figured the crew’s memories came from the hologram memory database, they’d not really be eligible for that…

    #121296
    Ridley
    Participant

    Write another comic? :P

    The interesting thing is that some of the crew members, if rebuilt from dead cells, wouldn’t necessarily have to have been on the ship at the time of the radiation leak. And vice versa (like non Dwarf Space Corps. personnel)

    Were there be bits of Camille, Jim or Bexley lying around that could and were revived? The polymorph(s)? The Mayor of Warsaw? The mutated pneumonia that made him solid? It’s not like we were shown much beyond what was happening on Floor 13.

    #121297
    Andrew
    Participant

    > Write another comic? :P

    I’m not sure the reception the last one got makes that a good idea… :-)

    But yes, absolutely, there’s a stack of interesting SF and character possibilities raised by the nanobotic revival. As I say, the fact that Holly was commanding the nanos means they rebuilt only what was wanted – but it’s not like Holly was ever that reliable…

    #121298
    ChrisM
    Participant

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?
    A continuation. I am interested in seeing the material of the film done in some way at some point, but for another series, let’s continue as we go.

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?
    Original.

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?
    Both.

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?
    It’s a continuation, so lets keep to the new version.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?
    Since the others left the ship in the last episode, lets keep it mainly based around the usual cast. However, other crewmembers could make an appearance here and there.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?
    Keep to human Rimmer at start, but let’s have the Ace holo-rimmer turn up. But make him a more rounded character than the cheesie original Ace (amusing though he was.)

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?
    Keep her. Regardless of how many seem to dislike her, she is now part of the crew. Besided she’s lovely.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?
    I like the dual personality thing. Have them switch.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?
    Kind of both. Have individual stories but an ongoing arc running through the series too. (It’s not the contradiction it might appear.)

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.
    I don’t mind them leaving it open if we had more series, but otherwise finish the story. Let’s find Earth at some point.

    #121300
    Steve Harris
    Participant

    1= a few years down the line from VIII (Finding Rimmer etc)

    2= Originals (see 1)

    3= Both

    4= New

    5= Gone (but about somewhere)

    6= Hologram

    7= Stick with Chloe

    8= Hattie

    9= Story arc & stand alone

    10= End it (unless there’s more planned)

    #121302
    John Hoare
    Participant

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?

    With the Movie, as it’s a different medium, I’m happy the idea was to do a reboot. But if it’s for telly, I don’t see the point in that – a continuation is best.

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?

    Originals. Although I wouldn’t necessarily have a problem with with the idea of a spin-off series, set in the same universe, with different characters and actors – that could be rather good. (But for the rest of these questions, I’ll presume we’re talking about a continuation of the original series.)

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?

    Both.

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?

    Old. Although I wouldn’t mind a third version, either – I *loved* some of the unused design sketches as seen on the Bodysnatcher release.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?

    Gone. Not that interested in having them back, as I prefer the dynamic of just having our crew there (even though Hollister was responsible for some of my favourite moments in VIII) – but not interested in rewriting history, either.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?

    Not sure it matters too much, but if I had to choose – our Rimmer, the hologram.

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?

    GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE. GONE.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?

    I’d be happy with either, I think – but I’ll go towards Hattie, purely because Norm’s acted like a bit of a dick. If I thought Norm was going to be that much better, I’d go with him and ignore personal reasons – but I don’t think that’s the case. (I think Norm gives the better performance in Beat The Geek – but I think that’s because he played Holly a lot more recently than Hattie. (Life In Lame doesn’t count, because she won’t have had time to get into the character properly, unlike a proper series of Dwarf.)

    They’d *really* have to start writing her better, though, and get a handle on the character. If that can’t be done, then it should be Norm.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?

    I don’t think it matters as long as its good – but I think the best episodes of Dwarf have been the standalone ones (with the exception of Out Of Time, and that’s not massively arc-based), so I’d go for that.

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.

    Difficult. If the series was great, I’d want more. If the series was terrible, then I’d be glad there wasn’t going to be any more!

    I’d plump for what Buffy did at the end of each season, though – make it a suitable ending, but also give it a way to carry on if they decided to. Which is really how VIII should have ended.

    I?ll tot up all the answers in a few weeks and see what the overall consensus was.

    We’ll soon see how totty it is, laddie.

    #121304
    Smeg4Brains
    Participant

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?
    Continuation.

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?
    The Good ol’ Dwarf

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?
    I like then pencil.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?
    well they sodded off at the end of VIII so they could be scattered about and just pop up now and then but not be part of the crew.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?
    I’ll go for a dead one, he’ll have more to complain about

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?
    If we could get Claire back.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?
    I like the switching idea so i’ll steal that.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?
    I hate “To Be Continued”‘s

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.
    Finish, not straight away though…maybe a few more series first.

    #121311
    Dave
    Participant

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?
    Series IX, but Episode 1 should carry on regardless, and a later episode can sort out the cliffhanger.

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?
    Originals

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?
    The Dwarf

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?
    I don’t care

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?
    They’ve moved on, in various Starbugs & Blue Midgets all affected by the chameleonic microbe and they all need rescuing. Maybe. Maybe not.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?
    The living one, unless we get an Ace spinoff.

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochanski still with them or returned to her dimension?
    Still here.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?
    Hattie. With a better wig.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?
    Stand alones

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.
    No more ‘To Be Continued…’s, but not a definite Earth ending either.

    11. In the top ten question list, why were there eleven questions?
    Doug, if it happens, call me. I’ve got ideas that will curl your nostril hairs.

    #121312
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    > The living one, unless we get an Ace spinoff.

    This might work. Despite my comments above, I don’t really have any interest in seeing a new series of Red Dwarf and am not keen on the “Next Generation” ideas, but a six part series with old iron-balls dimension jumping from place to place, putting right what once went wrong and hoping that each jump will be the jump home?

    That could work. And the others could appear occasionally in a variety of “amusing” guises.

    Arnie would make a right mess of things each week, obviously. Leading to hilarious consequences.

    I have no idea if I’m being serious about this.

    >No more ?To Be Continued??s

    Indeed. Epideme -> Back in Red Part Three. It’s a bloody five-parter!

    #121318
    TheLeen
    Participant

    > > > But I think a nanobotically remade original Kochanski & Lister are somewhere out there still, too.

    > I never understood this logic – and it comes up a lot. Why would the ?bots, as commanded by Holly, rebuild Lister and Kochanski when they?re already knocking around? For that matter, why not a second Cat?

    The Red Dwarf was re-built according to its original plans (see shape, Holly’s head, etc.) One complete, whole, originaller-than-original (missing asteroid in ship etc) Red Dwarf would have contained an original, THIS universe, Kochanski.

    Cat clearly was not part of the original plans, or original crew (and neither was Kryten). He wasn’t even around pre-leak. *If* any cat would’ve been resurrected, it would’ve been Frankenstein…

    As far as I’m concerned, this is the logic of the nanobots.

    > One thing I?d have done with VIII is rebuild one or more members of the cat race, who?s leftovers must also be available somewhere, for a one-episode story mid-season. Though as I ALSO always figured the crew?s memories came from the hologram memory database, they?d not really be eligible for that?

    See above :(

    #121320
    TheLeen
    Participant

    PS: Living Rimmer vs. Hologram: I think it would be fun if it was living Rimmer but if he died again. he’d be Holorimmer II in this universe. Haha.

    #121321
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    >Cat clearly was not part of the original plans, or original crew (and neither was Kryten). He wasn?t even around pre-leak. *If* any cat would?ve been resurrected, it would?ve been Frankenstein?

    Wasn’t this the intention for the horrendous rat-arsed sequence?

    #121323
    TheLeen
    Participant

    Ohhhh, yeah…

    #121342
    Andrew
    Participant

    > The Red Dwarf was re-built according to its original plans (see shape, Holly?s head, etc.) One complete, whole, originaller-than-original (missing asteroid in ship etc) Red Dwarf would have contained an original, THIS universe, Kochanski.

    It makes kinda sense if this were totally undirected resurrection, but (and this seems to get forgotten a lot) they were under Holly’s control. We learn this in BITR3, and as such there’s no reason for him to add a second Kochanski and Lister to the mix.

    Plus, hey, a personnel list isn’t on the ship blueprints, and crews would rotate constantly; who says which members of Red Dwarf were part of the very first line-up. The ship’s been running for years before The End, it’s already dilapidated and used. Is Caroline Carmen also on board? McIntyre, alive and well? Or is he a hologram?

    Aside from anything else, there patently aren’t rebuilt versions of Lister and Kochanski on board – the crew would have mentioned that two crew member’s dopplegangers are being incarcerated after blowing up a Starbug. Petersen, Chen, Selby, Hollister, Rimmer – they’re all aware of the incident. Wouldn’t one of them have mentioned “Hey, how can you be getting locked up when you’re also at work?” Lister goes back to his shared bunkroom – wouldn’t he have bumped into himself?

    > As far as I?m concerned, this is the logic of the nanobots.

    Which would be fine, if it was them making the call. But it wasn’t. Plus, as I say, Holly’s not exactly reliable – he didn’t just hit the reset button, the rebuild was clumsily tailored to Lister. We’ve no reason to believe the changes are accurate, flawless – leaving plenty of scope. (Remember Lister gets a few lines about how the rebuild ISN’T accurate.)

    #121341

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?

    Keep going. We’ve gone this far, and I don’t want to see the current story end so terribly. (see #10)

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?

    If the original cast aren’t all senile by the time this series gets off the ground, go with them.

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?

    As long as the writers can still get mileage out of either, use both.

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?

    …Ah, what the hell, go with the old one. And while I’m dreaming, use some damn model shots; those original models were gorgeous.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?

    Oooooooh this is a toughie. See, I liked the loneliness thing they had going in previous series, but there’s a lot of untapped potential in our heroes’ interactions with the other crewmembers. I can’t decide. Surprise me.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?

    Make him dead. It gives him more to moan about.

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?

    If they can actually decide which character she’s going to be, once and for all–and not just “The Girl, who, y’know, does girl things, lawl”–then I see no reason not to keep her for a few episodes, altho’ not permanently (surely she’d have to go back sometime, right?).

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?

    Y’know what? Norm got a Big Comeback; it’s Hattie’s turn again.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?

    I have no problem with the idea of multiple-episode stories for Red Dwarf–after all, it’s worked out excellently for other shows. However, the thought occurs that in the past, the show’s multi-episode arcs have been anywhere from mediocre to abominable. So I say save it for that one absolutely amazing and incredible story they just couldn’t possibly tell in one half-hour. And even then, keep it to two parts.

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.

    Anything but a goddamned cliffhanger.

    Also, I’d like to hear more about the Cat society. Dammit, an entire species has evolved, built a civilization, torn itself apart, and dispersed on board the Dwarf and we know almost exactly fuck-all about it. There’s a couple of metric fucktons of untapped story potential there, I’m sure of it.

    #121350
    TheLeen
    Participant

    > Plus, hey, a personnel list isn?t on the ship blueprints, and crews would rotate constantly; who says which members of Red Dwarf were part of the very first line-up. The ship?s been running for years before The End, it?s already dilapidated and used. Is Caroline Carmen also on board? McIntyre, alive and well? Or is he a hologram?

    Caroline and George, heck, why not alive and well? Everyone else is. Did Holly specifically name each crew member to be ressurrected by the nanobots? Did he order the nanobots to resurrect the prisoners? What reason would he have had to do so? So the nanobots could well have decided some things on their own… or just resurrected everyone they knew of.

    > Aside from anything else, there patently aren?t rebuilt versions of Lister and Kochanski on board – the crew would have mentioned that two crew member?s dopplegangers are being incarcerated after blowing up a Starbug. Petersen, Chen, Selby, Hollister, Rimmer – they?re all aware of the incident. Wouldn?t one of them have mentioned ?Hey, how can you be getting locked up when you?re also at work?? Lister goes back to his shared bunkroom – wouldn?t he have bumped into himself?

    I think nano-Lister and nano-Kochanski ran off together into the wild, maybe on the planet where the Hollywatch was found ;)

    #121353
    Anonymous
    Guest

    > PS: Living Rimmer vs. Hologram: I think it would be fun if it was living Rimmer but if he died again. he?d be Holorimmer II in this universe. Haha.

    Actually it’d be Holorimmer III as he was brought back to life and killed again in Timeslides!

    #121355
    TheLeen
    Participant

    Yeah but that was this universe’s Rimmer and not the nanobotical Rimmer, so there’d still be only two in this instance of universe.

    Also, exploding Rimmer could die because he was alive because they’d changed the past and he’d somehow survived the radiation leak, so he didn’t actually even die twice but only died later and differently.

    #121356
    Anonymous
    Guest

    *goes cross-eyed*

    #121357
    Baz
    Participant

    Suppost I’d better comment too.

    1. The Story. A re-imagining from the start or continuing, with Series 9?

    If not a spin-off set in the same universe (my own option), continuing, but with a big gap of time, 10 years or so.

    2. The Cast. Originals or replacements?

    Originals.

    3. The Setting. Starbug or Red Dwarf?

    Starbug. Still looking for Red Dwarf. Managed to find a bug during the 10 year gap or nicked it from the alternate universe.

    4. The Ship. Old Red Dwarf or the new version?

    Old version. The new one was a copy and the nanocreated matter didn’t last long.

    5. The Crew. Did the 1000+ crew survive or have they gone/were never there?

    They were nanocreated. They didn’t last long.

    6. The Smeghead. A living Rimmer or a Hologram?

    Hologram. They managed to save the personality of the copied one before he disintegrated and download it into a hologram.

    7. The Foami? The Girl. Is Kochansky still with them or returned to her dimension?

    Gone back.

    8. The Computer. Hattie or Norman as Holly?

    Hattie. The Norman personality is the one that took control of the nanites to get a Red Dwarf of his own. Might be a recurring villain.

    9. The Series. Story arc or mainly stand-alone episodes?

    Story arc with occasional stand-alone.

    10. The End. Finish the story for good or leave it open.

    Finish it, they get back to a Earth 3 million years older, but with a new human civilization looking for farmers on Fiji. But there’s that 10 year gap you could go back to.

    And I like the expression “Metric Fucktons!” I shall use it as an expletive from now on.

    #121358
    Andrew
    Participant

    > I think nano-Lister and nano-Kochanski ran off together into the wild, maybe on the planet where the Hollywatch was found ;)

    That wasn’t a planet, that was Red Dwarf. With the ship rebuilt, it’s gone.

    Oh, fuck it, whatever. Hey, let’s say there’s a second Lister in stasis and the other Kochanski is…I dunno, shacked up with Todhunter using ‘I’m in prison’ as an excuse not to show up to work. Bah! :-)

    #121360
    Dave
    Participant

    > It makes kinda sense if this were totally undirected resurrection, but (and this seems to get forgotten a lot) they were under Holly?s control. We learn this in BITR3, and as such there?s no reason for him to add a second Kochanski and Lister to the mix

    Lest wee forget “My job is to keep Dave sane. True, I’m not that good at it, but I do my best. That’s why I create these little diversions to keep him occupied”

    The little diversions put Lister through the wringer, but I think replacing him would be a step too far even for Series VIII’s Holly

    #121398
    Ridley
    Participant

    I just always assumed the nanobots consciously decided not to duplicate Lister and Kochanski because they were already there.

    “If I’m so stupid, explain why I was able to re-create a new set of
    nanobots and get them to resurrect the crew.”

    I wouldn’t have thought Holly would have been very specific in telling them what to do any more than Kryten’s (DivaDroid International’s?) nanobots being told “We want that planetoid turned back into Red Dwarf, and we also want you to build a new arm for Mr Lister”.

    #121413
    TheLeen
    Participant

    > I just always assumed the nanobots consciously decided not to duplicate Lister and Kochanski because they were already there.

    Well, they knew for a fact Holly was already there and yet…

    Oh sod it, most of “the rest of Dwarf” is one big blur to me. Meski forgetski.

    #121423
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    ?If I?m so stupid, explain why I was able to re-create a new set of nanobots and get them to resurrect the crew.?

    = Plot point that went precisely nowhere and made no sense whatsoever.

    #121425
    Antipodean
    Participant

    This is how I’d make a new Red Dwarf series at some point in the future:
    1. Start again from the start. I’d try and make a “definitive version” by “blending” the first series and first novel.
    2. Hate to say it, but replacements would be the way to go.
    3. Red Dwarf, of course! With Starbug appearing regularly too, of course.
    4. The original shape of Red Dwarf. Mel Bibby-style interior set design.
    5. Original crew die, as it was in the original story.
    6. Living in the first episode, then hologram. Of course.
    7. Kochanski dies, then is brought back later. Not sure if I’d do it like in Ouroboros, in the Better Than Life novel, or some original way.
    8. Female Holly.
    9. I’d structure it like what tvtropes.org calls a “Half-Arc Season” – i.e. mainly stand-alone with an arc subplot. Incidentally, I think I’d make it 45-minute episodes.
    10. The ending… You know how Back to Reality ended? And how the original ending of Only the Good went? I’d end it like that – open for more, but a suitable ending if it turns out to be the last one.

    Now, if I were in charge of a new series eight years ago:
    1. Series 9.
    2. Originals.
    3. Red Dwarf, with Starbug featuring in almost every episode. It’d be the Starbug they spent 200+ years flying around in (still wrecked in the landing bay, until they repair it, so it’s their only shuttlecraft until they salvage more.
    4. It has to be the new version, really, but I’d try as hard as possible to get back Peter Wragg etc. so we can have model shots rather than CG.
    5. Lister, Rimmer, Cat, Kryten, Kochanski and Holly are on Red Dwarf. All the rest of the crew are on the fleet of Starbugs and Blue Midgets. (Possible spinoff?)
    6. Living Rimmer. It seems cheap to kill him off again just so he can be a hologram.
    7. Kochanski is still there. I actually like her character, especially as written in Series VIII.
    8. Well, I’m guessing it’d have to be Norman, but I’d rather have Hattie back.
    9. Stand-alone episodes (except for the first episode, which ties up Only the Good) but with a a continuity to them so they can’t just be mixed & matched. Like “Spaced”, I suppose.
    10. Not a fucking cliffhanger! Again, I’d close it Back to Reality style.

    Things I’d put in: more Gelf tribes, the reappearance of the Cat species, and I came up with a story once which had mechanoids who had rebelled in the Mechanoid War showing up (except for the TV series this would be between Lister’s time & Kryten’s time, rather than before Lister’s time as in the novels) so I think I’d put that in there.

    #121437
    Anonymous
    Guest

    So if you could choose a new cast, who would it be?

    I’d go for…

    Lister: Nick Frost or Richard Herring

    Rimmer: Julian Barratt or Stephen Merchant or Steve Coogan

    Kryten: Err….David Walliams?

    Cat: Richard Ayoade or Noel Fielding.

    Or maybe none of the above.

    #121439
    Dave
    Participant

    Looking at your list you have a lot of performers that would lean toward a more Hyperdrive-style show.

    Plus Richard Ayoade as the Cat? Even at his most confident he’s still Duane.

    I’d go for unknowns again.

    #121442
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    Jimboftu: never, ever get a job as a casting director.

    #121443
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Phil Jupitus as Holly!

    Errr….

    #121523
    peas_and_corn
    Participant

    >Did Holly specifically name each crew member to be ressurrected by the nanobots?

    In the lift, he said “Presumably they’ve all been resurrected as well” (or something to that effect)- meaning he didn’t totally direct the rebuild

    #121525
    ChrisM
    Participant

    In the lift, he said ?Presumably they?ve all been resurrected as well? (or something to that effect)- meaning he didn?t totally direct the rebuild

    True but he did direct who wasn’t built. As in the main living characters.

    #121528
    TheLeen
    Participant

    And forgot to put himself on the list?

    #121549
    Andrew
    Participant

    Well, to be fair, the FIRST nanos built the ship – of which Holly is part – the second lot, under his control, made the crew.

Viewing 40 replies - 1 through 40 (of 40 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.