Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Red Dwarf: Back to Earth – The FX Search for: This topic has 9 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by SkyAndSun. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic April 18, 2009 at 3:21 pm #3406 siParticipant Mike Seymour’s Twitter account mentions this: http://www.fxguide.com/article528.html Thought I’d share. Creator Topic Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total) Author Replies April 18, 2009 at 3:40 pm #97416 MnoooahParticipant ‘There is one shot where Chris Rimmer is being ‘marginalized’ and we managed to add a zoom and repositioning to the shot in Post, which crept Rimmer out of shot, underlining his lack of relevance.’ where is this? April 18, 2009 at 3:44 pm #97417 siParticipant I was wondering that, too. April 18, 2009 at 4:08 pm #97418 p2p_productionsParticipant Hi-res if you want ’em, guys. April 18, 2009 at 4:09 pm #97419 siParticipant Loving that second one! April 18, 2009 at 4:13 pm #97421 p2p_productionsParticipant Nice one on posting the article, Si. Cheers! April 18, 2009 at 4:37 pm #97423 Nick RParticipant It’s great to see Red Dwarf getting an article as in-depth as that. It’s not far off the length of the VFX articles I recently read about Watchmen! The fact you can’t tell which shot(s) they zoomed-in to crop out Chris just shows how ridiculously high-res those cameras are. After watching the Making Of, I had a thought about what they might do for special effects if new Red Dwarf episodes are filmed in front of a live audience. Some of the virtual set scenes in Back to Earth (such as the Rimmer/Katerina corridor scene in part 1) were still focused on dialogue rather than action, and only only done green-screen because the budget wouldn’t allow for a full-size corridor set. If those budget restrictions continued into a new series, they might need many more virtual sets. From the comments in the Making Of, it sounds like green-screen setups don’t have to be as time-consuming as they used to be, and they don’t require as controlled an environment. My point is: would it be feasible to set up a small green-screen stage in view of the audience, right next to the the bunk-room set and anything else they construct for real? That way, you’d retain the performer-audience interaction (as VII proved, laugh tracks benefit from being captured live), while still allowing the final shot to have all the the grandeur of a CGI set. No doubt someone’ll point out that it’s already common practice for live audience sets to include green screen elements… April 19, 2009 at 4:27 pm #97584 NoFroParticipant Good article though some of it went right over my head. Some nice before/after and progress shots though. > ?There is one shot where Chris Rimmer is being ?marginalized? and we managed to add a zoom and repositioning to the shot in Post, which crept Rimmer out of shot, underlining his lack of relevance.? I was also wondering where this is. April 19, 2009 at 6:10 pm #97588 pfmParticipant Even if the audience were back we would still be looking at 60% pre-record, at least IMO. They could still keep the four-walled bunkroom though, just like on Alan Partridge where all the sets were enclosed but there was still a live audience. April 19, 2009 at 6:36 pm #97590 SkyAndSunParticipant edit Author Replies Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total) Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In