Home Forums Ganymede & Titan Forum Red Dwarf used for a pile of shit ‘spoof’ article

Viewing 23 replies - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #124170
    Smeg4Brains
    Participant

    Yup……that’s wank.

    #124171
    John Hoare
    Participant

    My God.

    #124173
    Danny Stephenson
    Keymaster

    that could’ve been done so much better…

    #124174
    Mr Flibble
    Participant

    Even better:
    http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s1i22070

    Illustrated by a picture of… yup, Television Centre.

    #124175
    Phil
    Participant

    Jesus Christ. Are all of the articles this unfunny? I’m afraid to read any more.

    #124176
    Tarka Dal
    Participant

    Surely having a spoof news site and then calling it “The Spoof” A) Ruins the gag somewhat – I use gag in the singular, I mean there must be one in one of the articles somewhere and B) Erm… B) Er… Two B’s – Behave and Bequiet.

    #124177
    Danny Stephenson
    Keymaster

    If they’re making up things and trying to be recognised, then the Mirror needs to stop hiding behind this ‘Spoof’ pseudonym and own up…

    Satire, i love it

    #124178
    Jonathan Capps
    Keymaster

    *sounds the SATIRES claxton*

    #124180
    Somebody
    Participant

    More to the point – when the sun expands, it will become a red GIANT.

    Red dwarves (and brown dwarves, which are the same basic thing, just slightly warmer) are failed stars, like Jupiter (which on some models is a failed star) only bigger – they don’t have enough mass to start nuclear fusion, and so just fade away slowly.

    For the spoof to have a hope of working, that sort of thing needs to be factually accurate. The fact that The Sun the self-styled newspaper predates Red Dwarf doesn’t help the case either. For a spoof to be funny, it needs to be nearly believable, just twisted a little…

    #124183
    Seb Patrick
    Keymaster

    Yeah, well, you only have to look at the aforementioned “Broadcasting House” article to see how utterly ill-informed and downright shit the standard of writing on that site is. Because, from the looks of it, there’s no editorial work at all – anyone can just submit stuff, and so it’s filled with utter bollocks.

    God, what a complete waste of internet.

    #124186
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    Because, from the looks of it, there?s no editorial work at all – anyone can just submit stuff, and so it?s filled with utter bollocks.

    Are you thinking what I’m thinking?

    #124189
    John Hoare
    Participant

    Boy, this is gonna be fun.

    #124208
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    Abysmal even though I say so myself.

    #124209
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    Have you met the kettle?

    #124210
    Tonguetied
    Participant

    I have not met Le Kettle, sir.

    #124211
    Jonathan Capps
    Keymaster

    > Have you met the kettle?

    Colin Baker’s not keen on either, to be honest.

    #124231
    Danny Stephenson
    Keymaster

    > Colin Baker?s not keen on either, to be honest

    Ooh, no he isn’t at all!

    #124502
    John Hoare
    Participant
    #124504
    Seb Patrick
    Keymaster

    >we tried interviewing the BBC’s head of light entertainment

    Won’t get very far asking him about a sitcom, mind.

    #124626
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    I like the way that all the funniest bits are in bold, for the busy housewife or businessman.

    #125089
    John Hoare
    Participant

    Not a spoof article, but: this is pretty dreadful. The odd factual error (“Jack Bullet”?) – but its main fault is just being dull, Dull, DULL.

    #125241
    peas_and_corn
    Participant

    By the end of the second paragraph I was wondering how many cliches he had left…

    #125243
    Dave
    Participant

    Four (4)

Viewing 23 replies - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.