Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › J.J’s Trek Trailer Search for: This topic has 104 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by Andrew. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic February 4, 2008 at 11:48 am #2156 thomasaevansParticipant http://www.paramount.com/startrek/ Its seriously good. And Im no trekkie! Simple and effective! Really looking foward to this. Creator Topic Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 104 total) 1 2 3 Author Replies February 4, 2008 at 11:49 am #120028 thomasaevansParticipant OOOO… just found this hidden on the front page: http://www.ncc-1701.com/ February 4, 2008 at 12:08 pm #120029 TheLeenParticipant Me: big trekkie. Huge trek person. The last one was so bad that there is not even a word for how bad it was. This one might be good! It’s also Star Trek’s last chance ever. If it’s good, it’ll probably spawn toys, animated series and so on! If it sucks, it’s all over! God, do I hope that Abrams doesn’t screw up. But anyway, what we’ve got to read and see so far… gets one’s hope up :) February 4, 2008 at 12:21 pm #120030 bluedwarfParticipant I saw the trailer last week online, and thought uit was awesome – but it wasn’t until I saw it on the big screen last friday that I almost had an orgasm at the cinema. That ncc-1701 site is weird…. and i’m not sure what its trying to show us. According to some forum (of which i can’t find the link right now) the fourth camera will show if you tune the other three in correctly, then refresh the page – but it doesn’t work for me. When you do get the other camera you can see mainly static, with a halfsecond glimpse of a corridor, assumingly it’s inside the Enterprise. Its like the things JJ did with Lost, teasing us with tidbits, and making us work for the information. But for the challenge and effort of trying to see jsut a clip of the corridor, I can’t say that it’s worth it… unless theres something I’m missing? February 4, 2008 at 12:28 pm #120031 TheLeenParticipant > I can?t say that it?s worth it Yet! My guess is that it’ll be built up over time. There’s one year left till the release. I think this kind of cryptic teaser website is a *brilliant* marketing tool. February 4, 2008 at 12:32 pm #120032 charliebobParticipant http://www.trekmovie.com It looks awesome! I know a few of the plot ideas, and have seen a uniform :P February 4, 2008 at 2:46 pm #120034 DaveParticipant If this is the end for Trek it’ll probably be far more satisfying than the last episode of Enterprise. February 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm #120035 NakrophileParticipant Nemesis wasn’t even that bad. I cried when Data died. I’m still betting this will be shit. They really should just either continue the current time-line, either another TNG film or maybe even in a animation if need be with DS9 characters as well. February 4, 2008 at 3:31 pm #120037 Pete Part ThreeParticipant Must.resist.urge.to.quote.The.Last.Day February 4, 2008 at 3:34 pm #120038 TheLeenParticipant Sorry. Nemesis *was* that bad. February 4, 2008 at 3:38 pm #120039 NakrophileParticipant It was hardly great, but it was more than watchable. February 4, 2008 at 3:39 pm #120041 Pete Part ThreeParticipant Data dying in Nemesis was the lamest thing ever. Kill a character off, sure, but don’t then soften the blow to the audience (and create a safety net for the actor) by writing in another character who’s played by the same actor and is, to all intents and purposes, the same character. What’s the point? February 4, 2008 at 3:52 pm #120042 TheLeenParticipant > It was hardly great, but it was more than watchable. Maybe you watched a different one. I knew it was going to be the last TNG film and I was absolutely determined to enjoy it, no matter what they do. And I live in my own little world, normally when I’m determined to enjoy myself, I manage! But it was impossible for me because it was lousy beyond words. I wrote a lengthy review back then for a Star Trek forum that I can’t find now – and I’ve only seen Nemesis this once so I can’t even tell you in detail why exactly I hated it so much (and it got worse each minute of the film) – but I still remember some things… such as: Issues that are too trivial to actually cock up and they still managed to… cock them up. I.e. they give aliens elaborate masks but don’t think of handing Tom Hardy some contacts. Resulting in Picard and his clone to have different coloured eyes… which is really nasty when you show their faces next to each other in close-ups. And totally unnecessary nuisances, like recycling storylines from TNG like the fans have never seen the actual show. I’m not even talking about Data finding his older brother (no mentioning of Lore there, was there?) but troy being remote-mind-raped… it was exactly like in that TNG episode. The entire movie ended up seeming a lot cheaper than it actually was. Like a B movie version, a caricature of itself. And I TRIED REALLY HARD to like it. February 4, 2008 at 3:58 pm #120044 NakrophileParticipant Yeah I know it had lots (well, loads) of flaws (wasn’t the director completely unwilling to research anything about the series or something?) but nevertheless I did enjoy it. It was the worst TGN film, though. Ah well. February 4, 2008 at 4:21 pm #120045 bluedwarfParticipant is this really the end for trek, or will they remake the entire kirk series with these new actors? Kinda like a restart, just like battlestar galactica just did. Where the series is *similar* but not necessarily the same. I’m not sure what i’d think about this, as I like continuity – but this screws it all up. But if it starts a new continuity…. it might actually be okay! February 4, 2008 at 4:24 pm #120046 TheLeenParticipant Oh God, I read this and now I remember all the horrible details. February 4, 2008 at 6:54 pm #120052 bluedwarfParticipant hehe I liked it. Not much, admittedly. But it had some good bits. February 5, 2008 at 12:14 am #120067 thomasaevansParticipant You right about one thing, this is make or break for Trek. The final frontier indeed. February 5, 2008 at 12:17 am #120068 WayneParticipant I freedly admit to watching all the trek movies over the years multiple times….all except nemesis. What a total and utter waste of film that was, I’d sooner haev watched a hour video of myself being sick. I’ve seen it once and have avoided it like a plague ridden whore ever since. Weak, feeble, and utterly baffelingly written tripe…. well I could go on but I think the points made. Nemesis was the lump of hardened shit on the arse of a dog that was the star trek universe. JJ better not fuck this one up… although I’ll reserve judgement till I actually see it. February 5, 2008 at 6:31 am #120075 John HoareParticipant I don’t think the film will be a TOTAL make-or-break for Trek. The franchise has made too much money for that. However, if it flops, it *will* mean we won’t get any new Trek for a fair bit of time. 10 years, perhaps? February 5, 2008 at 8:48 am #120080 TheLeenParticipant But I need my Star Trek! Deep inside, I’m still sad that TNG ever stopped. February 5, 2008 at 11:21 am #120082 DaveParticipant I don’t think this is the end necessarily, but it might be for the best if Trek only gets one last hurrah. If they launch another TV series it’ll be just another ship, with just another crew. There were a few TNG episodes that were almost remakes of TOS episodes, but the rot really set in with Voyager & Enterprise where huge swathes of eps were constructed as an amalgamtion of earlier episodes. When a series is cannibalising it’s own past like that it needs a rest. Or a slap. February 5, 2008 at 11:38 am #120083 WayneParticipant To be frank I feel that some new writers are needed with some freshideas if the franchise is ever going to keep running. Your right that they have been rehashing the same storylines for long nough now….for gods sakes write something fresh and new! I have a feling that JJ will ‘try’ at least to bring something fresh and original to the writing, whether it turns out to be good or something that grates on the viewer is soemthing we’ll have to wait to find out. There does seem to be a thing for recasting well known actors in very well known roles of late…take the up coming new freddy movies…with freddy kruger NOT played by Robert Englund!! WTF? February 5, 2008 at 12:06 pm #120085 BazParticipant I think they needed to take a fresh approach with the ST franchise too. Leave Starfleet with it’s shiny ships and root beer behind, concentrate on some of the little people, say the crew of a beat-up tramp freighter, trying to make an honest (or otherwise) dollar below the radar of all the galaxy shaking events of a normal ST series. Had this idea for a series called “Star Trek- Tradewind” along the above lines. That fantastic deep-space freighter design as the ship (google it). A half Orion captain, Pel the female ferengi from that episode of DS9 as the negotiator, cute Andorian girl as a bridge bunny, slightly insane roller-skating Vulcan as the ship’s accountant (“He’s using an old Vulcan mind trick!”). Then Firefly came out and I thought “Bugger!”. Played too much Traveller in my youth, that’s what it is, growing up in the Spinward Marches… February 5, 2008 at 12:06 pm #120086 TheLeenParticipant Well, Voyager started out wiht a bunch of adventurers on board, but the whole Marquis storyline was quickly ditched when everyone became nie and sober and very starfleet. ;) February 5, 2008 at 1:31 pm #120087 John HoareParticipant Voyager has some great episodes: Projections, Death Wish, Future’s End, Unity, Real Life, Distant Origin, Scorpion, Year Of Hell, Message in a Bottle, The Killing Game, Demon (I *know* loads of people hate that one, but it’s good fun!), Hope and Fear, Timeless, Latent Image, Bride of Chaotica, Course: Oblivion, Equinox, One Small Step, The Voyager Conspiracy, Pathfinder, Blink of an Eye, Virtuoso, Critical Care, Body and Soul, Shattered, Author Author… and that’s just from a quick glance down an episode list. And also Living Witness, and Someone to Watch Over Me, which are two of my favourite episodes of Trek ever (although it’s not a coincidence that they’re both Doctor shows). Voyager could certainly have done with a massive kick up the arse, and it’s definitely the runt of the family, and did far too many dull or over-familiar stories, and they absolutely fucked up the last season in the worst way possible (they should have got home at least five episodes before the end of the series, and seen how everyone reintegrated) – but there’s also a hell of a lot there that I enjoy, too. It doesn’t deserve all the criticism it gets. Still, DS9 showed what a weekly Trek series can be if you put decent writers in charge and do something other than a ship series. February 5, 2008 at 1:37 pm #120088 Seb PatrickKeymaster I am popping my head round the door of this thread to declare that I care not a jot for Trek in any of its forms; but despite the fact that the last time Abrams was let loose on someone else’s property he wrote what was by all accounts a downright insulting Superman script, I think this film could be pretty cool. Mainly because of Pegg. Um, as you were. February 5, 2008 at 2:37 pm #120090 DaveParticipant I love Living Witness, Tuvix, Distant Origin, Message in a Bottle, The Voyager Conspiracy, Pathfinder, Shattered, Author Author Just think how cool Voyager would have been if it had all been like Year Of Hell, pristine Starfleet ship gets shit kicked out of it for seven years and is forced to integrate alien technology to carry on. It’s very telling that many on your list are Doctor episodes, and not for example, Harry Kim ones. When Voyager was good it was really good, when it was bad it was rectal surgery without anaesthesia. February 5, 2008 at 2:46 pm #120091 John HoareParticipant Just think how cool Voyager would have been if it had all been like Year Of Hell, pristine Starfleet ship gets shit kicked out of it for seven years and is forced to integrate alien technology to carry on. Yep, it really would. They’re a great couple of episodes, but they point towards how the show should have been rather too uncomfortably. It?s very telling that many on your list are Doctor episodes, and not for example, Harry Kim ones. Without the Doctor and Seven, I wouldn’t be defending the show, yes. Harry was a waste of time. So was Kes. So was Chakotay. And good characters like Torres, Paris and Tuvok didn’t get nearly enough to do, either. Oh, for what could have been… February 5, 2008 at 2:56 pm #120092 DaveParticipant Trek’s long history is one of getting very able actors and then ignoring them. LeVar Burton, Jennifer Lien, Tim Russ have all been great in other roles and then turned up on a starship just to say “Yes, Captain” The genius of the Doctor & Seven is that the characters work equally well in dramatic and comedic episodes. February 6, 2008 at 11:14 pm #120120 bluedwarfParticipant I think Baz’s idea would make a brilliant and fresh Star Trek series, I’ve had a similar idea actually. I think it would work because Star Trek has set up such an established universe that we know and love now. Following just a few characters as they traverse it would be much better than an entire crew of people who are underused. I think firefly worked cos you only had a few characters to follow, and you can get to know them better. The series 1 of any Trek series is bad because they have to do so many character-building episodes for their large cast. Larger casts can work too of course, BSG has a fair few. But is good because they all have very different roles, not just ANOTHER bridge officer. Has anyone ever read or heard of the Star Trek New Frontier books by Peter David? They are brilliantly action packed, and he describes his characters with witty colourful brilliance. It’s another ship, and another crew in the Next Gen / DS9 universe, but it works because they’re all so diverse and… bonkers. Theres quite a few in the series and it’s a good read from book 1. I had a few ideas for new Star Trek spinoffs Starfleet Academy: Saved by the bell – Some smart-ass teenagers and their days at the academy Starfleet Top Gun: About some hotshot Starfleet pilots Section 31 Files: Agents Dulmer and Lucsley (from that DS9 episode) investigate strange things across the Federation USS Tribulation: The adventures of the Federation’s only crew of Tribbles Any good? :-P February 7, 2008 at 1:44 am #120128 peas_and_cornParticipant I don’t see it outside of possibility that they will make a series based around a time ship from the 29th century February 7, 2008 at 10:10 am #120131 BazParticipant Peter David’s work is generally good. He did write the first four-issue set of Little Mermaid comics, in fact he went to the Marvel Execs and threatened to break their legs if they didn’t let him. Being a bit of an Arielholic myself, I approve. Wonder if someone could persuade Joss Whedon to write a Trek series, apparently Michael J Stracsynski had a script for 3 series of a new franchise all ready to go, but they turned him down. February 7, 2008 at 11:05 am #120132 AndrewParticipant > I think firefly worked cos you only had a few characters to follow, and you can get to know them better. See, I always thought the large number of characters was why it struggled. Firefly had 9 characters set up in its first episode(s), all protagonists. Add bad guys and one-offs to that and it turns out to be way too many people. That it took until Our Mrs Reynolds to go from ‘almost great, but clunking’ to ‘utter genius’ is one of the things that made it struggle to find an audience in the early weeks. The movie was really well done, but had to deal with the same problem – hence Book being reduced to a couple of off-ship scenes, Inara being brought in later, etc. And still it’s too many – deaths that mattered greatly to we browncoats registered as ‘oh dear, shame’ to newbies. Because there isn’t the time to get to know that many people in two hours. I’d HATE for Whedon to go anywhere near Trek. Ptchaw! February 7, 2008 at 11:07 am #120133 bluedwarfParticipant Joss Whedon would be great becauase he’d focus on the characters, which have always been a bit watery in Trek, and JMS would be good cos he’s really use the existing alien races and focus on the politics. I think a new series should definately be like a mini-series, and focus an entire season on a proper ongoing story – not individual episodes. I think Enterprise got much much better when it had the ongoing story rather than rubbish single episodes. I still stick by my idea that Peter David’s new Frontier should be turned into a miniseries. It’s full of action and whacky characters. The budget would have to be pretty high cos a lot of actiony things happen, maybe a 3D animated series would be okay? February 7, 2008 at 11:57 am #120134 BazParticipant Perhaps we could get Rob and Doug interested. Star Trek penned by the Red Dwarf writers. Brain melting… does not compute… Aieee! PS- Now I have the image of Kirk nipping out of the bridge for a fag and beaming down for a curry and Data pulling a spare head 3 face and going “Ah’ve cacked me pants!” February 7, 2008 at 12:07 pm #120135 AndrewParticipant I think they should STOP THE MADNESS and rest the bloody thing for…well, ever, actually. But a couple of decades, anyway. Let the cash cow die. February 7, 2008 at 12:13 pm #120136 TheLeenParticipant Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Don’t stop the madness! February 7, 2008 at 1:27 pm #120138 NakrophileParticipant > Oh God, I read this and now I remember all the horrible details. That was brilliant! Still, two episodes of TNG and five of DS9 a week is pretty damn good, although I do wish the former would end before the latter. As for continuing it, I would definitely take the current continuity over some bullshit new one. February 7, 2008 at 2:53 pm #120141 bluedwarfParticipant Don’t ever stop ANY madness. I like the madness. When do we get to see more RD Madness? I love the idea of Kirk nipping out for a fag and a curry! February 7, 2008 at 3:35 pm #120145 pfmParticipant I still firmly believe the TNG crew deserve one more outing rather than ending with the lame duck of Nemesis. The story could culminate in the introduction of the Next NEXT Generation. As for Abrams’s film, it’s looking to be pretty good but I still can’t get over some of the casting. The one decision they SHOULD make is having Shatner’s Kirk appear at the end. It seems so crap to me that it’s a movie about Kirk, Spock etc. and Leonard Nimoy is in it but NOT Shatner!? Screw Kirk’s death in Generations! It could be easily explained away – just say it was an alt-Kirk that died, that the Nexus spewed out another Kirk somewhere else, perhaps in the past timeline that Abrams’s movie deals with! February 7, 2008 at 3:40 pm #120148 TheLeenParticipant Bah, I don’t know why even Nimoy is in this. And I’m bloody glad Shatner isn’t… As for the NEXT next Generation, wasn’t that Deep Space Nine or something? February 7, 2008 at 3:54 pm #120151 pfmParticipant > And I?m bloody glad Shatner isn?t? lol. I wouldn’t want him to have a large role in it, just a cameo at the end would be a fantastic nod to all the fans who hated his death in Generations. I doubt it will happen though. And there’s a good chance Nimoy’s Spock will die in the new film, leaving Zachary Quinto firmly as the new Spock (you just KNOW if this is successful there’ll be sequels). February 8, 2008 at 6:09 pm #120183 NakrophileParticipant I thought given that this was a new continuity, Kirk hasn’t died yet on that planet in Generations? February 8, 2008 at 9:45 pm #120195 Ben PaddonParticipant This is a prequel. It seems to be set before the original series, but isn’t strictly speaking a “reboot”. Not if my information is accurate, at least. February 8, 2008 at 11:50 pm #120209 NakrophileParticipant I still do not understand how Leonard Nimoy is appearing then if it is a prequel. I guess maybe it will start in the present continuity and then flashback to the younger new cast. Oh well. February 9, 2008 at 12:30 am #120211 Ben PaddonParticipant Yes, that’s it. February 9, 2008 at 12:35 am #120212 DaveParticipant He’s adding credence to the idea of a new cast. If they had just recast Trekkies would have said it was sacrilege. I’m expecting a framing story with him describing the launch of the ship and then cut to Quinto. And then a scene at the end. It’d be quite nice if it were a bit involved than that though. February 9, 2008 at 1:07 am #120217 pennyParticipant Maybe he’s going to play Spock’s dad or relative…but I thing the flashback is more likely. February 11, 2008 at 5:09 am #120289 AntipodeanParticipant The movie will be set in multiple time frames: there’ll be flashbacks, and presumably flash-forwards with Leonard Nimoy. I’m really looking forward to this. I check Trekmovie every other day. February 11, 2008 at 9:38 am #120293 AnonymousGuest ***SPOILERS******SPOILERS******SPOILERS******SPOILERS****** It involves Spock time-travelling and helping his younger self to avert a Romulan plot to assassinate a young Kirk / alter history. Apparently the time-line is changed somewhat, which allows for a reboot of the franchise. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 104 total) 1 2 3 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In