Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Craig Charles interview Search for: This topic has 26 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by pfm. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic March 16, 2009 at 9:29 am #3076 SkyAndSunParticipant Just about to read this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/mar/16/craig-charles-interview-red-dwarf Apparently CC talks about drugs and his return to Red Dwarf. Creator Topic Viewing 26 replies - 1 through 26 (of 26 total) Author Replies March 16, 2009 at 9:38 am #93918 Dax101Participant damn! no one should have to pay thousands for new teeth March 16, 2009 at 9:45 am #93919 Seb PatrickKeymaster Good piece, and the teeth bit made me chuckle. March 16, 2009 at 9:48 am #93920 SkyAndSunParticipant I was interested in his reluctance to return to RD until he read the scripts. Red Dwarf was of its time, etc. Wonder if that reluctance would affect a future series? March 16, 2009 at 11:46 am #93922 thomasaevansParticipant That was a good piece. So theres a book on the way? March 16, 2009 at 12:02 pm #93924 siParticipant > becoming a household name by starring in the BBC2 sci-fi drama Red Dwarf Drama? Makes it sound almost sophisticated. March 16, 2009 at 11:53 pm #93946 John HoareParticipant That *is* a surprisingly good interview. I’d argue with the “low-budget sets and ironic pastiche” stuff, but then I always do, and it’s at least phrased slightly less irritatingly than most. Weird to think that Craig thought Dwarf was “of its time and place”, though. Not quite sure what he means by that. I can’t see much of the good stuff in the show that irrevocably links it to the 80s/90s. The same scripts would work now, with very, very few changes to the pop culture references. Or does he mean something else? March 17, 2009 at 12:26 am #93948 pfmParticipant > Or does he mean something else? I definitely think it’s c) something else, in this case. More like it’s “of it’s time and place” in his head. It’s a show that’s in his past as opposed to being something current. The stuff he did for the DVDs probably pushed it further into his past, and with the movie being a no go it’s likely he thought that was it for Dwarf, finito. Maybe his attitude was that it should be left alone because they could never be as good as they were in those days. Doug obviously persuaded him differently. As far as Dwarf beyond BTE is concerned, I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that BTE will end with Lister either dead or, more likely, left behind somewhere, leaving open the option of new episodes without Craig. This would be due to his Corrie commitments, of course. Maybe if they did a 6 part series Craig could do the last two of them, or something. They find Lister towards the end of the series. Yes, Red Dwarf is massively about Lister, but if they were struggling to make it due to Craig’s schedule, I would say they should try and go for it without him, as long as it wasn’t a permanent exit for Lister. March 17, 2009 at 12:34 am #93949 peas_and_cornParticipant That sounds like a prettty good idea there, have a series around them finding/rescuing lister or just leaving him somewhere for whatever reason. March 17, 2009 at 1:05 am #93953 Dax101Participant as alot of storys were centered around lister, i dont think red dwarf would work without him, it barely worked without Rimmer a replacement character would be added and fans wouldnt be happy. i honestly cant see a series 9 happening, if anything they will just be more specials for when craig gets time off corrie March 17, 2009 at 1:25 am #93957 ChrisMParticipant Nice Metro article clip in the news section.(thanks for posting it Seb.) Chris Barrie: “This could be the beginning of the rekindling of our adventures in space.” I know that future Dwarf is a consideration (depending on how the specials fare of course.) but after Craig’s mention of Dwarf, ‘being of it’s time’, it was nice to read something more optimistic. March 17, 2009 at 3:13 am #93961 CarlitoParticipant I wouldn’t want to commit to wanting more Dwarf until April 12th, no matter how the episode ends. It’s about quality not quantity. If these episodes are mad good, then I’d say 1000% I’d love more. If we end up getting a pale shadow of the show we loved, especially after we’ve had cast, crew and writer all raving about it for months, then I’d say it’s time has passed. Most (not ALL) comedy people have a finite shelf life of funniness, inventiness and relevance. When that time has passed them by, it’s very very hard to recapture the humour and perspective that once made them so good. I’m sure everyone can name a comedian or writer or comedy performer they once loved, whose prime body of work still stands up today, yet of whom they often ask the question “when did you stop being funny?” March 17, 2009 at 3:16 am #93962 CarlitoParticipant As for future episodes, if BtE is amazing and more are on the horizon, I think they should schedule it around Craig Charles if they need to. As long as Craig hasn’t quit outright, Lister is as vital to the show as Rimmer. Theirs is the main, show driving dynamic. The whole is better than the sum of the parts. RD without Rimmer, didn’t work. RD without Lister, won’t work. March 17, 2009 at 6:34 am #93964 hummingbirdParticipant > RD without Rimmer, didn?t work. RD without Lister, won?t work. This. March 17, 2009 at 9:37 am #93968 SkyAndSunParticipant Have to agree. They need Lister and Rimmer. Hopefully CC still wants to do it and he’s able to do it; assuming BTE is good and someone (Dave, BBC, someone else) wants to pay for more. March 17, 2009 at 11:13 am #93980 siParticipant I tried to post that Metro thing yesterday evening (better quality too – taken from the e-metro ;P), and nothing happened. Boo. March 17, 2009 at 4:54 pm #93990 Stabbim the SkutterParticipant > “Twenty grand teeth. That’s weird. So where was I?” I can’t believe I only just got that! :O March 17, 2009 at 5:27 pm #93992 Danny StephensonKeymaster I still dont get it. March 17, 2009 at 6:20 pm #93999 JoParticipant http://www.myparkmag.co.uk/articles/television/craig-charles-blames-corrie-.html “Craig Charles has blamed ‘Coronation Street’ for making him a drug addict.” I think that’s a bit of a leap!! March 17, 2009 at 6:38 pm #94000 ChrisMParticipant Agreed. I read the article and I didn’t interpret it that way. I got the impression that the strain of working on Coronation Street, coupled with the death of his father was part of the reason he turned to coke, but to interpret that as blaming the soap is indeed taking it too far. There are other ways to deal with stress after all. Classic example of journalists taking something small from a statement and putting a whole other slant on it. March 17, 2009 at 7:06 pm #94001 JoParticipant And as ever the Daily Star can be relied on to jump on the bandwagon… “CORRIE TURNED ME INTO A CRACKHEAD” http://tinyurl.com/dailyshit March 17, 2009 at 8:29 pm #94005 Tarka DalParticipant Ah well. So Corrie fires him. What’s he going to do then? If only there was some old hit show he could fall back on. Hmm. March 17, 2009 at 8:41 pm #94007 siParticipant >I can?t believe I only just got that! :O I only got that this morning as well. Shocking. March 17, 2009 at 8:48 pm #94009 Pete Part ThreeParticipant I had to google it. March 17, 2009 at 8:53 pm #94011 clemParticipant > ?Twenty grand teeth. That?s weird. So where was I?? I can’t get this either. Somebody explain please. March 17, 2009 at 9:12 pm #94013 siParticipant Featured interview/Tenth Doctor’s first words. I kicked myself. March 17, 2009 at 10:27 pm #94018 pfmParticipant ‘Barcemolar’ Author Replies Viewing 26 replies - 1 through 26 (of 26 total) Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In