Home › Forums › Ganymede & Titan Forum › Did Kochanski ever find out whether the Time Wand can do boob jobs? Search for: This topic has 144 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by Nick R. Scroll to bottom Creator Topic February 6, 2018 at 12:23 am #227318 JawscvmcdiaParticipant Discuss this important question. Creator Topic Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 144 total) 1 2 3 Author Replies February 6, 2018 at 12:37 am #227319 flanl3Participant PETE PART EIGHT Pete steps on the crushed remains of the time wand, accidentally activating it and giving Kochanski a boob job. Unfortunately, this boob job has made each of her boobs as large as her. Of which there are now eight, by the way. Can she get her old self back, and does she even want to? February 6, 2018 at 1:35 am #227322 Ben SaundersParticipant It could only make her tits younger or older, so sort of. Next question please. February 6, 2018 at 6:36 am #227325 DaveParticipant RACK IN THE BED February 6, 2018 at 8:03 am #227327 WarbodogParticipant Did Captain Hollister ever follow through on his threat to bust the coffee machine’s ass down to tampon dispenser? Did Kochanski use this dispenser when she was famously on her period, in a nice bit of bookending to the series? February 6, 2018 at 11:00 am #227328 International DebrisParticipant He did, and then the machine realised that its life was actually a lot more worthwhile dispensing hygiene and comfort aids to menstruating women rather than fuelling the ship’s caffeine addiction. February 6, 2018 at 11:03 am #227329 Ben SaundersParticipant “Famously on her period” hahahaha. I love how that’s basically an accurate statement February 6, 2018 at 11:48 am #227330 bloodtellerParticipant given the timewand can turn men into gorillas(why does it do that?) i think it’s safe to say it can do boob jobs and various other things. how useful February 6, 2018 at 4:15 pm #227333 JawscvmcdiaParticipant Assuming it can do boob jobs, can it also do penis enlargement? February 6, 2018 at 4:46 pm #227334 Ben SaundersParticipant It’s probably all the the DNA somewhere. Probably. It could maybe give your a gorilla cock, which might be bigger. I don’t think you’d want gorilla tits, though February 6, 2018 at 5:09 pm #227335 GlenTokyoParticipant A gorilla penis would only be bigger if your penis is less than 2 inches. Human penises are some of the largest of the primate wangs. The time wand can make it so that a person born in the 22nd century can revert to a time when they inexplicably wore clothes and styled themselves as though they were in the late 20th, so who knows. Maybe Kochanski can revert her chest to a time when she had a boob job, despite never having one. Or just send her boobs back in time so they’re as pert as possible which is probably what she meant, though as a 27 year old woman at the time, the joke was probably a bit early from Doug. February 6, 2018 at 5:12 pm #227336 HamishParticipant Actually humans have by far the largest cock of all the great Apes. Why the fuck do I know this? February 6, 2018 at 5:15 pm #227337 HamishParticipant How did we both know this GlenTokyo? February 6, 2018 at 5:24 pm #227338 DaveParticipant COCK TO REALITY February 6, 2018 at 5:27 pm #227339 Ben SaundersParticipant BETTER THAN COCK February 6, 2018 at 5:38 pm #227340 bloodtellerParticipant THANKS FOR THE COCK February 6, 2018 at 5:41 pm #227341 bloodtellerParticipant honestly i wouldn’t risk getting a boob job from the time wand myself, given that according to lister it can “turn you into anything” (how?) so you might just end up turning into a giant pair of tits or something equally as morbid February 6, 2018 at 6:09 pm #227342 JawscvmcdiaParticipant >Or just send her boobs back in time so they’re as pert as possible which is probably what she meant, though as a 27 year old woman at the time, the joke was probably a bit early from Doug. To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future. February 6, 2018 at 6:12 pm #227343 JawscvmcdiaParticipant Double post, but I wonder how that situation would play out in an episode if she actually decided to use the Time Wand for a boob job? February 6, 2018 at 6:18 pm #227344 bloodtellerParticipant then it’d have been the sixth episode in a row where kochanski is just used as a sex object February 6, 2018 at 6:36 pm #227345 DaveParticipant THANKS FOR THE MAMMARY February 6, 2018 at 7:03 pm #227346 GlenTokyoParticipant >To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future. Good point. I apologise Douglas. February 6, 2018 at 7:20 pm #227348 Ian SymesKeymaster If you’re going to revert your boobs to the time in your life when they were at their physical best, you might as well do the same to the rest of your body too. Sticking to the breasts shows a paucity of ambition. February 6, 2018 at 7:55 pm #227349 Ben SaundersParticipant Could it revert your brain as well, making you forget everything that happened since you were actually that age? February 6, 2018 at 8:43 pm #227350 JawscvmcdiaParticipant Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself? February 6, 2018 at 9:20 pm #227351 HamishParticipant > If you’re going to revert your boobs to the time in your life when they were at their physical best, you might as well do the same to the rest of your body too. Sticking to the breasts shows a paucity of ambition. How great is that! I can go back to last Thursday! February 6, 2018 at 9:28 pm #227352 flanl3Participant I mean, supposedly you could just target the chest area and send it forward through evolution a good number of years and we could assume that tits evolve in the direction of increasing size. February 6, 2018 at 9:39 pm #227355 LilyParticipant >Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself? If I was relying on someone to program that thing to selectively turn my boobs back to their 18 year old selves, I sure as hell wouldn’t give it to Lister. February 6, 2018 at 10:24 pm #227356 International DebrisParticipant To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future. Yes, but that was off the record. Intriguingly, Kochanski was given the same line in the episode. February 6, 2018 at 10:26 pm #227357 By Jove its holmesBlocked Yeah, that’s right about Lister. Although there is a breast spectrum between “A-cup” and back pain. February 6, 2018 at 10:30 pm #227358 peas_and_cornParticipant What if the Time Wand makes her pregnant with baby Lister? February 6, 2018 at 11:12 pm #227359 Plastic PercyParticipant How come the Time Wand never de-aged her so she looked like Clare Grogan? February 6, 2018 at 11:18 pm #227360 Flap JackParticipant It’s kind of funny that Lister had the ability to go anywhere in time and space, but only used it to look for curry, and in this episode Kryten gained the ability to bend reality to his will, and his first thought was “Ooh, we could skip to the end of our prison sentence!”. Where’s the AMBITION? Also, this isn’t strictly on topic, but I just reminded myself that Pete opens with Ackerman having been drugged with ~truth serum~. The actual hell?! February 7, 2018 at 12:11 am #227362 International DebrisParticipant “Shall we use the truth serum to find out whether the crew were really wiped out and recreated by nanobots?” “No, let’s put them in an alternate reality within another alternate reality that they don’t know they’re in and watch them for a couple of days” February 7, 2018 at 3:07 am #227366 Ben SaundersParticipant Using immense godlike powers to do relatively mundane stuff is absolutely Kryten, though. See: White Hole February 7, 2018 at 3:11 am #227367 By Jove its holmesBlocked “How come the Time Wand never de-aged her so she looked like Clare Grogan?” if Chloe was 25 when filming VII, i wonder how old you wanted Clare Grogan to be… February 7, 2018 at 7:57 am #227369 Flap JackParticipant The difference is that White Hole would play that mundanity for a joke, Pete… doesn’t. This basically encompasses two of the biggest problems with Series VIII for me – the high concentration of magic-level sci-fi concepts, and the relegation of the “3 million years into deep space” setting to an unimportant background detail. February 7, 2018 at 8:13 am #227371 bloodtellerParticipant >Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself? i mean personally if i were using the timewand for a boob job, i’d do it myself. kryten is so bad at using it that he turns a sparrow into a dinosaur, and i suppose lister’s skills with it are unknown but since it’s VIII he’d probably do something stupid with it. no wonder rimmer was so insistent it was destroyed at the end of the episode, he was probably sick of everyone’s shit by then February 7, 2018 at 2:20 pm #227374 Ben SaundersParticipant I’d say being three million years into deep space is a bit of a background detail for quite a lot of episodes in more than just VIII. At least it’s made somewhat of a do out of in Back in the Red. February 7, 2018 at 3:00 pm #227375 NoFroParticipant Do you think it does roob jabs? February 7, 2018 at 3:49 pm #227376 Flap JackParticipant I’d say being three million years into deep space is a bit of a background detail for quite a lot of episodes in more than just VIII. At least it’s made somewhat of a do out of in Back in the Red. Well, when I say “background detail” I don’t mean that it’s irrelevant to the plot, I mean that it’s irrelevant to everything, to the point where (after Back in the Red) everyone just behaves as if it’s 3 million years ago and the radiation leak never happened – anachronistic presence of The Cat and Kryten aside. It feels more like a time travel or “What if… ?” alternate premise for the series than it does a “The crew have come back to life – what do we now?” story: – The entire crew just go back to their old jobs with absolutely nobody questioning or disrupting the old schedules or hierarchy, despite being millions of years past any of it having a point. – There’s no reflection on the fact the crew of Red Dwarf have the new burden of planning the survival of the entire human race (or not). – The fact that there must be 2 Kochanskis is never brought up. – Nobody worries about what the ship’s living crew growing from 3 to over 1000 will do for everyone’s long term survival prospects, considering the requirements for food, water, oxygen etc. Obviously I never would have expected them to dwell on all of these depressing details, but the utter lack of any acknowledgement is such a wasted opportunity, and ultimately it just doesn’t feel like Red Dwarf. However, I do kind of like the bit in Back in the Red Part 3 where they lead you into thinking they’re pivoting back to a Starbug-based “Series 7 + alive Rimmer” status quo, and then go “lol nope, fuck you, this resurrected crew setting is really happening, deal with it”. For all of Series 8’s faults, it’s not short on chutzpah. February 7, 2018 at 3:56 pm #227377 DaveParticipant Why would there be two Kochanskis? The nanobots are intelligent, they know there’s already a living Kochanski so they don’t need to create a new one. February 7, 2018 at 4:36 pm #227380 JawscvmcdiaParticipant -bananas. February 7, 2018 at 4:51 pm #227382 Flap JackParticipant So the nanobots decided that because a version of Kochanski had by chance been brought over from a parallel universe, that Kochanski-Prime was the sole crew member who deserved to stay dead? How arbitrarily cruel of them. Although, I always assumed the crew resurrection was a mistaken overcorrection on their part, that they just indiscriminately reconstructed everything without realising the crew weren’t there before… February 7, 2018 at 5:18 pm #227383 JawscvmcdiaParticipant >So the nanobots decided that because a version of Kochanski had by chance been brought over from a parallel universe, that Kochanski-Prime was the sole crew member who deserved to stay dead? How arbitrarily cruel of them. And yet decided to rebuild Red Dwarf to its original design specifications, before the JMC made all its cutbacks. February 7, 2018 at 5:21 pm #227384 bloodtellerParticipant >Although, I always assumed the crew resurrection was a mistaken overcorrection on their part, that they just indiscriminately reconstructed everything without realising the crew weren’t there before… but it’s established in Back In The Red Part 3 that the crew were only brought back because Holly made a second set of nanobots so they could resurrect the ship’s crew to “keep Dave sane”. February 7, 2018 at 5:50 pm #227386 Flap JackParticipant but it’s established in Back In The Red Part 3 that the crew were only brought back because Holly made a second set of nanobots so they could resurrect the ship’s crew to “keep Dave sane”. WHAT. Please don’t motivate me to rewatch Back in the Red… I do like the idea that Holly would bring the entire crew back to life as a secondary task for keeping Lister sane, and not as a prime directive. In any case, Kochanski-1 should definitely be there. No real reason for either Holly or the nanobots to exclude her from the necromancy. February 7, 2018 at 6:50 pm #227388 Pete Part ThreeParticipant Why did the Nanobots make another Holly if Holly was the one who programmed- oh fuck this shit February 7, 2018 at 7:00 pm #227389 GlenTokyoParticipant No Kochanski or not. None of the crew should have been able to be reconstructed because nanobots need the material to make the crew surely? The material which was put in the kilner jars and flushed into space 10 years previous. Unless they made it them from another source, which would mean something would be missing elsewhere. When they made Lister’s arm they used leftover material, bits of bone the skin from the flap, and I assume stole bits from here and there. Bit of bum cheek for the bicep etc. They don’t just magic it up. February 7, 2018 at 7:12 pm #227390 flanl3Participant Holly was part of the ship’s original design specifications, not a life form that needed to be excluded from bringing everybody back to life, so that was the first set of nanobots that brought him back, not the second. Also,Kochanski not being brought back is about as justifiable as Lister not being brought back. February 7, 2018 at 7:14 pm #227391 flanl3Participant The VIII Dwarf doesn’t have a giant-ass rock in the side of it, right? Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 144 total) 1 2 3 Scroll to top • Scroll to Recent Forum Posts You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In