Home Forums Ganymede & Titan Forum Did Kochanski ever find out whether the Time Wand can do boob jobs?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #227318
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    Discuss this important question.

Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 144 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #227319
    flanl3
    Participant

    PETE PART EIGHT

    Pete steps on the crushed remains of the time wand, accidentally activating it and giving Kochanski a boob job. Unfortunately, this boob job has made each of her boobs as large as her. Of which there are now eight, by the way. Can she get her old self back, and does she even want to?

    #227322
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    It could only make her tits younger or older, so sort of.

    Next question please.

    #227325
    Dave
    Participant

    RACK IN THE BED

    #227327
    Warbodog
    Participant

    Did Captain Hollister ever follow through on his threat to bust the coffee machine’s ass down to tampon dispenser?

    Did Kochanski use this dispenser when she was famously on her period, in a nice bit of bookending to the series?

    #227328

    He did, and then the machine realised that its life was actually a lot more worthwhile dispensing hygiene and comfort aids to menstruating women rather than fuelling the ship’s caffeine addiction.

    #227329
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    “Famously on her period” hahahaha. I love how that’s basically an accurate statement

    #227330
    bloodteller
    Participant

    given the timewand can turn men into gorillas(why does it do that?) i think it’s safe to say it can do boob jobs and various other things. how useful

    #227333
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    Assuming it can do boob jobs, can it also do penis enlargement?

    #227334
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    It’s probably all the the DNA somewhere. Probably.

    It could maybe give your a gorilla cock, which might be bigger. I don’t think you’d want gorilla tits, though

    #227335
    GlenTokyo
    Participant

    A gorilla penis would only be bigger if your penis is less than 2 inches. Human penises are some of the largest of the primate wangs.

    The time wand can make it so that a person born in the 22nd century can revert to a time when they inexplicably wore clothes and styled themselves as though they were in the late 20th, so who knows.

    Maybe Kochanski can revert her chest to a time when she had a boob job, despite never having one.

    Or just send her boobs back in time so they’re as pert as possible which is probably what she meant, though as a 27 year old woman at the time, the joke was probably a bit early from Doug.

    #227336
    Hamish
    Participant

    Actually humans have by far the largest cock of all the great Apes.

    Why the fuck do I know this?

    #227337
    Hamish
    Participant

    How did we both know this GlenTokyo?

    #227338
    Dave
    Participant

    COCK TO REALITY

    #227339
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    BETTER THAN COCK

    #227340
    bloodteller
    Participant

    THANKS FOR THE COCK

    #227341
    bloodteller
    Participant

    honestly i wouldn’t risk getting a boob job from the time wand myself, given that according to lister it can “turn you into anything” (how?) so you might just end up turning into a giant pair of tits or something equally as morbid

    #227342
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    >Or just send her boobs back in time so they’re as pert as possible which is probably what she meant, though as a 27 year old woman at the time, the joke was probably a bit early from Doug.

    To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future.

    #227343
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    Double post, but I wonder how that situation would play out in an episode if she actually decided to use the Time Wand for a boob job?

    #227344
    bloodteller
    Participant

    then it’d have been the sixth episode in a row where kochanski is just used as a sex object

    #227345
    Dave
    Participant

    THANKS FOR THE MAMMARY

    #227346
    GlenTokyo
    Participant

    >To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future.

    Good point. I apologise Douglas.

    #227348
    Ian Symes
    Keymaster

    If you’re going to revert your boobs to the time in your life when they were at their physical best, you might as well do the same to the rest of your body too. Sticking to the breasts shows a paucity of ambition.

    #227349
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    Could it revert your brain as well, making you forget everything that happened since you were actually that age?

    #227350
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself?

    #227351
    Hamish
    Participant

    > If you’re going to revert your boobs to the time in your life when they were at their physical best, you might as well do the same to the rest of your body too. Sticking to the breasts shows a paucity of ambition.

    How great is that! I can go back to last Thursday!

    #227352
    flanl3
    Participant

    I mean, supposedly you could just target the chest area and send it forward through evolution a good number of years and we could assume that tits evolve in the direction of increasing size.

    #227355
    Lily
    Participant

    >Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself?

    If I was relying on someone to program that thing to selectively turn my boobs back to their 18 year old selves, I sure as hell wouldn’t give it to Lister.

    #227356

    To be fair, Chloe does say that she is thinking about the future.

    Yes, but that was off the record.
    Intriguingly, Kochanski was given the same line in the episode.

    #227357

    Yeah, that’s right about Lister. Although there is a breast spectrum between “A-cup” and back pain.

    #227358
    peas_and_corn
    Participant

    What if the Time Wand makes her pregnant with baby Lister?

    #227359
    Plastic Percy
    Participant

    How come the Time Wand never de-aged her so she looked like Clare Grogan?

    #227360
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    It’s kind of funny that Lister had the ability to go anywhere in time and space, but only used it to look for curry, and in this episode Kryten gained the ability to bend reality to his will, and his first thought was “Ooh, we could skip to the end of our prison sentence!”. Where’s the AMBITION?

    Also, this isn’t strictly on topic, but I just reminded myself that Pete opens with Ackerman having been drugged with ~truth serum~. The actual hell?!

    #227362

    “Shall we use the truth serum to find out whether the crew were really wiped out and recreated by nanobots?”
    “No, let’s put them in an alternate reality within another alternate reality that they don’t know they’re in and watch them for a couple of days”

    #227366
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    Using immense godlike powers to do relatively mundane stuff is absolutely Kryten, though. See: White Hole

    #227367

    “How come the Time Wand never de-aged her so she looked like Clare Grogan?”

    if Chloe was 25 when filming VII, i wonder how old you wanted Clare Grogan to be…

    #227369
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    The difference is that White Hole would play that mundanity for a joke, Pete… doesn’t.

    This basically encompasses two of the biggest problems with Series VIII for me – the high concentration of magic-level sci-fi concepts, and the relegation of the “3 million years into deep space” setting to an unimportant background detail.

    #227371
    bloodteller
    Participant

    >Also, who would carry out the boob job? Would it be Kryten? Lister? Kochanski herself?

    i mean personally if i were using the timewand for a boob job, i’d do it myself. kryten is so bad at using it that he turns a sparrow into a dinosaur, and i suppose lister’s skills with it are unknown but since it’s VIII he’d probably do something stupid with it.

    no wonder rimmer was so insistent it was destroyed at the end of the episode, he was probably sick of everyone’s shit by then

    #227374
    Ben Saunders
    Participant

    I’d say being three million years into deep space is a bit of a background detail for quite a lot of episodes in more than just VIII. At least it’s made somewhat of a do out of in Back in the Red.

    #227375
    NoFro
    Participant

    Do you think it does roob jabs?

    #227376
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I’d say being three million years into deep space is a bit of a background detail for quite a lot of episodes in more than just VIII. At least it’s made somewhat of a do out of in Back in the Red.

    Well, when I say “background detail” I don’t mean that it’s irrelevant to the plot, I mean that it’s irrelevant to everything, to the point where (after Back in the Red) everyone just behaves as if it’s 3 million years ago and the radiation leak never happened – anachronistic presence of The Cat and Kryten aside. It feels more like a time travel or “What if… ?” alternate premise for the series than it does a “The crew have come back to life – what do we now?” story:

    – The entire crew just go back to their old jobs with absolutely nobody questioning or disrupting the old schedules or hierarchy, despite being millions of years past any of it having a point.

    – There’s no reflection on the fact the crew of Red Dwarf have the new burden of planning the survival of the entire human race (or not).

    – The fact that there must be 2 Kochanskis is never brought up.

    – Nobody worries about what the ship’s living crew growing from 3 to over 1000 will do for everyone’s long term survival prospects, considering the requirements for food, water, oxygen etc.

    Obviously I never would have expected them to dwell on all of these depressing details, but the utter lack of any acknowledgement is such a wasted opportunity, and ultimately it just doesn’t feel like Red Dwarf.

    However, I do kind of like the bit in Back in the Red Part 3 where they lead you into thinking they’re pivoting back to a Starbug-based “Series 7 + alive Rimmer” status quo, and then go “lol nope, fuck you, this resurrected crew setting is really happening, deal with it”. For all of Series 8’s faults, it’s not short on chutzpah.

    #227377
    Dave
    Participant

    Why would there be two Kochanskis? The nanobots are intelligent, they know there’s already a living Kochanski so they don’t need to create a new one.

    #227380
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    -bananas.

    #227382
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    So the nanobots decided that because a version of Kochanski had by chance been brought over from a parallel universe, that Kochanski-Prime was the sole crew member who deserved to stay dead? How arbitrarily cruel of them.

    Although, I always assumed the crew resurrection was a mistaken overcorrection on their part, that they just indiscriminately reconstructed everything without realising the crew weren’t there before…

    #227383
    Jawscvmcdia
    Participant

    >So the nanobots decided that because a version of Kochanski had by chance been brought over from a parallel universe, that Kochanski-Prime was the sole crew member who deserved to stay dead? How arbitrarily cruel of them.

    And yet decided to rebuild Red Dwarf to its original design specifications, before the JMC made all its cutbacks.

    #227384
    bloodteller
    Participant

    >Although, I always assumed the crew resurrection was a mistaken overcorrection on their part, that they just indiscriminately reconstructed everything without realising the crew weren’t there before…

    but it’s established in Back In The Red Part 3 that the crew were only brought back because Holly made a second set of nanobots so they could resurrect the ship’s crew to “keep Dave sane”.

    #227386
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    but it’s established in Back In The Red Part 3 that the crew were only brought back because Holly made a second set of nanobots so they could resurrect the ship’s crew to “keep Dave sane”.

    WHAT.

    Please don’t motivate me to rewatch Back in the Red…

    I do like the idea that Holly would bring the entire crew back to life as a secondary task for keeping Lister sane, and not as a prime directive.

    In any case, Kochanski-1 should definitely be there. No real reason for either Holly or the nanobots to exclude her from the necromancy.

    #227388
    Pete Part Three
    Participant

    Why did the Nanobots make another Holly if Holly was the one who programmed-

    oh fuck this shit

    #227389
    GlenTokyo
    Participant

    No Kochanski or not. None of the crew should have been able to be reconstructed because nanobots need the material to make the crew surely? The material which was put in the kilner jars and flushed into space 10 years previous. Unless they made it them from another source, which would mean something would be missing elsewhere.

    When they made Lister’s arm they used leftover material, bits of bone the skin from the flap, and I assume stole bits from here and there. Bit of bum cheek for the bicep etc. They don’t just magic it up.

    #227390
    flanl3
    Participant

    Holly was part of the ship’s original design specifications, not a life form that needed to be excluded from bringing everybody back to life, so that was the first set of nanobots that brought him back, not the second.

    Also,Kochanski not being brought back is about as justifiable as Lister not being brought back.

    #227391
    flanl3
    Participant

    The VIII Dwarf doesn’t have a giant-ass rock in the side of it, right?

Viewing 50 replies - 1 through 50 (of 144 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.