Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 51 through 100 (of 115 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > I’m not sure what’s worse about “rat-arsed”; the idea, the shit CGI, Norm’s delivery of the line or the reaction of the studio audience.

    A little of each. For me I just don’t think “rat-arsed” is a very Holly-esque way of saying “drunk”. As with much of series 8 it doesn’t feel like the comedy is coming from the characters as it should; rather the characters are morphing around contrived scenarios that Doug deems to be hilarious.

    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I personally don’t think it matters much if Holly doesn’t have many lines or direct involvement in the story. Others will disagree but for me what matters is the sense of this vast ship with Holly as an ever-present background ambience. Just having Holly there on background monitors reacting would be enough.

    in reply to: PLUG: A new podcast about movies about toys #229888
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The Joel Schumacher ‘Batman and Robin’ movie is essentially a toy commercial.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228900
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    And imagine if in Porridge it turned out that Fletcher was his own Dad, but nobody seemed to mind because they had one good scene together in an episode with all racist vending machines.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228897
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    >I get that it effectively de-ages the universe because the alignment brackets were misaligned, meaning that it casts its beams outward rather than inward

    I’d quite like to know how the misaligned beams somehow had enough range to cover every atom in the entire universe.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228896
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > they explain in Tikka Xtended that they can’t use the time drive to go back to Earth 3 million years ago as they might end up causing another paradox or messing up history, with Lister promising to Rimmer that his timejump to 3 weeks ago to get the ship’s curry back will be the last time they use it.

    This doesn’t solve it though. Their single problem with the events of ‘Tikka to Ride’ was the damage they inflicted on the history that should result in Red Dwarf being in space.

    They’d cause no problems whatsoever going back to a century that was after the accident happened on the Red Dwarf ship, but before the human race became extinct.

    The question is how they justify pissing around in deep space 3 million years into the future, when they actually don’t need to and are constantly complaining about how sick they are of each other’s company. All that time in the empty vacuum of space looking for planets and moons for supplies, hoping they might run into other individuals who aren’t hostile… well just use the time drive, mate.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228892
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > But the (admittedly slightly poetic) point being made by the story is that the time loop creates a new chronology that goes round and round forever, with Lister’s bloodline never ending as his family continues to give birth to descendents for an infinite amount of time.

    Am I the only one who hates the idea that Lister is somehow <i>infinitely inbred</i>? This is why I can never like the ‘father’s day’ plot strand in Fathers and Suns. It’s an idea that should have been instantly dropped after series 7, and a new continuity quickly established in its place (they’ve retconned enough other things to get away with this) rather than brought back for series 10.

    Inevitably when a show reaches something like its seventh or eighth series it starts eating at its own past. Series 7 was at that point in Red Dwarf history when it had already done the slightly repetitive, formulaic series (series 6) so aimed at more ambitious ideas to keep itself fresh. It would have been so lovely for Lister to have just had an ordinary mother and father, and just been an ordinary bloke who was pulled into a science fiction world. But no, his own birth had to be science-fictionised and now he’s infinitely inbred. Urgh!

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228775
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Ouroboros:

    “With us going round and round in time, the human race can never become extinct. We’re like a kind of holding pan.”

    in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228659
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Would it really have cost very much to remove the colour from Rimmer for a ten second segment?

    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Has Red Dwarf really run into more problems than most other shows? Or do we just know about its problems more than other shows because the DVD documentaries/commentaries are so extensive and candid?

    in reply to: Familiar sound effects used in Red Dwarf? #226579
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The skutter clapping in Back to Earth uses the sound of the Cyberman head moving around in the series 5 Doctor Who finale.

    in reply to: Does everyone else's Red Dwarf XII DVD play properly? #226489
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Thanks folks. I’ve decided to get a replacement on Amazon. Just baffled that the disc isn’t visibly scratched or anything, yet struggles to play. Anyway, the process is begun and now I have to return it to them.

    Happy New Year!

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #226477
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    >but 2018 is fifty-two weeks long

    Not all of it.

    in reply to: Does everyone else's Red Dwarf XII DVD play properly? #226476
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    If I don’t get much of a response over this week I’ll assume it’s because everyone else’s DVDs are playing normally.

    The reason I’m asking is that if it’s a widespread encoding error, a replacement from amazon won’t make a difference until the problem is addressed.

    in reply to: Only The Good Is Alright #225758
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The *only* good thing to come out of ‘Only The Good’ is Mac McDonald’s joke in the series VIII documentary that he could play the violin with his left hand in the mirror universe, because that is the opposite of not being able to play the violin.

    in reply to: Thoughts on the Series XII Flipside Cover? #225520
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I keep my Red Dwarf DVDs in one of those album-style cases that hold around 60 discs. They currently share that space with my Quantum Leap DVDs.

    In other news, none of the reversible covers have ever done anything for me. They lack a silvered logo, for example.

    in reply to: Only The Good Is Alright #225296
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Only the Good is not alright. It is deeply shit.

    /thread

    in reply to: Red Dwarf poised to return for another series on Dave #225164
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The closest I want to get to a Red Dwarf stage show is Series VIII. That series has all the hallmarks of something like Bottom Live: overegged performances that seem to be pitched more for the live audience than the viewers at home, and a raucous, sycophantic audience cheering and clapping.

    in reply to: Idea for an episode. #225117
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Suddenly there are teeth and they go shopping.

    in reply to: Let’s Talk About Red Dwarf XII: The Game #224968
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I’m glad that my iPhone isn’t one of the newer ones that knows when you’re looking at the screen. I like the perks of ‘watch video’ (of an advert for a random app) without having to actually watch any of them.

    in reply to: Hour Long Dwarf? #224560
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Happy for episodes to be as long as necessary to tell a story, so they don’t feel too rushed or stop suddenly. Good episodes have enough breathing time. There’s a danger though that without the half hour restriction, Doug will turn out flabby scripts again like Back in the Red and Pete.

    The argument I would make for flexible running times is that shown on Dave with an advert break, there’s no specific reason why 30 minutes should be used, apart from tradition. As a standard on advert channels you’d get a show that was either 30 or 60 minutes *with* adverts, not 35 minutes with them included. It seems there’s a lot of flexibility around scheduling in that regard, which means episodes could be as long as Doug wanted, presuming it didn’t cost more to do this.

    in reply to: XII on disc (UK) #224559
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Okay, that didn’t work. It was a spine-ready image of Ziggy, anyway.

    in reply to: XII on disc (UK) #224558
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant
    in reply to: A thought occurred last night about Series VIII and its sets #224556
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Series XII makes the ship feel more spacious than Series VIII. In Series VIII you get things like the warehouse where the dinosaur walks around, but it doesn’t feel like the inside of the ship, it feels like somewhere else entirely. There’s less coherence there. Series XII feels very coherent and it’s brilliant at subtle things like reusing corridors in a way that you don’t notice.

    in reply to: XII on disc (UK) #224365
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > Rundown of the XI extras

    We probably don’t need to speculate about the Red Dwarf XI DVD release anymore, though.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223368
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I’m so sorry because I do respect the effort of trying to fix Series VIII. I’m not trying to be a cunt, but I need to be honest. I am criticising Series VIII, not KyoSo.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223367
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    (It’s almost as if Series VIII has no comedic or narrative worth whatsoever.)

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223366
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    “but then the scene would be incredibly short and feel rather pointless.”

    It’s a pointless scene already. May as well get it over with, no?

    I’ve just sat through Kryten re-corrupting his files through the profundity of ambivalence again, so I’m not in the most generous of moods. That needs to be cut as well.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223364
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    If I was editing this, I would be removing more instances of screws going deep into the ground.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223363
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    “Comment – I don’t particularly like the overly cartoonish joke about The Cat having a “cool” heartbeat, but I feel we need to see where he ended up after they were arrested.”

    Solution: Cut the scene after “Those are his nipples, Frank”. Narratively, no more is needed than that.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #223359
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    “The Time Wand scene would be SO much better (or less shite) if they’d done it with clever editing, rather than having the actors do it”

    This is like trying to pluck the dog shit from a vast dog shit that has had a thin layer of icing sugar sprinkled on top.

    If you love icing sugar so much just have some icing sugar. That’s what I say.

    in reply to: Dwarfcasts XII #221954
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    What’s the big deal about having three separate onions? I eat specifically three separate onions all the time.

    in reply to: The Entire Saga #221953
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Cassandra only seems watchable when it’s viewed in sequence after the first few episodes of Series 8, where it stands out and even gives you hope that the rest of Series 8 isn’t as bad as you remembered. Taken without that context it’s a horrible episode, with pantomime gurning, Series 8 lobotomised characters, and illogical plotting galore. Urgh. Hate it.

    in reply to: Dwarfcasts XII #221875
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    But I like the shit bits. :(

    in reply to: Please view this thread to read title. #221864
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > two other people have anything they

    Looking for an acronym to repeat the CLITORIS gag, I can only find TOPHAT which is not rude enough; sorry.

    in reply to: Camille's Condition #221863
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Yes, exactly. The “condition” would be whatever it is that impulsively turns Camille into a slave of other people’s desires, although presumably that’s what a Pleasure GELF is designed for. Camille and her husband have probably labelled it a “condition” as part of a process of breaking her from her genetic programming.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf current logo recreation #221763
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Why are there “examples of the logo in action” for series other than Series 12? And what’s the difference between, say, the “Season 1” version of the Series 12 logo and the “Season 8” version of the Series 12 logo? I am so confused.

    in reply to: New, mildly spoilery XII synopses copy-and-pasted within #221750
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    So I’m presuming M-Corp is the one where they upgrade to iOS 11 and realise their devices can’t play 32-bit apps like the Monkey Island 1 and 2 Special Editions anymore, even though they paid for them with their own money.

    in reply to: 'Jump The Shark' – Guardian article #221569
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    There’s also the fact that Irene is the first real human they’ve come into contact with for ages. Even taking into account the shamelessly unfiltered guff that was Series 8, encountering real human beings is rare and this should be an ethical crew that cares about other humans. Instead we see Rimmer doing his “ah Bisto” face when his own brother dies, and Lister and Rimmer both deciding to not even try rescuing Irene when she’s sucked out of an airlock.

    I’d like to think Lister would quickly put on a spacesuit and do his best to save Irene, not give up the second the airlock door reseals. Would he give up just as quickly if it had been Kochanski? No, of course not. So he shouldn’t have done it here.

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221524
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The prison subplot was entirely unneeded too. How much more interesting it would have been for Lister to have been forced back into the Red Dwarf hierarchy after years of adventure, nobody believing a word of what he says, a metaphorical prison rather than a literal one. It would have been the writers’ opportunity to explore the pre-accident crew in a way they regretted never doing, as well.

    in reply to: 'Jump The Shark' – Guardian article #221499
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > Either way Chris has been quite open about the fact, making reference to it in the recent documentary. You seem to be taking it a bit more personally than perhaps he would?

    I only said the word “cunt” mate. You’re acting like something important has happened.

    in reply to: 'Jump The Shark' – Guardian article #221494
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > Any need to use such derogatory language ‘Me Own Stunts’?

    Depends what you think of jokes about receding hairlines, I suppose.

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221492
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I didn’t say “high drama”. It’s a combination of the music and the understandable assumption after the more filmic Series 7 that Naylor would continue pushing Red Dwarf in that direction.

    And I’m talking about before we’d seen Series 8. When you’ve already seen the series and you know the scenes that all the clips are from, you’re bound to have a different reaction.

    in reply to: 'Jump The Shark' – Guardian article #221486
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > But, with the chances of matching its imperial phase receding faster than Chris Barrie’s hairline

    LOL RECEDING HAIRLINES!!!

    Cunt.

    in reply to: "There wouldn't have been a Series 6, 7 or 8…" #221474
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > Can VIII not be Red Dwarf instead?

    Only if you also lose Series 6 and 7. Them’s the rules.

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221473
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    The trailer gives the sense that it’ll be dramatic and exciting, though. Especially (perhaps only) when you haven’t actually seen Series 8 yet.

    It’s logical to presume from the trailer that Series 8 will build on the dramatic elements of Series 7, but with a live audience there to make the performances less dull, and writing that’s sharper due to Naylor’s revisiting of Series 1-3.

    It was definitely a shock in 1999 to go from expectations created by the trailer to Series 8 itself – the insanely raucous audience, and performances that are pitched more for a Bottom Live theatre type of audience than a television audience.

    in reply to: "There wouldn't have been a Series 6, 7 or 8…" #221454
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    > Hang on. Do people really think series X is named X because IX is meant to be the lost series, and not because Back to Earth *is* IX? Even if you consider the director’s cut the definitive version of BTE, it was originally broadcast as a series of three episodes, and it was the ninth one, so it’s series IX. Doug has stated that BTE isn’t Red Dwarf, mind you, but this lost series thing is bollocks, surely?

    I was personally clarifying that if we had no Series 6, 7 and 8 in the 90s, a special made in 2009 with, at first, a name rather than a series number, would retrospectively be considered Series 6, with the current Series 10, 11 and 12 (although they would differ from the “current” versions for reasons already outlined in posts above) being Series 7, 8 and 9 respectively.

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221447
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    If you are watching Series 8 immediately after Series 7, you should build your hopes up first with the Star Wars parody trailer for Series 8 that makes it look good. Tell yourself “Chris Barrie is back, Norman Lovett is back, the studio audience is back, and Doug Naylor has spent a lot of time studying the first three series for the Remastered project, so the characterisation will be spot on. What could possibly go wrong?”

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221443
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    I do know what you mean. I think that’s because the technology didn’t exist in the late 1980s to make all the characters into broad, pantomimic stereotypes.

    in reply to: Do you know who the Series 8 Rimmer is? #221440
    Me Own Stunts
    Participant

    Ah yes, I was drunk when I started this thread, but I wanted to make the Series 8 and Me2 connection; Series 8 gives us a ‘rebooted’ Rimmer that we didn’t get at the end of Me2. In the first series, the message was that Rimmer progressed with the Red Dwarf team and softened into a more likeable character. The rebooted version of Rimmer was deleted and we moved on from there. It’s weird to think that without a gap of several years – let’s say if Series 9 had come out a couple of years after Series 8 – we’d probably have been left with the rebooted Series 8 Rimmer forever. It wouldn’t have felt right.

    Just an observation, not an interesting one.

Viewing 50 replies - 51 through 100 (of 115 total)