Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 51 through 100 (of 277 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Mundane observation dome #324195
    Doomitron
    Participant

    So it would have been basically Promised Land wrapped around by The Beginning as a framing story. 

    Its more likely Naylor wrote several different plots for the movie considering he had a decade of free time to screenwrite, the Cat thing sounds like a completely different plot from the Homo sapienoid one he probably used for The Beginning.

    in reply to: Mundane observation dome #324192
    Doomitron
    Participant

    There’s been a lot of times a supposed Red Dwarf movie script has gone up for auction on eBay or wherever and nobody really seriously considers it, there’s probably been at least one or two times an actual draft has been hawked off and nobody took the bait.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #324150
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I love Peri, but man oh man is that accent diabolical. It’s worse than I remember!

    Maybe I’m brain rotted but I swear it improves overtime, Planet of Fire is where its at its worse.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324122
    Doomitron
    Participant

    But everyone you loved is dead and your only companions are an advanced ChatGPT, the necromanced AI of the worst person you know and a stupid one-dimensional narcissist. Realistically I think most people who top themselves pretty quick, but its dependent on the person as evidenced here.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324120
    Doomitron
    Participant

    It’s also about variety. A third of the book takes place in the video game.

    Be false advertising if it weren’t, that is its title. Kind of like how I do expect Titan to take place predominately on Titan.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324116
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Might be up to personal preference but one thing I like about the novels is they take the setting and situation pretty seriously, in the show it seems like a fun adventure most of the time but I don’t think I’d describe anything in the books as cozy at any point.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324072
    Doomitron
    Participant

    The highlight is the entire exchange between the Dwarfers and Peter Pettigrew for me, otherwise I’d put Holoship, Inquisitor (especially plot wise) and Quarantine over it (still a good episode anyway, 5 is my favorite series).

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324053
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I never got the hype for Back to Reality. Its a good episode, but I don’t think I’d have it in my top 10.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324037
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I love the escape from the game in BTL. Only weak part of the novel for me is the Marooned adaption only because I don’t think it works in print form and they don’t add anything to it.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324027
    Doomitron
    Participant

    BTL has what, a bit of Marooned, pool with planets, and then most of Polymorph is tacked on the end.

    Keep in mind the pool with planets in BTL came before White Hole, which adapted that chunk from the novel. BTL I think has the most original content of the novels, possibly rivaled by Last Human.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324021
    Doomitron
    Participant

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #324014
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I don’t see the issue that’s fairly vague on its own, unless the next parts have Mel in the thumbnails.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324012
    Doomitron
    Participant

    BTL > IWCD > Backwards > Last Human > The Log: A Dwarfer’s Guide to Everything

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #324003
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Richard was a producer on the show. Of course he had some influence over what was included in the script and what wasn’t, but that’s not the same thing as being a script editor.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323932
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Hiding under the table as I was meant to be in bed. When I got caught I said ‘what IS that?’ while pointing at the TV. My mum said ‘that’s Doctor Who’ and I said ‘oh, like the knock knock joke!’ and my tiny twenty year old mind was blown.

    You were twenty and had a curfew?

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323918
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Some asshole in a community I’m in died recently and it really stretched the whole “don’t speak ill of the dead” concept to its limits for me. Guy was a prick but everybody was like ohh what a loss and essentially lying about how great they were. I just didn’t say anything but was very close to being like “are you sure we’re talking about the same person here?”

    Spill the beans.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf on YouTube #323901
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Not going to click and feed, but I thought this was a nice, real photo of the cast.

    Must be the same photographer.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #323890
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Richard unofficially served that role on The Promised Land with pushing for the contribution of the Moonlight scene I believe, he may have given his scripts a readthrough on XI / XII too. Funnily enough just for that contribution, Richard might’ve actually been Doug’s best script editor.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #323882
    Doomitron
    Participant

    “I’m looking forward to it despite Rob Grant’s involvement” is an unexpected take.

    In fairness, we do seem to forget Marshall is the co-writer of this too, so he’ll be bringing his own creative twists and energy that we have never seen done in Red Dwarf before, that opens a lot of potential creative avenues and directions entirely new to the franchise. Also maybe Asclepius is a very big Whoops Apocalypse fan.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #323833
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I hope Grant jazzed it up a bit from Backwards, put a few nudie pictures in, a couple of car chases.

    in reply to: What do you expect from Titan? #323831
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I think it’ll be a comedy.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323818
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Sneezing the ashes in Samsara, probably the most obvious gag in Red Dwarf history.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323813
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Not to be 8’s biggest defender but you can explain that away as a creation of the nanobots.

    in reply to: Positives in the Remastered episodes? #323800
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Is that why Goodall didn’t come back for Promised Land?

    in reply to: The Inquisitor and Quarantine Missing from iPlayer #323798
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Something about canaries and coal mines.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323789
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Skipper has another Dave Dwarfian quirk I really hate where Kryten makes sure to point out “the skipper does require recharge time between skips” and this gets referenced once and promptly forgotten about immediately for the montage gags. Someone on the Discord said a lot of Dave era scripts feel like they’re one draft away from completion and this is one instance where I think that sentiment applies, I wonder if anyone ever proofread Naylor’s scripts before he’d submit them.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323787
    Doomitron
    Participant

    There’s no Sandifer in any of the sources I compiled regardless.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323782
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Checked quickly to see if I ever used a source from an ‘Elizabeth Sandifer’ for either the Second or Sixth Doctor Wikipedia articles I edited so I could promptly replace it with a non-shithead, but thankfully her academic expertise must’ve eluded me both times.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323753
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Most of what you said lasts for like ten seconds each.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323732
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Yet somehow he’s remembered for being the nice one, which is probably entirely Time Crash’s fault because 10 goes into a soliloquy about how 5 wasn’t grumpy which he absolutely was.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323727
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Tegan is half the reason Davison’s era is even watchable half the time.

    in reply to: Your Unpopular Red Dwarf Opinions #323709
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I always loved this bit of stock music in Back to Earth.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323706
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Interesting to realise that “I’ll explain later” is a Sawardism, Fivey says it in just about every episode, and Three says it at the end here.

    Those aren’t even the best example of it, wait until you get to Timelash.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323705
    Doomitron
    Participant

    The premise of this conversation with IMDb ratings is nonsense when Samsara and Krysis are implied to be episodes worth keeping in a single 6 episode series when one is complete piss and the other is mostly piss.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323693
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I have always liked the “After all, that’s how it all started” ending. Its funny with the Doctor gets the presidency again when they do absolutely nothing with it, Colin Baker had to remind Saward about it at the beginning of Trial so he’d reference he got deposed in a throwaway line, that’s how redundant that was. Although apparently they did a Big Finish story where the Time Lords called back 5 to act as president and its really good, I haven’t listened to it though.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323654
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I’m joking about Gatiss, its mainly because most of the Who episodes he’s written and acted in haven’t been pretty good (I think I only liked Sleep No More, which everyone else didn’t anyway).

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323650
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Do my eyes deceive me or did I just see “great” and “Mark Gatiss” used in the same sentence?

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323648
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Maybe because we expected it to be Mega-Corp from the XI DVD sleeve

    Oh, this passed me by:

    Maybe because I’m always distracted by the quality of the acting throughout that scene.

    I have criticisms about some of the boys’ acting in the newer series but contrasted with those parts they’re Shakespearean.

    in reply to: The Drive Plate #323645
    Doomitron
    Participant

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323633
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I’m not sure about that since M-Corp bought JMC, which implies they were separate entities.

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323628
    Doomitron
    Participant

    That’d explain it. Examining the lighting choices upon closer inspection in XI / XII is giving me a newfound appreciation for them in terms of their lighting choices, although I stand by thinking they went too far in certain places.

    in reply to: The Classic Doctor Who Thread (1963 to 1989/1996) #323627
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Bought the Unearthly Child to Dalek boxset today

    You mean Unearthly Child to Brink of Destruction boxset?

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323622
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Oddly in this scene in M-Corp everything is lit in non-blue haze in the Science Room, much unlike most of XI /XII.

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323616
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Feels more overbearing in XI / XII though, granted I don’t think Series III – V had so many corridor scenes but maybe I’m misremembering.

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323614
    Doomitron
    Participant

    This seems to be just part of the studio set itself since its in XI /XII and The Promised Land, but the shadows from the lights (or in-universe from the ceiling of the corridors or something like that) overcast on top of the actors heads in scenes isn’t too appealing to me either. Just seems unnecessary, not sure the logic behind it.

    in reply to: Mundane observation dome #323603
    Doomitron
    Participant

    in reply to: Mundane observation dome #323599
    Doomitron
    Participant

    No he’s DeepSeek.

    in reply to: Mundane observation dome #323594
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Kryten just ran that through ChatGPT and won’t admit it.

    in reply to: The XI-XII Lighting vs. The Promised Land Lighting #323592
    Doomitron
    Participant

    I do think the Science Room benefits heavily from the XI / XII lighting, when its lit in The Promised Land it looks pretty obviously fake and like a studio set.

    I don’t like it when it does the corridor fan effect in the corridors though, that I’m going to stick with it being overboard. Even practically that corridor is way too dark, its like the ship’s on low power.

    I think the lighting for Moonlight scene/Starbug crashed scenes does work, though, since they’re supposed to be on low power while on the subject. I imagine if they were still using atmospheric lighting they wouldn’t have made the distinction when lighting the cockpit for the scene since they keep it pretty uniform when they stick to something.

    in reply to: Favorite Doug Dwarf gags #323589
    Doomitron
    Participant

    Within XI and XII there’s a very solid 1 series in there that’s been stretched to the brink to cover 2.

Viewing 50 replies - 51 through 100 (of 277 total)