Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 451 through 500 (of 526 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: New Red Dwarf Fanclub homepage layout… #118796
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Penny, you’ve clearly not read a lot of G&T. When we’ve talked about the fan club on here, we’ve tried to stick to constructive critism (although we’ve occasionally got frustrated), because the problems the fan club are having could actually be easily fixed if there was the skill and, indeed, the will.

    You like BTL? Good for you. A significant section of fans do not, and also recognise that the production values are just not good enough to attract people to the fan club nowadays. It’s somewhat unfortunate that the fan club have chosen to focus on the lack of fan contributions, especially when many people sent stuff in that was not published. And, yes, Penny, I HAVE contacted James on more than one occasion, and left feedback on BTLi. That’s you assuming I’m stupid again, isn’t it?

    The ‘mumbling and crumbling’ comes from a real desire to have a excellent fan club. I have no idea about the amount of effort coming from the fan club team as a whole, but the point is that it’s not meeting the standard expected from an official fan club when it comes to things outside DJ. James has admitted as much, to his credit. I wasn’t suggesting the whole fan club team should leave either; I was responding to the excuses that have sometimes been used by some team members to excuse late or substandard output. It’s a voluntary position, producing output which is paid for by the fans. Either you provide the service that is being paid for, or you don’t do it.

    Again, if you really knew the type of site G&T was, you’d already know this. Also, seeing as you actually haven’t seen the site that is being discussed, what’s the point of you even trying to contribute to the thread?

    in reply to: New Red Dwarf Fanclub homepage layout… #118783
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Well, exactly. It’s easy to feel sympathy for the fan club team when you meet them in person at conventions (which continues to be the one thing they do really, really well), but if you’re trying to get new members, you really need to impress people nowadays. I can’t think of a single reason for someone to pay their subs at the moment, and I consider myself one of the more understanding members. Directly blaming fans for the failure of BTL is both bad PR and actually pretty insulting, given the history behind the production of BTL in recent years.

    And Penny; please stop addressing people on here like they’re fucking stupid. You should have worked out that G&T posters are fairly bright by now.

    Basically, if you’re not capable of producing something halfway professional, or don’t have the time to do a good job, then don’t do it. No-one is holding a gun to any of the fan club teams’ heads, and they can leave at any time without anyone blaming them.

    in reply to: Unexpected combinations #118709
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I actually didn’t know they were that important! I remember watching them with my dad on TV and so got the Spitting Image jokes, but knew nothing about their achievements. Surely a revival is due?

    in reply to: Unexpected combinations #118707
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I only remember who Saint and Grevasie were because of Spitting Image. They used to be REALLY famous, didn’t they?

    in reply to: Christmas Telly #118692
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    It’s the “Well, I was extremely relaxed, what can I say?” line that I remember above all.

    in reply to: Green Green Grass #118641
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Oh, I wasn’t saying there’s anything wrong with liking Heartbeat! It’s got Bill Maynard in it, for heaven’s sake :) It’s there for a specific purpose, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

    in reply to: Beowulf… 3d and not 3d #118586
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I’ve not seen Ed Wood, although I’ve always adored Beetlejuice. A Nightmare… I only saw recently, and was utterly charmed by, as I was by Corpse Bride. I need to see more of Burton’s stuff, really.

    in reply to: Green Green Grass #118585
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Heartbeat is a show for people who want to be nostalgic about the Sixties. Frankly, I’m amazed they’ve even bothered moving on in time. And Last of the Summer Wine doesn’t have to be set in any particular time period for the jokes, really; as Seb says, it’s not like they’ve actually changed from episode to episode. Although Harold and Marina look even sillier with advancing age. What makes me sad about LOTSW is that it wastes Peter Sallis’ talent; he was absolutely awesome in The New Statesman as the retired hangman and pub landlord. Oh well, the series pays Roy Clarke’s pension, so I guess he can’t be bothered to raise his game.

    in reply to: When is it best to get drunk alone? #118549
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Quite. As always, moderation in everything is fine.

    in reply to: NEW ZEALAND AD. #118453
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I’m proud of you, Ben.

    in reply to: NEW ZEALAND AD. #118444
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    “I’m rating this 3 stars out of 5, mainly because I don’t like the way the BBC held back the two main documentaries for this release. If they’d been included on the earlier sets I wouldn’t even be giving this release a look.”

    Breathe, Andrew, breathe…

    in reply to: NEW ZEALAND AD. #126239
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    And there we have the nub.

    in reply to: Matt… #126238
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I hate you, Phil.

    Copyright me.

    in reply to: Doctor Who II #126158
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Hmm…I got 31, and to be honest, I’m having trouble working out why you’re singling out Rose for this accusation. Surely nearly all DW companions show these traits? Also, DW is a kid’s show; one that is enjoyed by adults, but a kid’s show all the same. If the character development sometimes seems a bit simplistic, that’s probably because we’re talking prime-time BBC One family entertainment.

    in reply to: Slightly mad conspiracy theory #126105
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    That theory amuses me! I can see why someone would believe it, if they didn’t think about it too much.

    in reply to: Dialogue in porn films that really puts you off #125964
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    TCP is NOT a good lube. Astroglide is your friend.

    in reply to: Sexual Attitudes are Opposite? #125954
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Yeah, I pretty much saw it as a satire on sexual politics. Nothing complex there, I thought! I’ve always been fond of the episode because of Arlene Rimmer; beautifully played.

    in reply to: Men Behaving Badly #125916
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >I was glad they replaced Harry Enfield because I never seemed to like his character much.

    It’s certainly a more awkward performance than Neil’s, although I do like Dermott’s utter contempt for humankind. They couldn’t really have kept that going, though, so it’s just as well Tony came into being instead.

    in reply to: Dialogue in porn films that really puts you off #125915
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >Then they screw, unfortunately, leaving the book-review aspect of this particular porno woefully unexplored.

    This reminds me of the alleged review of Lady Chatterley’s Lover by a fieldsports magazine, which concluded that it was no subsitute for Amateur Gamekeeper.

    in reply to: BBC YouTube Compo Bollocks… #125914
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I thought Rob moaning about sound was a bit rich, considering the appalling sound on WomanWizard… ;)

    in reply to: TV spotting #125827
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    That’ll be the John Lloyd connection, and Howard being generally great, of course.

    in reply to: Ducktales alternate intro… #125750
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I spent most of the video thinking ‘Aww..’ and then the twist made me piss myself laughing. Ta, Mick!

    in reply to: G&T are too bastard lazy to read my mail… so here it is: #125732
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Yes, it’s right up his alley! Oo-er, etc…

    in reply to: G&T are too bastard lazy to read my mail… so here it is: #125724
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qb47OmMtGaE

    This REALLY could have done with a NSFW warning! RUDERY. And yes, I know I should know what John’s like, but I thought you meant John Hoare was credited or something…

    in reply to: G&T are too bastard lazy to read my mail… so here it is: #125723
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I didn’t see the Mobisode commercial – perhaps that’s why you didn’t get a reply, Thomas.

    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >there?s still at least one mason place in exeter. it?s on gandy st, opposite that place that sells cards and lava lamps and next to the bakery. if you look at the door, the logo is a giveaway.

    Thanks Matt, although I’ll be honest here and admit that I’m not deliberately seeking the Freemasons out. I now know where they are in my street, though, and the low-profile sign is understandable.

    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Thanks for the link, Baz; this now makes total sense. Of course, when I said ‘Grand Wizard’, I meant ‘Grand Master’. It appears that the person got the house number the wrong way round, which is why it ended up at our address. I really should have googled it and put it in the right letterbox! Unfortunately, we threw the letter away, assuming that the sender had the wrong end of the stick entirely. The Devon lodge certainly don’t advertise themselves…

    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Baz, do you know if Exeter used to have Freemasonry links? There was a letter addressed to the Grand Wizard of something or other at our address, and when we opened it (after several days of it lurking in the post box), it was a request for the history of Freemasonry in the South West (or something of that ilk). We were confused.

    in reply to: Surely Worth a Tread of It’s Own! #125582
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    You’ve been watching Desmond’s again, haven’t you?

    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >I found my other type of bra, so not so high any more.

    The balconette instead of the peephole? Wise choice.

    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Look on the bright side, Penny; at least your ability to do the job doesn’t matter. All you need to do is turn up in low-cut tops. Easy money!

    in reply to: Misheard lines #125301
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Stop it, Phil, you’re scaring me.

    in reply to: Young ones 25th year DVD box set #125278
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    And Ken Bishop’s Nice Twelve! Awesome!

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125159
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    > Personal, your the willy woofter around here friend of mine. Swivel on it you philistine.
    >Because I have decency, and I don?t want to get personal with people.

    ?

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125138
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I’m glad to hear that they would!

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125136
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    It would help your sarcasm if you spelt it right yourself, Baz.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125134
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >True. Save that she doesn?t come across as a bit of a prat, really. And for smeg?s sake, it?s YOU?RE. It?s a contraction of ?You are?, hence ?You?re?.

    Can you not recognise a humourous affectation?

    in reply to: Sad, sad, sad. #125125
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >It?s against users civil liberties if the forum leaders decide to manipulate and alter users like this. Grow up you pathetic little petty men.

    No it isn’t. This is a benign dictatorship, not a democracy. And I’m a woman.

    in reply to: Regarding Lister’s imprisonment in Stasis #125124
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Tonguetied, Seb is admin, and therefore can ban yo’ ass. As can I.

    in reply to: They were gonna sort that out in the dub #125010
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    >I prefer the big red red big clenched fist, but don?t mind the pencil, but that might just be because it looks slightly like an ejaculating phallus and I?m pathetic enough to find that sort of thing quite funny.

    Welcome to G&T, Paul.

    in reply to: The Peter Serafinowicz Show #124971
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I was very amused at the ‘Return to Sender’ parody.

    in reply to: Jokes it took me fucking years to get #124877
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    The joke’s rather sexist if you think about it too hard. I wish I hadn’t…

    in reply to: Jokes it took me fucking years to get #124854
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    WOMEN; WATCH YOUR MUFFS.

    in reply to: Regarding Starbug’s support legs #124709
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I hate you, Phil.

    in reply to: What was the first episode of Red Dwarf you saw? #124602
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Oddly enough, pm, this is comforting to read.

    in reply to: What was the first episode of Red Dwarf you saw? #124596
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Er, yeah, that’s what I was thinking.

    in reply to: What was the first episode of Red Dwarf you saw? #124536
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    It’s possible that I saw series 1 first, and I’m almost certain that I saw series 2, because I was an obsessive fan of series 3 (knew several eps off by heart). No idea about the first episode, though. I was defintely a big comedy watcher by 1988, as I remember the continuity and series like Alexei Sayle’s stuff, so I think it’s highly likely I did see series 1; but no vivid memories, sadly.

    in reply to: Doctor Who II #124569
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    Sorry, that was me. I am a MORON. Here’s my post below;
    >So far on my list of companions I like: Sarah Jane Smith, Leela, Jo Grant (she?s like a puppy, honestly?half the time she?s useful, and the other half she ends up making things worse, but she?s all bright eyes and eager grin and ?Did I help, Doctor? Did I did I huh huh did I was I a helper did I help?? and you know the Doctor can only pat her head and say, ?Well, Jo?at least you tried?.)

    >Companions I?m not sure about: Captain Jack Harkness (he?s either pretty neat or an embarrassment to the show?can?t decide which), K9 (I just haven?t seen enough of it in action, but I want it to work, I really do)

    >Just don?t ask about: Rose Tyler. (Seriously, don?t ask. She?s RTD?s Mary-Sue. Gr.)

    There?s a great story about Katy Manning bumbling in late for her audition for Jo, and chain-smoking all the way through. They loved her.

    IMO, Captain Jack is brilliant, and brings guaranteed entertainment. You can do very well without K9, but he?s cute when he?s around; it?s a nice idea. I think you?ve misjudged Rose, as she?s a much more complex character than she initially appears. But anyway?Romana. Yes indeed.

    I’ve deleted your original post, because it’s now not representing what you said at all. Sorry. I, I…shame mode.

    in reply to: Doctor Who II #124527
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    If it makes you feel better, Arlene, the only time Louise Jameson permitted Leela to scream was in ‘The Talons of Weng-Chiang’. She kept pushing back on the writers on other episodes, insisting that ‘Leela wouldn’t scream’.

    in reply to: So NBC’s importing The IT Crowd?… #124515
    Tanya Jones
    Participant

    I think Jen’s character is really misunderstood. She’s ostensibly a stereotypical woman, but as the first series progresses, it becomes clearer that she’s not actually as good at being ‘girly’ as she thinks she is, and that she actually has more in common with Roy and Moss. Also, I’m fairly geeky, and even I have had silly shoe experiences and have eaten goat’s cheese salad, and have read Heat, so Linehan’s writing really is on the button.

Viewing 50 replies - 451 through 500 (of 526 total)