Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 801 through 850 (of 920 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Font help? #218544
    flanl3
    Participant

    I’ll be printing it off next week when I get home. It’s fantastic.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218540
    flanl3
    Participant

    *Naylhoare

    in reply to: Font help? #218525
    flanl3
    Participant

    Oh my, that is definitely beautiful. I mean, the synopsis text has always been justified left rather than aligned to the center, but I’d say it looks better centered anyhow. But I do believe that is one of the loveliest things I’ve seen all month. Year, maybe.

    in reply to: Font help? #218518
    flanl3
    Participant

    Yeah, so I guessed for most of that. Still, it looks quite lovely.

    in reply to: Font help? #218513
    flanl3
    Participant

    Could I be putting my microanalysis abilities to better use? Definitely. So what.

    in reply to: Font help? #218512
    flanl3
    Participant

    I don’t suppose anyone’s done Region 1 versions alt covers for BTE and X, have they?

    Not any worth using.

    Also, that WB logo could definitely use being swapped out for the idk-what-symbol-that-is symbol and that thing I’ll call an “E-code”. Probably incorrect, probably irrelevant, and probably outdated, and I definitely don’t know what it means, but the numbers which would match for that:
    BTE: 0840
    X: 1206
    XI: 5434

    And that shot of Lister is a noticeably different one, but at least it’s sexy.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218510
    flanl3
    Participant

    John Whore.

    International Debris is daughterfan13 confirmed.

    in reply to: Font help? #218509
    flanl3
    Participant

    Also, not sure how well it would work with just seven, but I know with the original run’s eleven to twenty (ish) extras per DVD, the bonus features box would just move its top up & down so as to not leave blank spaces.

    in reply to: Font help? #218506
    flanl3
    Participant

    R1 has always looked better, but XI colors especially suit the format.

    in reply to: Font help? #218503
    flanl3
    Participant

    Very nice. As in very, very nice. A couple of things I notice, though, having spent much time staring at the R1 covers myself:
    – The Rimmer and Lister picture should be split, although that would probably near impossible given the unavailability of a clean copy of the background.
    – if properly done, the complete series eleven bar fades across.
    – “Kruten”
    – The bonus features font isn’t wide enough, while the episode titles are too wide.

    But again, VERY nicely done.

    in reply to: Let’s Talk About Red Dwarf XI: The Game #218490
    flanl3
    Participant

    Any news on how close Give & Take might be?

    in reply to: Would you watch a Red Dwarf porn film? #218489
    flanl3
    Participant

    It’s dumb and really ought to quit it

    in reply to: I'm Back #218475
    flanl3
    Participant

    I do believe this website has mild PeteTSD

    in reply to: Why do people hate Series VIII? #218474
    flanl3
    Participant

    There’s no Xtended Cassandra?

    in reply to: Font help? #218465
    flanl3
    Participant

    Also, thank you much to GlenTokyo.
    Okay, the uniform isn’t exactly black, but the shot makes it look pretty dark.

    in reply to: Font help? #218464
    flanl3
    Participant

    Well, for the TOS image:

    So, yes, Rimmer’s uniform for the picture is black, but it normally does stand out from the foil.

    in reply to: Font help? #218461
    flanl3
    Participant

    Oh, and ‘THE ORIGINAL SERIES FOUR’

    in reply to: Font help? #218460
    flanl3
    Participant

    This is honestly my favorite of the US covers because it looks like Lister’s actually shooting Rimmer.

    Is it the foil effect that’s making Rimmer look like he’s in some kind of Oswald Mosley-approved version of his costume in that scan upthread?

    Don’t know what you mean, but the foil is on the front logo & numeral, text on the spine, and the logo in the episode box.

    in reply to: Font help? #218450
    flanl3
    Participant

    I’ll be honest, I would stare at my US spines all day, while I just find the UK ones, even with the logo set up… odd. Although it would probably do a much better job encouraging me to put them back in the box.

    Oh yes, the foil. It’s lovely.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218441
    flanl3
    Participant

    M-CHoarep

    in reply to: Font help? #218438
    flanl3
    Participant

    Crap.

    Maybe?

    in reply to: Font help? #218437
    flanl3
    Participant

    Alright, here’s a niceish quality scan, should help quite a bit:

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218435
    flanl3
    Participant

    CHoareonation Street

    in reply to: Font help? #218429
    flanl3
    Participant

    I don’t think it is, as evidenced by the way the L in Mecanic curls up while the L in ‘ORIGINAL’ doesn’t, but it’s close enough that I could try it.

    in reply to: Font help? #218427
    flanl3
    Participant

    I can’t name the BONUS FEATURES font, but it seems it’s the same as THE ORIGINAL AND EXTENDED SERIES, so I suppose if you find one of them you’ve killed two birds with one stone.

    in reply to: Font help? #218424
    flanl3
    Participant

    the XI

    in reply to: Font help? #218423
    flanl3
    Participant

    Oh yeah, also, is there any clean version of the backgrounds? Because, if not, I suppose I’ll just use that beautiful panoramic shot of the bunkroom for X, and, well, who knows what for the XI.

    in reply to: Font help? #218422
    flanl3
    Participant

    I know those pictures are a little low-res, I’ll see if I can’t scan a better version when I get home.

    in reply to: Font help? #218419
    flanl3
    Participant

    I don’t believe you’re correct, as the font on R1 DVDs are quite different, but thanks anyhow.

    in reply to: Font help? #218410
    flanl3
    Participant

    Ooh, I should probably say that the nicest version I could find online was the VIII one at . Good luck.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218406
    flanl3
    Participant

    UnivHoaresity Challenge would have worked better.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218400
    flanl3
    Participant

    Son of ClicHoare

    in reply to: Why do people hate Series VIII? #218388
    flanl3
    Participant

    I think it’s important to note what sorts of trouble the bunch easily get into when others are around, it’s not just when they’re bored and have been alone for fifteen years.
    Otherwise, VIII serves little to say anything about anything in the rest of the show.

    in reply to: Who is/was John Hoare? #218377
    flanl3
    Participant

    FutHoareama

    in reply to: On G&T #218363
    flanl3
    Participant

    No no, there is no overlap bar they’re all shagging each other.

    By the way, this is legendary.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218352
    flanl3
    Participant

    Okay, but what will you do once your plan gets a little messed up after you get three mill years out into space after one of your buddies couldn’t properly repair the site in time and it blows up on everyone?

    in reply to: On G&T #218351
    flanl3
    Participant

    I’ve been listening to them, which is why much of the about confused me.

    flanl3
    Participant

    Oh, but there are differences. Go watch the original Can of Worms opening in deleted scenes then go watch the actual one in Starbug 19 (apparently an XII set, judging from when they filmed it), then go look at the last scene of Twentica (they say in the documentary that’s an XII set). Small differences, but it shows that they really do intend to give that different feel.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218324
    flanl3
    Participant

    So what if it’s a dead thread? I was too proud of thinking of this.

    Give & Take: After much debating, Cat finally gets tricked into filling Lister’s hole, before it’s discovered that Cat’s incapable of such and Lister will have to fill it himself.

    in reply to: Think we could make it to half-four? No. #218316
    flanl3
    Participant

    Don’t mean to push things, but is there any chance there’s some sort of synopsis they’ve included along with it?

    in reply to: Think we could make it to half-four? No. #218311
    flanl3
    Participant

    Has it got to do with Silicon Heaven?

    in reply to: Think we could make it to half-four? No. #218308
    flanl3
    Participant

    WHAT ARE THOOOOOOSE?
    Actually though, they feel slightly off for RD episode titles. Something’s fishy about them.

    in reply to: Think we could make it to half-four? No. #218298
    flanl3
    Participant

    Well, I mean, that’s a lovely innuendo, but seriously.

    in reply to: Think we could make it to half-four? No. #218297
    flanl3
    Participant

    Why do problems like this happen every time a small company tries to manage two big things at once?

    in reply to: Blu-ray steelbook series XI #218291
    flanl3
    Participant

    “Details revealed via Dave, Grant Naylor or Baby Cow can and will be discussed openly;” – G&T XI & XII spoiler policy
    This is very revealed via Dave, Grant Naylor or Baby Cow if you ask me, but if you wanted you could wait for an official G&T representative to come along and tell you their opinion.

    in reply to: …but is there proof? #218290
    flanl3
    Participant

    Doesn’t mean I don’t want to know.

    in reply to: …but is there proof? #218275
    flanl3
    Participant

    I mean the intent of which Kochanski, but at the same time the idea of ‘she died the only chance we have left is if the other one isn’t dead might as well try’ and I suppose we could go round and round on it all day and it would still be more likely that you were right, I’d just like to think I am.
    Plus, on the note of ‘resigning’ to installing Pree, I think that could just be because she was recently found, not a resignation.
    Either way, it’d be amazing to see a IX (or somehow otherwise numbered) series which did end up explaining (if not showing) the plot gaps, and if only it were to live up to ‘best series, if you ask me’, I would be amazed.

    in reply to: …but is there proof? #218265
    flanl3
    Participant

    His-dimension Kochanski, hoping she lived and escaped to elsewhere? I’ll say I didn’t remember that detail and it’s pretty convincing but still…

    in reply to: …but is there proof? #218263
    flanl3
    Participant

    Alright, excuse the fact that I haven’t actually watched much X in a while, so my facts may be a little off, but is there anything to say that he wasn’t searching for her hologram disc for a C&P-esque situation, except using the power the ship has left over from not running Holly anymore instead? A simple ‘search’ for Kochanski could be searching through thousands of floors of clutter for the only remaining copy of her, albeit virtual.

    Also, sorry for being crazy, but I suppose I’d just like to find any reason to believe that we’ll ever see the plot holes filled in.

    in reply to: What is the story behind this Red Dwarf clip? #218243
    flanl3
    Participant

    Wait, does that put them at nine years after this clip instead of Only the Good… since this is when they were last seen?

Viewing 50 replies - 801 through 850 (of 920 total)