Profile Topics Started Replies Created Engagements Forum Replies Created Viewing 50 replies - 151 through 200 (of 216 total) 1 2 3 4 5 Author Replies May 18, 2008 at 9:43 pm in reply to: Just saw Batman Begins… #80484 NakrophileParticipant I would like to watch it again before I see Dark Knight. As I cannot be bothered to buy it however, this could be problematic. May 18, 2008 at 9:28 pm in reply to: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull #80482 NakrophileParticipant I have forgotten if anyone had mentioned it already but watching Last Crusade again the new one will have to have a fucking good ending, as this one was perfect. May 16, 2008 at 2:07 pm in reply to: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull #80402 NakrophileParticipant Anyway I have always loved Temple of Doom. It gets such a bad rep, and although Kate Capshaw is pretty damn irritating at times Short Round is genius. I still cannot really decide which of the trilogy I like the best, but it’s fair to say that the last two films both have flaws and Raiders does that. That said they are all fantastic. May 16, 2008 at 1:48 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #80401 NakrophileParticipant Oh dear, that looks horrible. Nice to see Colm Meaney but other than that it does appear to be failing on an incredible level. Also, fuck The Departed. May 10, 2008 at 8:41 pm in reply to: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull #80156 NakrophileParticipant Yes! May 1, 2008 at 12:35 pm in reply to: Star Trek X1 #123086 NakrophileParticipant DS9 was the best Star Trek by far. One thing that does kind of bother me about Roddenbery is how much he refused to deviate from the ‘Starfleet = living gods’ thing he had set up. I love DS9 because it challenged that. Anyway, even though I have rather large reservations about this new film, I won’t admit that the trailer doesn’t make me happy. I just hope it isn’t filled with lots of cool and witty dialogue to be hip. Ugh. April 29, 2008 at 1:10 am in reply to: Can this be genuine? #122978 NakrophileParticipant Anyway it is not genuine. April 28, 2008 at 12:11 am in reply to: Can this be genuine? #122922 NakrophileParticipant Signed up for the free blowjob as well, eh? April 15, 2008 at 3:08 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #122513 NakrophileParticipant Ah it just strikes as if they haven’t really thought things through completely. April 12, 2008 at 1:19 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #122388 NakrophileParticipant > We?ve seen nothing so far to prove that Ashes to Ashes works to a different ?logic? than Life on Mars. But surely there is. Afterall, given that the people that made LoM basically said “it’s in his head,” how can ATA exist in the same world now that Gene Hunt (a construct of Sam Tyler’s imagination, or even as one in Alex Drake’s after reading Sam’s files) exists in the real world? Bah. The thing about looking in history books for any record of Gene is something I too thought of, but after the end of ATA I can’t see any way he is not real. Unless Alex has simply gone insane, or is the product of psychic interference. April 10, 2008 at 12:12 am in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #122299 NakrophileParticipant Well there were scenes with the other characters without Alex because it’s time-travel this time, which makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it? GOOD ONE. March 27, 2008 at 10:42 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #121977 NakrophileParticipant Yeah, but still fail. Didn’t go the way I liked. March 27, 2008 at 10:04 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #121974 NakrophileParticipant Fail. February 19, 2008 at 11:56 pm in reply to: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull #120628 NakrophileParticipant I have hard. February 11, 2008 at 5:46 pm in reply to: Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles #120341 NakrophileParticipant Just the fact that every defense of the show I have heard after I have done my awesome pre-judgery is pretty much the same thing, that the girl who’s playing the Terminator is really hot, tells me that it is a piece of fail. Mind you, I don’t disagree about the girls looks, but still: fuck this show. February 10, 2008 at 11:08 pm in reply to: Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles #120282 NakrophileParticipant I discovered that the Terminator is a teenage girl and automatically decided never to watch it, and indeed to mock it on internet forums whenever a chance may arise. So I say that it’s a bag of shite, and I am probably right. February 10, 2008 at 11:03 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #120281 NakrophileParticipant It is looking like it will be Gene show, I mean Philip Glenister’s name was even first in the credits… February 10, 2008 at 5:11 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #120274 NakrophileParticipant I know, but exaggeration is a great thing. Besides, I wasn’t so much replying to you as I was the thread in general. February 10, 2008 at 5:01 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #120272 NakrophileParticipant I didn’t take the ending of LOM as a damning indictment of policing today at all. I am going over some of the same points people have already made I’m sure, but it was the friendships he had made, life in general but most of all it was Annie. Sam simply wasn’t enjoying life anymore, and if the life he wants to lead is a dream in his head when he’s near death, so be it. I didn’t find anything wrong with the ending at all. But the point someone made about Gene being the one who is traveling through time is an interesting one. February 8, 2008 at 11:53 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #120210 NakrophileParticipant It all makes little sense at the moment. If anything, it seems to point to more of a time travel thing than anything else, and that really would be stupid. Hmmm. I imagine Sam will appear at some point (maybe with Annie) although really it would be… silly. February 8, 2008 at 11:50 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120209 NakrophileParticipant I still do not understand how Leonard Nimoy is appearing then if it is a prequel. I guess maybe it will start in the present continuity and then flashback to the younger new cast. Oh well. February 8, 2008 at 6:13 pm in reply to: Ashes to Ashes #120184 NakrophileParticipant It was pretty much what I expected. Good fun, but it made no sense. What seems to have happened is that Alex (who is really annoying) has found her way into the world Sam created in his subconscious. Gene, Ray and Chris are still around and remember Sam, who is now dead in this world. The fact they have killed Sam kind of pisses me off. So… what? That makes no sense. If anything, it seems to point to more of a time travel angle, which it was made clear wasn’t what happened in Life On Mars. All I can think is that Alex has read so much of Sam’s reports and what-not that she has re-created his world, just without him and eight years on. Which doesn’t make any sense. February 8, 2008 at 6:09 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120183 NakrophileParticipant I thought given that this was a new continuity, Kirk hasn’t died yet on that planet in Generations? February 7, 2008 at 2:40 pm in reply to: “I felt like a piece of shit.” – Robert Llewellyn #120140 NakrophileParticipant I found nothing wrong in his rant. February 7, 2008 at 1:27 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120138 NakrophileParticipant > Oh God, I read this and now I remember all the horrible details. That was brilliant! Still, two episodes of TNG and five of DS9 a week is pretty damn good, although I do wish the former would end before the latter. As for continuing it, I would definitely take the current continuity over some bullshit new one. February 4, 2008 at 3:58 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120044 NakrophileParticipant Yeah I know it had lots (well, loads) of flaws (wasn’t the director completely unwilling to research anything about the series or something?) but nevertheless I did enjoy it. It was the worst TGN film, though. Ah well. February 4, 2008 at 3:38 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120039 NakrophileParticipant It was hardly great, but it was more than watchable. February 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm in reply to: J.J’s Trek Trailer #120035 NakrophileParticipant Nemesis wasn’t even that bad. I cried when Data died. I’m still betting this will be shit. They really should just either continue the current time-line, either another TNG film or maybe even in a animation if need be with DS9 characters as well. January 4, 2008 at 12:12 pm in reply to: Rob on Five #118981 NakrophileParticipant > Didn?t he mention something about the sewer thing on his YouTube channel? That he did. He also looked really really ill. January 1, 2008 at 3:20 pm in reply to: German IT Crowd – episode 2 review inside #118920 NakrophileParticipant The IT Crowd is bollocks. Apart from Matt Berry and his voice. December 28, 2007 at 2:15 pm in reply to: OH MY CHRIST #118821 NakrophileParticipant > I give It?s A Wonderful Life a view every Christmas. I do the same with Die Hard. December 28, 2007 at 2:08 pm in reply to: Take that BBC! #118820 NakrophileParticipant That was more depressing than contracting AIDS. December 16, 2007 at 12:51 pm in reply to: When is it best to get drunk alone? #118552 NakrophileParticipant The masterpiece that is Jingle All the Way is on channel 4 at ten to five today, so if you’ve anything left may I suggest saving it for that? December 15, 2007 at 11:50 pm in reply to: Christmas Telly #118532 NakrophileParticipant > ?aw heeeeell no!? Maybe an early Will Smith role? December 15, 2007 at 7:22 pm in reply to: Christmas Telly #118520 NakrophileParticipant Yeah it’s a shame. I was still slightly pissed off with the Ultimate Action Edition, though, when I found it didn’t have the theatrical edition (with Bruce Willis commentary) as well. I doubt Bruce would be as amazing a commentator of his own films as Arnold, but it would be fun I bet. December 15, 2007 at 1:18 am in reply to: Christmas Telly #118506 NakrophileParticipant > ITV are very good at editing movies. Case in point: Opening scene of Shaun of the Dead: > Ed: ?Can I get any of you COCKS! a drink?? The best one has to be Die Hard: “Yippee-ki-yay mother” *lift noise* Although they have shown the notoriously cut-to-pieces Cliffhanger in the most uncut form I have ever seen on British television. December 14, 2007 at 10:28 pm in reply to: The End – The Smeg it is or not? #118488 NakrophileParticipant > OR Little Britain Yeah, it’s a bag of shite, isn’t it. December 14, 2007 at 10:22 pm in reply to: AvP Requiem #118487 NakrophileParticipant I reckon this will be just as shit as the first one, just slightly more entertaining. December 8, 2007 at 2:31 pm in reply to: Brilliant pictures from pre-watershed sitcoms #126234 NakrophileParticipant I have to say that this image is one of the greatest I have ever seen. December 3, 2007 at 11:11 pm in reply to: NEW ZEALAND AD. #126126 NakrophileParticipant > Red Dwarf:Just the Tott > Tott? Tott. November 28, 2007 at 11:12 pm in reply to: GELF rape #126033 NakrophileParticipant I prefer this: http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u147/Nakrophile/arnoldgelfrape.jpg Thinking about it now, I put Arnold’s face on the wrong person, but am I going to make another? Am I fuck. November 27, 2007 at 11:05 pm in reply to: GELF rape #125995 NakrophileParticipant I really want this poster. November 19, 2007 at 3:21 pm in reply to: Simpsons DVD #125781 NakrophileParticipant And I still haven’t seen it. November 18, 2007 at 10:14 pm in reply to: The Greatest Moment In The History Of Television Broadcasting #125757 NakrophileParticipant Amazing. November 18, 2007 at 3:45 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf on Dave #125756 NakrophileParticipant Cut my life into pieces. November 18, 2007 at 12:19 am in reply to: Red Dwarf on Dave #125752 NakrophileParticipant I flipped onto Dave to see what episode/series it was at around nine thirty, assuming they would do a whole series if it’s nine-twelve/one with ads. It was Camille. When I flipped back after watching Donnie Darko again it was Camille again. What a bag of shite. November 15, 2007 at 11:16 pm in reply to: Star Trek- Remastered. #125733 NakrophileParticipant > TNG all the mother fucking way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am pleased to finally be seeing the Picard/Borg incident after seeing it several years ago in First Contact and remaining confused ever since. November 14, 2007 at 11:52 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf on Dave #125704 NakrophileParticipant We never had UKTV G2 in our house, so I have no frame of reference beyond bitching posts here, all of which I am prepared to believe whole-heartedly. November 14, 2007 at 11:23 pm in reply to: The Peter Serafinowicz Show #125699 NakrophileParticipant What little I saw reminded me of That Mitchell and Webb Look. That is to say, some excellent stuff and some right shit as well. I will attempt to watch it next time it is on. November 14, 2007 at 11:18 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf on Dave #125698 NakrophileParticipant Yeah I saw that. I wonder how they’ll go about it, as there isn’t enough time for the whole lot. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 151 through 200 (of 216 total) 1 2 3 4 5