Profile Topics Started Replies Created Engagements Forum Replies Created Viewing 50 replies - 1,201 through 1,250 (of 2,004 total) 1 2 3 … 24 25 26 … 39 40 41 Author Replies June 3, 2009 at 12:24 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99575 JamesTCParticipant > the fact that the ?dimension-hopping leviathan? part of the episode?s publicity synopsis was an out-and-out lie. It wasn’t a lie because the other dimension does exist, Kryten states that at the end, the infinite multi-verse thing, the squid exists in one of the infinite universes created by the hullucination. June 2, 2009 at 10:35 pm in reply to: Wait a minute….this isn’t my fantasy! #99552 JamesTCParticipant Didn’t you see ‘Back to Reality 2: Emosquid’ in Series IX? One of my favourites. June 2, 2009 at 10:33 pm in reply to: Maybe they’ll release it as a TIV… #99551 JamesTCParticipant If a Red Dwarf game were to be released then Series VI would be the best time to set it. I think if it was made like Mass Effect it would be great, what I mean is a main set of missions as well as a hell of a load of side missions. It would also be the greatest thing ever to be able to fly Starbug, if I could do that I wouldn’t put the controller down. June 2, 2009 at 8:24 pm in reply to: Norman interview #99525 JamesTCParticipant Was it worse than T3? June 2, 2009 at 7:59 pm in reply to: Maybe they’ll release it as a TIV… #99519 JamesTCParticipant I had Project Eden, it was pretty good, kept crashing at a certain point so I stopped playing. June 2, 2009 at 7:58 pm in reply to: Norman interview #99518 JamesTCParticipant >Btw who gives a fuck that Norman won?t be back as Holly? No-one. Holly shouldn?t return full stop (period). Holly became surplus with Kryten joining and should have been axed as a character from Backwards onwards. Then they would have all died in ‘Back to Reality’. Anyway I do disagree. I think Series VI was the perfect time for the character to go but I think her character is just as important through the 3 series, I mean we have the whole of ‘White Hole’ and a hell of a bunch of one liners, great ones. While Kryten replaced the intelligent side of Holly we have Hattie to replace the stupid side, it worked very well for the 3 Series and was ended at the perfect time. June 2, 2009 at 2:14 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99489 JamesTCParticipant No I disagree, I think they should cut every scene apart from the first episode and a shot of Red Dwarf over earth, you know, for closure. June 2, 2009 at 2:12 pm in reply to: I appear to have stumbled into the future #99488 JamesTCParticipant Arn’t Sony making a virtual reality console? This motion thing looks ok but really the only games I play are shooters like Crackdown and Halo, maybe the odd racing game, it really depends on the price if I could justify buying one. June 2, 2009 at 2:10 pm in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99487 JamesTCParticipant Yeh, Tom Hanks has been off TV for so long since he got that afro it is good to see him back. June 2, 2009 at 9:02 am in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99466 JamesTCParticipant They really should find the guy leaking episodes and footage onto the internet. June 1, 2009 at 11:25 pm in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99451 JamesTCParticipant Oh I just watched it on youtube, Cat coming back through time at the end was fantastic though what could “Vista Riddle” mean? June 1, 2009 at 11:02 pm in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99447 JamesTCParticipant Next weeks ‘Krazy Krytie’ looks very promising. June 1, 2009 at 8:55 pm in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99437 JamesTCParticipant I have just finished the episode ‘Kryten Kholera’ and I have to say the USB shit scene was way too graphic. May 31, 2009 at 11:27 pm in reply to: Did you see Red Dwarf? – Spoilers! #99394 JamesTCParticipant I don’t like some of the re-casting in the latest series though I must say Zachary Quinto was born to play Rimmer. May 31, 2009 at 11:16 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99391 JamesTCParticipant Isn’t ‘Back to Earth’ Doug’s first shot at being a solo director? I think he did pretty fucking well considering. May 31, 2009 at 8:23 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99383 JamesTCParticipant The munchkin Rimmer came to mind but I didn’t think it was a refrence to that. May 31, 2009 at 4:37 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99375 JamesTCParticipant Not all of ‘Back to Earth’ or ‘Blue Harvest’ were Blade Runner or Star Wars jokes though. I mean just look at the couch gag in ‘Blue Harvest’, one of the best gags in the special and it is a joke anybody can get. Hell even the “Don’t get penisy” can give a luagh even if you don’t know it is mocking “Don’t get cocky”. I had never watched Blade Runner when I watched ‘Back to Earth; but it didn’t stop me enjoying it, now after watching Blade Runner I may understand more of the jokes but not alot of them, some of them work on more than one level such as the giant headed Rimmer things in Part 3, I laughed at those when they came on screen without knowing it was a Blade Runner refrence. Hell even the scene of the gang running through the glass worked well without watching Blade Runner because it is clearly explained that it is a refrence to Blade Runner in the show. May 30, 2009 at 9:53 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99335 JamesTCParticipant Quite a few people I know didn’t like it, quite a few did. About the same each way really. May 30, 2009 at 7:42 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99319 JamesTCParticipant >The tired LoG comparison is rubbish, mind. No I disagree, I mean LoG came up with an original concept that has never been used ever in anything and Red Dwarf just copies it exactly. Oh wait a minute, that is bull shit. I have already had an argument with somebody on IMDB who thinks Red Dwarf copied of LoG. Still SFX have not given the most idiotic review I have ever seen, this is from IMDB – “if u think red dwarf back to earth is good, ur a retarded fanboi with no life and zero good taste. nuff said.” I and another poster commented on his intelligence, his view on opinions and his spelling and got called “a pair of retarded fanbois with no life and zero taste”. They should get him to write for SFX. May 30, 2009 at 6:53 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99310 JamesTCParticipant Om nom nom nom nom nom http://www.bookingsmodels.co.uk/details.aspx?nav=0&modelID=393822&%20amp;indx=&subid=5583&mainsubid=5583 Me like Karen May 29, 2009 at 11:51 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99279 JamesTCParticipant She should be Jamie McCrimmon’s great great great great great great great great grand-daughter. May 29, 2009 at 11:09 pm in reply to: SFX Stinker! #99275 JamesTCParticipant I can’t believe the extras would get 2/5, I mean I have not seen them but looking at the past of the range I just can’t fathom how it could take a big dip. As for 2.5/5 for the story, well that is just plain bull shit. I do know it gets bad reception but it doesn’t deserve that low a score. May 29, 2009 at 9:59 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99271 JamesTCParticipant >What do you want; a biscuit? Depends on what you got. May 29, 2009 at 9:48 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99268 JamesTCParticipant > Apparently she was the soothsayer in ?The Fires of Pompeii?. Which is why I said – “And she is someone joining a list of people to play a small part in Doctor Who and then go on to play a big part – Nicholas Courtney, Colin Baker, Lisa Bowerman, Freema Agyeman ect.” I can add David Tennant to that list. May 29, 2009 at 1:43 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99262 JamesTCParticipant Ahh a breath of fresh air, a series companion who isn’t from London. And she is someone joining a list of people to play a small part in Doctor Who and then go on to play a big part – Nicholas Courtney, Colin Baker, Lisa Bowerman, Freema Agyeman ect. May 29, 2009 at 1:38 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99260 JamesTCParticipant Wait what? Is that the new companion? When the fuck was this announced? May 29, 2009 at 11:08 am in reply to: Next Dwarf DVD update #99257 JamesTCParticipant Oh and it ends on a cliffhanger – “So – what are the menus like…?” May 27, 2009 at 2:03 pm in reply to: Obscurities on VHS tapes #99228 JamesTCParticipant I think I had that video but I don’t know if it had a cartoon in the middle, might go and check if I still have it. May 26, 2009 at 2:45 pm in reply to: Obscurities on VHS tapes #99206 JamesTCParticipant Yep, on many BBC videos it would have a dialing tone at the start making a little tune. Other obscurities on VHS? Well there was that weird pirate who made pirate videos using coal and a hot branding iron. They had that weird trailer were the guy got sold a pirate version of Trainspotting and the guy says he can’t understand the film and the pirate video seller uses the excuse that they are all Scottish and it is meant to be like that. Good ol’ VHS. May 25, 2009 at 6:46 pm in reply to: Happy Towel Day #99185 JamesTCParticipant You wanna get high? May 25, 2009 at 10:18 am in reply to: Happy Towel Day #99176 JamesTCParticipant I could watch ‘The Pirate Planet’. May 24, 2009 at 9:49 pm in reply to: I’ve just seen 2001: A Space Odyssey for the first time… #99169 JamesTCParticipant I have a shelf classic in Independance Day, got the two disc special edition over a year ago and I still haven’t watched it. May 24, 2009 at 11:43 am in reply to: Talk to the Toaster #99161 JamesTCParticipant you> My Name is Earl was cancelled Talkie Toaster> Glad to know you,Earl was cancelled. you> What is my name? Talkie Toaster> Your name is Talkie Toaster, seeker. May 24, 2009 at 11:36 am in reply to: Talk to the Toaster #99160 JamesTCParticipant Talkie Toaster> Are you aware that the ALICE chat robot logs and records all converstaions? you> ALICE is a cunt Talkie Toaster> Thanks and you are a delightful person too. Am I a cunt? Maybe May 24, 2009 at 11:23 am in reply to: Talk to the Toaster #99159 JamesTCParticipant you> Why did the chicken cross the road? Talkie Toaster> Because she was a robot. May 24, 2009 at 11:16 am in reply to: “Back In Business” available for download on Sky Player #99158 JamesTCParticipant I once sat through ‘Zombie Strippers’, yeh. May 23, 2009 at 7:44 pm in reply to: John Hoare #99130 JamesTCParticipant RIP John. May 22, 2009 at 6:55 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99093 JamesTCParticipant Maybe they will dress Matt like Tennant, we won’t see his face, the Rani will then fire at the TARDIS and it will crash and the Doctor will get a bump on the noggin to regenerate. May 22, 2009 at 5:03 pm in reply to: Really horrible plot problem in Ouroboros #99086 JamesTCParticipant Here – http://www.ganymede.tv/forum/2009/01/plot-hole-in-ouroboros May 22, 2009 at 5:01 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99085 JamesTCParticipant I wonder if Matt Smith will just film a pick up scene when he starts or if he filmed at the same time as Tennant for the regeneration. May 22, 2009 at 4:59 pm in reply to: Really horrible plot problem in Ouroboros #99084 JamesTCParticipant I made a topic about this months ago. May 19, 2009 at 7:48 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99033 JamesTCParticipant They got it wrong a few weeks back when the first ‘The War Games’ set was put up there. May 19, 2009 at 6:44 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99030 JamesTCParticipant Oh my, they got his name wrong again. May 19, 2009 at 6:44 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99029 JamesTCParticipant Oh my, they got his name wrong again. May 19, 2009 at 2:12 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #99023 JamesTCParticipant http://bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/7CB95B1FD0FB9806802575BB003A8810?OpenDocument http://bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/DB3EA956ECC7CC5D802575BB003A87FA?OpenDocument The bonus features of ‘The War Games’ DVD, by god that will be a fantastic release. May 18, 2009 at 10:24 pm in reply to: Give me that Star Trek crap #99015 JamesTCParticipant I missed out the “5” before Series 2 so it looks like I payed ?2, I wish. May 18, 2009 at 10:14 pm in reply to: Give me that Star Trek crap #99013 JamesTCParticipant I was going to get Who series 3 for ?15 when I saw it at an asda, went to my local when I actually had the money and it was ?20, pfft, still I paid ?2 for Series 2 there and nearly paid ?25 for Series 3 but I decided to order Bodysnatcher online instead, I certainly made the best choice. Oh and you know, star trek. May 17, 2009 at 9:02 pm in reply to: Give me that Star Trek crap #98994 JamesTCParticipant Why is the second Scotty soft light? May 17, 2009 at 4:57 pm in reply to: Give me that Star Trek crap #98985 JamesTCParticipant >It looks more like the guy out of The Big Bang Theory Bloody hell it does! May 17, 2009 at 3:11 pm in reply to: Give me that Star Trek crap #98980 JamesTCParticipant Oh I actually like all the Star Trek films bar TMP. VIII and VI probably being my favourite. I think II, III and IV are much easier for a new comer to get into though. Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 1,201 through 1,250 (of 2,004 total) 1 2 3 … 24 25 26 … 39 40 41