Profile Topics Started Replies Created Engagements Forum Replies Created Viewing 50 replies - 151 through 200 (of 227 total) 1 2 3 4 5 Author Replies January 14, 2009 at 5:14 pm in reply to: Martin Clunes is Reggie Perrin #88713 SomebodyParticipant Wasn’t this announced yoinks back? January 11, 2009 at 11:57 pm in reply to: The new specials will be recorded infront of an audience #88670 SomebodyParticipant True but there?s always pick-ups that alter things. I was most confused at the end of Only the Good when Death turned up – ?THIS IS NOT THE ENDI?.oh.? Except For Viewers In Scotland, where BBC Scotland cut away immediately after “The End”. January 10, 2009 at 1:34 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS ‘Recommend Me Old Who’ Thread. #88629 SomebodyParticipant SoundableObject: I think the next Pertwee?s we will see will be the liked of ?The Daemons? and ?Invasion of the Dinosaurs? though, they can benefit from dot chrome reconstruction which was used for ?Planet of the Daleks?, shame they didn?t realise before ?Doctor Who and the Silurians? was released, that would have a better picture using dot chrome restoration then the use of NTSC tapes. Not necessarily: 1) Not all B&W film recordings HAVE the chroma dots to start with. They were meant to be stripped out during recording, and on some recordings (like Mind of Evil pt 1), they actually were. 2) Even where they exist, they aren’t necessarily clear enough to recover the colour 3) Even when you CAN recover colour, that doesn’t mean that the resulting colour will be stable and broadcast-quality. The Planet of the Daleks recolourisation is a blend of from-scratch computer colouring (done before they got the chroma-dot process working) and the chroma-dot recovery. If you look at the official article on it – http://www.purpleville.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rtwebsite/DalekWarDVD.htm – you’ll notice some of the problems with the colour on the chroma-dot-only pictures (the middle ones – notice the heavy rainbow-patterning on Jo’s hair and jumper in the first set of pictures), and that they say “the CR colour was unstable and noisy”. January 10, 2009 at 1:08 pm in reply to: Spidey & Obama #88628 SomebodyParticipant So what Marvel is saying, is that Obama supports dealing with the devil? December 30, 2008 at 1:49 am in reply to: The Spoilery Doctor Who Thread (The Next Doctor / Matt Smith casting) #87955 SomebodyParticipant The Pearly Gate(s) leap instantly to mind. December 29, 2008 at 5:19 am in reply to: The Spoilery Doctor Who Thread (The Next Doctor / Matt Smith casting) #87931 SomebodyParticipant Teh Ellard: Is that considered a good slot? I was going to say no?but in fact it?s where the Beeb have put the new Jonathan Creek. So you may well be right. Vicar of Dibley was the fifth-highest rated show of 2007 with 13.08m, having gone out on New Year’s Day (Eastenders, the Rugby World Cup, Coronation St and Doctor Who were the only shows above it. It also beat the Xmas Day episode of the same show a week earlier, which got 12.39m) December 29, 2008 at 1:10 am in reply to: Craig Charles discusses new Dwarf #87926 SomebodyParticipant There’s four, remember – two actual eps, the clip show, and the Other One (which they’re refusing to put a label on). December 18, 2008 at 12:06 pm in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #87689 SomebodyParticipant Hey, I warned y’all to stick to the sidebar :p December 18, 2008 at 9:14 am in reply to: Marleen’s NO SPOILERS Doctor Who Thread – Part III #87675 SomebodyParticipant Considering most of the stuff which came up in the latter part of Part II… read the sidebar (don’t bother with the main blog unless you REALLY want to) here: http://beasthouse-lm2.blogspot.com/ November 6, 2008 at 3:15 am in reply to: US Presidential Election 2008 – McCain v Obama #86607 SomebodyParticipant > You know who I feel sorry for? Tina Fey. :-) Didn’t she say she was never going to do Palin again after the election, regardless of result, to avoid being typecast as “that Palin clone” for all eternity? September 18, 2008 at 2:02 am in reply to: I am a complete and utter fucking twat #84510 SomebodyParticipant It?s good that book on self-enlightenment, isn?t it? September 16, 2008 at 12:15 am in reply to: The Prisoner remake #84225 SomebodyParticipant > Much as I like Ian McKellan, I?m hoping that he?s not the sole occupier of the Number 2 position. Apparently, he’s meant to be the permanent No. 2. August 26, 2008 at 9:10 pm in reply to: Holoship – It Just Bugs Me #83357 SomebodyParticipant There’s also the thought that, even if it’s 90% efficient at optimal range: 1) Humans won’t use it at optimal range, but wherever they can get just enough of a signal to run the device – which won’t be anything like optimal, and… 2) How much would using these as standard, without increase in used power, add to the electricity consumption of the planet, and thus to the burning of fossil fuels, building of huge dams, and all those negative things… August 25, 2008 at 11:19 am in reply to: New Red Dwarf Episode Announced August 24th 2008 #83252 SomebodyParticipant BBC Worldwide? They make shows by themselves? July 29, 2008 at 2:15 am in reply to: I bought bodysnatcher #82859 SomebodyParticipant I prefer stacking to the things that rattle around inside, myself. *Got it for ?18.50 off a “PlayTrader” at Play.com a few weeks back, and watched the extras, including commentaries – but not the text track beyond The End, nor the remaining episodes (incidentally, what pea-brained goit decided that making it impossible to have the text-tracks on WITH the commentaries was a good idea?!). Feels he paid too much having seen it.* July 26, 2008 at 1:08 am in reply to: NOISE TO SIGNAL #82705 SomebodyParticipant Uh…do we have to register again? Can’t it be arranged to have NtS & GnT share a user database? July 21, 2008 at 1:40 pm in reply to: “I wish to do more violence” – the Angel thread #82537 SomebodyParticipant > I rather liked the Doyle character in series 1, and I wasn?t happy when they killed him off so soon. Apparently, they were having problems with the actor BTS – I believe he had a drinking problem. Certainly, he died for real some time during the filming of S4 or S5. July 7, 2008 at 11:01 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #82160 SomebodyParticipant 2. I don?t think she can remember most of the stuff that she did when she absorbed the heart of the tardis. I.e. she might not remember having sent the BAD WOlFs to that time period. Rose: If you… escaped the Time War, don?t you want to know what happened? What happened to the Emperor? Dalek Sec: The Emperor survived!?! Rose: ‘Til he met me. ‘Cause if these are going to be my last words, then you?re gonna listen. I met the Emperor. And I took the Time Vortex, and poured it into his head, and turned him into dust. D?you get that? The God of all Daleks. And I destroyed him. (laughs) July 7, 2008 at 7:52 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #82135 SomebodyParticipant I think part of the problem is that it’s not shown (especially since Doctor-blue is apparently fine) why the Doctor needed to do such a catastrophic search-and-destroy on Donna’s memory. He needed to remove the imprint of himself, fine. Perhaps the events of TL, TSE & JE as well since they all tie into that. But why EVERYTHING since TRB? If anything, by blocking stuff he doesn’t need to, he heightens the risk of it all bursting out one day surely. July 5, 2008 at 7:57 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #82075 SomebodyParticipant That’s from 2005-6 – like all the official sites, it’s been in stasis since then (unit.org.uk hasn’t been updated for this series at all, even to say “Unified Intelligence Taskforce”) July 5, 2008 at 3:12 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #82066 SomebodyParticipant So, what is it? July 4, 2008 at 4:13 pm in reply to: Metropolis Found! #82048 SomebodyParticipant But I don’t want to spend a lot of money. [/Professor Farnsworth] July 4, 2008 at 2:30 pm in reply to: Metropolis Found! #82045 SomebodyParticipant Looking at that YouTube clip… I suppose beggars can’t be choosers, but it looks to be in a pretty bad state. July 1, 2008 at 2:17 am in reply to: Is this still a going concern? #81894 SomebodyParticipant Am I the only one who thought the title of the thread referred to THIS SITE? :) July 1, 2008 at 2:15 am in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81893 SomebodyParticipant > I went looking for anagrams that could be made out of ?Mr Copper Foundation?, ??? June 29, 2008 at 4:58 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81853 SomebodyParticipant Trailer here (UK only): http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/s4/episodes/?episode=S4_12&action=videostream&playlist=/doctorwho/playlists/s4_12/video/s4_12_trl_05.xml June 29, 2008 at 2:17 am in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81849 SomebodyParticipant I think it’s locked relative to the Earth’s gravity well – it moves around the centre of the earth in geosynchronous orbit – rather than being stretched and squeezed as the Earth moves around the sun, and the whole solar system moves around the centre of the galaxy, and the galaxy moves around… And on a completely different note… http://www.ganymede.tv/forum/2008/05/the-doctor-who-spoilers-thread-part-ii#comment-129165 Oh-so-nearly got it right. I got the right names in the right order, just put the “with” in the wrong place (it was Lis, not Freema who got the “with” credit – I thought they’d use it to split the recurring characters from the two regulars). June 29, 2008 at 1:39 am in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81847 SomebodyParticipant Well, the rift kinda has to move with the planet. Otherwise, it would only be in Cardiff for a few minutes out of every year. June 28, 2008 at 11:17 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81844 SomebodyParticipant Chris M: > I can?t help wondering why the tardis didn?t go with the earth when it was transported, but I imagine that?s something to do with it existing partly in another dimension. (I have an idea I?ve seen the tardis teleported before but I can?t quite place it? so I could be wrong.) Earlier this series, for one example. The Sontarans teleported it – with Donna inside – to their ship. I agree that that bit was VERY ropey. June 22, 2008 at 8:15 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81614 SomebodyParticipant Not so much “a line” as “[poor] running gag” (scuba-diving in Spain during Army of Ghosts/Doomsday, for instance) You will note, however, that she was prompted to notice practically everything here (it was only Wilf’s intervention that made her realise what the labour camps were, for instance). About the only exception was the equivalent of the TRB events themselves. June 22, 2008 at 6:52 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part III #81612 SomebodyParticipant Meh – 324 posts? Amateurs :p Andrew: I think you?re wrong. The reason some people are focussing on the arc is because of how little the stand alone aspects of the ep succeed. For a story that was supposed to show Donna?s Great Importance, what it actually showed was how dead we?d be without the Doctor. She saved his life once – so have loads of companions (and guest characters), so much as his life CAN be saved – and that?s really not enough to grant her this mythic status. Well, quite. Moreover, there’s no indication that the Doctor came so close to (effectively) suicide between TRB and S&J, or between VotD and PiC, when he was travelling without a companion- Doomsday/TRB was just his One Bad Day. And, for a basically Rational (as opposed to magic-dominated) universe like DW, putting “fate” and “prophecy” into things… doesn’t really work. Although, of course, episodes like the terminally horrid Shakespeare Code chip away at that foundation. June 22, 2008 at 3:39 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part II #81604 SomebodyParticipant Four and a half, surely? Turn Left was more Fear Her – a mostly unrelated episode with heavy hints at Something Bad in the last thirty seconds – than Utopia. June 22, 2008 at 2:10 am in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part II #81597 SomebodyParticipant > (joking aside, I genuinely think the opening titles will feature those names, in that order, up to and including Barrowman. Because all those people have had their names in it before, and that seems to be the ?rule?. Sladen hasn?t, so she won?t this time.) I’m expecting Sladen to be in it – she headlines a spin-off, like Barrowman, so she’ll be in the titles. I doubt the other Torchwood lot will though, nor Jackie or Mickey. My prediction for the opening credits/order is: DAVID TENNANT CATHERINE TATE with FREEMA AGYEMAN JOHN BARROWMAN ELISABETH SLADEN and BILLIE PIPER > Which would be fine but this show has a get out clause for death. Oh, but I?m forgetting, the Doctor didn?t regenerate because it was sudPLOT CONTRIVANCE. Since the whole show had to rest on this creaky premise, it was never going to work. 1) How do we know he didn’t regenerate? We never saw his face – and if he regenerates UNDERWATER, he’s going to burn through regenerations at a rate unseen since The Curse of Fatal Death. Was the guy who claimed “too fast to regenerate” familiar with him? 2) Either way, the point was that he was both homicidal *and* suicidal in that scene from TRB. Again, who’s to say he wouldn’t have let it go (I think whoever claimed you *have* to trigger a regen has it backwards though – they can HOLD BACK regens until it’s too late, but that doesn’t mean it can’t happen automagically – otherwise, how did the unconscious 3 regenerate into 4, 6 regenerate into 7, or (the kicker) 7 into 8)? 3) All the Time Lords (Except the Doctor himself) who got shot on the old show stayed down… June 18, 2008 at 10:24 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part II #81530 SomebodyParticipant Andrew: …you COULD have put episodes between Utopia and the finale, more or less? Uh-huh? Tardisless episodes, of course… June 18, 2008 at 6:51 pm in reply to: The Doctor Who Spoilers Thread – Part II #81517 SomebodyParticipant > I wondered how many people would think that, if they didn?t know that it was only at the last minute that he?d written it? Wait… didn’t he say he keeps “three or four” scripts in a drawer for just such an eventuality? Notice how the companion is sidelined, and forget about Turn Left for a moment. It wouldn’t take much to rewrite Donna’s brief scenes for Rose, or Martha… June 6, 2008 at 10:37 pm in reply to: Rob Llewellyn on Ready Steady Cook… #81056 SomebodyParticipant Well, the choice of replacement isn’t; but yeah, he posted that he wasn’t going to do any S11 back in FEBRUARY. June 3, 2008 at 12:05 am in reply to: Tales Of the Riverbank: The Next Generation #80987 SomebodyParticipant > Please please don?t let it be CGI, it?ll spoil the whole thing Well, no real animal could replace the original Hammy Hamster, ja? :) May 28, 2008 at 8:45 pm in reply to: Red Dwarf Radio Show on iTunes. Meh. #80806 SomebodyParticipant Don’t Apple legally have to sell the iPhone without a contract in France or somesuch? May 22, 2008 at 12:56 pm in reply to: “Examinees are reminded that learning drugs are forbidden, and urine testing could take place.” #80604 SomebodyParticipant > That reporter has the most generic name ever. No, that would be Andrew Norman Other May 22, 2008 at 1:29 am in reply to: Just saw Batman Begins… #80589 SomebodyParticipant Andrew: I don?t find the conclusion silly, it?s just a little perfunctory – the kind of climax everybody does. Which is only a shame because for 90 minutes the film had been rich, intelligent, smartly performed and cleverly structured. The finale was just ?fine??hurt slightly because Nolan is still figuring out how to shoot and cut action. What really hurts the Bat-Begins finale for me isn’t so much that – it’s the fact that Batman effectively LOSES (all he does is reduce the scale of the disaster, not avert it), but from then on it’s treated as a victory [bar a swift line or two in the very last scene]. Didn’t Gordon get a lungful of the fear-gas steam? Didn’t about a quarter of Gotham (not just the Narrows)? It’s dealt with as if everything after the house fire was pretty much wrapped up cleanly. May 12, 2008 at 7:58 pm in reply to: So…Gladiators is back… #80229 SomebodyParticipant http://forum.gladiatorszone.com/YaBB.pl?num=1209883889/15 So I can confirm that Hunter, Saracen, Lightning and Scorpio have all left the show. Scorpio felt that they had left on good terms and actually wished the production team every success with the new show… […] In essence, the legends left the production for the following reasons: – 1) The legends were anticipating the new show to be “bigger and better”, but they did not feel that it was either and that it did not do justice to the great show that they were a part of. 2) Concerns over safety – the legends had some concerns over the safety of some of the equipment, in relation to their own personal safety. 3) Insurance – the legends were not happy with the arrangements in place regarding insurance, in particular that previous injuries would not be covered by the insurance. The legends could not afford to put their personal incomes at risk for the show. 4) Personas – the legends were told that they could not use their Gladiator names and would be contenders, wearing contender style costumes. The legends did not want their final appearances on Gladiators to be as contenders. It was never about being a contender for Scorpio – she was an original Gladiator ! So there were a variety of reasons for them pulling out, all of which are understandable. May 8, 2008 at 10:15 pm in reply to: New Batman Posters – thread is potentially spoilery! #80125 SomebodyParticipant They couldn’t execute that concept with latex – certainly, not so it would look right in anything except a straight profile shot. The concept involves stripping away skin & flesh, to the point of seeing the teeth through a big hole in the cheek. You can only build up with latex, not strip away. May 6, 2008 at 11:32 pm in reply to: New Batman Posters – thread is potentially spoilery! #80098 SomebodyParticipant Still up here: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/articles/4489.asp And for when that goes: http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/571/toohottofacelmw6.jpg May 6, 2008 at 1:37 am in reply to: New Batman Posters – thread is potentially spoilery! #80080 SomebodyParticipant DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK. Seriously, don’t. It’s the small image that was in LitG before it got pulled down, and you probably don’t want to see it. So DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK. :? April 29, 2008 at 2:08 am in reply to: New Batman Posters – thread is potentially spoilery! #122980 SomebodyParticipant I’m sure I read that the plan was for Joker to get captured in movie 2, then have a relatively small role in movie 3 with Batman checking in to try and get info on Two-Face (who would be the main villain in movie 3), and possibly something bigger in movie 4 if they got that far. With that all out of the window, who knows what they’ll do – I wouldn’t bet on them having the footage to do a Joker death scene, but I suppose it’s not impossible. April 8, 2008 at 6:20 pm in reply to: Did you see Doctor Who? – Spoilers! #122277 SomebodyParticipant Ben Paddon / Sun, 2008-04-06 16:59: Each time it does, it grows on me a little. I still prefer the Series 1-3 theme, though. Overall it?s my favourite Who theme EVAR, very closely followed by Peter Davison?s theme. Umm… Series 1 theme != Series 2-3 theme (and there might have been some more subtle tweaks between 2 & 3). The S1 theme was built from samples, and had no middle eight. The S2-3 theme(s) was (were) performed by the National Orchestra of Wales. And had the middle eight. The difference isn’t so drastic as the S4 theme, but the original Delia Derbyshire theme elements were far stronger in the S1 theme. They kind of got buried in the live-orchestra theme. April 3, 2008 at 10:44 pm in reply to: Odd things in the TV series which are explained by the books #122132 SomebodyParticipant Future Echoes, dear boy. I?ve had to change that, as it?s just TOO EMBARASSING. And yet it still reads… Was this censorship – self or otherwise – as the line is written in The End? :) March 21, 2008 at 4:21 am in reply to: Man flu makes you realise … ! #121843 SomebodyParticipant Yes, but RTD thinks Catherine Tate is a good idea… March 18, 2008 at 1:15 am in reply to: “The [official website]’s kerploding!” #121747 SomebodyParticipant Dunno about that, but I’ve been looking at the website there… pretty much for the first time since Relaunch Day, and a couple of things: 1) The “features” navigation feels wrong – there’s no first/last page link (given that there’s only ten a page, and how many pages that translates to, getting to older articles is a real chore), and (even if chronologically it’s accurate) clicking the “back” link to go to “older articles” feels counter-intuitive since they’re numbered in reverse (“(Showing 1 to 10 of 137)” being the most recent page) 2) The “random” page header is cute, but that it’s sticky feels like it defeats the purpose. March 8, 2008 at 3:11 pm in reply to: Zavvi #121444 SomebodyParticipant Play has the eight individual series for ?6.99 (which means that it’s cheaper to buy V-VIII from them individually than it is to buy Just the Shows v2…): http://tinyurl.com/32gotd Author Replies Viewing 50 replies - 151 through 200 (of 227 total) 1 2 3 4 5