Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 3,351 through 3,400 (of 3,509 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Stock Laughter in Series 8? #219222
    Moonlight
    Participant

    That sound affects me just the way the 9th Symphony does Alex in the second half of A Clockwork Orange.

    in reply to: Stock Laughter in Series 8? #219219
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Yeah, that’s my video. I posted a thread about it here a while ago. That same laugh also shows up in VII and Remastered as well, albeit to a far lesser degree than in VIII. Somebody else posted an instance of it from a different show entirely, which proved beyond a doubt it was stock laughter.

    It’s a fucking annoying laugh and literally the thing I most dislike about Series VIII. It’s EVERYWHERE, and once you notice it you’ll hear it all over the place. Even worse, it’s almost always pasted after something that wasn’t even a joke. Besides the Rimmer line I included in the video, the second laugh in all of Tikka to Ride is that stock laugh inexplicably playing as Lister picks up the camera, something that’s clearly not supposed to be humorous.

    Sweetening your audience reaction is one thing, a lot of shows do it to varying degrees, but copy-pasting the same distinctive, irritating laugh all over the place? I noticed this thing when I was a kid it’s so obvious. As an aspiring video editor rather proud of her own sound mixing ability I’m especially frustrated to see such unprofessional work in my all-time second favorite show.

    I started a Tikka fanedit a while back that I never finished in which I made it a point to utilize the audio track of the extended episode to mute that laugh the couple of times it appeared.

    in reply to: The Junior Wikipedia of Space #219183
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I made that Wikipedia page, thank you. I was hoping others would step up to contribute further but that never happened.

    in reply to: Strong: Sl*g B*st*rd tw*ts @ *fc*m #219119
    Moonlight
    Participant

    “Crap” is not even harsh enough to be considered a swear word where I live and this list ranks it equal to “goddamn”, which if you said it on an American television show would get you a TV-MA rating (equivalent to the high end of a UK 15, I believe). “Pissed off” is pretty socially acceptable, though not child-friendly, and here it’s listed in the Medium section on par with all sorts of swear words including “shit”, which is another word that’ll get you rated TV-MA.

    I feel like my normal everyday speech would get be jailed for public indecency if I traveled to the UK.

    in reply to: Strong: Sl*g B*st*rd tw*ts @ *fc*m #219113
    Moonlight
    Participant

    As an American, I completely forget bollocks is even a swear word at all.

    I certainly never imagined it was considered bad enough to bleep on TV.

    in reply to: Spoilery Thread Deleted #219047
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I think it’s a mistake to have the crew meet Mohammed in episode 3.

    in reply to: Amazon US is Terrible at Red Dwarf ]]> #219046
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Actually it now occurs to me that just adding the 2007 release date in parentheses to the listing title would convey that fine without renaming anything.

    Or maybe just let anybody who buys it expecting every new episode learn their lesson to actually read the product description next time. Yeah, that sounds better. They should’ve been grabbing the Blu-Rays of BtE and onward anyway.

    in reply to: Amazon US is Terrible at Red Dwarf ]]> #219043
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I recommended they rename the listing for “The Complete Collection” to “The Complete Series I-VIII” considering that by next year it will be 21 episodes short.

    in reply to: Amazon US is Terrible at Red Dwarf ]]> #219042
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I have thus far successfully managed to get Amazon to correctly list X’s as DVD as “Red Dwarf: Series X” and XI’s DVD and Blu-Ray as “Red Dwarf: Series XI”. Now every DVD and Blu-ray is listed consistently as “Red Dwarf: Series [Roman Numeral]” except for the VIII DVD and the Blu-Ray of X, which are just missing the “Series” part.

    But at least nothing is called Red Dwarf: “X” anymore, which is somehow the wrongest possible way you could ever write even though it included all the right words in the correct order.

    Moonlight
    Participant

    Might as well add ‘why is Lister sitting down when there’s no gravity in space?’ to the opening credits

    And the hologrammatic pile of random crap Rimmer crashes into in The End: Remastered.

    If we’re going to include Remastered we’ll be here until we die of old age. We could reasonably assume the spacesuit boots are magnetic in the original, like how they walked in the Discovery podbay in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218873
    Moonlight
    Participant

    “Cat finds a lady cat. Whatever you’re thinking, it’s not even close.”

    in reply to: New Things You've Spotted In Red Dwarf #3671 #218872
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I’m surprised that’s a real book, but I wouldn’t be if it were published in the past decade.

    in reply to: GlenTokyo's Alternative Cover Dump #218871
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Is this the one whose name implies that the Official Fan Club is not actually a real fan club?

    No, but for some reason the name ends in an ellipsis followed by three exclamation points. Wouldn’t that cancel out to nothing?

    in reply to: GlenTokyo's Alternative Cover Dump #218861
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I wish there was a social media group that wasn’t 10,000 strong and filled with people who are convinced that Red Dwarf is a parody of sci-fi or that it’s “never taken itself seriously” or are legitimately confused by the idea that anyone could think Series VIII is any less good or even a different style and tone from any other series.

    And yes, every few days somebody discovers the smeg fridge.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218837
    Moonlight
    Participant

    The good news is that Red Dwarf is surprisingly affordable on DVD in the US

    I’m missing the episodes for I and V.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218830
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Meanwhile in 2016, Red Dwarf is not available for streaming in the US period.

    And some of my discs are lost.

    in reply to: Something I've noticed about Balance of Power Remastered #218829
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Those added starfields never did anything but distract me anyway, especially when they’d disappear every time the camera was about to move. It especially didn’t help that EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ONE HAD A BRIGHT NEBULA OR SHINY SPARKLY FLOATING THINGS SHOOT BY (as seen in that screencap above).

    I don’t understand why people are so allergic to just showing empty space nowadays. There’s always a planet or something in every single shot.

    in reply to: Something I've noticed about Balance of Power Remastered #218826
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I noticed this many years ago from watching Re-Dwarf too many times. It doesn’t really make sense.

    Moonlight
    Participant

    He crashed into a pile of hologram crap.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218798
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I’d love to see an entirely new costume this time. If it still goes with solid colors, III/IV green or V/VI red would suit it fine. Hell, the alternate blue Red Dwarf uniform from Ouroborus would be pretty awesome but I know that’d never happen. Again, return of the quilted jacket but in dark green would be cool, but they established in preproduction of BtE it made him look too “big” now.

    Red Dwarf visually changes so much it just feels wrong to me for Rimmer’s costume to stay the same for 18 episodes straight.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218793
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Or we could have purple like when he went softlight in Entangled.

    Don’t make me crack out the screencaps and the eyedropper to show you; it’s purple and nowhere close to the normal red some clearly colorblind people have insisted to me that it is.

    in reply to: GlenTokyo's Alternative Cover Dump #218779
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Region 1 Bodysnatcher with a skutter obscuring the logo.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218778
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Three series of the dark blue tunic is more than enough. I say they play color/costume combo again and give Rimmer a dark green quilted jacket for Series XIII.

    Come on, we all know that’s a more interesting subject matter than the well-trodden Rob/Doug split.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218775
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Rob probably wasn’t bored of red dwarf since he did write backwards soon after and that was a pretty long novel

    Yeah, but solo-writing a novel at your own leisure is not at all the same experience as co-producing a TV series under massive budgetary and time restrictions. It’s like cooking yourself dinner as opposed to operating a busy restaurant.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218770
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Yeah, but do you have SCREENCAPS AND SQUARES to back it up?

    in reply to: GlenTokyo's Alternative Cover Dump #218754
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I’m embarrassed to say that if you Google “Red Dwarf X DVD” you’ll pretty much immediately find a shitty Photoshop I did in 2009 shortly after BtE aired. I’m not linking it, but it’s the one in the second row where Rimmer has a yellow uniform and horrible smeary clonebrush hair.

    These on the other hand are top-quality products. Nice job.

    in reply to: The real reasons behind Rob and Doug's breakup #218743
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Is Rob Grant the vampire?

    in reply to: XI review scores #218681
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Looks like most people agree with me on Can of Worms than you lot.

    Moonlight
    Participant

    That opening synth sounds fucking terrible, especially since I’ve just heard the wonderful high-quality version of the real thing on the OST.

    in reply to: GOG.com is selling Simon the Sorcerer on the cheap #218579
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I really enjoyed it. It just took forfucking ever to figure out to use the pig on the door.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf is Back on Netflix Streaming, but… #218334
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Hooray, I indirectly contributed to G&T.

    in reply to: What will be 'XII's color'? #218096
    Moonlight
    Participant

    If you violently splatter blue and orange paint across a canvas there’s a 55% chance you’ll accurately recreate a screencap from Star Trek Into Darkness.

    in reply to: What if Red Dwarf Series 10 and 11 were remastered? #218039
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Throughout Officer Rimmer, Rimmer is given distracting white flashes and glitchy sound effects that drown out his dialogue to indicate his growing ego.

    in reply to: What if Red Dwarf Series 10 and 11 were remastered? #218012
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Lens flares over the skutter’s turn signal.

    in reply to: What if Red Dwarf Series 4 and 5 were remastered? #218007
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Imagine how terrible the underwater stuff in Back to Reality would look, especially with an all-new CGI Despair Squid.

    I can’t even make a joke, it’s too depressing for words.

    in reply to: What if Red Dwarf Series 4 and 5 were remastered? #217967
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Poorly paste a shitton of CGI maggots over the low strawberry.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #217771
    Moonlight
    Participant

    >I just don’t watch it.

    I’ll have way more fun chopping bits out than I ever will watching what I leave in.

    in reply to: Not Another Back in the Red Fanedit #217761
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Just for the record, here’s the complete changelog of the entire project so far:

    Cut – Entire opening prison scene. 5 minutes approx right off the bat. There’s really no reason for this to be here except to show off to that they’re doing Rimmer/Lister bunkroom scenes again. It’s not any good and it gets in the way.

    Cut – Compressed the opening shots of Starbug approaching Red Dwarf.

    Cut – Unnecessary Holly fluff. Contributes nothing and isn’t funny enough to justify interrupting what is supposed to be a fast, exciting scene.

    Cut – “Brown Alert”. We’ve seen similar, better jokes in the past.

    Cut – Cat saying he doesn’t always get through stop signs in one sitting. Hahahahahah. Get it? Because he’s literally retarded now.

    Cut – Unnecessary extra joke simile from Kryten about how long they’ve got left because they literally just had one in the previous line, and it was a lot better.

    Cut – Kryten line about Kochanski having a teddy bear and “hurdling towards 30”. As if we could believe any of these people are under 30.

    Change – Matched Holly’s motion to the shaking of the monitor on his one funny line so they’re not constantly moving in different different directions.

    Cut – The following 30 seconds of scene-slowing unnecessary Holly lines.

    Cut – The entire rat segment. Red Dwarf isn’t a cartoon, let’s not.

    Comment – “Red Dwarf isn’t a cartoon, let’s not” is probably going to show up a lot in this changelog.

    Cut – Cat doesn’t know you need engines to fly. One could argue this isn’t really unreasonable for him, but it that still wouldn’t make it funny.

    Cut – The shot of Starbug’s front segment grinding across the hangar bay in a completely stationary position without tumbling. That always bothered me.

    Comment – Man, that whole sequence feels really nice and tight now. I can actually buy the sense of urgency it’s supposed to have. I like it.

    Cut – Removed short segment added in the Extended where Lister is annoyed that he can’t snog an unconscious woman without her consent. They immediately bail Starbug now like in the broadcast version.

    Comment – We’re pretty much exactly 3 minutes in as they first meet the crew, opening montage included. That’s 11 and a half minutes into the extended version. Even though most of it is the prison scene, we’ve cut almost 3/4ths of the opening third of the episode and you’d never miss it. Expect the major cuts to slow for a while and then get common again when we hit the material from BtR Part 3.

    Cut – Both pointless additions to the missing persons board joke. It was funny, don’t oversell it.

    Change – The extremely pantomime megasalute is gone, as I have replaced the entire captain’s office scene with the first version shot. It feels so much more like Red Dwarf.

    Change – Swapped in the deleted version of Rimmer and Lister’s scene with the positive viruses leading to Lister’s escape shot in the Series I bunkroom. Graded shot-by-shot, because if Series I was shot in black and white this scene was shot in sepia. Stars greenscreened in. Green reflection on door removed.

    Cut – The second prison sequence. It does nothing but get in the way of the story.

    Cut – Edited Lister’s line to end after “It is morally inexcusable to use a sexual magnetism virus” instead going on to say he was planning to use it on Kochanski next time she got drunk. I’d like the minimize the unfortunate implications of characters using a virus that forces people to uncontrollably want to have sex with you.

    Cut – Lister and Kochanski in the elevator. See previous entry.

    Cut – Data Doctor.

    Cut – “The Dibbley family!” Please don’t.

    Change – Fixed the greenscreened stars behind Hollister to actually track with the small camera movement.

    Cut – “Computer programmers!”

    Cut – Rimmer smashing his testicals with a hammer. Red Dwarf isn’t a cartoon, so let’s not.

    Cut – The Resovoir Dogs parody, which includes the deeply painful moment where two skutters dress as Dwayne Dibbely.

    Cut – The Blue Midget dance. Red Dwarf isn’t a cartoon, so let’s not. It is an awkward cut, but it’s far less awkward than Cat leading spaceships in a dance routine.

    Cut – The claymation sequence. Red Dwarf actually is a cartoon here.

    Cut – Most of the deeply tedious Theory of Relativity routine. I would have cut all of it, but it segways into an important bit.

    Change – Undid that stupid stretched head on non-senile Holly.

    in reply to: What if Red Dwarf had started in 2006 and not 1987? #217745
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I agree with Debris.

    Bollocking damn and jumbo LimeWire.

    in reply to: Series XI's model shots #217744
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Very weird seeing the VFX alternate between ropey and fucking fantastic. Overall I think they average out to quite good even if some shots are pretty iffy like the underwater stuff in Samsara which looks so much like a little tiny model.

    in reply to: A thought regarding Pot Noodles #217175
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I love Ramen if I haven’t had it in weeks, but I hate it the second time in a row.

    in reply to: What effect did 9/11 have on Red Dwarf? #217017
    Moonlight
    Participant

    If you freezeframe on Kryten’s eyes at various points in Series IX (especially during the Duane Dibbley sing-along in Lister First Bath – Polymorph III), you can see reptile-like slits. I can’t decide if the two vertical lines were a warning the towers were going to fall or if he’s actually the lizard who ordered the attack, but it’s definitely one of those two.

    in reply to: Red Dwarf: The Movie #217004
    Moonlight
    Participant

    >Ah, but is she really the pilot of Unit 2?

    I rejected when I noticed the term “mind rape” was in the contract twice.

    in reply to: The two abandoned X episodes #216993
    Moonlight
    Participant

    I could see that being the case, but it seems like a really bizarre thing to use as an example.

    in reply to: Should any comedy ever be commissioned ever? #216964
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Are you fucking kidding me, forum?

    It was MST3K silhouettes.

    in reply to: Should any comedy ever be commissioned ever? #216963
    Moonlight
    Participant

    >Oh that’s why there are TV shows that are people watching other TV shows

    <img src=”https://claragiuliani.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/sil_340x270-597674861_fqyl.jpg
    ” border=”” alt=”” height=”” width=””>

    in reply to: The two abandoned X episodes #216962
    Moonlight
    Participant

    One of them apparently had “a circus” as a location according to We’re Smegged.

    in reply to: Should 1919 have happened? #216961
    Moonlight
    Participant

    1914-1918 were the height of the show’s myth arc, and the last few episodes of 1918 wrapped up the story nicer than you could’ve possibly hoped for. It really shows that the writers didn’t want or have any intention to continue with 1919 until they were forced to. I mean look at it, tired old thing about war-devastated Germany that doesn’t have any gunfights or chlorine, what a total snoozefest. However I’m really glad it existed, because things really picked up again in 1920 with the prohibition arc the show had been teasing in earlier seasons but kinda forgot about when the nationalism stuff kicked off. 1922-1927 truly were new classics.

    Should they have just skipped over it and picked up again from 1920?

    Fucking duh.

    in reply to: Amazon US is Terrible at Red Dwarf ]]> #216820
    Moonlight
    Participant

    You know, they should go back and do some sort of new master that adds the numbering to every series. And annoying, distracting sound effects over Rimmer’s big scene impersonating the whole crew in Queeg.

    Also I will say I wouldn’t mind nearly as much if people did the same “mistake the Roman numeral for a title” thing with any other series, it’s just that Red Dwarf X as in X the letter and not X the Roman numeral for 10 is an awful title, and I hate that some people think the show is supposed to be called that. It reminds me of watching and really liking Sonic X as a kid but being embarrassed to ever bring it up because the title was so lame.

    The X-Files is a rare good use of the letter X in a title.

    in reply to: Amazon US is Terrible at Red Dwarf ]]> #216766
    Moonlight
    Participant

    Well yes, but generally the English-speaking fans will only see it labeled “Back to Earth”, and those are the people who are treating the X as a letter. I think they definitely would have labeled it Series IX from the beginning if they’d known for sure there would be more to follow. Back to Earth is definitely not a series because it’s a three-part special, but from a practical standpoint it has to be considered Series IX now (which streaming services do, but Red Dwarf is no longer on Netflix or Hulu in America) because it takes place chronologically between VIII and X. Not doing so would be absurdly confusing for first-time viewers.

    But not as absurdly confusing as trying to figure out how the fuck this Red Dwarf: “X” fits into the whole mess.

Viewing 50 replies - 3,351 through 3,400 (of 3,509 total)