Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 replies - 3,801 through 3,850 (of 3,882 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228840
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I read a fan fic once where Rimmer was over two Listers

    The ‘H’ Stands For ‘Horny’: A Red Dwarf Fan Fiction.

    “So good it converted me from softlight to hardlight.” – The Guardian

    in reply to: When did you first read the novels? #228838
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Well… at least it’s something. One for the money-rich/time-poor among us, I suppose.

    in reply to: When did you first read the novels? #228831
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Okay so I’ve never read the books as I presumed they were essentially novelizations of the shows.

    But skimming this thread has me horrified enough to pique my interest.

    Oh, now I feel bad for this thread containing so many plot details.

    Despite my complaints, I do definitely recommend the first 2 novels, because no matter how good or bad things are in the moment, the divergences from the TV series are always interesting.

    FWIW, it’s not too much of a financial risk to try them out. The books are all super cheap used, and the unabridged Chris Barrie audiobooks are pretty reasonably priced on both iTunes and Audible.

    By the way, does anyone know what the difference is between the unabridged audiobook versions of IWCD/BTL and the “Radio Show” versions? They seem to be a lot shorter, but cost 2-3 times as much. If they’re just abridged versions, then that’s seriously terrible value for money.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228827
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    i think the point of the scene is he’s putting himself under the pool table so that he can become the last human being alive in the future- he’s basically made it his own “destiny” to wind up 3 million years in the future on a shit spaceship, because otherwise the human race would be wholly extinct.

    No, because the quote is “With us going round and round in time, the human race can never become extinct.”

    That’s never become extinct, not “the human race can only become extinct thousands/millions of years after it would do otherwise” – and “round and round in time” part refers to the human race “continuing” through Lister in the past, because if it’s just about Lister surviving an extra 3 million years, then the fact that it’s a time loop wouldn’t make a difference.

    in reply to: When did you first read the novels? #228814
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Well, it’s not really. In Infinity, the explanation is that there is a real town by this name (believable) where fans of the film live and honour the fiilm It’s basically a Capra-convention. Lister goes by the pseudonym “George Bailey” (although this seems to be abandoned in the second novel) and the other residents treat it as an in-joke.

    OK, I guess my attempts to look for wholly rational reasons not to like the Bedford Falls fantasy didn’t go to plan. My only remaining rationale is that Bedford Falls requires an extra level of fakery. Better Than Life has constructed the fantasy, but Lister has constructed a fantasy within the fantasy.

    in reply to: Misheard lines #228813
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Exactly.

    Lister’s life may not have one point of origin, but it definitely will have one point of conclusion.

    (Ouroboros is kind of bad, folks. I don’t know if you’d heard.)

    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Clearly Holly was struggling to maintain 2 Rimmer holograms at once. :D

    Really good spot. I never would have caught that.

    in reply to: When did you first read the novels? #228803
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    IAWL is seeded early in the novel as being the favourite film of both him and Kochanksi. (Were you listening to the abridged versions?, as maybe it’s not in that). Lister’s annoyance when he discovers that they are in BTL and he could have dreamt a little bigger comes up, but it’s indicated that the game is trying to conceal itself by going relatively subtle (being a far more devious type of game than the TV episode’s version of a genie lamp. Plus, Lister craves a simple life (in contrast to Rimmer and The Cat).

    Ah, I wasn’t listening to the abridged versions, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t just forget that detail. Fair enough!

    I can’t exactly pinpoint why Lister’s fantasy feels off to me, because it does make sense for Lister to want a simple, calm life like that.

    Maybe it’s that everyone else’s fantasies are original settings, while Lister’s is literally just It’s A Wonderful Life. With the other fantasies, you can kind of buy that Earth might just be like that in the distant future, but Lister’s fantasy makes the artifice immediately obvious.

    Surely if the game was trying to stop Lister realising it wasn’t real, it would put him in a scenario that was like Bedford Falls, but not literally Bedford Falls. If it’s his favourite ever movie, then Lister of all people should have recognised it as a fiction straight away.

    in reply to: When did you first read the novels? #228794
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I’ve only listened to the audiobook versions of the first 2 novels, but nonetheless.

    1. 24.

    2. ALL OF IT – except for Series XII because that hadn’t been broadcast yet.

    3. Wow, OK, that’s a broad question. I’ll try to break my reaction to the novels into points:

    • I really liked a lot of the back-story expansion and pre-accident story stuff, especially the details about the development of the cat race, Lister’s first meeting with Rimmer and induction to Red Dwarf, Rimmer’s whole exam ordeal, and his stasis habit too.
    • However, I hated any major detail which contradicted the TV version. Lister got himself sentenced to time in stasis on purpose? Hate it. Kryten was directly responsible for getting the crew killed due to inexplicably being crap at his only job? Hate it. “Zero-Gee Football: It’s A Funny Old Game by Joe Klump”? HATE. IT. They got it backwards; Lister is meant to be kind of thick (at least in the beginning) and Kryten is supposed to be smart. Yes, yes, I know, skeletons, but the show makes it clear that’s the exception, not the rule.
    • Compared to the TV version, there was a definite shift towards drama, which made for some really good set pieces, but on the whole really wasn’t that funny to me. Classic dialogue exchanges fall a bit flat when it’s just multiple Chris Barries with no audience..
    • So… Better Than Life The Book was really one made for Talkie Toaster fans, eh?
    • There’s so much bitterness and bleakness in these books. The 2 Rimmers are both around for much longer and torture each other way more, Holly revives Talkie out of pure loneliness and they end up hating each other too, Lister and Rimmer basically just straight up loathe each other even more than on TV, everyone is almost killed by Better Than Life, Lister spends several decades just barely managing to survive all alone on Garbage World before dying of a heart attack… there’s no everyday life on Red Dwarf here to make it feel like a sitcom, just constant danger and sadness.
    • The concept of the black hole causing time to move at different speeds in different parts of the ship is brilliant, and I’m surprised the show itself didn’t copy the idea back (not that I’d replace the time trickery we did get in White Hole!). I actually finished listening to Better Than Life less than a week before the Doctor Who episode “World Enough And Time” aired, which was a fun coincidence for me.
    • Something felt… off about Lister’s fantasy being It’s A Wonderful Life. Not just the fact that we never got any indication that this was a fixation for him before this, but the fact that it’s so specific and limited. Surely a Lister fantasy would be more inventive than just “Lister, in one specific part of It’s A Wonderful Life” – and definitely involve a farm on Fiji? As with so many Marilyn Monroe mentions, it felt more like Doug and Rob were the George Bailey fanboys, not Lister.
    • The structure is still very episodic despite the format, which unfortunately prevents either book from feeling like it has a proper overarching story. Hitchhiker’s Guide has this problem too, of course, but Hitchhiker’s has a style and humour that better suits it. Also, I can confirm that ending a book on a cliffhanger is just as annoying as ending a series on one.
    • Garbage World as a concept is great. It was the one part that felt truly Adamsian in its view of the future, and could have been a genuine direction the TV show could have gone in, if they wanted to be a bit darker.
    • The Cat’s BTL fantasy was perfect; Rimmer’s was good, especially with how bizarre the Trixie stuff got, but the amount of complexity involved with his multiple marriages and such seemed a bit needless. I don’t even remember Kryten’s fantasy; something about doing a nice bit of ironing?
    • Chris Barrie’s reading is just spot on for so much of these audiobooks. I think I would have listened to the remaining 2 novels by now if he’d done those as well.

    Phew. Anyway, on the whole, I’d say that Red Dwarf (affectionately known as “Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers”) and Better Than Life are… fine. Yep.

    in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228745
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I’m happy to accept the vague notion that there are other second and third technicians on the ship, but they’re in different sub-departments to Rimmer and Lister, so it’s just that their section of the hierarchy is considered lower down than others, i.e. a third technician in another department might not have direct authority over Rimmer, but would consider themselves “more important”.

    in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228735
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    There are 2 major possibilities I can think of.

    1. All other technicians were sick/unavailable.
    2. It was a combination of Rimmer massively talking up his abilities to management in his latest attempt to climb the ladder, and management not realising how crucial the drive plate repair was, so they assigned it to Rimmer on pretty much a whim.
    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228731
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    So that’s it? What, we some kinda… red dwarf?

    in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228730
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I always thought that Todhunter was the First Technician, even though he’s clearly an Exam Invigilator / Stasis Explainer.

    Rimmer being First Technician in the novels is definitely one of those “different for the sake of different” changes to me. Rimmer managing to actually attain a high-ranking position in any department just feels… unRimmerish. Even if it is just there to demonstrate how terrible he is at leadership.

    I also assume that there are other technicians than Rimmer and Lister (maybe all the others are Firsts?), because their assessment of themselves as the lowest ranking people on the ship is based on the fact that their responsibilities (USUALLY) are just to do basic routine maintenance on food dispensing machines, which at least suggests that there are other technicians or engineers who do the more taxing, higher skilled work of making sure the ship keeps moving, the mining equipment keeps working etc.

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228622
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    What about things like draining Rimmer’s negativity in Trojan, or loading in his Charisma etc in Psirens? If you can delete negativity can you delete schizophrenia?

    Personality tuck machine in Can of Worms.

    These seem like pretty good examples of how mental illnesses could be virtually treated, but not necessarily removed outright.

    IMO, they should only be able to treat mental illnesses in holograms to the extent that they theoretically could treat them in living human beings, so mood alterations or experimental personality shifts are doable, but you can’t just move BodyDysmorphicDisorder.exe to the Recycle Bin.

    in reply to: Skipper (lost opportunity) #228617
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I think the reference is a bit too obscure to be worth it, and the oddness of it would probably be too distracting, unless it was very brief.

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228615
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    My take is that they would be able to fix a hologram’s pre-mortem physical disabilities if they desired but not their mental illnesses, what with brains being inordinately complex and holograms’ minds just being wholesale copies of them.

    I assume that holograms could be given virtual treatments, at least.

    Also, it’s pretty strange that physical disabilities haven’t been cured in the Red Dwarf universe, because apparently even cleaning robots come with nanobots which are capable not only of rebuilding missing limbs, but of invoking the power of Satan to bring people from ancient history back to life.

    in reply to: The Blu-ray Awakens #228600
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    They don’t charge you until the thing actually ships so there would be no harm in pre-ordering it, I think

    It’s not so much that I’m worried about not being able to cancel, it just feels weird to pledge to buy something we know so little about. Plus, the pre-order price is unlikely to rise, so there doesn’t seem to be much advantage to being so prepared.

    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228595
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    So, what, do you have other people round, give ’em a sherry, and invite them to watch you snuff it?

    in reply to: The Blu-ray Awakens #228548
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    so this has just popped up on amazon. blu-ray of 1-8 coming on October 1st i guess

    Yeah, that Amazon listing has been there a while. Still weird to have a release date – even if it’s just a placeholder – before the thing has even been announced. Can’t say I’m leaping to pre-order a product that might not even exist!

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228546
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Is Lister’s mind (the backup they use to restore his memories after M-Corp) stored in the same place as Officer Brown’s was? Is that on holodisk, or just on a shipwide backup?

    I’d guess so. It seems like each crew member gets their own external hard drive, and sometimes those hard drives remain constantly connected to the central computer for quick access and blending of hologrammatic assets, and sometimes Rimmer unplugs them and hides them in a cupboard to be a prick.

    It could be that the holo-data is not stored on the main computer at all and the holo-disks are the only copies, but it could also be that holo-data is stored on both the main computer and in disk-based backups, and Rimmer deleted some/all of the original hologram data in Confidence & Paranoia, because he is a prick.

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228506
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    If Holoship isn’t enough evidence that they still have the holo-disks, then there’s also Bodyswap.

    The copy of Officer Brown’s mind they put into Lister’s body is surely from the same source as the holograms, and the fact they can put Rimmer’s mind inside Lister’s body too pretty much proves it.

    Although… now a question about Bodyswap occurs to me: why do they make Lister’s mind inhabit a Rimmer hologram when they could just put him in a Lister hologram (similar to how Rimmer could become Kochanski in Balance of Power)? I think the ‘H’ and the outfit choice would be enough to tell them apart…

    OK, forgetting that point, let’s say: some of the holo-disks were destroyed after Me-2, including all of the obvious people they would choose first to resurrect but leaving enough people to interview in Holoship, then the rest of the holo-disks were accidentally destroyed later, at some point between Only The Good… and Back to Earth (Or before Psirens, assuming that everyone in Series VIII was too stupid to make new backups while the crew were alive again).

    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228472
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Do you honestly think I’d put Kochanski’s disk in Kochanski’s box where any munchkin could find it?

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228471
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    It’s probably best we don’t bring up how Rimmer can be sustained for 6 months without a recharge, because if that’s true then there’s absolutely no reason not to revive other members of the crew as holograms too.

    Seriously, I can understand them not doing that because Rimmer refuses to be switched off or because doing it would significantly impair Red Dwarf’s performance, but once it was established in Series VI that Rimmer could be maintained by Starbug alone – before he got his hardlight upgrade, even – those excuses went out the window.

    I’m so surprised that Doug/Rob never put in a throwaway line about all of the other holo-disks being destroyed, that I’m wondering if they actually did and I’m just not remembering it.

    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228412
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Well, I can’t say I’m totally shocked; you’ll bonk anything, won’t you, Lister?

    in reply to: Where's the bomb? #228283
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I mean, I said “I bet” but only like, £2.50.

    I’ll just spitball some other possible reasons to use a self-destruct, that JMC would definitely prepare for for some reason:

    1. The ship’s navigation systems have been irreparably damaged and it’s on a crash course for a major population centre, but there’s a window of opportunity to blow up the ship while it’s still in the outer atmosphere and minimise the total number of deaths.
    2. A Xenomorph is loose on the ship.
    3. In case of interstellar war breaking out, Red Dwarf could be repurposed as a warship and used in a Kamikaze attack.
    4. The thing what I said before, but as a safer implosiony type self-destruction that might be possible in the technologically advanced future.
    5. To jumpstart the second big bang. Well, that’s the final irony, isn’t it? Lister, the ultimate atheist, tur- oh, you already did this one.
    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #228259
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    You say “in I-V they’re trying to get back to Earth”, but are they? Past Series 2 I’m not sure they do any work to achieve this goal, and even in Series 1 and 2 it’s maybe only half the episodes that make any kind of focus out of it.

    In Series III-V, getting back to Earth is barely mentioned, and their goal seems to pretty much be just to carry on with their lives. In that regard, Series XI-XII is most like the best era of the show!

    Also, “gotta find Kochanski” isn’t really a major goal in Series X AFAIC. They only mention it once an episode, and they never actively look for her. Lister and Rimmer’s attempts to better themselves professionally were closer to being a series-wide goal. Even “get an automatic tea-stirrer” was a higher priority.

    in reply to: Where's the bomb? #228140
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I bet if Lister hadn’t survived the radiation leak, Holly’s protocol would have been to trigger the self-destruct, to ensure that no other people would try to approach the ship and die from exposure to the radiation.

    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228118
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    What, you mean like persuade Dustin Hoffman not to make Ishtar?

    in reply to: Did Lister ever find out what an iguana is? #228114
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    The Theory of Relativity is… what is the Theory of Relativity?

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #228046
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    And that not all series take place in the same universe as one-another.

    *spits out Leopard Lager*

    WHAT?!?!

    in reply to: Tikka To Ride Xtended #227993
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I consider Lister’s happiness with eating carb-less curry meals to be a contrived plothole deus ex machina, and so hereby disavow Red Dwarf as a naturalistic nutrition-based docu-drama.

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227992
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    The Bexley plot in Future Echoes has already been summed up in the wonderful ‘Homecoming’ fan-fic:

    Ooh, I didn’t know about this. Thanks!

    And it’s by Karnie as well. :'(

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227967
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Right, fine, lesson learned: thoroughly rewatch episodes before proposing fan theories about them. (The 15 years thing doesn’t directly contradict my second hastily thought up explanation, though!)

    However, I think you may just be jumping to conclusions regarding the whole “Lister becomes a brain in a jar tomorrow” idea. I always read it as “Kryten doesn’t know when and how a tragic incident befalls Lister, but the knowledge that it’s going to happen upsets him and makes him want Lister to cherish his body while he still has it”.

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #227961
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I suppose Hattie might have had Series V in mind when she was asked that question, and could consider the idea more if the scripts actually gave her things to do.

    At least, one can dream.

    Someone should ask her again at Dimension Jump this year, and by “someone” I mean Doug Naylor.

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227960
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Stasis Leak might work, but Future Echoes Lister isn’t a brain in a jar.

    I may have been operating under the assumption that Out Of Time took place later than Future Echoes.

    But then why does Future Echoes Lister look so much older than Out Of Time Cat?

    Erm… very good question! Well… uh… maybe felis sapiens age slower than humans, or maybe Future Echoes Lister experienced an M-Corp/Better Than Life (novel)-style aging event without it being reversed? Yeah, let’s go with that!

    OK, OK, I’m obviously floundering here, but I think I had a good crack at it. =D

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #227955
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    No-one ever seems to consider Hattie and I’ve no idea if she even has any appetite for it.

    I can’t speak for anyone else, but I always consider Hattie returning over Norman!

    Though I’m also lazy, so I’m just going to quote my own comment I made here a few months ago:

    I love both the Lovett and Hayridge versions of Holly, but if Doug does want to bring Holly back as a regular, then I’d definitely choose Hattie over Norman (or both).

    1. The aforementioned point about Hattie being a nicer, humbler person than Norman.
    2. The Red Dwarf cast is already 4 men, so it’s obviously way better to make the 5th regular a woman.
    3. Hattie’s Holly is already established to have a good group dynamic with Lister, Rimmer, Cat and Kryten all together (though Series VIII probably isn’t Norman’s fault, to be fair).
    4. Norman has already appeared in more episodes than Hattie so far.
    5. Hattie never got to be in a Holly-focused episode as Norman did with Queeg (White Hole is really only half-focused on Holly).
    6. Female Holly has better dramatic range than male Holly. Holly showed believable concern for the crew in episodes like Back to Reality, but Series I-II Holly is pretty much stuck in sarcastic mode.

    Tell me I’m wrong. ;-)

    in reply to: What would you expect of Red Dwarf XIII? #227946
    Flap Jack
    Participant
    • There will be exactly one Rimmer-focused episode and one Kryten-focused episode.
    • The current status of Kochanski will either be the basis of an entire episode, or be mentioned 0 times.
    • Snacky will make an appearance.
    • The episodes will continue to go up on UKTV Play a week early, half-ruining the experience of their release.
    • Either Starbug or Red Dwarf will be exploded.
    • Holly will become a regular character again.
    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227942
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Wow, OK, I guess I just kept assuming that the scrolling text mentioned Bexley’s death, but it doesn’t, does it?

    I’ve never rated Future Echoes as highly as the G&T surveys (44th compared to 11th in the Pearl Poll), and I think that Lister’s jarringly happy reaction to hearing that he’ll have a son who will die at age 25 is the cause. Doug and Rob were setting themselves up for a guaranteed fall when they established this plot point. In fact, they tried to improve it in IWCD by changing “Bexley” to “Bexley’s son” and made it so Lister wasn’t quite as chilled out about it, but ultimately it had the same problems and probably made even less sense.

    Right! So my modified fan theory is that the “Out Of Time” future crew were able to adapt the technology of the time drive to retrieve Bexley from the parallel universe and stop his rapid aging. They then arrogantly assumed they would use time travel to stop his death, but were unable to, and the tragedy of his passing helped put them on the dark path.

    … you know, I’ve never thought about this until now, but presumably Jim and Bexley were unable to speak, walk or toilet when they left the universe as fully grown adults. Just in case anyone wanted to imagine what “Dad” might have ended up being like.

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227927
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    He also doesn’t seem too affected by having to abandon… himself. Which is obviously a very emotionally confusing situation, but he still had to abandon his baby. Though, at least in Ouroboros he gives a heartfelt speech about it before it’s never acknowledged again (except for Fathers & Suns, of course).

    Ah, and I was just reminded that Lister actually does directly reference giving birth to twins in Demons & Angels, which doesn’t exactly support the “it never happened to him” theory, BUT he also says he played pool with planets, which in-story never happened and so shouldn’t be remembered.

    Clearly Lister just has supernatural powers which allow him to remember alternate timelines whenever he eats a Pot Noodle.

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227915
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    They can do the other side of Future Echos, from the old Lister perspective.

    OK, this is only slightly related, but one of my favoured Red Dwarf fan theories is that the future versions of Lister from Future Echoes (and also the future versions of the crew from Stasis Leak) are from the same timeline as the future crew from Out Of Time – so, the time drive being destroyed prevented any of those futures from happening.

    If this explanation is accepted, it cleans up a few issues:

    1 – Lister and Red Dwarf can be in actual peril, without us assuming the reason he’ll definitely be fine is that Future Echoes needs to happen.

    2 – It’s not a plot hole that everyone is now older than their future versions from Stasis Leak, yet those events haven’t happened.

    3 – It allows the needlessly grim fate of Bexley to be considered non-canonical (I know this risks sparking an argument about whether unreadably fast-scrolling text is canon, but… I’d really just prefer a Red Dwarf where Lister didn’t give birth to two sons, have one die tragically young less than a week later, have to leave the other forever in another universe shortly after that, and all that have literally no emotional effect on him whatsoever, to the point that he never mentions them ever again… you know?).

    So what I’m saying is: don’t do Old Future Echoes Lister, just so I can keep believing this fan theory. :p

    in reply to: Doug WhatCulture interview #227865
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    It’s like watching porn; entertaining enough and you’re happy it exists, but you know it’s not a patch on experiencing the event yourself.

    I’d say that porn is probably the clearest example where watching something performed live in a theatre full of strangers is really NOT preferable to watching a recorded version in private. The chance to shout out “he’s behind you!” just doesn’t make up for the downsides.

    in reply to: It's Here Where Somewhere #227848
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    I tell you, the more I hear about these “Remastered” episodes, the less I like ’em!

    in reply to: Doug WhatCulture interview #227813
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Interesting that Doug apparently met up with Rob for what must be the first time in ages. Wonder what the reason was?

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227800
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Seb,

    > but this is still the anniversary year (of not one, but two series in fact!)

    Surely that number should be three?

    Not three, twelve.

    in reply to: Doug WhatCulture interview #227790
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Epideme/Nanarchy is a 2-parter in the same way that Confidence & Paranoia/Me^2 is a 2-parter.

    i.e. Not really.

    in reply to: So what do you think we'll be getting for the 30th? #227770
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Thanks for the elaboration, Seb! I personally wasn’t expecting any big official announcements yesterday, so your feature on TOS was a cool surprise, but I guess I can see why people would.

    But hey, yesterday was only the 30th anniversary of The End. There are still 11 more Red Dwarf episodes which have their 30th anniversary this year! Bonus PR Points on offer for making a major announcement on one of those anniversaries; x5 multiplier if the announcement relates to the specific episode.

    Though really, I’m just chuffed to be in an era where we can reasonably expect a new series of Red Dwarf to be announced. I remember feeling crushed when I first reached the end of my Just The Shows, Vol. 2 DVD set, and realised that “The End? The Smeg It Is.” was genuinely the end of the whole show, and that this was several years ago, so there seemed like no chance it would come back. What a difference a decade makes!

    So what do you think the next announcement will be, folks? I reckon they’ll do Series IV-XII Remastered, with new CGI skutters and star fields and that.

    in reply to: Post your Pearl Poll rankings #227735
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    Cool, someone else who considers The Last Day the best of Series III! Back to Reality only 28th though… overall, you’re definitely more against the grain than I am.

    Eh, what the hey. Let’s do this:

    1 – The Last Day
    2 – Back to Reality
    3 – The Inquisitor
    4 – Queeg
    5 – Quarantine
    6 – M-Corp
    7 – Out of Time
    8 – Gunmen of the Apocalypse
    9 – Marooned
    10 – Holoship
    11 – Skipper
    12 – Timeslides
    13 – Backwards
    14 – Stasis Leak
    15 – Justice
    16 – Meltdown
    17 – Polymorph
    18 – Legion
    19 – Camille
    20 – Terrorform
    21 – Bodyswap
    22 – Psirens
    23 – DNA
    24 – Siliconia
    25 – Give & Take
    26 – Officer Rimmer
    27 – Thanks for the Memory
    28 – Twentica
    29 – Better Than Life
    30 – Dimension Jump
    31 – Me2
    32 – The Beginning
    33 – Mechocracy
    34 – Demons & Angels
    35 – Krysis
    36 – Lemons
    37 – Kryten
    38 – White Hole
    39 – Emohawk: Polymorph II
    40 – Balance of Power
    41 – Fathers & Suns
    42 – Rimmerworld
    43 – The End
    44 – Future Echoes
    45 – Cured
    46 – Trojan
    47 – Confidence & Paranoia
    48 – Entangled
    49 – Waiting for God
    50 – Tikka to Ride
    51 – Samsara
    52 – Parallel Universe
    53 – Back to Earth – Part 2
    54 – Can of Worms
    55 – Back to Earth – Part 3
    56 – Blue
    57 – Beyond a Joke
    58 – Cassandra
    59 – Stoke me a Clipper
    60 – Epideme
    61 – Back to Earth – Part 1
    62 – Nanarchy
    63 – Dear Dave
    64 – Ouroboros
    65 – Duct Soup
    66 – Only the Good…
    67 – Back in the Red – Part 2
    68 – Back in the Red – Part 1
    69 – Timewave
    70 – Pete – Part 1
    71 – Krytie TV
    72 – Back in the Red – Part 3
    73 – Pete – Part 2

    It’s a bit weird that people keep saying they wish they’d saved their entries. Did they only start automatically emailing people copies of their rankings late in the process?

    in reply to: The End TV Listing 15th Feb 1988 #227708
    Flap Jack
    Participant

    It’s interesting what they decided to spoil and what they decided not to spoil in this listing. Concealing the existence of The Cat – “Danny John-Jules as ?” – but not concealing the main twist of the story, that all but 1 of the crew die.

    At least they keep it ambiguous about whether Lister or Rimmer is the one to survive.

    Flap Jack
    Participant

    he also states he caught the shuttle to the all-night hospital and had to pay 2 fares, so i guess we’re also meant to assume his penis is literally the size of another human being

    So it’s confirmed: Kryten’s nanobots could have revived Todhunter, but instead chose to use his matter to give Captain Hollister a six-foot schlong.

    Flap Jack
    Participant

    There’s a happier universe out there where instead of making Pete a 2-parter, they made one episode entirely focused on the time wand as a concept, and shoved all of the leftover nonsense like Kryten’s Remote Robotic Phallus, basketball competitions, and potato peeling into a different episode.

Viewing 50 replies - 3,801 through 3,850 (of 3,882 total)